Fox News host: Mueller Indictments Prove Russian Probe Is 'Opposite Of A Hoax'

Dafinch · Feb 16, 2018

How does this guy keep his job at that scum he's been consistently on Twittler's ass for months now. Ya know when you'd know there is definitely "no collusion," you Fat Ass Welching prick(besides in your dreams)? When Mueller says the investigation is over, which it's a far way from being, and doesn't call your name-fat chance.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/shepard-smith-mueller-indictments-prove-013136592.html
Shepard Smith: Mueller Indictments Prove Russian Probe Is 'Opposite Of A Hoax'

Mary Papenfuss

HuffPost•February 16, 2018

Fox News host Shepard Smith said Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller’s string of indictments against Russian operatives for meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election is a stark demonstration that the probe into Kremlin election interference is “the opposite of a hoax.”
Smith’s declaration was a pointed dig at Donald Trump’s often-repeated complaint that the Mueller probe is a “hoax,” a witch hunt, or “fake news” concocted by the media.

“If there was ever any question — even a single question — there is no more. Russia attacked the United States of America,” Smith said on “Shepard Smith Reporting.” He called it a “coordinated, government-sponsored campaign to undermine American democracy.”
The Russians “infiltrated our system, manipulated us on behalf of Vladimir Putin, and they did it online and in person, on our soil,” Smith added.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced Friday that 13 Russian nationals and three Russian organizations were indicted on several charges for their alleged attempts to interfere in the election to support Trump and hurt his opponent Hillary Clinton. The Russians are charged with posing as Americans to stage fake political rallies, create fake social media accounts and buy political ads. The budget for the operations was more than $1.25 million a month shortly before the election, according to the indictments.
In one case, according to the indictments, Russians reached out to “unwitting” people associated with the Trump campaign.

One Twitter account allegedly run by the Russians, @TEN_GOP, tweeted to Trump last year: “We love you Mr. President.” Trump retweeted to his millions of followers and responded: “So nice, thank you!”
The president’s son Donald Trump Jr. also retweeted several messages from the account and others allegedly operated by Russians.

Trump said in a tweet after the indictments were announced that election results were “not impacted” — which Rosenstein did not say at his press conference. Trump added: “The Trump campaign did nothing wrong — no collusion!”
But Twitter users weren’t buying it.
The investigation is ongoing.

THawk+ · Feb 16, 2018

Shep Smith is credible? HAHAHA Seriously man?!

Dafinch · Feb 16, 2018

T Hawk said:
Shep Smith is credible? HAHAHA Seriously man?!

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King. On Fox News, he's head and shoulders above the rest. Who's YOUR Big Chief of Truth, that scum Hannity? You probably had your lips glued to O'Reilly's jock until he let his dick outta his pants once too often, lol.

THawk+ · Feb 16, 2018

I am going to assume you did not see Rosenstein's presser and what was said.

He said pretty much no Americans knowingly participated in anything.
Nothing that happened affected the outcome of the election.

Oh, let's not forget they will never be here for anything as they are in Russia. LOL
Oh, and also all the big boys mess around during another country during elections
The U.S. has done far worse and it has been shown in recent time....

You sir are a joke!!!

Now call me a cocksucker and tell me to shove an acid dipped dildo up my ass..

Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))cockingasnook()cockingasnook()cockingasnook()kth)(&^kth)(&^kth)(&^kth)(&^

ointer:

ointer::hammerit:hammerit:hammerit:hammerit!<<)!<<)!<<)!<<)!<<):hanging::hanging::hanging::hanging:

uppy:

uppy::guillotin:guillotin:guillotin:guillotin:shoota::shoota::shoota::shoota::fckmad::fckmad::fckmad::fckmad::fckmad:

ucking:

ucking

)

@)

ointer:

THawk+ · Feb 16, 2018

Dafinch said:
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King. On Fox News, he's head and shoulders above the rest. Who's YOUR Big Chief of Truth, that scum Hannity? You probably had your lips glued to O'Reilly's jock until he let his dick outta his pants once too often, lol.

Nope, don't bother with any of them. I am going off of what was said in Rosensteins's press conference.
You should watch or read it

Dafinch · Feb 17, 2018

T Hawk said:
Nope, don't bother with any of them. I am going off of what was said in Rosensteins's press conference.
You should watch or read it

Wait, if you don't bother with any of them, how do you know who is credible and who isn't, and, how do your form your extremely enlightened opinion? Hmmm, there's no emoticon for "sarcasm," as far as I know. Pity. I read some of the indictment, and you might do the same.

Dafinch · Feb 17, 2018

T Hawk said:
I am going to assume you did not see Rosenstein's presser and what was said.

