Forum: College Football Forum - Sponsored by:

Thread: 2017 NCAA Systems

  1. #51  
    RX Local Scott L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    pa
    Posts
    24,302
    Thanks for the work RT. Was looking at above angle to support Jets.

    Over the years I've been given many systems by Lawrence, Barbose, Toby Scot, Taxi Driver. Most were accurate but most also fell toward 500 when I u$ed them for wagers so I've tossed most out. Can't remember who gave me that one.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #52  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott L View Post
    Thanks for the work RT. Was looking at above angle to support Jets.

    Over the years I've been given many systems by Lawrence, Barbose, Toby Scot, Taxi Driver. Most were accurate but most also fell toward 500 when I u$ed them for wagers so I've tossed most out. Can't remember who gave me that one.
    yeah lawrence put one out this week, supposedly 21-1-1 ATS on the Lions, that I can't get better than 65% .... actually what got me into doing this was backchecking Rocky's newsletter and, to a lesser extent, the Playbook (ML) newsletter. ML does a great job but he's too invested into getting something to 8-0 ATS tightened from a 55-10 ATS system. I'd much rather know the 55-10 ....

    the one you posted is very good and I have saved the tightener so thx for posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #53  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by exploited17 View Post
    I'm not sure where they got these stats from but you got totally different ATS then them. Maybe this isn't a good system

    The league is 17-0 ATS as a home dog after they suffered a 3+ turnover margin and the OU is greater than 35. 62% is pretty good, but is there anyway we can get information that adds the turnover margin of 3+ to the equation? i'd like to see if this system as good as it claims. I personally plaid it twice in those situations and both won
    i already added previous turnover margin of 3 or greater. it's a 44-27 ATS spot. sorry it's not 17-0. Bears fit this week
    HD and line > 6.5 and
    p:TOM > 2
    and total > 35
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #54  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    a rare one....

    OVER with any team that lost SU despite allowing less than 10 points and had poor time of possession. 32-6 o/u (DEN/BUF o)
    p:L and po:points < 10 and p:TOP < 2018 and season > 1994
    SU: 17-21-0 (-3.05, 44.7%) Teaser Records
    ATS: 18-20-0 (-1.55, 47.4%) avg line: 1.5 +6: 22-16-0 (57.9%) -6: 15-23-0 (39.5%) +10: 25-11-2 (69.4%) -10: 8-29-1 (21.6%)
    O/U: 32-6-0 (11.43, 84.2%) avg total: 38.8 +6: 24-14-0 (63.2%) -6: 34-3-1 (91.9%) +10: 20-17-1 (54.1%) -10: 38-0-0 (100.0%)
    Rushes Rush Yds Passes Pass Yds Comp TOs Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Final
    Team 28.5 110.5 32.5 205.7 18.8 2.2 4.0 8.1 5.1 5.9 23.6
    Opp 29.0 137.8 32.7 201.6 18.8 2.2 5.4 7.8 5.3 8.1 26.7
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #55  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    one reworked from newsletter

    PLAY ON away dog of 3+ that were a playoff team last year and off a good defensive performance. 68-28 ATS (on NYG) 22-7 if a divisional game

    ___________________________________________________________________________


    here is the PLAYBOOK newsletter NFL play of week vs the actual number. Not ripping on Lawrence at all, because he puts a hell of a lot of work into his stuff, but I can't make any sense out of his #'s....

    this is a very simple query for me so you can't blame it on user error ;)


    PLAY ON any NFL non-division home dog of 2 or more points with a winning record if they were a playoff team last year and are facing a foe off an ATS win of 7 or more points. 22-1-1 ATS since 1992 (on DET)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #56  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    with 2 weeks behind us in NFL it is worth seeing how teams have done in the past 7 years coming off b2b very good scoring weeks and b2b poor scoring weeks. dps=the expected points scored based on line and total. the NYG were negative dps in both weeks so would be worth a look vs philly

    p:dps < 0 and pp:dps < 0 and season > 2009 and ...
    Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________-

    p:dps > 0 and pp:dps > 0 and season > 2009 and ...
    Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries


    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #57  
    RX Senior
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    ny
    Posts
    2,003
    Does not apply this week. If you wan I can just post what applies. Because if it doesn't it might clog your thread and may get lost. But for future reference anyway. Your choice

