I don't like the word trap, but it is the kind of line -- short road dog, public pounding one side but line stays firms or moves the wrong way etc... -- that lends itself on playing the dog, for sure
The book has been killing it with these kind of games. Last week Philly and Buffalo were the other end of "traps" and cashed. But, B-more and oakland covered as short road dogs, too (but not quite as much public money on those too).
Probably TB or no play for me.
The book has been killing it with these kind of games. Last week Philly and Buffalo were the other end of "traps" and cashed. But, B-more and oakland covered as short road dogs, too (but not quite as much public money on those too).
Probably TB or no play for me.
I know what you mean about the word trap...this is the kind of game where Tampa comes to play and Denver has a letdown.
However, the talent level isn't really close at all especially on defense. If the Bronco's want this game bad enough then I think they win easiily. Therefore, I cautiously have to go with Denver.
Denver -3 is one tough game to cap IMO........
The difference is that this line makes no sense. This line should be at least -7, if not higher.
There are no injuries I'm aware of that would make this line so low.
This is the reason people are saying trap.
There is a difference between saying a game is a trap, because of situational concerns......and saying its a trap because the line makes absolutely no sense.
