Treatment of legacy posters on the Rx

Search

Banned
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
37
Tokens
Hi all. Just wondering what everyone's opinion is about the treatment of long time posters ('2005 or earlier) by the powers that be on the Rx

Are they treated well? Or are they treated shabbily because they might have an opinion or two that isn't accepted by most posters

Thanks

HF
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
29,752
Tokens
I have been here for a long while, usually on a daily basis,before 2004 but that's when I think there was a switch over to a new platform, and have had no complaints....I would ask why do you care? You have been here 3 months...Post about sports and not stupid stuff like this, and you will have no problems!
 

The Miracle Worker
Joined
Jul 21, 1999
Messages
8,748
Tokens
Hi all. Just wondering what everyone's opinion is about the treatment of long time posters ('2005 or earlier) by the powers that be on the Rx

Are they treated well? Or are they treated shabbily because they might have an opinion or two that isn't accepted by most posters

Thanks

HF




Been here since when Ken of blessed memory opened the doors in late 95 early 96.

Even though my join date says 1999 ( have a few thousand more posts too than whats listed).

The treatment is okay. I think with the founding members or to use your term "Legacy Posters"

we were here at a different time. Back then it was mostly guys who were in the industry in some

form or another, a lot of professional and year around gamblers, and everyone took this way more

seriously. You didnt have all the off topic/ non sportsbetting threads until a few years in. Which

changed the dynamic of the site and its members. More people started hanging out that are followers

and or blind tailers on plays. And many who do not even wager on sports. I think and its just my own

opinion and perception is that the veteran posters from the mid to late 90's like myself approach and embrace

the sight a little more differently. Because most of us like I mentioned were involved in the industry in some form

or another. And either did this professionally and or were year around bettors. So thus we take it more seriously.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
2,941
Tokens
Been here since when Ken of blessed memory opened the doors in late 95 early 96.

Even though my join date says 1999 ( have a few thousand more posts too than whats listed).

The treatment is okay. I think with the founding members or to use your term "Legacy Posters"

we were here at a different time. Back then it was mostly guys who were in the industry in some

form or another, a lot of professional and year around gamblers, and everyone took this way more

seriously. You didnt have all the off topic/ non sportsbetting threads until a few years in. Which

changed the dynamic of the site and its members. More people started hanging out that are followers

and or blind tailers on plays. And many who do not even wager on sports. I think and its just my own

opinion and perception is that the veteran posters from the mid to late 90's like myself approach and embrace

the sight a little more differently. Because most of us like I mentioned were involved in the industry in some form

or another. And either did this professionally and or were year around bettors. So thus we take it more seriously.

Cool to read. Wish I would have been around back then.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
Hi all. Just wondering what everyone's opinion is about the treatment of long time posters ('2005 or earlier) by the powers that be on the Rx

Are they treated well? Or are they treated shabbily because they might have an opinion or two that isn't accepted by most posters

Thanks

HF



Why do you ask Grasshopper?
 

Banned
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
37
Tokens
Never fresh ...i mean Hang fung...

Who .. Or whom are you speaking about ?

"Whom" (sic) I'm speaking about is posters like JC, Rory etc who have the guts to disagree with people on here now and then and, in Rory's case, get banned forever for dissing Bitcoin (of all things)

Meanwhile you allow the psychos to post death threats, threats of physical violence and deeply disturbing racist and sexist rants on a daily basis

Inmates running the asylum I guess. What a way to run a forum
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
11745763_10156032201530413_4306541942711463492_n.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
13,655
Tokens
"Whom" (sic) I'm speaking about is posters like JC, Rory etc who have the guts to disagree with people on here now and then and, in Rory's case, get banned forever for dissing Bitcoin (of all things)

Meanwhile you allow the psychos to post death threats, threats of physical violence and deeply disturbing racist and sexist rants on a daily basis

Inmates running the asylum I guess. What a way to run a forum

You know... If he looks like a woman.....Why not do him........

Sound familiar???
 

EV Whore
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
19,916
Tokens
"Whom" (sic) I'm speaking about is posters like JC, Rory etc who have the guts to disagree with people on here now and then and, in Rory's case, get banned forever for dissing Bitcoin (of all things)

Meanwhile you allow the psychos to post death threats, threats of physical violence and deeply disturbing racist and sexist rants on a daily basis

Inmates running the asylum I guess. What a way to run a forum
JC is a legacy poster. Ha, that is rich.

How the mods allow you to continue to post here as a blatant EF ghost is beyond me.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
"Whom" (sic) I'm speaking about is posters like JC, Rory etc who have the guts to disagree with people on here now and then and, in Rory's case, get banned forever for dissing Bitcoin (of all things)

Meanwhile you allow the psychos to post death threats, threats of physical violence and deeply disturbing racist and sexist rants on a daily basis

Inmates running the asylum I guess. What a way to run a forum

I believe You didn't get banned for dissing Bitcoin ... more like because of your many Many Ghost handles... talking nonsense , starting crap, etc... etc...
But if you continue to register as a Ghost, We will continue to Ban you.

You once said that you have created the most Ghosts on the RX. That might be true since we have Banned around 40+ Oh wait, we just banned one yesterday... so make it 41+
or was it 50+ ?? I lost count

Maybe you should look in the mirror when you talk about others...

Oh, and enjoy this user name for now.... Time is running Out.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,193
Messages
13,449,330
Members
99,401
Latest member
gift-express
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com