    The Sports Data Query Language (SDQL) offers plentyof opportunity to fine-tune systems and trends with thewealth of parameters available. This system starts off witha road team on grass off a double-digit road loss. The SDQLfor this situation isp:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grassNext we insist that they had single-digit wins in theprevious regular season and are facing a non-divisionopponent that had more regular season wins in the previousseason.NDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10Note that NDIV is the SDQL shortcut for a game betweennon-divisional opponents and PRSW is the SDQL shortcut forprevious regular season wins.What all this adds up to is an overconfident home team.They are facing a team that:1. Is playing their second straight road game.2. Is off a double-digit loss.3. Has fewer wins than them.4. Had fewer than ten wins the previoous season.p:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grass andNDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10 and date >=20031221This system is 35-3 ATS and what is really interesting isthat the system was 0-3 ATS 2011. If we exclude 2011, thesystem is a perfect 35-0 ATS. We can also get it perfect witha number of other “tweaks.” One is by insisting that theteam has a season-to-date rushing average of at least 3.3yards per rush and that their opponent is not on a 12-plusgame winning streak. These two modest requirementsbring the system to 33-0 ATS since December 21st, 2003.The complete SDQL for the 33-0 ATS system
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #58  
    RX Local Scott L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    pa
    Posts
    24,302
    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    yeah lawrence put one out this week, supposedly 21-1-1 ATS on the Lions, that I can't get better than 65% .... actually what got me into doing this was backchecking Rocky's newsletter and, to a lesser extent, the Playbook (ML) newsletter. ML does a great job but he's too invested into getting something to 8-0 ATS tightened from a 55-10 ATS system. I'd much rather know the 55-10 ....

    the one you posted is very good and I have saved the tightener so thx for posting
    He gave me a ton of stuff once 20 years ago in a 2 hour phonecall. This was back when he kept stuff by hand and found it by pouring through years of ATS logs (BTW worthless as it is I have every lined Football ATS line and score since 1974). He had names for all his systems.... "All Revved Up" .... "Hibernating Wolf" etc. I would keep them all until they would fail 3 straight and eventually they all did.

    Mike Neri set up his original DB before he quit to go out on his own and put out all double digit chalk the last 20 years. Lawrence's son (who doubles as a professional thief) took it over. They have the DB set to run queries and juggle numbers around 24/7 until it produces something that's "never lost" they can promote. No one handicaps in that office anymore. But there is a 6 car garage next to his house so he did something right over the years.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #59  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Bay, No California
    Posts
    8,443
    Quote Originally Posted by exploited17 View Post
    Does not apply this week. If you wan I can just post what applies. Because if it doesn't it might clog your thread and may get lost. But for future reference anyway. Your choice

    The Sports Data Query Language (SDQL) offers plentyof opportunity to fine-tune systems and trends with thewealth of parameters available. This system starts off witha road team on grass off a double-digit road loss. The SDQLfor this situation isp:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grassNext we insist that they had single-digit wins in theprevious regular season and are facing a non-divisionopponent that had more regular season wins in the previousseason.NDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10Note that NDIV is the SDQL shortcut for a game betweennon-divisional opponents and PRSW is the SDQL shortcut forprevious regular season wins.What all this adds up to is an overconfident home team.They are facing a team that:1. Is playing their second straight road game.2. Is off a double-digit loss.3. Has fewer wins than them.4. Had fewer than ten wins the previoous season.p:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grass andNDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10 and date >=20031221This system is 35-3 ATS and what is really interesting isthat the system was 0-3 ATS 2011. If we exclude 2011, thesystem is a perfect 35-0 ATS. We can also get it perfect witha number of other “tweaks.” One is by insisting that theteam has a season-to-date rushing average of at least 3.3yards per rush and that their opponent is not on a 12-plusgame winning streak. These two modest requirementsbring the system to 33-0 ATS since December 21st, 2003.The complete SDQL for the 33-0 ATS system
    This looks like its more back fitting data than being predictive.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #60  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Bay, No California
    Posts
    8,443
    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    with 2 weeks behind us in NFL it is worth seeing how teams have done in the past 7 years coming off b2b very good scoring weeks and b2b poor scoring weeks. dps=the expected points scored based on line and total. the NYG were negative dps in both weeks so would be worth a look vs philly

    p:dps < 0 and pp:dps < 0 and season > 2009 and ...
    Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________-

    p:dps > 0 and pp:dps > 0 and season > 2009 and ...
    Showing 1 to 32 of 32 entries


    Why would the past 7 years be relevant today?

