2/15 - TAMPA BAY LIGHTENING (-245) Money Line BEST PICK ; rarely do I feel comfortable laying such a high ML price in the NHL. But my "hockey model" which is 3 - 0 this season, says despite the "experts" who say laying a price like this is a "no no" , I say, value is value. Watch them win. Good luck!
VITOPUCK - Thank you for the reply. If I could share with you, over the years, how many winners I had, but tied or lost by conservatively using "your suggestion" of wagering -1 (tie} and worse -1.5 (loss); but that is impossible for obvious reasons. I consider (-1) a tie, costing me money. When I select a win, I get paid. As you know,TIES do not pay a profit. However, your records I'm sure are the basis for your remarks, as does mine speak for my NHL profits over the years. I finally refined this disaster of getting a tie (-!) which is not a loss but still pays no profit, and worse the -1.5 (loss). My method , less risks, with more profits won, using my refined "model selections" are a proven profit maker. Just keep "clocking my NHL suggestions and you perhaps may see for yourself. I certainly understand only 3 wins and no losses since posting here (NHL), mean nothing, but maybe when we get to 10-0 on just the high money line selections, you may consider my model. Hopefully I won't have to use the high money line selections, but if my model calls for it, I play. Last season, I only used 13 money line selections of over -175. Please know I do not make a habit of laying those NHL Money line Monster prices. But when I do, the results speak for themselves. I only play money lines; last season I played a total of 71 games total, for the entire season. This year I think will be less plays, particularly with VEGAS entering the NHL. I have yet to select Vegas , on or against them and probably won't , at least not until next season. Last season, the majority of my 71 selections were between (-105) and (-130). BOL!
ointer:
hno:Moderators (specifically, betallsports): Poster StevieRay just will not let up with his disrespectful, disgusting, arrogant remarks in his posts, specifically like the last one in this thread. Is there any good reason why me and my followers have to be subjected to this poster's "sickening" vocabulary, ("fart", not a respectful name to call anyone) directed at me? "betallsports", you assured me you would help me out if I advised you of such posting. I hereby am following with this example as a reminder, to at least warn or admonish this poster. Evidently he seems not to respect or
adhere to your warnings previously.
Thank you, Hank Hahn
adhere to your warnings previously.
Thank you, Hank Hahn
