If you aren't betting on NE in the superbowl, you might as well flush your money down the toilet

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

I dont see any way they lose. They are more talented, more prepared, more rested.

As we have seen, NE will do anything to win...anything.

I believe the Seahawks would have no problems cheating as well, but I don't think that Carroll is as sneak/smart as Belichek

GoSooners · Jan 23, 2015

More prepared? More rested? How do you know?

festeringZit · Jan 23, 2015

Waaaaaaaaahhhhhhh

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

GoSooners said:
More prepared? More rested? How do you know?

more rested as in they got to relax in their championship game. Hawks had a tough struggle....they need this extra week.

more prepared, the pats are always more prepared

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

festeringZit said:
Waaaaaaaaahhhhhhh

MantisToboggan · Jan 23, 2015

I'm truly struggling to understand how they are more rested. I mean 2 weeks off should be plenty for Seattle to recover from a "tougher game".

FairWarning · Jan 23, 2015

Shdw - take your NE wager and put it into your 401K instead.

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

Mantis Toboggan said:
I'm truly struggling to understand how they are more rested. I mean 2 weeks off should be plenty for Seattle to recover from a "tougher game".

two weeks might be a lot...but when I think of the last time i saw the patriots.....brady watching the end of the game on the bench....blount being only one of many RBs that have carried the load this year also resting.

when i saw the seahawks last....they were running frantically trying to make a miracle comeback....played the full 60 min with high intensity and they had to play additional minutes in overtime....Sherman was walking around holding his limp arm.

Just looked to me with my untrained eye that NE was in better shape for another physical football game

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

FairWarning said:
Shdw - take your NE wager and put it into your 401K instead.

lol....only losers fund their 401k

GoSooners · Jan 23, 2015

shdw01 said:
two weeks might be a lot...but when I think of the last time i saw the patriots.....brady watching the end of the game on the bench....blount being only one of many RBs that have carried the load this year also resting.

when i saw the seahawks last....they were running frantically trying to make a miracle comeback....played the full 60 min with high intensity and they had to play additional minutes in overtime....Sherman was walking around holding his limp arm.

Just looked to me with my untrained eye that NE was in better shape for another physical football game

I hope you didn't use this reasoning after Ohio State played a tough game vs Bama and played Oregon the next week after the Ducks came off an easy win vs FSU...

shdw01 · Jan 23, 2015

GoSooners said:
I hope you didn't use this reasoning after Ohio State played a tough game vs Bama and played Oregon the next week after the Ducks came off an easy win vs FSU...

i sure did

tanner12oz · Jan 23, 2015

You don't think the pats are slightly distracted at the moment? I haven't even seen a Seattle player in the past 5 days. You don't think that is a factor?

LENBO · Jan 23, 2015

tanner12oz said:
You don't think the pats are slightly distracted at the moment? I haven't even seen a Seattle player in the past 5 days. You don't think that is a factor?

Im sure we'll be hearing a lot about that if they lose.

Enfuego · Jan 23, 2015

shdw01 said:
I dont see any way they lose. They are more talented, more prepared, more rested.

As we have seen, NE will do anything to win...anything.

I believe the Seahawks would have no problems cheating as well, but I don't think that Carroll is as sneak/smart as Belichek

How is NE more talented than Seattle? I'd like to know how you measured this one. Maybe at QB, TE a few positions on the OL and one WR position. Other than that, where are you coming from?

REDEYE · Jan 23, 2015

Enfuego said:
How is NE more talented than Seattle? I'd like to know how you measured this one. Maybe at QB, TE a few positions on the OL and one WR position. Other than that, where are you coming from?

not sure why you would bother with this my man ?

Defying · Jan 23, 2015

shdw01 said:
lol....only losers fund their 401k

lmao

Defying · Jan 23, 2015

Enfuego said:
How is NE more talented than Seattle? I'd like to know how you measured this one. Maybe at QB, TE a few positions on the OL and one WR position. Other than that, where are you coming from?

I'd argue all day that NE is more talented... one WR? Position.. Kearse/Baldwin wouldn't see the field in NE... Barley have enough for Amendola who is better than those guys

With that said, I got buried by DEN last year vs Sea.. i'm completely clueless ont his game. lol

Enfuego · Jan 23, 2015

Defying said:
I'd argue all day that NE is more talented... one WR? Position.. Kearse/Baldwin wouldn't see the field in NE... Barley have enough for Amendola who is better than those guys

With that said, I got buried by DEN last year vs Sea.. i'm completely clueless ont his game. lol

Amendola is more talented than Baldwin or Kearse? Or LaFell? I don't see that my man. Amendola caught 27 passes for 200 yards this year.

Enfuego · Jan 23, 2015

RED EYE said:
not sure why you would bother with this my man ?

I know man. It's a waste of time. Seattle is doing something a team hasn't done since 2004 but NE is more talented? Three starters on D are first team all pro too.

REDEYE · Jan 23, 2015

NE has players on offense that can get hurt really easy in a game like this....

If you aren't betting on NE in the superbowl, you might as well flush your money down the toilet

Rx Senior

Member

Member

Rx Senior

Rx Senior

Member

Official Rx music critic and beer snob

Rx Senior

Rx Senior

Member

Rx Senior

New member

RX Member

Member

Nirvana Shill

Member

Member

Member

Member

Nirvana Shill

Forum statistics

Share this page