Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, 12/12/2017, #40
[FONT="]Cecilia.[/FONT]
Q Thank you, Sarah. The President said today that Senator Gillibrand would “do anything” for campaign contributions. Many, many people see this as a sexual innuendo. What is the President suggesting?
MS. SANDERS: I think that the President is very obvious. This is the same sentiment that the President has expressed many times before when he has exposed the corruption of the entire political system. In fact, he’s used similar terminology many times when talking about politicians of both parties, both men and women, and certainly in his campaign to drain the swamp.
The system is clearly broken. It’s clearly rigged for special interests. And this President is someone that can't be bought, and it’s one of the reasons that he’s President today.
[FONT="]Cecilia.[/FONT]
Q Thank you, Sarah. The President said today that Senator Gillibrand would “do anything” for campaign contributions. Many, many people see this as a sexual innuendo. What is the President suggesting?
MS. SANDERS: I think that the President is very obvious. This is the same sentiment that the President has expressed many times before when he has exposed the corruption of the entire political system. In fact, he’s used similar terminology many times when talking about politicians of both parties, both men and women, and certainly in his campaign to drain the swamp.
The system is clearly broken. It’s clearly rigged for special interests. And this President is someone that can't be bought, and it’s one of the reasons that he’s President today.
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, 12/12/2017, #40
[FONT="]Cecilia.[/FONT]Q So you're saying that this quote -- “Senator Gillibrand would do anything” -- is a reference to campaign contributions in Washington, the swamp? This has nothing to do with her being a female? What is he alleging would happen behind closed doors with her?
MS. SANDERS: He’s not alleging anything. He’s talking about the way that our system functions as it is; that politicians repeatedly beg for money. That's not something new. And that comment, frankly, isn’t something new. If you look back at past comments that this President has made, he’s used that same terminology many times in reference to men. There’s no way that this is sexist at all. This is simply talking about a system that we have that is broken, in which special interests control our government. And I don't think that there’s probably many people that are more controlled by political contributions than the senator that the President referenced.
[FONT="]Cecilia.[/FONT]Q So you're saying that this quote -- “Senator Gillibrand would do anything” -- is a reference to campaign contributions in Washington, the swamp? This has nothing to do with her being a female? What is he alleging would happen behind closed doors with her?
MS. SANDERS: He’s not alleging anything. He’s talking about the way that our system functions as it is; that politicians repeatedly beg for money. That's not something new. And that comment, frankly, isn’t something new. If you look back at past comments that this President has made, he’s used that same terminology many times in reference to men. There’s no way that this is sexist at all. This is simply talking about a system that we have that is broken, in which special interests control our government. And I don't think that there’s probably many people that are more controlled by political contributions than the senator that the President referenced.
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, 12/12/2017, #40
[FONT="]April.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Q Is Gillibrand owed an apology for the misunderstanding of the President's tweet this morning? Because many -- including the Senator -- thinks that it's about sexual innuendos.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]MS. SANDERS: I mean, only if your mind is in the gutter would have read it that way. And -- so, no.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Q No, it's not. What he said was open, and it was not mind in the gutter.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]MS. SANDERS: He was obviously talking about political partisan games that people often play and the broken system that he's talked about repeatedly. This isn't new, this isn't a new sentiment, this isn't new terminology. He's used it several times before. As I said a few minutes ago, he's used it several times before, referencing men of both parties, in fact. And so I think that there -- if you look back at the past comments he's made, it was very clear what his reference was.[/FONT]
[FONT="]April.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Q Is Gillibrand owed an apology for the misunderstanding of the President's tweet this morning? Because many -- including the Senator -- thinks that it's about sexual innuendos.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]MS. SANDERS: I mean, only if your mind is in the gutter would have read it that way. And -- so, no.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Q No, it's not. What he said was open, and it was not mind in the gutter.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]MS. SANDERS: He was obviously talking about political partisan games that people often play and the broken system that he's talked about repeatedly. This isn't new, this isn't a new sentiment, this isn't new terminology. He's used it several times before. As I said a few minutes ago, he's used it several times before, referencing men of both parties, in fact. And so I think that there -- if you look back at the past comments he's made, it was very clear what his reference was.[/FONT]
Oh, ya THINK?:think2: This shit is gonna backfire, only a moron would fail to recognize that any kind of sexual harassment is so different now then it was just a couple of months ago, them women ain't gonna stand for it-and now that Pedo Putz has been shown the door, we get to focus ALL our attention on the Pervert-in-Chief, especially since he has obligingly brought the subject up again when this comment and calling them liars. Bend over, Fat Boy, and take it just like Moore did...
NY Post claims Obama will give Sexual Favors to save Obamacare!
https://nypost.com/2016/10/23/obama-will-do-just-about-anything-to-save-obamacare/
Obama will give sexual favors to save ObamaCare
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...he-can-to-help-donald-trump-succeed-1.2862718
Obama will give sexual favors to help Trump Succeed!
http://wvgop.org/articles/manchin-will-do-anything-he-can-for-obama
Manchen will give Oral Sex to help Obama!
I didnt know so many political people would be giving sexual favors and oral sex.... This is breaking news!! The secret codes have been unbroken!!
Literally thousands of politicians are offering sexual favors of any type to help their party succeed!
https://nypost.com/2016/10/23/obama-will-do-just-about-anything-to-save-obamacare/
Obama will give sexual favors to save ObamaCare
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...he-can-to-help-donald-trump-succeed-1.2862718
Obama will give sexual favors to help Trump Succeed!
http://wvgop.org/articles/manchin-will-do-anything-he-can-for-obama
Manchen will give Oral Sex to help Obama!
I didnt know so many political people would be giving sexual favors and oral sex.... This is breaking news!! The secret codes have been unbroken!!
Literally thousands of politicians are offering sexual favors of any type to help their party succeed!
MS. SANDERS: He was obviously talking about political partisan games that people often play and the broken system that he's talked about repeatedly. This isn't new, this isn't a new sentiment, this isn't new terminology. He's used it several times before. As I said a few minutes ago, he's used it several times before, referencing men of both parties, in fact. And so I think that there -- if you look back at the past comments he's made, it was very clear what his reference was.
MS. SANDERS: He’s not alleging anything. He’s talking about the way that our system functions as it is; that politicians repeatedly beg for money. That's not something new. And that comment, frankly, isn’t something new. If you look back at past comments that this President has made, he’s used that same terminology many times in reference to men. There’s no way that this is sexist at all. This is simply talking about a system that we have that is broken, in which special interests control our government. And I don't think that there’s probably many people that are more controlled by political contributions than the senator that the President referenced.