He said pretty much no Americans knowingly participated in anything.
Nothing that happened affected the outcome of the election.
<<You assumed wrong, and, like I said, you might try actually looking at the indictment. A few interesting points from it:

"...being persons employed by and associated with the Enterprise, which Enterprise engaged in, and
the activities of which affected interstate and foreign commerce, did knowingly, willfully, and
intentionally combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other, and with
other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (hereinafter
the "Racketeering Violation"), that is, to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the
conduct of the affairs of that Enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, as that term is
defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1961(1) and (5), involving multiple acts
indictable under:

"...persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury." So, there are persons known to the Grand Jury? Well, why aren't their names in the indictment, then? Here's a guess: Big Bob likes to drive home a point, like he did with Flynn, putting out that he had enough evidence to indict him, but then not doing so for about 5 weeks. He let him twist slowly in the wind for awhile, to think about himself and his son, and, lo and behold, Flynn flips! Here, Mueller had this stuff for at least 2 weeks, we know that because the one American has already pled guilty and is cooperating. Mueller let all the shit that has happened the last 2 weeks simmer, and now he is sending a message to those "known to the Grand Jury"(who know perfectly well who they are), and that message is, don't make me come and get you. Flip or fry.
What about the persons unknown to the GJ? Well, they might be unknown because Big Bob hasn't revealed them yet to the GJ, or, they might be unknown because they haven't been ratted out by all the dolphins, I mean, Flippers, as yet. Every single expert I've seen or read-people who prosecuted Watergate, former FBI agent Clint Watts, who quit almost as soon as Twittler got in and predicted mass indictments concerning Russian many months ago, have heavily praised the charges, and all agree that there are many more to come. But, of course, YOU know better than they do, not to mention, more than Mueller, which brings us to your wish: The "we're only doing what everybody does" defense is often untrue, and always irrelevant. Should the Russians not be punished because of that ridiculous stance when they get caught? You don't know what you're talking about, and, you're a moron. Get out that dildo, Numbnuts.>>

Oh, let's not forget they will never be here for anything as they are in Russia. LOL
Oh, and also all the big boys mess around during another country during elections
The U.S. has done far worse and it has been shown in recent time....

You sir are a joke!!!

Now call me a cocksucker and tell me to shove an acid dipped dildo up my ass..

Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))Slapping-silly90))cockingasnook()cockingasnook()cockingasnook()kth)(&^kth)(&^kth)(&^kth)(&^ointer:ointer:ointer:ointer::hammerit:hammerit:hammerit:hammerit!

SheriffJoe · Feb 17, 2018

DAFINCH is a piece of human garbage!!

HERE IS 100% TRUTH about him....

FACT: DaFinch had a woman add him onto HER house that another man used his VA loan to get.
FACT: DaFinch files frivolous lawsuits as a PAUPER so he doesn't have to pay court fees
FACT: DaFinch in one of his frivolous lawsuits, he tried to sue Wells Fargo for $6,000,000 for "Civil Rights" violations
FACT: DaFinch under oath told a judge he has around $1000 a month in income so he can file as a PAUPER
FACT: DaFinch and his wife had some sort of business which had its license REVOKED by the state of Nevada
FACT: DaFinch doesnt pay his bills on time
FACT: DaFinch once tried to turn a judgement of $6000 into over $40,000 and it got thrown out

Non-Facts: Dafinch ex wife was a felon, has relatives in VA that are felons, and his wife didnt get the house in a divorce...

If anyone has ANY doubt.... just ask him to have NFLTrends PROVE those facts are real. When he refuses to do it, you know why.

NFLTrends · Feb 17, 2018

Litigants who represent themselves (in forma pauperis and pro se) sometimes make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure.

NFLTrends · Feb 17, 2018

[W]hen a judge calls an argument "ridiculous" or "frivolous," it is absolutely the worst thing the judge could say. It means that the person arguing the position has absolutely no idea of what he is doing, and has completely wasted everyone's time. It doesn't mean that the case wasn't well argued, or that judge simply decided for the other side, it means that there was no other side. The argument was absolutely, positively, incompetent. The judge is not telling you that you were "wrong." The judge is telling you that you are out of your mind.[8]

NFLTrends · Feb 17, 2018

Jonathan Lee Riches
In 2010, federal prosecutors asked a judge to help them stop Jonathan Lee Riches from filing any more lawsuits, arguing that his frequent filings were frivolous.[15]

NFLTrends · Feb 17, 2018

Abuse of process is a cause of action in tort arising from one party making misusing or perversion of regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action. It is a common law intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution, another type of tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the courts.

The elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are as follows: (1) the existence of an ulterior purpose or motive underlying the use of process, and (2) some act in the use of the legal process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings.[1] Abuse of process can be distinguished from malicious prosecution, in that abuse of process typically does not require proof of malice, lack of probable cause in procuring issuance of the process, or a termination favorable to the plaintiff, all of which are essential to a claim of malicious prosecution.[2] "Process," as used in this context, includes not only the "service of process," i.e. an official summons or other notice issued from a court, but means any method used to acquire jurisdiction over a person or specific property that is issued under the official seal of a court.[3] Typically, the person who abuses process is interested only in accomplishing some improper purpose that is collateral to the proper object of the process and that offends justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an unfounded criminal prosecution. Subpoenas to testify, attachments of property, executions on property, garnishments, and other provisional remedies are among the types of "process" considered to be capable of abuse.

