Chuck Schumer telling us the truth, and it's reflects poorly on him

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) on Tuesday dismissed a legislative proposal backed by Republican leaders to keep immigrant families together at the border, arguing that President Trump could fix the problem more easily with a flick of his pen.

“There are so many obstacles to legislation and when the president can do it with his own pen, it makes no sense,” Schumer told reporters. “Legislation is not the way to go here when it’s so easy for the president to sign it.”

Asked if that meant Democrats would not support a bill backed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to keep immigrant families together while seeking asylum on the U.S. border, Schumer said they want to keep the focus on Trump.

-----------------------------------

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/393069-schumer-rejects-gop-proposal-to-address-border-crisis
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
25,906
Tokens
Lets not forget the Democratic party voted Trump's DACA resolution down just a few short six months ago.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
He doesn't want a solution, he wants a wedge issue. He wants to divide the country every way he can.

He doesn't want a legislative fix, which would be a permanent solution. He says he wants an executive order which is not permanent.

He doesn't want to WORK for a solution, he wants his media to keep selling his lies and his narrative. They literally rewrite history, change the story, purchase fake dossiers and create issues that don't exist. And then the scum of the earth start investigations into the lies they created about their opponents.

They're not well, they're sick lying scumbags, and they're propped up by the dumbest of the dumb .




They can never win on ideas, and that's why they ALWAYS CHOOSE THE PATH OF LIES AND DECEPTION AND WEDGE ISSUES AND DIVIDING THE NATION
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
The Republicans have had an asylum bill written since 2015.

The Democrats have nothing, do nothing, and think illegal immigrant children are pawns to win an election.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
DgGUQjOUcAIjNsV.jpg
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
He doesn't want a solution, he wants a wedge issue. He wants to divide the country every way he can.

He doesn't want a legislative fix, which would be a permanent solution. He says he wants an executive order which is not permanent.

He doesn't want to WORK for a solution, he wants his media to keep selling his lies and his narrative. They literally rewrite history, change the story, purchase fake dossiers and create issues that don't exist. And then the scum of the earth start investigations into the lies they created about their opponents.

They're not well, they're sick lying scumbags, and they're propped up by the dumbest of the dumb .




They can never win on ideas, and that's why they ALWAYS CHOOSE THE PATH OF LIES AND DECEPTION AND WEDGE ISSUES AND DIVIDING THE NATION
There are a lot of Senators and Representatives who think like that.
I think they believe if they solve too many problems they will become obsolete.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
So Trump signs an executive order to change the policy, something Obama NEVER did nor did the Democrats cry about such policy for at least eight years

They're just feeding their brain dead flock
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
Bump, because good and smart people talk about every side of every issue

And a little perspective goes a long ways, if someone is capable of comprehending perspective
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
So Trump signs an executive order to change the policy, something Obama NEVER did nor did the Democrats cry about such policy for at least eight years

They're just feeding their brain dead flock
I'd like to know the real reason he used an executive order rather than keeping
the heat on Congress. I read where Melania and Ivanka were humping him to do
something. If that's true then I can understand why he did it. As you go through
life you realize there are some fights you just can't win.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
SENATOR GRAHAM:

We’ve got a big massive mess that’s been going on for decades, and we’re all going to fix it one day, I hope. But we got a specific problem that puts the country in a dilemma. Here’s your dilemma and was President Obama’s dilemma, and our dilemma: If a family shows up at the border and we let the family go into the country, and say please come back for your hearing, about 80 percent of the time the adults never show up for the hearing. I think most Americans feel like that is bad; it will create a third wave of illegal immigration.



I want to be fair to people who came here under the old system, but I don’t want to create incentives to create a third wave.



The other choice is, is if you detain the parents who broke the law, under the Flores decision you have to break the family up. So there’s a 1997 Supreme Court case that we’ve got to deal with.



So I would urge my Democratic friends to see if we can find a way to keep families together, have a legislative fix of the Flores decision, and argue about the other things later.



Because right now, Mr. President, you’re in a real bind. If you detain the adults, the law requires the children to be separated. If you let the adults into the country, they’d never show up. It seems to me that we want to keep the family together and have the parents show up for their day in court.



To Senator Schumer: I know there’s a lot we don’t agree on, but surely to goodness we can fix this court decision, because the country is in a bad spot, not just you.



THE PRESIDENT:

Well, Lindsey, the dilemma is that if you’re weak — if you’re weak, which people would like you to be — if you’re really, really pathetically weak, the country is going to be overrun with millions of people. And if you’re strong, then you don’t have any heart. That’s a tough dilemma. Perhaps I’d rather be strong, but that’s a tough dilemma.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
SENATOR JOHNSON: Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, go ahead, Ron.


SENATOR JOHNSON: In our community, homeland security, we’ve held 30 hearings on border security. And you know how much I like data. And, you know, Senator Graham mentioned the fact that we have these incentives. There’s nothing compassionate, by the way, of enticing people to take a very dangerous journey on a train they call “the beast,” or through the desert. We’ve seen the pictures of dead — desiccated bodies in the desert. There’s nothing compassionate about that.



