Nationals won't meet Bryce Harper's $400M demand, making free agency likely

Search

New member
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
10,462
Tokens


It appears Harper will become a free agent in two years instead of getting an extension


Time to start the "Bryce Harper to the Yankees" rumors. It seemed inevitable anyway, given the fact that Harper grew up a Yankees fan, how much money the Yankees can spend and how well set up they are to spend two years from now.

And then there was this, from a USA Today report on Monday:

The Washington Nationals, balking at Bryce Harper's demands in early talks about a long-term contract extension, now are preparing themselves to be without their All-Star outfielder after 2018, a high-ranking Nationals executive told USA TODAY Sports.

The executive spoke to USA TODAY Sports on Monday only on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the negotiations.
Harper, according to the executive, is asking for a record deal that will exceed 10 years in length, and likely pay him in excess of $400 million.


Ten years and $400 million! Holy smokes.

Assuming the MLB salary bubble doesn't burst in the next two offseasons, it wouldn't be surprising to see Harper get such a figure. To be clear, Harper will hit free agency after the 2018 season, absent a contract extension and it appears that just went out the window.

Keep in mind, most players don't hit free agency until their late 20s or early 30s. Harper will get there after his age-25 season. Harper is coming off a down season that followed his MVP year in 2015, but he still had a .373 on-base percentage, 116 OPS+, 24 doubles, 24 homers and 21 stolen bases. It's a career year for many players but a clear step down from his unbelievable 2015 season.
If Harper puts together two more seasons like he did in 2015, watch out. The $400 million figure might not even be high enough. Even if he sits around his career levels (.279/.382/.501 with a 162-game average of 30 doubles and 30 homers per season), he's dynamically talented and looks to earn a record deal on the open market.

We can connect the dots here to the Nationals being aggressive, per reports, in acquiring both Andrew McCutchen and Chris Sale. If the window of having one of the most talented players in baseball in his prime has two years left, the Nationals might as well be willing to give up prospects in order to load the MLB roster in an attempt to get a ring before Harper is gone.

Based upon that report above, it sounds like that's the direction this thing is headed
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
10,462
Tokens
474747922-e1433335671931.jpg
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,450
Tokens
The only way these mega-deals are ever good for the team is if they have unlimited spending money, ala the yankees from a decade or two ago.

First off they barely ever produce at the same level as before the contract. Even if they produce the same or better they still aren't worth it if it prevents you from getting other pieces you need.
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
10,462
Tokens
I'm very much a free market guy, but man these salaries just never stop increasing so big! Wish I could throw a ball 95 miles per hour or get around on one
 

New member
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Messages
2,674
Tokens
Overrated. 1 great season and 4 mediocre ones do not equal $400.
 

New member
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
10,462
Tokens
I'll tell you this...it wouldn't be a clown contract
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,302
Tokens
He's at least the 2nd best player in baseball.
I think he has not faced a pitcher yet in the big leagues that younger then him yet
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,302
Tokens
I'd rather give a 25 year old a 400 @10 year deal where he will be 35 at the end of a contract then give a 32 year old 250 when he will be 42 at the end of his .

This will be the first player in baseball history to sign a 10 year deal where the player will still be in his prime when the contract ends
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
26,300
Tokens
He's at least the 2nd best player in baseball.
I think he has not faced a pitcher yet in the big leagues that younger then him yet

Imagine he would be the best if he played for the braves....lol

I don't even rank him in the top five...
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,758
Tokens
He's at least the 2nd best player in baseball.
I think he has not faced a pitcher yet in the big leagues that younger then him yet

He was 23 for all of 2016, I doubt that's true, especially since he plays in the same division of the Phillies
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,302
Tokens
He was 23 for all of 2016, I doubt that's true, especially since he plays in the same division of the Phillies

As of the all star break of last year he hasn't .
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
44,302
Tokens
He was 23 for all of 2016, I doubt that's true, especially since he plays in the same division of the Phillies

i just looked it up he faced his first pitcher younger then him July 10th 2015.
Still impressive though
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,790
Tokens

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,524
Messages
13,452,196
Members
99,418
Latest member
TennisMonger
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com