2016 bowl games with better rushing defense and offense

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
After two seasons of betting every bowl game based on the team with the better run D only and then realizing (with the help of other posters) that the winning percentage increases with incorporating the possibility that the same team has the better run offense, now I will just focus on those teams that qualify for both. starting with :

December 17,2016

appalachian st,,,RO 13th,,,RD 23rd,,,current line app st +1 -105 (no bet yet)
vs
toledo,,,,,,,,,,,,,RO 44rth,,,RD 60th
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
southern miss,,,RO 63rd,,,RD 43rd
vs
Ul lafayette,,,,,RO 60th,,,RD 24th,,,,current line ul laf +5.5 (no bet yet)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
my book has ul laf +5.5 -115,,everywhere else is +5,,,I dont play the hooks on most numbers and maybe this line goes up further by game time but my bet is now ul laf +6 -125 and moneyline +175
 

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
3,518
Tokens
Have you tried incorprating this into to it as well..def less games but nice win rate



Over the last 25 years, underdogs in bowl games that averaged 200 or more rushing yards in the regular season are 44-9 ATS (83%)

Over the last 25 years, underdogs in bowl games that averaged 200 or more rushing yards in the regular season are 44-9 ATS (83%)
 

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
3,518
Tokens
Over the last 25 years, underdogs in bowl games that averaged 200 or more rushing yards in the regular season are 44-9 ATS (83%)
 

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
3,518
Tokens
That didnt work...lol//try again

teams that rush for over 200 yrds in the season...does very nice in bowl games
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
Thanks for the data, I appreciate someone who contributes with information, not just "Bumfuck University - 7"

The running stats data is a great approach. IMO you can enhance it by incorporating it with:

-strength of schedule
-weather
-conference styles

First game SOS are very close so the running stats are valid, the weather should be comperable to both's equally, and the conference styles are not significant so YEP App St looks good...

(in the old days cold weather run dominated Big 10 schools who won the conference with the run and against the run went to warm southern California for the Rose Bowl and faced the pass happy Pac 12 winner and usually lost badly... the same schools, if they played outdoors in Ohio or Michigan Jan 1st, the Big 10 team would win)
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
Thanks for the data, I appreciate someone who contributes with information, not just "Bumfuck University - 7"

The running stats data is a great approach. IMO you can enhance it by incorporating it with:

-strength of schedule
-weather
-conference styles

First game SOS are very close so the running stats are valid, the weather should be comperable to both's equally, and the conference styles are not significant so YEP App St looks good...

(in the old days cold weather run dominated Big 10 schools who won the conference with the run and against the run went to warm southern California for the Rose Bowl and faced the pass happy Pac 12 winner and usually lost badly... the same schools, if they played outdoors in Ohio or Michigan Jan 1st, the Big 10 team would win)

Im sure there are many other factors to look at including some teams that arent actually playing on a neutral field for a bowl game,,,and with those other things to look at comes the likelihood that i might lay off a winner,,and really like one particular game that ends up being a loser. that would be my luck. Right now my book moved southern miss to -6.5 -115,,,that would tend to make me think im on the wrong side with ul laf,,but if line moves were always correct then that would be an even easier way to place bets
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
Speaking of line moves,,app st is now a pick at some places,,and a -1 at others

my bet is in for app st -115 as a pick
 

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
6,545
Tokens



And that is the EXACT reason that Washington will most DEFINITELY cover that enormous spread. Not calling for the outright win, but guys, I EAT, SLEEP, AND SHIT THE PAC 12 IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL, and it would "NOT" be a shock to me if Jake "the snake" beat this awesome Alabama D. Not only can the Huskies throw the ball, they have a great running game to go w/ it. Hey, they are 2 TD underdogs for what reason, I have no clue, other then simply the BOOKS know where the public is going to lay their $$$$ on, & they are just reeling them in like easy fishing.


Maybe because Alabama crushed USC 52-6, the same USC team that did handily beat Washington!!!
 

New member
Joined
Dec 23, 2012
Messages
197
Tokens
Not the same USC team. Darnold is a significant upgrade over Browne at QB. It's a well known fact that Alabama struggles with above average QB's. Washington has the athletes to keep this within the number. Add to that, Chris Peterson getting a month to prepare for this game, Washington is the play. Alabama wins by 7-10pts but this game won't get out of hand.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,588
Tokens



And that is the EXACT reason that Washington will most DEFINITELY cover that enormous spread. Not calling for the outright win, but guys, I EAT, SLEEP, AND SHIT THE PAC 12 IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL AND BASKETBALL, and it would "NOT" be a shock to me if Jake "the snake" beat this awesome Alabama D. Not only can the Huskies throw the ball, they have a great running game to go w/ it. Hey, they are 2 TD underdogs for what reason, I have no clue, other then simply the BOOKS know where the public is going to lay their $$$$ on, & they are just reeling them in like easy fishing.


