How Questions About Terrorism Challenge Bitcoin Startups

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,160
Tokens
[h=1]How Questions About Terrorism Challenge Bitcoin Startups[/h]
Jonathan Chester
forbes.com

In light of the recent attacks in Paris that led to the deaths of 129 Parisians, the European Union (EU) and other international powers, including the United States and Russia, have been gathering to discuss how to curb the threats of terrorism, specifically ISIS or ISIL. Being mentioned in those discussions is the controversial topic of virtual currency with an emphasis on Bitcoin and its role in terrorism financing. But why are government officials so afraid of Bitcoin as a possible avenue for terrorist “donations”?


When you think of Bitcoin as a currency, there are a number of reasons a criminal may consider it in a money laundering application. The strongest one being you can instantly send Bitcoins anywhere in the world, nearly for free, and without any intermediaries to freeze the funds. That makes it a very efficient tool for terrorists trying to transport money faster than physical cash. Similar to cash, there is no identity attached to any Bitcoin transaction either. But, there are two glaring attributes that make Bitcoin an ineffective method for financing terrorism.


The first attribute is actually it’s lack of anonymity. While no virtual currency transactions have a direct link to identity, each transaction is displayed on a public ledger (called the blockchain) and remains there forever. This means every transaction and every chain of transactions can be traced. Furthermore, Gavin Anderson, the Chief Scientist at the Bitcoin Foundation, notes that, “Unless you are very careful in the way you use Bitcoin (and you have the technical know-how to use it with other anonymizing technologies like Tor or i2p), you should assume that a persistent, motivated attacker will be able to associate your IP address with your bitcoin transactions.” This means a Bitcoin transaction by itself, without the use of additional technology, does not fully hide a user’s identity. Instead, it can be used to identify the sender’s IP address, and ultimately, who they are. Even cash is not that transparent.


The second attribute involves the ability to exchange Bitcoins for local currency. It’s not as simple as walking up to the exchange booth found in any international airport. If you look at the bitcoin exchange infrastructure in Syria and Iraq specifically, it is quite limited. A terrorist receiving bitcoins in these countries would either have to create a bitcoin-based goods and services market, or they would have to exchange the bitcoins for currencies in more fluid markets like the United States, Europe, or China.


In the latter scenario, once the bitcoins are liquidated, they would still need to move the funds into the Islamic State controlled territories. Since the money at this point would be a traditional currency interacting with the traditional banking systems, all movements could be easily traced and subject to governmental oversight and regulation. This seems very inefficient when the original funds most likely originated in the ISIS controlled states and neighboring territories to begin with.


 

Oh boy!
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
38,362
Tokens
Currency is still the number one tool used to finance terrorism. As you may see by the story posted above, it's a lot more anonymous than Bitcoin.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
24,824
Tokens
You never here them talk about going after hard cash, which is the number one tool of trade for terrorist. I think the gov just doesn't like getting their inflation cut.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,901
Messages
13,439,380
Members
99,343
Latest member
manojkumarone17
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com