Should "bump stocks" be Banned or at least be regulated ?

Search

Should "bump stocks" be Banned or at least be regulated ?

  • Banned

    Votes: 14 58.3%
  • regulated

    Votes: 3 12.5%
  • Leave it be

    Votes: 6 25.0%
  • Don't care about it

    Votes: 1 4.2%

  • Total voters
    24
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
I'm all for Gun Ownership, happen to be one... BUT I don't believe you should take a Semi-automatic and turn it into a Fully Automatic Weapon
an Everyday person should have No Need for this IMHO

In case nobody has been following the Vegas shooting ......

[h=2]What are bump stocks?[/h]Bump stocks are cheap and legal accessories that can be installed in semi-automatic weapons, allowing gun owners to fire rapidly without having to pull the trigger for each bullet.If handled properly, a bump stock could increase the rate of fire from between 45 and 60 rounds per minute to between 400 and 800 rounds per minute, Feinstein said in a news release. It’s typically easy to buy the piece, which can sell for about $50 to $400. But Slide Fire — considered one of the main manufacturers of the bump stock — said on its website this week that it has “decided to temporarily suspend taking new orders in order to provide the best service with those already placed.” Slide Fire did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Authorities have not named the manufacturer of the bump stocks Paddock owned.

The device is still available elsewhere, including on Amazon. It was initially meant to help gun owners who have limited hand mobility, according to the AP.[h=2]How do bump stocks work?[/h]Bump stocks are difficult to operate and are unpopular among gun enthusiasts, gun expert Paul Glasco told TIME on Thursday. “Real gun guys don’t use them for anything,” said Glasco, an NRA-certified instructor who stars in a local Louisiana TV show, Legally Armed America.
Bump stocks replace the semi-automatic’s butt stock and pistol grip. They use the recoil of the gun to fire multiple rounds in rapid succession. “It, in essence, bounces off your body,” Glasco said.
But in order to get the gun to fire, a shooter has to simultaneously push the handle grip closest to the barrel forward while pulling the handle grip closest to the body backward. “It’s an unnatural motion to push and pull at the same time,” Glasco said. “It’s like you’re ripping something apart.”
A shooter would have to maintain that motion the entire time, gripping the gun with both hands — not just merely holding it. He would also have to resist the intense recoil, which pushes the torso backward, as well as the heat that radiates from the barrel.
It would be tough to accurately hit a target, even for an advanced marksman, Glasco said. “It’s not as easy as people think it is,” he said. “It’s tiring and very hard to control. Because of the posture of your body, and how you have to hold it to your body, it’s difficult to shoot.”
Inexperienced gun owners might buy a bump stock if they can’t afford or manage to get their hands on a fully automatic weapon, which are expensive and scarce because they are largely illegal. “It’s simply a novelty,” Glasco said, adding that a fully automatic weapon can sell for $50,000 to $100,000. “It’s totally ineffective. I call it a poor man’s machine gun.”
[h=2]Are bump stocks legal?[/h]Bump stocks are legal in America, as are semiautomatic weapons. Fully automatic weapons, which fire in rapid succession without the need to pull the trigger individually, are illegal under the National Firearms Act. But those registered with the government before 1986 can still be legally bought, owned and sold if the transaction goes through the proper federal channels.
On Wednesday, more than two-dozen Democratic lawmakers moved to ban bump stocks through the bill Feinstein introduced.
Republican Sens. John Cornyn and Ron Johnson are among the few GOP lawmakers considering moving forward with the ban legislation. Cornyn told reporters there’s an “obvious concern” about bump stocks after the Las Vegas shooting, according to the AP.
"I own a lot of guns and as a hunter and sportsman I think that's our right as Americans, but I don't understand the use of this bump stock and that's another reason to have a hearing,” he said.
Johnson added: "I have no problem in banning those.”
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
This is a solution in search of a problem.
You can do the same thing with your belt or your hip. You don't need a bump stock to bump fire.

Video

 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
Jeremiah Cottle an veteran who invented the 'bump stock' device.


4515A21200000578-4954598-image-a-24_1507269441646.jpg


 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
4515A24000000578-4954598-_Bump_stocks_were_found_on_the_rifles_used_by_shooter_Stephen_Pa-a-5_1507291933930.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
4515A23700000578-4954598-Now_the_device_has_become_widely_controversial_following_the_Las-a-7_1507291933930.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
4515A22A00000578-4954598-The_NRA_has_since_argued_calling_for_additional_regulations_for_-a-6_1507291933930.jpg
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
[h=1]Bump Fire Stock - M&P 15-22 - Slide Fire - Freedom Unleashed.[/h]
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
[h=1]At the Range: Slide Fire Takes on 9mm.[/h]
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
This is a solution in search of a problem.
You can do the same thing with your belt or your hip. You don't need a bump stock to bump fire.

Video


That's fine if you can do it that way. Then there's no need for the Bump stock to be sold in stores for everyone and anyone to buy it
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,653
Tokens
"Gun control" is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,653
Tokens
The top 14% of gun owners – a group of 7.7m people, or 3% of American adults – own between eight and 140 guns EACH for an average of 17 each.

Too much firepower? Says who? Idiot politicians and their media mouthpieces? Michael Moore? Jimmy Kimmel?

758c1556-7e15-41a3-9649-37a8472b9d2b.jpg


You want real "gun control" old school style? Reintroduce gun safety education into the public school system.

The cancer isn't the Second Amendment, it's liberalism.
 

Retired; APRIL 2014 Thank You Gambling
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
12,632
Tokens
Here's a great idea... what would happen if 10% of the people down at the concert were gun carrying citizens and they all took cover and started shooting back??
1.. the guy gets killed most likely, with 50-60 rounds coming back at him... only 10 people die.

2. A few more windows are shot out at the hotel... No one dies... only 10 people die on the ground..

3. A few more windows get shot out... slim chance someone gets nicked by the ground fire... only 10 people die..
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,653
Tokens
Yep, more guns = less homicide (and vice versa)

So much for "gun control":

Research from the
"restrictive firearm legislation has failed to reduce violent crime in Australia, Canada, or Great Britain."

Instead, due to an ever growing number of U.S. states allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns for self-defense, "only the United States has witnessed such a dramatic drop in criminal violence over the past decade" confirming the AEI data of more guns, less homicide, and vice versa.

The Failed ExperimentGun Control and Public Safety in Canada,Australia, England and Wales

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/FailedExperimentGunControl.pdf

Imagine that.

Shush()*...don't tell crybaby Jimmy Kimmel.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
Here's a great idea... what would happen if 10% of the people down at the concert were gun carrying citizens and they all took cover and started shooting back??
1.. the guy gets killed most likely, with 50-60 rounds coming back at him... only 10 people die.

2. A few more windows are shot out at the hotel... No one dies... only 10 people die on the ground..

3. A few more windows get shot out... slim chance someone gets nicked by the ground fire... only 10 people die..

I like this idea BUT, because of his weapons of choice and his advantage of where he was there might have been a slight difference
people carrying would be Handguns and their range wouldn't match what he had.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
6,106
Tokens
Here's a great idea... what would happen if 10% of the people down at the concert were gun carrying citizens and they all took cover and started shooting back??
1.. the guy gets killed most likely, with 50-60 rounds coming back at him... only 10 people die.

2. A few more windows are shot out at the hotel... No one dies... only 10 people die on the ground..

3. A few more windows get shot out... slim chance someone gets nicked by the ground fire... only 10 people die..

A bunch of armed drunks at a concert shooting into Las Vegas hotels, brilliant.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,764
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com