Maybe because Alabama crushed USC 52-6, the same USC team that did handily beat Washington!!!

Because its obvious that the USC team in Game 1 is the same USC team now,

Just brilliant.

Your book must love you if this is the thought process behind your action.
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
there are 22 games that qualify this year,,but now it is 21 since minnesota was a qualifying team but that situation is a mess, so no bet there.

Game 1 APP ST PK WIN

Game 2 UL LAF +5.5 LOSE


​Total 1-1
 

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
593
Tokens
December 20th, 2016

memphis,,, RO 78th,, RD 85th
vs
western kent,,RO 61st,,RD 4rth western kent opened -4,-5

current line -5.5,-6 my bet is placed at western kentucky -6
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,588
Tokens
Tide has a great system play on this in his thread.
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,588
Tokens
Are you sure this is a good system?

game type = BG and D and tA(rushing yards/rushes) > oA(rushing yards/rushes) and season >= 2010
SU:29-62-0 (-7.84, 31.9%)Teaser Records
ATS:36-54-1 (-2.86, 40.0%) avg line: 5.0+6: 53-37-1 (58.9%) -6: 26-63-2 (29.2%) +10: 57-34-0 (62.6%) -10: 17-73-1 (18.9%)
O/U:42-47-2 (0.12, 47.2%) avg total: 57.9+6: 31-59-1 (34.4%) -6: 60-31-0 (65.9%) +10: 26-64-1 (28.9%) -10: 66-25-0 (72.5%)
RushesRush YdsPassesCompPass YdsTOsQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Team39.7162.731.617.4214.21.95.86.85.56.825.1
Opp37.7158.034.921.2268.91.68.68.97.47.832.9
DateLinkDayWeekSeasonTeamOppSiteQ1Q2Q3Q4FinalLineTotalSUmATSmOUmDPSDPASUr ATSrOUrot
Dec 26, 2014 boxFriday 18 2014 RUT NCAR neutral 7-0 16-0 7-7 10-14 40-213.5 69.0 19 22.5 -8 7.2 -15.2 W W U 0
Dec 27, 2014 boxSaturday 18 2014 DUKE AZST neutral 3-10 14-10 0-10 14-6 31-367.5 66.5 -5 2.5 0.5 1.5 -1.0 L W O 0
Dec 27, 2014 boxSaturday 18 2014 NEB USC neutral 17-10 0-14 17-21 8-0 42-457.0 62.5 -3 4 24.5 14.2 10.2 L W O 0
Dec 29, 2014 boxMonday 18 2014 TXAM WVA neutral 14-20 14-7 17-3 0-7 45-372.0 66.5 8 10 15.5 12.8 2.8 W W O 0
Dec 31, 2014 boxWednesday 19 2014 BOIS ARZ neutral 21-7 10-10 7-10 0-3 38-303.0 67.5 8 11 0.5 5.8 -5.2 W W O 0
Dec 31, 2014 boxWednesday 19 2014 GTCH MSST neutral 14-0 7-20 21-0 7-14 49-347.0 60.0 15 22 23 22.5 0.5 W W O 0
Jan 01, 2015 boxThursday 19 2014 MCST BAY neutral 14-14 0-10 7-17 21-0 42-413.0 70.0 1 4 13 8.5 4.5 W W O 0
Jan 01, 2015 boxThursday 19 2014 MIN MIZ neutral 7-0 0-10 10-9 0-14 17-334.5 46.5 -16 -11.5 3.5 -4.0 7.5 L L O 0
Jan 01, 2015 boxThursday 19 2014 WIS AUB neutral 7-7 0-7 14-3 10-14 34-316.0 65.0 3 9 0 4.5 -4.5 W W P 1
Jan 02, 2015 boxFriday 19 2014 IOWA TEN neutral 0-21 7-14 0-7 21-3 28-453.5 52.0 -17 -13.5 21 3.8 17.2 L L O 0