    Coaches change, players change, etc...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #61  
    RX Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    here
    Posts
    1,377
    Quote Originally Posted by Biz View Post
    This looks like its more back fitting data than being predictive.

    Any team fit this angle this week ??
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #62  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Biz View Post
    Why would the past 7 years be relevant today?

    Coaches change, players change, etc...
    well then don't analyze and stats at all, just toss coins in the air or trust what you watched on TV last week. players change weekly, coaches change monthly, and GM's change every few years so all previous stats must be irrelevant right?

    it's called inforfuckingmation...do with it what you please

    is this going to be your new schtick, biz? hit quote on everything typed and post some cunty one-liner to be cool? let me know as this is way too time consuming (AS YOU KNOW) to be dealing with bullshit
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #63  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by exploited17 View Post
    Does not apply this week. If you wan I can just post what applies. Because if it doesn't it might clog your thread and may get lost. But for future reference anyway. Your choice

    The Sports Data Query Language (SDQL) offers plentyof opportunity to fine-tune systems and trends with thewealth of parameters available. This system starts off witha road team on grass off a double-digit road loss. The SDQLfor this situation isp:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grassNext we insist that they had single-digit wins in theprevious regular season and are facing a non-divisionopponent that had more regular season wins in the previousseason.NDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10Note that NDIV is the SDQL shortcut for a game betweennon-divisional opponents and PRSW is the SDQL shortcut forprevious regular season wins.What all this adds up to is an overconfident home team.They are facing a team that:1. Is playing their second straight road game.2. Is off a double-digit loss.3. Has fewer wins than them.4. Had fewer than ten wins the previoous season.p:margin<=-10 and p:A and A and surface = grass andNDIV and PRSW < o:PRSW and PRSW<10 and date >=20031221This system is 35-3 ATS and what is really interesting isthat the system was 0-3 ATS 2011. If we exclude 2011, thesystem is a perfect 35-0 ATS. We can also get it perfect witha number of other “tweaks.” One is by insisting that theteam has a season-to-date rushing average of at least 3.3yards per rush and that their opponent is not on a 12-plusgame winning streak. These two modest requirementsbring the system to 33-0 ATS since December 21st, 2003.The complete SDQL for the 33-0 ATS system
    if you drop the surface and toss in a line parameter = Browns this week

    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #64  
    RX Senior
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    here
    Posts
    1,377
    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    if you drop the surface and toss in a line parameter = Browns this week


    Thank U Roll ... Cleveland it is !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #65  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaboom View Post
    Thank U Roll ... Cleveland it is !
    not my stuff...was just playing around with what that other guy posted. too many backfits for me but the root reason for the success, a road team will play well after getting blown out on the road, has worked for many years. there are many systems for teams in 2nd of b2b away games, like Dallas and Cleveland this week, who played poorly in previous week. Now betting the hapless Browns as a road fav is something I'm not sure i could wager with real money
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #66  
    RX Senior
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    ny
    Posts
    2,003
    But they don't have fewer wins. They are both 0-2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #67  
    RX Junior
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    49
    thanks Rolltide!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #68  
    RX Local Scott L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    pa
    Posts
    24,302
    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    is this going to be your new schtick?
    Props for schtick

    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    a road team will play well after getting blown out on the road
    One of my favorites. A girl named Lynn Zinser used to write a weekly NFL prediction column in the Philly Inky. She posted the Road Team off Road Loss by 31+ angle years ago and I followed it. I have it at 37-14 since 1990 with no plays last year and none so far this season.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #69  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by exploited17 View Post
    But they don't have fewer wins. They are both 0-2
    PRSW = Previous Regular Season Wins
    not current season wins which would have been wins<o:wins

    please don't do this every time exploited or this will be a 200 page thread. i can't explain every query...not to mention this was the query YOU posted which even explained that "PRSW is the SDQL shortcut for previous regular season wins"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #70  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Bay, No California
    Posts
    8,443
    Quote Originally Posted by rolltide View Post
    well then don't analyze and stats at all, just toss coins in the air or trust what you watched on TV last week. players change weekly, coaches change monthly, and GM's change every few years so all previous stats must be irrelevant right?

    it's called inforfuckingmation...do with it what you please

    is this going to be your new schtick, biz? hit quote on everything typed and post some cunty one-liner to be cool? let me know as this is way too time consuming (AS YOU KNOW) to be dealing with bullshit
    Its a perfectly reasonable question, where did I say analyzing stats is unreasonable??

