What's with all this Philly love already for the Superbowl?

Search
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Let's not forget these last two weeks they've been playing at home...


Well they matchup better than the vikings do that is for sure. Vikings offense wasn't going to do shit vs Patriots defense
 

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2005
Messages
585
Tokens

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
1,870
Tokens
I get that Pats were at home, but it's the same Pats that have won on the road and at neutral sites. Eagles have been riding their backup at home.
 

We see the light
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
2,580
Tokens
6 is alot.... This playoffs runs were dominated by dogs... A win by 3 is suffice to the Bs
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
I get that Pats were at home, but it's the same Pats that have won on the road and at neutral sites. Eagles have been riding their backup at home.

I don't think Brady has faced a worse qb in the superbowl as far as public perception so I doubt everyone is going to take the eagles.

Most nfl fans just look at the qb's and decide. Think jake dolhomme was the closest one
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,595
Tokens
Patriots SBs are really close. That may be it. My initial lean is Pats (but I am a homer) and UNDER. BUt the last two Patriot SBs went over, I am fairly sure. But 48/Nick Foles....seems like a good price.
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
602
Tokens
Pats have 0% chance of covering the spread. Brady will be on his ass. The eagles will go after the hand and chop at it, they will step on it and late hit him.
 

my clock is stuck on 420 time to hit this bong
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,131
Tokens
John I hope you are right I too have no love for pats however Tom Brady continues to lead by example.There is nothing more I want then to see them lose on the big stage but he has continuously defined all odds and regardless of them covering you really think philly wins this game?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
John I hope you are right I too have no love for pats however Tom Brady continues to lead by example.There is nothing more I want then to see them lose on the big stage but he has continuously defined all odds and regardless of them covering you really think philly wins this game?

Foles beating Brady, I don't know, I can see Philly covering.......but, if the most over rated Qb ever to win 2 SB's, Eli Manning can wlbeat Brady, so can Foles......& Foles has a better defense.
 

my clock is stuck on 420 time to hit this bong
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,131
Tokens
Foles beating Brady, I don't know, I can see Philly covering.......but, if the most over rated Qb ever to win 2 SB's, Eli Manning can wlbeat Brady, so can Foles......& Foles has a better defense.

I hear you cg but I always feel like betting against this guy is the kiss of death. That fourth quarter yesterday was dragged on forever and I had Jax +9 but
 

I like money
Handicapper
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
5,381
Tokens
Pats have 0% chance of covering the spread. Brady will be on his ass. The eagles will go after the hand and chop at it, they will step on it and late hit him.
This right here. We know (or the nfl common knowledge) the playbook to beating the Pats is put Brady on his ass a couple times. Hes a tough guy, but he goes into hissy-fit mode when it happens.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
I hear you cg but I always feel like betting against this guy is the kiss of death. That fourth quarter yesterday was dragged on forever and I had Jax +9 but

Yeah, I had +9 also, & was sweating when Pats RB almost broke free after gettingbthe 1st down.....if he did, game over & Pats cover......with help from the refs, the Pats can destroy the other team.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
4,026
Tokens
Well they matchup better than the vikings do that is for sure. Vikings offense wasn't going to do shit vs Patriots defense

Mobdeeper ... I don't like to disagree with you , but the vikings could have won that game last week, Vikes offense was good; Case Keenum was shit he blew that game .. after the interception he mentally broke down, and the interception was not his fault, but the entire rest of the game he had wide open receivers and blew 4 drives when the Vikes were in the red zone.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Messages
505
Tokens
Mobdeeper ... I don't like to disagree with you , but the vikings could have won that game last week, Vikes offense was good; Case Keenum was shit he blew that game .. after the interception he mentally broke down, and the interception was not his fault, but the entire rest of the game he had wide open receivers and blew 4 drives when the Vikes were in the red zone.


Really??? "Could have won that game last week" Seriously? Maybe we were watching different games? It was 38-7... Case Keenum wasn't giving up 51 yard TD's to the Eagles WR's. "Could have won that game last week" lmao.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Messages
3,094
Tokens
Mobdeeper ... I don't like to disagree with you , but the vikings could have won that game last week, Vikes offense was good; Case Keenum was shit he blew that game .. after the interception he mentally broke down, and the interception was not his fault, but the entire rest of the game he had wide open receivers and blew 4 drives when the Vikes were in the red zone.

hard to see wide open receivers when u constantly getting pressure.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,765
Messages
13,438,754
Members
99,334
Latest member
mu88forum
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com