Is this line an overreaction? I wonder how big a drop off the replacements for Sherman and Chancellor really are... S & C were dominant but I think maybe these guys have been banged up and are slowed down with age to some extent, anyway, and the new kids seem to be OK, Pete has planned for them to take over at some point.
Dome team travelling 4 of 5 weeks, hasn't covered except vs Dallas (who BLOWED UP) and are not putting points up like last year. JJ is outstanding but is hobbled, I wish I could wager that he limps off the field by early 2nd quarter and then is in and out the rest of the game.
We have that Falcon massacre of Dallas in our minds but Dallas is ca ca with the huge injuries/suspension, witness, last night.
Seattle at home on MNF? Need the game? I say, Seattle - 4 should be the line.
Anybody have ideas on the DBs that are playing tonight?
Dome team travelling 4 of 5 weeks, hasn't covered except vs Dallas (who BLOWED UP) and are not putting points up like last year. JJ is outstanding but is hobbled, I wish I could wager that he limps off the field by early 2nd quarter and then is in and out the rest of the game.
We have that Falcon massacre of Dallas in our minds but Dallas is ca ca with the huge injuries/suspension, witness, last night.
Seattle at home on MNF? Need the game? I say, Seattle - 4 should be the line.
Anybody have ideas on the DBs that are playing tonight?
Seattle. It's not rocket science. Don't overthink this one lol
Not really. It's been moved from money
I think the opening line was -3 but then with the news on Chancellor the perception is the Seattle D vulnerable missing him, too, not just Sherman, so to me the line is not fishy. Hard game to cap but not fishy. Agree Seattle no running game... it all adds up to me. Not a strong play but a little one on Seattle for me 12 days off, Wilson will do what it takes, cold for the dome Falcons, Falcons have not won ATS last 7 other than against beat up Boys.
Seattle wins tonight