    I'm specifically talking about this ONE piece of information.

    Why would a SPECIFIC team situation from 6-7 years ago be relevant TODAY?? Thats all I asked.

    No need to be insulting, I can toss them around as well as anyone so why not just stay on point. Cunty one liner??

    New schtick? Really Tide??

    You might want to watch your tone, you are completely out of line here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #71  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Bay, No California
    Posts
    8,443
    BTW Tide, this thread is filled with people quoting entire posts and leaving a comment. Did you throw a tantrum at the other 88 people that did the same thing??
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #72  
    RX Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    south florida
    Posts
    726
    RT- thank you for posting all of this. These are great tools that add value. Much appreciated l!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #73  
    RX Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    336
    I appreciate what Rolltide does but to be honest this happens every year in his threads. You either buy into or believe in 'systems' and incorporate them into your handicapping or you don't. No point in bashing it.

    THANK YOU ROLLTiDE
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #74  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    East Bay, No California
    Posts
    8,443
    Nobody is bashing anything. I use systems to aid my handicapping. I simply asked a question.

    For years the Raiders have been awful in every aspect. Road games, playing on the East Coast, etc... If you went by past records for this team, you would have had many losers as over the last couple years they have won these games.....and that was my point when I said things change on specific teams.

    Players - Carr, Cooper, Mack, etc...., GM - McKenzie replacing Al Davis, and coaches of which the Raiders are notorious for replacing constantly.

    If you disagree then fine. But there is no reason to be rude.

    As for the comment I made about back fitting data and having too many filters, I was referring to the system presented that had multiple filters. You can go on and on adding filters to tighten up the results, but the more filters you add the less predictive they become. Go into the Service Plays forum and look at some of the systems mentioned. You will see a 90% system that is 9-1 since 1997. It has filter after filter, and often times these 90% systems somehow lose that game. Why? Because its just random shit thrown together that isn't predictive.

    SDQL sends out an email every day with systems, you can find them on YouTube, often times its undefeated over the last year or 8 years. But if you look at the filters, its not predictive. For example, Player A strikes out 2 or more times in the previous game, they have a "system" that shows the team going 12-0 OVER since 2016. Thats great, but if you look at the 3 previous years the Over is less than 50%. Why is the past year relevant but not the previous 3 years?? Its random.

    There are patterns to randomness, randomness isn't just a hodgepodge of W's and L's. You will see streaks in randomness.

    I have exchanged several emails over the years with Tide, he's a good dude. I am completely onboard with his use of systems, at times I disagree with some of the systems he puts together. Its just a difference of opinion. But I support what he does. He has some really good stuff.

    This is a handicapping forum, we exchange opinions and ideas. I have a friend who is a professional handicapper, he doesn't buy in to much of what I do. We have exchanges where we disagree, but I don't refer to his opinions as "cunty" and he doesn't have a "schtick". He has opinions and has reasons for those opinions.....as do I. We agree to disagree in a respectful manner. This forum should be no different.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #75  
    113-12 with 5 titles in 9 years rolltide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    24,526
    Quote Originally Posted by beejmi View Post
    I appreciate what Rolltide does but to be honest this happens every year in his threads. You either buy into or believe in 'systems' and incorporate them into your handicapping or you don't. No point in bashing it.

    THANK YOU ROLLTiDE
    what's completely silly is that BIZ is a user and believer in this data so he was just coming in here to be a jerkoff...no idea why at all

    and yes, BIZ, how the Giants perform off b2b games for the past 7 years does matter. sure, maybe it doesn't matter what they did specifically 6 or 7 years ago vs what they've done in the past 3 seasons but all you have to do is click on the link i provided and you find the Giants most recent 11 games in this spot they have covered 9. That doesn't mean to jump on NYG but it's information for people to use in capping their games.

    same, shit different year but wouldn't expected it from you, BIZ. but looking at your recent posting history it seems I'm not the only guy on your hit list.

    I better not post the Eagles 31-1 over system because Wentz wasn't the QB for all 32 games, right? ridiculous. come on, biz...wtf?

    we all know this thread will end in a few weeks because people can't just enjoy free, detailed information without being assholes but simply wouldn't have expected you to jump on the train
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •