OJ Simpson appeal rejected by Nevada Supreme Court

Search
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens





LAS VEGAS (AP) — Imprisoned former football star O.J. Simpson lost his latest appeal of his 2008 kidnapping and armed robbery conviction in Las Vegas.

A three-member Nevada Supreme Court panel rejected Simpson's request for a new trial, ruling in a 16-page order Thursday that there was no reason to overturn a lower court judge's decisions in the case.


"We ... conclude the district court did not err in denying these claims," justices Ron Parraguire, Michael Douglas and Michael Cherry said.


Simpson lawyers filed the appeal last October, arguing that Clark County District Court Judge Linda Marie Bell was wrong to deny Simpson a new trial on charges that got Simpson sentenced to 9 to 33 years in a botched hotel room heist.


Simpson lawyers Patricia Palm, Ozzie Fumo and Tom Pitaro argued that his trial attorney mishandled his case and had conflicts of interests. The three attorneys didn't immediately respond to messages late Thursday, and it wasn't immediately known if Simpson was aware of the ruling.


Simpson, 68, is serving his sentence in a northern Nevada prison after a jury found him guilty of multiple felonies for leading five other men in a September 2007 confrontation with two sports memorabilia dealers at a Las Vegas hotel. Two of the men with Simpson testified they brought guns, at Simpson's request.


The Heisman Trophy winner, NFL Hall of Fame member and former television and movie star didn't testify at his robbery trial in Las Vegas. His attorneys, Yale Galanter and Gabriel Grasso, claimed Simpson was just trying to retrieve items stolen from him after his 1995 acquittal in Los Angeles in the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman.


The Supreme Court in September 2010 rejected a previous Simpson appeal, filed by Galanter.


Simpson's appeal argued that his multiple convictions and sentences for assault with a deadly weapon and robbery with use of a deadly weapon constitute double-jeopardy; that Galanter should have challenged his multiple convictions and punishments; and that the jury should have been given a chance to consider lesser kidnapping and theft offenses.
Galanter denied the allegations that he mishandled Simpson's case and had conflicted interests.


Bell held several days of hearings in May 2013 on Simpson's claims. Simpson testified, and continued to insist he never knew any of the men with him were carrying guns.


Bell ruled in November 2013 that any errors at trial wouldn't have changed the outcome of Simpson's trial, and agreed with prosecutors that there was no need for another trial.


The judge said she reviewed the entire court record and determined there was overwhelming evidence that Simpson orchestrated the armed kidnapping and robbery.
Four men who were with Simpson pleaded guilty before trial to felonies and served probation.


One co-defendant, Clarence "C.J." Stewart, stood trial with Simpson and was convicted.


Stewart was sentenced to 7½ to 27 years, but his conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court as tainted by Simpson's fame. Stewart avoided retrial, pleaded guilty to felony robbery and conspiracy, was freed from prison after serving more than two years.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,786
Tokens
I wonder if there are still some idiots in here that think he's innocent of the murders.

There used to be a few...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2001
Messages
15,877
Tokens
Even all blacks admit he's a murdering rodent - fuck him and his whore mother for giving birth to the pos
 

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
6ebcec41076d33070978b3c1e742725b.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2008
Messages
3,301
Tokens
Now he can't look for the real killers..
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,423
Tokens
I wonder if there are still some idiots in here that think he's not innocent of the murders.

There used to be a lot...
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
If you can rush for 2000 yards in a 14 game season, you should be allowed to kill 2 people.

3? That's a bit excessive
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,423
Tokens
If you can rush for 2000 yards in a 14 game season, you should be allowed to kill 2 people.

3? That's a bit excessive


Point taken. But with all the liberal rule changes maybe we can let him slide with 3.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,529
Messages
13,452,328
Members
99,420
Latest member
Garryter12
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com