Pennywise 6/19/16 fathers day !!!!!

Incubus said:

RESEARCH FINDINGS

Should PENNYWISE win this 4:10PM EST game of LA Angels -124 over Oakland, there's a very good chance our favorite
nightmarish clown will play the 8:05PM EST Sunday Night MLB Game of Pittsburgh at Chicago.

Many here have asked for a more detailed breakdown on how PENNYWISE does in two (2) play sessions.

I went through the entire existing 23 two (2) plays session population and came up with the following findings.

Split sessions can either be the following:

1) one play posted, finishes, another play posted in SAME thread
2) one play posted, finishes, another play posted in DIFFERENT thread

Simultaneous sessions are when the 2 plays are posted in the SAME thread starter comment.

Since PENNYWISE only posted one (1) play here so far in today's Sunday 19th session, if he posts another for tonight, it will qualify
as a "split session" entry.

Out of the available 23 two (2) play sessions, 14 of them were "split sessions." 60.87%
The remaining 9 were "simultaneous" in that 2 plays were entered in the same comment entry and these are
not applicable in this analysis.

Of these 14 two (2) plays "split sessions," what is PENNYWISE's record for the FIRST play posted?

12-1-1 ATS or 85.71%

OK, here's what people NEED to focus in on!

How has PENNYWISE done on his 2nd posted game after winning those FIRST posted plays?

7-5 ATS or 58.33%

The remaining 2 "split sessions" went like this:

Sunday 22 May, PENNWISE'S FIRST play posted PUSHED, 2nd posted gamed WON.
Sunday 12 June, PENNYWISE's FIRST play posted LOST, 2nd posted game WON.

Therefore, if the LA Angels play LOSES, and PENNYWISE posts a side, total, RL for tonight's
Pittsburgh-Chicago game, chances are it'll WIN.

I realize it's an extremely small sample size. Just remember that out 23 two (2) play sessions,
PENNYWISE has only gone 0-2 ATS ONCE or 4.35%! !/

Hopes this helps everyone here!

Click to expand...

athan12 said:

So if this early morning play wins and PW decided to play Chi/Pit game. There's a good chance that the 2nd play for today will be a loss? That means if this early morning game wins, we either fade the 2nd pick or call it a day

Click to expand...

Incubus said:

I wouldn't FADE PENNYWISE under any circumstance if he wins the first game. face)(*^%

He could also go 2-0 ATS! Did you read what I wrote?

How has PENNYWISE done on his 2nd posted game after winning those FIRST posted plays?

7-5 ATS or 58.33%

7 wins = he's gone 2-0 ATS 7 times.

58.33% indicates there's a legitimate chance you'll go 2-0 ATS.

What's the worse that can happen? The 2nd play loses, and you go 1-1 ATS for the session for a "juice session."

Personally, I'm willing to take the gamble for sure on the 2nd play if the 1st play cashes.

If you're risk adverse, you'll should walk away after the first win. But to fade our PENNYWISE on the second play (if he wins the first?) No way! :nono5:

Anyway, I posted the above just for the sake of analysis. @)

Click to expand...

Incubus said:

I wouldn't FADE PENNYWISE under any circumstance if he wins the first game. face)(*^%

He could also go 2-0 ATS! Did you read what I wrote?

How has PENNYWISE done on his 2nd posted game after winning those FIRST posted plays?

7-5 ATS or 58.33%

7 wins = he's gone 2-0 ATS 7 times.

58.33% indicates there's a legitimate chance you'll go 2-0 ATS.

What's the worse that can happen? The 2nd play loses, and you go 1-1 ATS for the session for a "juice session."

Personally, I'm willing to take the gamble for sure on the 2nd play if the 1st play cashes.

If you're risk adverse, you'll should walk away after the first win. But to fade our PENNYWISE on the second play (if he wins the first?) No way! :nono5:

Anyway, I posted the above just for the sake of analysis. @)

Click to expand...

varkeyboy said:

Ewwwwwww Inky.....that chick is fuckin disgusting.

Click to expand...