Dec 19, 2015 boxSaturday 16 2015 AKST LTCH neutral 3-10 14-7 3-17 8-13 28-471.5 67.5 -19 -17.5 7.5 -5.0 12.5 L L O 0
Dec 21, 2015 boxMonday 16 2015 SFL WKY neutral 7-0 7-10 7-28 14-7 35-453.0 67.5 -10 -7 12.5 2.8 9.8 L L O 0
Dec 22, 2015 boxTuesday 17 2015 TOL TEM neutral 0-3 12-0 0-6 20-8 32-172.0 49.5 15 17 -0.5 8.2 -8.8 W W U 0
Dec 23, 2015 boxWednesday 17 2015 GSOU BOWL neutral 9-13 14-14 21-0 14-0 58-274.5 64.5 31 35.5 20.5 28.0 -7.5 W W O 0
Dec 23, 2015 boxWednesday 17 2015 NIL BOIS neutral 0-21 7-10 0-10 0-14 7-558.0 56.5 -48 -40 5.5 -17.2 22.8 L L O 0
Dec 26, 2015 boxSaturday 17 2015 DUKE IND neutral 10-0 7-17 10-14 14-10 44-413.0 71.0 3 6 14 10.0 4.0 W W O 1
Dec 26, 2015 boxSaturday 17 2015 TLS VTCH neutral 21-24 10-21 6-7 15-3 52-5513.5 62.5 -3 10.5 44.5 27.5 17.0 L W O 0
Dec 26, 2015 boxSaturday 17 2015 SMIS WAS neutral 7-14 10-7 7-10 7-13 31-448.0 54.0 -13 -5 21 8.0 13.0 L L O 0
Dec 26, 2015 boxSaturday 17 2015 MIAF WAST neutral 7-7 0-13 0-0 7-0 14-202.0 62.0 -6 -4 -28 -16.0 -12.0 L L U 0
Dec 29, 2015 boxTuesday 18 2015 AIR CAL neutral 7-14 14-21 8-17 7-3 36-556.5 70.5 -19 -12.5 20.5 4.0 16.5 L L O 0
Dec 29, 2015 boxTuesday 18 2015 TXT LSU neutral 6-14 7-7 7-21 7-14 27-567.0 74.0 -29 -22 9 -6.5 15.5 L L O 0
Dec 30, 2015 boxWednesday 18 2015 NCST MSST neutral 0-14 14-17 7-6 7-14 28-516.0 61.5 -23 -17 17.5 0.2 17.2 L L O 0
Dec 30, 2015 boxWednesday 18 2015 TXAM LOU neutral 7-20 7-0 0-7 7-0 21-274.0 49.0 -6 -2 -1 -1.5 0.5 L L U 0
Jan 01, 2016 boxFriday 18 2015 NOTD OHST neutral 0-14 14-14 7-7 7-9 28-445.0 57.5 -16 -11 14.5 1.8 12.8 L L O 0
Dec 17, 2016 boxSaturday 16 2016 AKST CFL neutral 4.0 50.0 0
Dec 17, 2016 Saturday 16 2016 NCC GRAM neutral 15.0 57.0 0
Dec 17, 2016 boxSaturday 16 2016 SDST HOU neutral 0-10 6-0 14-0 14-0 34-104.5 51.5 24 28.5 -7.5 10.5 -18.0 W W U 0
Dec 23, 2016 Friday 17 2016 NAVY LTCH neutral 5.5 67.0 0
Dec 26, 2016 Monday 17 2016 VAN NCST neutral 4.0 44.0 0
Dec 27, 2016 Tuesday 18 2016 BAY BOIS neutral 7.5 67.0 0
Dec 27, 2016 Tuesday 18 2016 MIN WAST neutral 9.0 61.5 0
Dec 28, 2016 Wednesday 18 2016 WVA MIAF neutral 3.0 56.0 0
Dec 29, 2016 Thursday 18 2016 OKST COLO neutral 3.0 62.5 0
Dec 29, 2016 Thursday 18 2016 ARK VTCH neutral 7.0 61.5 0
Dec 30, 2016 Friday 18 2016 TCU GEO neutral 1.0 48.5 0
Dec 30, 2016 Friday 18 2016 FLST MICH neutral 7.0 54.0 0
Dec 31, 2016 Saturday 18 2016 KTKY GTCH neutral 3.5 61.5 0
Dec 31, 2016 Saturday 18 2016 LOU LSU neutral 3.5 60.0 0
Jan 02, 2017 Monday 18 2016 IOWA FLA neutral 2.5 40.5 0
Jan 02, 2017 Monday 18 2016 WMCH WIS neutral 7.5 54.0 0
Showing 1 to 40 of 40 entries
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,580
Messages
13,452,578
Members
99,423
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com