most of the small bets were on seattle but the huge late money was on seattle and the books knew it would happen
u kidding? vegas always wins on sb day.
it was a weird ending to me
i didnt think that the money on the hawks would make a difference but alas i know better now
summary of most playoff games this year
they needed gb over sea
needed colts over pats
needed cowboys over gb
needed car over sea
the books won most
i saw a ticket of fezzik's he had the 1 h under
so yes they won the totals as well
No doubt. It was interesting to me how the media was protraying new england as the villans now when seattle was just that last year. The roles had switched imo. Seattle was def getting hammered on gameday. I saw a graphic of vegas sportsbooks incomes on sbs. I will try to find that again and post it.
Nevada sportsbooks won $3.2 million off $115.9 million wagered on the Super Bowl, according to numbers released by Nevada Gaming Control on Monday. But it could have been so much more.
The New England Patriots winning in a higher-scoring game than expected was the worst-case scenario for the majority of sportsbooks, and they still posted a profit for the 24th time in the last 26 Super Bowls. The point spread closed at pick 'em at most books with the over/under total 47.5.
Rob Carr/Getty ImagesMalcolm Butler's game-sealing interception took a bite out of Nevada sportsbooks' profits.
The Patriots defeated the Seattle Seahawks 28-24 Sunday, with Malcolm Butler's last-minute interception on the goal line sealing New England's victory and taking a giant chunk out of the books' profits.
MGM Resorts International, Nevada's largest sportsbook operator, said a Seattle touchdown, instead of the interception, would have produced a million-dollar swing in favor of the house. Instead, the book had to rely on winnings from prop and futures bets for its profit.
The books held just 2.8 percent of the money wagered on the Super Bowl, the lowest hold percentage since 2011.
Overall, the betting action on the Super Bowl was balanced at most books. Of 20,000-plus wagers on the point spread at the MGM, only 200 to 300 bets separated the Patriots and Seahawks, assistant manager Jeff Stoneback said. There was 50 percent more money on the Patriots, though, including a $1.22 million bet on New England. That was the only seven-figure bet at the MGM, but there were numerous six-figure bets.
"I'd say 60 percent of them were on the Patriots," Stoneback said.
John Avello, executive director at the Wynn race and sportsbook, also took a million-dollar bet on the Patriots from a "casino guest" Sunday, just a few hours before the game.
"He's a guy who hasn't really bet too much with me in the past," Avello said. "But he said he had a feeling about this game. I guess his feeling was right."
Avello said the goal-line interception also cost his shop seven figures and led to a net loss on the Super Bowl for the Wynn.
The Westgate SuperBook, Wynn, Caesars, William Hill and Stratosphere sportsbooks all said Patriots and the over was the worst-case scenario.
"It would have been huge if it fell [Seattle] 31-28," said Jason Simbal, vice president of risk at Las Vegas sportsbook operator CG Technology.
It was the first Super Bowl ever to have a consensus closing line of pick 'em. New England quarterback Tom Brady threw his fourth touchdown pass of the game with two minutes to play to push the total over.
It all went against the books, yet they still made money, thanks to prop and futures bets. Of course, the standard 10 percent juice or vig off the enormous handle also helped.
Sportsbook operator William Hill said its handle was up 10 percent from last year, when a record $119 million was bet on the Super Bowl statewide. Handle was up everywhere.
"I wrote seven figures on the second half," Avello said.
Since Nevada Gaming Control began tracking revenue numbers for the Super Bowl in 1991, the books are up $134.2 million. Their only losses came in 2008, when the New York Giants upset the Patriots, and 1995, when the San Francisco 49ers routed the San Diego Chargers.
The New England Patriots winning in a higher-scoring game than expected was the worst-case scenario for the majority of sportsbooks, and they still posted a profit for the 24th time in the last 26 Super Bowls. The point spread closed at pick 'em at most books with the over/under total 47.5.
The Patriots defeated the Seattle Seahawks 28-24 Sunday, with Malcolm Butler's last-minute interception on the goal line sealing New England's victory and taking a giant chunk out of the books' profits.
MGM Resorts International, Nevada's largest sportsbook operator, said a Seattle touchdown, instead of the interception, would have produced a million-dollar swing in favor of the house. Instead, the book had to rely on winnings from prop and futures bets for its profit.
The books held just 2.8 percent of the money wagered on the Super Bowl, the lowest hold percentage since 2011.
Overall, the betting action on the Super Bowl was balanced at most books. Of 20,000-plus wagers on the point spread at the MGM, only 200 to 300 bets separated the Patriots and Seahawks, assistant manager Jeff Stoneback said. There was 50 percent more money on the Patriots, though, including a $1.22 million bet on New England. That was the only seven-figure bet at the MGM, but there were numerous six-figure bets.
"I'd say 60 percent of them were on the Patriots," Stoneback said.
John Avello, executive director at the Wynn race and sportsbook, also took a million-dollar bet on the Patriots from a "casino guest" Sunday, just a few hours before the game.
"He's a guy who hasn't really bet too much with me in the past," Avello said. "But he said he had a feeling about this game. I guess his feeling was right."
Avello said the goal-line interception also cost his shop seven figures and led to a net loss on the Super Bowl for the Wynn.
The Westgate SuperBook, Wynn, Caesars, William Hill and Stratosphere sportsbooks all said Patriots and the over was the worst-case scenario.
"It would have been huge if it fell [Seattle] 31-28," said Jason Simbal, vice president of risk at Las Vegas sportsbook operator CG Technology.
It was the first Super Bowl ever to have a consensus closing line of pick 'em. New England quarterback Tom Brady threw his fourth touchdown pass of the game with two minutes to play to push the total over.
It all went against the books, yet they still made money, thanks to prop and futures bets. Of course, the standard 10 percent juice or vig off the enormous handle also helped.
Sportsbook operator William Hill said its handle was up 10 percent from last year, when a record $119 million was bet on the Super Bowl statewide. Handle was up everywhere.
"I wrote seven figures on the second half," Avello said.
Since Nevada Gaming Control began tracking revenue numbers for the Super Bowl in 1991, the books are up $134.2 million. Their only losses came in 2008, when the New York Giants upset the Patriots, and 1995, when the San Francisco 49ers routed the San Diego Chargers.
No one has figured out where the "smart" money went yet? Look at the Pat's history and you will see that since 2000, they participated in 4 Superbowls. They won 3 and lost 1. All 4 games were decided by 3 points. When the line hit a "pick" status, the smart money grabbed a 6-7 point teaser taking both Seattle and New Orleans. To make things even nicer, the Total also fell in between the 47 1/2 posted. This is one of the very few times that it made sense to wager on a teaser. Another tip. Mayweather dumped between 1 and 3 Million on Seattle. That just about guaranteed a New England win. Last year this loser dumped a million on Denver. Another hint. In 2004, Pete Carroll and USC demolished Oklahoma. In 2005, Carroll lost a close game in the final minute to Texas. Ten years later, Seattle rushes Denver and loses a close one to New England.
