Yes they are OK
Essentially Bitcoin Cash was an alt-coin that copy/pasted the source code for Bitcoin. In the world of Open Source software, it's a pretty dick thing to do.
One of the grand aspects of the blockchain is that everyone who participates has a vote. It is not controlled by one central agency or organization. Sure there are disproportionately larger share holders of the technology, but without the adoption of the general user base, shit deals don't go very far. There wasn't a lot of support for the initial release of the hard fork Bitcoin Cash - despite the seemingly propagated fear campaign that had been spreading for months.
Personally, I am reserved when reading opinion pieces and group-think efforts to cause FUD within the bitcoin community. The principle technology is sound and I believe it's a better alternative than credit for online transactions. Those are the only pieces of information I need to continue my use and investment. There are a lot of old money institutions, governments and organizations that do not benefit from a decentralized currency. Some might say it even threatens their control and or existence (or profits).
For your intents and purposes, Bitcoin Cash might be a better service. It has a faster transactions hashrate and more scale-able. But so would Litecoin, DASH, Monero, Namecoin, Dogecoin, etc. There are a few crypto exchanges that will accept it and actively trade it and you have the choice to use it as your transaction medium (Another grand aspect!) - or you can stick with Bitcoin and forget all this ever was a thing in 6 months, which is what I plan to do.