Dave007inVegas · Feb 17, 2018

NFLTrends said:
Litigants who represent themselves (in forma pauperis and pro se) sometimes make frivolous arguments due to their limited knowledge of the law and procedure.

A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.

Dafinch · Feb 17, 2018

T Hawk said:
Nope, don't bother with any of them. I am going off of what was said in Rosensteins's press conference.
You should watch or read it

Sooooooooo, Chicken Hawk, did you take a look at the indictment at all? Any thoughts on who persons "known and unknown to the Grand Jury" might be, Genius? Still maintain that YOU know more about the goings-on than Mueller, multiple Watergate veterans, and multiple law enforcement types? C'mon, get on the record, stick that foot nice and tightly into your big mouth, Jagoff.:hahahahah^^

ointer:Loser!@#0popcorn-eatinggif

GasMan · Feb 17, 2018

Dafinch said:
Sooooooooo, Chicken Hawk, did you take a look at the indictment at all? Any thoughts on who persons "known and unknown to the Grand Jury" might be, Genius? Still maintain that YOU know more about the goings-on than Mueller, multiple Watergate veterans, and multiple law enforcement types? C'mon, get on the record, stick that foot nice and tightly into your big mouth, Jagoff.:hahahahah^^ointer:Loser!@#0popcorn-eatinggif

Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.

Greenbacks · Feb 17, 2018

Dafinch said:
Sooooooooo, Chicken Hawk, did you take a look at the indictment at all? Any thoughts on who persons "known and unknown to the Grand Jury" might be, Genius? Still maintain that YOU know more about the goings-on than Mueller, multiple Watergate veterans, and multiple law enforcement types? C'mon, get on the record, stick that foot nice and tightly into your big mouth, Jagoff.:hahahahah^^ointer:Loser!@#0popcorn-eatinggif

Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.

Greenbacks · Feb 17, 2018

Dafinch said:
How does this guy keep his job at that scum he's been consistently on Twittler's ass for months now. Ya know when you'd know there is definitely "no collusion," you Fat Ass Welching prick(besides in your dreams)? When Mueller says the investigation is over, which it's a far way from being, and doesn't call your name-fat chance.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/shepard-smith-mueller-indictments-prove-013136592.html
Shepard Smith: Mueller Indictments Prove Russian Probe Is 'Opposite Of A Hoax'

Mary Papenfuss

HuffPost•February 16, 2018

Fox News host Shepard Smith said Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller’s string of indictments against Russian operatives for meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election is a stark demonstration that the probe into Kremlin election interference is “the opposite of a hoax.”
Smith’s declaration was a pointed dig at Donald Trump’s often-repeated complaint that the Mueller probe is a “hoax,” a witch hunt, or “fake news” concocted by the media.

“If there was ever any question — even a single question — there is no more. Russia attacked the United States of America,” Smith said on “Shepard Smith Reporting.” He called it a “coordinated, government-sponsored campaign to undermine American democracy.”
The Russians “infiltrated our system, manipulated us on behalf of Vladimir Putin, and they did it online and in person, on our soil,” Smith added.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced Friday that 13 Russian nationals and three Russian organizations were indicted on several charges for their alleged attempts to interfere in the election to support Trump and hurt his opponent Hillary Clinton. The Russians are charged with posing as Americans to stage fake political rallies, create fake social media accounts and buy political ads. The budget for the operations was more than $1.25 million a month shortly before the election, according to the indictments.
In one case, according to the indictments, Russians reached out to “unwitting” people associated with the Trump campaign.

One Twitter account allegedly run by the Russians, @TEN_GOP, tweeted to Trump last year: “We love you Mr. President.” Trump retweeted to his millions of followers and responded: “So nice, thank you!”
The president’s son Donald Trump Jr. also retweeted several messages from the account and others allegedly operated by Russians.

Trump said in a tweet after the indictments were announced that election results were “not impacted” — which Rosenstein did not say at his press conference. Trump added: “The Trump campaign did nothing wrong — no collusion!”
But Twitter users weren’t buying it.
The investigation is ongoing.

Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.

Greenbacks · Feb 17, 2018

Dafinch said:
Wait, if you don't bother with any of them, how do you know who is credible and who isn't, and, how do your form your extremely enlightened opinion? Hmmm, there's no emoticon for "sarcasm," as far as I know. Pity. I read some of the indictment, and you might do the same.

Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.

Greenbacks · Feb 17, 2018

Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.
Ban bet on the main board fuck tard.

Greenbacks · Feb 17, 2018

How come DaFinch's threads always get destroyed?

Fox News host: Mueller Indictments Prove Russian Probe Is 'Opposite Of A Hoax'

Member

New member

Member

New member

New member

Member

Member

Rx Normal

New member

New member

New member

New member

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Forum statistics

Share this page