Casino industry ramps up effort to repeal sports betting ban

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
Casino industry ramps up effort to repeal sports betting ban
By Michael Carroll
July 5, 2017


A national campaign to overturn the federal ban on sports betting outside Nevada got under way this month, giving momentum to sports betting supporters in states like Illinois and Pennsylvania.

The American Sports Betting Coalition, which is made up of state and local elected officials as well as law enforcement and businesses, launched the effort to repeal the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which was passed more than two decades ago. That law allows some forms of sports betting in Delaware, Oregon and Montana, but Nevada remains the top purveyor of sports wagering.

The coalition points to a study by Oxford Economics in Pennsylvania that concludes legalizing sports betting would curb ongoing illegal activities valued at $150 billion nationwide. Legalization would also produce $5.3 billion in tax revenue and support more than 150,000 jobs, the research said.

Among the groups that want to lift the ban is the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), whose standing committee recently voted in favor of the idea of lifting the congressional ban on sports betting, according to Jake Lestock, a policy specialist with the NCSL.

“Last year in August, they voted on this directive, allowing states to choose sports gambling within their borders …” Lestock told Watchdog.org in an email. “The federal government must respect the sovereignty of states.”

Across the nation, at least seven states, including Illinois, took up sports betting legislation this year, according to the NCSL. The Illinois measure consists of a joint resolution sponsored by Sen. Thomas Cullerton, D-Villa Park, urging President Donald Trump and Congress to overturn the ban on sports betting.

Sports betting would be a viable source of state revenue for Illinois, Cullerton said. He described Illinois as a gaming state that already regulates horse racing and casino gambling.

“We could be looking at hundreds of millions of dollars easily,” he told Watchdog.org.

Nevada last year reported that sports wagers in the state reached $4.5 billion, with the government netting more than $200 million in revenue, according to Cullerton’s resolution.

The resolution has already passed the state Senate.
“I think we’re in a great position,” Cullerton said. “It’s not as if this were something new in the gaming structure.”
People are already gaming and betting on sports, he said, noting that the Super Bowl alone generates $5 billion in gambling.
Illinois has to look at options other than the income and property taxes as sources of income, according to Cullerton.

His chief co-sponsor on the resolution – Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford, – says the effort to end the federal ban is bipartisan and something his fellow lawmakers in Illinois are open to.

“It would drive more people to Illinois, especially from surrounding states that don’t have it,” Syverson told Watchdog.org. “It would bring out-of-state sports wagering into Illinois.”

Past concerns about mafia or underworld involvement in sports betting are no longer an issue, he said, thanks to new technologies and strict regulations and oversight that are now in place.
Moreover, Trump is a person who understands the business side of gaming, so he may be more receptive to the idea, Syverson said.

“It is a form of entertainment that can generate significant tourism dollars into Illinois,” he said.
Although Nevada now has a near-monopoly on sports betting, some Nevada lawmakers seem open to the idea of expanding sports betting to other states. The infrastructure already in place in Nevada could assist other states in the development of sports betting, according to Nevada Assemblyman Jim Wheeler, R-Minden.

“Sports betting in other states would have to be controlled through Nevada,” Wheeler told Watchdog.org. That could ultimately benefit the state, he said.

How Nevada lawmakers feel about lifting the ban might also come down to the wording of the legislation, according to Wheeler, who wants to speak with people in the gaming business in Nevada to get their thoughts as well.

Remarks by Jim Murren, the chairman of the American Gaming Association and the chairman and CEO of MGM Resorts International, also signaled Nevada interests would keep an open mind on the issue.

“As the head of the largest private-sector employer in Nevada, I’m confident that the entertainment experience we provide in Las Vegas – which is unmatched anywhere else in the world – can continue to excel even as our country takes a fresh look at our approach to sports betting,” Murren said in a prepared statement.

A bill proposed by Pennsylvania Rep. Robert Matzie, D-Allegheny, would go further than the resolution under consideration in Illinois. Matzie’s legislation, if passed, would immediately allow Pennsylvania to engage in sports betting once the federal ban is lifted – either through congressional or court actions.

“Our Commonwealth is uniquely positioned to oversee sports betting in all its forms, and should be ready to act should the federal ban be lifted …” he said in a prepared statement earlier this year. “Legalizing sports betting will simply enable Pennsylvania to regulate a multimillion-dollar industry that already exists.”
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
Supreme Court & Congress are being pressured from every corner now to legalize sports betting.

Could be the reason they decided NJ's Case needed addressed & heard...
 

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
2,710
Tokens
Why does assemblyman Jim Wheeler think that NV would control the books in other states? No outside companies can open shops? Sounds like a monopoly. It's not like lines can only be made and posted in Vegas and offshore.
 

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
12,632
Tokens
Why does assemblyman Jim Wheeler think that NV would control the books in other states? No outside companies can open shops? Sounds like a monopoly. It's not like lines can only be made and posted in Vegas and offshore.

For the same reason Illinois is about to default on Lotto payments, and pensions.. need to be careful who is in charge, and carefully overseen..
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
Why does assemblyman Jim Wheeler think that NV would control the books in other states? No outside companies can open shops? Sounds like a monopoly. It's not like lines can only be made and posted in Vegas and offshore.

I assume because Vegas/Nevada is considered so experienced & the Godfather of it all & other states will need guided & educated in many ways.

I was thinking/wondering the other day about how many experienced sportsbook employees other states will steal away from Nevada when & if legalization happens.

I bet many experienced Offshore employees will even find work.

Nevada saw legalization coming, or believes it's coming.
About 2 years ago they passed an agreement in which they would be able to offer their services online, outside of their own state.

It appears they were trying to get a jump on everyone business-wise.
Of course whether or not they could operate outside of their state will probably depend on if legalization is allowed state to state (different rules & regulations) or federal regulation across the nation, as sports leagues prefer...
 

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
2,710
Tokens
For the same reason Illinois is about to default on Lotto payments, and pensions.. need to be careful who is in charge, and carefully overseen..

So Cantor Gaming and William Hill who have been fined by gaming regulators for violating laws are better options?
 

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
12,632
Tokens
So Cantor Gaming and William Hill who have been fined by gaming regulators for violating laws are better options?

Here is 1 thing I am certain.. MANY STATES will use them as options..

Most here may not know that in 95% of the US. Do you know in your city who collects the Parking meter revenue? It's not your city. It's an independent company..
Same will be true with this.. the state will ask for a quarterly fee, and the company will keep the rest..
0 liability for the state.. blah blah..

Same is true with MOST parks.. they are not federal jobs anymore.. they are "managed" by independent companies..
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,281
Messages
13,450,228
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com