Wow, the PAC12 really does suck this year

Willie99

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Handicapper

Joined

Sep 9, 2005

Messages

85,766

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #1

You'd think they'd get lucky and compete in at least one good game

If they're not playing some chump, they're simply not competitive

 

exploited17

Member

Joined

Sep 20, 2017

Messages

21,698

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #2

I managed to talk myself out of Penn St. Cost me big. Fucking losers Pac 12

 

Enfuego

Member

Joined

May 27, 2007

Messages

39,461

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #3

It's not even halftime yet.

 

Willie99

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Handicapper

Joined

Sep 9, 2005

Messages

85,766

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #4

Enfuego said:

It's not even halftime yet.

Click to expand...

it's not just 1 game or 1 half my friend, this is an established trend for the 2017 bowls

 

exploited17

Member

Joined

Sep 20, 2017

Messages

21,698

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #5

Enfuego said:

It's not even halftime yet.

Click to expand...

You are right. But...sometimes you just know 28-7 lead. And considering the teams and the way they are playing. If it is only halftime. Well...bet 10%of your bankroll on Wash on the ML. Get great odds. Otherwise that is just a saying. Yes, there is always a chance. But, I can't ever remember truly believing it is over and being wrong. Even with the curse of Lang.

 

exploited17

Member

Joined

Sep 20, 2017

Messages

21,698

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #6

Willie99 said:

it's not just 1 game or 1 half my friend, this is an established trend for the 2017 bowls

Click to expand...

Exactly

 

Serbone

Member

Joined

Sep 17, 2010

Messages

8,574

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #7

There was a guy made a big deal out of it, said last years 0-6 ATS by PAC 12 had no meaning in handicapping this years bowls.

 

Enfuego

Member

Joined

May 27, 2007

Messages

39,461

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #8

Serbone said:

There was a guy made a big deal out of it, said last years 0-6 ATS by PAC 12 had no meaning in handicapping this years bowls.

Click to expand...

Your reasoning for picking a winner was ludicrous. PAC-12 did bad last year, means they'll do bad this year.

Dumb fuck.

 

doogieboy

Member

Joined

Jan 9, 2007

Messages

1,681

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #9

Title of this thread...apparently true

 

Stickee

Member

Joined

Feb 15, 2016

Messages

4,446

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #10

Hard to deny, but Washington is still in this game. 28-35 lotsa time left
And Stanford with a healthy Love coulda competed with any team towards the end of the year

 

doogieboy

Member

Joined

Jan 9, 2007

Messages

1,681

Tokens

• Dec 30, 2017

• #11

Yes and I have them +10...holdem Huskies!!!!