But here’s what’s happened since 2012, since DACA. Just to talk about unaccompanied children: Prior to that, somewhere between 3,000 or 4,000 unaccompanied children from Central America came into this country. Then DACA was instituted in 2012, and that problem skyrocketed. The numbers on it — about 225,000 unaccompanied children, just from Central America; about almost half a million family members. So we’ve got another 750,000 individuals — very sympathetic — that we’re just incentivizing for coming. And we have to stop those incentives.



Our goal of our policy should be to reduce the flow of people incentivized to come to this country, and that’s what strong enforcement actually does.



THE PRESIDENT: So just so everybody knows, this deal was just about done. We had a deal signed. President Obama signed DACA. When he signed it, he said, I’m really not allowed to sign this, and I’m going to sign it anyway. But he actually said, I’m not allowed to sign this, never going to hold up. And they got a judge who held it up, and they got another one who held it up. Then we had a couple that turned it down, and it’s going to be a Supreme Court issue.



But before it was held up, everyone assumed that the DACA would not be held up. But we had a deal with the Democrats. It was a deal that everybody agreed to. It was $25 billion. We were going to build a wall. We would take care of many, many different things, including loopholes. And it was all done, except when this judge ruled in favor of DACA, meaning that it could continue until we get to the Supreme Court, all of a sudden, they weren’t there anymore. And that’s what happened, and that’s why we’re in this mess — because we had a couple of court decisions, which is going to force an issue to the Supreme Court that shouldn’t be forced to the Supreme Court.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
John, you were going to say something?


SENATOR CORNYN: Mr. President, to your point, America is the most generous country in the world when it comes to legal immigration. And I think we ought to draw a very clear line between legal immigration that benefits our country —



THE PRESIDENT: Right, absolutely.



SENATOR CORNYN:and illegal immigration, which is a threat to public safety.
I just wanted to make the one point. I agree with what Tom Cotton and others have said, what you’ve said, about being able to enforce the law and keep families together. It’s not a mutually exclusive choice. We can do both. And I’m confident we will achieve that goal.
But I just want to point out that, coming from a border state, like Mac and I do, the border — the illegality along the border is a complex problem because it is — as somebody pointed out, it’s “commodity agnostic.” In other words, they said it’s people, it’s drugs, it’s weapons. And you talk about an opioid crisis in the United States — it’s not just prescription drugs; it’s heroin that comes from Mexico.


THE PRESIDENT: Right.


SENATOR CORNYN: So this is a very complex situation. We need law and order along the border. Everybody agrees with that. We need to be compassionate in the way we handle these families. But it’s important to remember that larger context, because the cartels and the criminal organizations that benefit from this, they’re just making a lot of money and keeping this situation very dangerous for everybody involved.


THE PRESIDENT: And, John, in many ways, they’re using the children and always — they’re using the children as a ticket to getting into the country.


SENATOR CORNYN: Absolutely.


THE PRESIDENT: And we have to remember that. You know, there’s a number of the 12,000 children; 2,000 are with the parents, and 10,000 came up with some really horrible people, in some cases. You have the coyotes, you have the traffickers — the human traffickers — not only drug traffickers, but you have the human traffickers. And they use these children as passports to get into the country. So we have to work on that, too. It’s a very complex issue.



It has been going on — you shouldn’t feel guilty, because it’s been going on for many, many years. Many, many decades. But we’re going to solve that, along with a lot of other problems that we’ve already solved. We’re doing well at solving problems.



You know, when I became President, we had North Korea; we had the Iran deal, which was no good; we had lots of problems with trade and bad trade deals. There are a lot of things that we’ve solved and we’re solving that, in theory, I shouldn’t have had to solve. These are things that should have been solved for a long time. Even on trade.



We should have never allowed our past leaders — should have never allowed China to get to a point where there’s a $500 billion trade deficit with the United States. When they went up, we should have gone up. We should have gone up together — not where you allowed one to get so far ahead. And that includes the European Union and it includes many others. Shouldn’t have happened.



So we came at a time where there were plenty of problems to solve, and one of the big problems is immigration. And I hope that within not too long a distance — and I mean beyond just one problem of immigration. You can mention the word “comprehensive,” or you don’t have to use it. A lot of politicians don’t like the word “comprehensive immigration reform.” But I really think we have an opportunity to redo the whole immigration picture, and that’s what I’m looking to do, ultimately. But right now, we want to fix this problem and I think we’ll be able to do that.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
[FONT=&quot]Q THE PRESS Mr. President, did the images of those young children at the border change your mind on this?


[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]THE PRESIDENT: Yes. They affect everybody. Those images affect everybody. But I have to say that you have double standards. You have people that want absolute security and safety, and you have people that do look at the children. And then you have people like me, and I think most of the people in this room, that want both. We want the heart, but we also want strong borders, and we want no crime.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]We don’t want crime in this country. We don’t want people coming in. We don’t want people coming in from the Middle East through our border, using children to get through the lines. We don’t want that. We’re doing too good a job to allow that to happen. So we’re not going to allow that to happen.

[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Thank you very much. Thank you.[/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
Schumer is a lying despicable ca ca and poo poo head ! F HIM ! :hammerit:hammerit:hammerit:hammerit
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,702
Tokens
I can't stand Chuck
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,423
Tokens
Are you trying to say their is nothing to this collusion thing?
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
Chuck Schumer Fail: 62% of Americans Want New Supreme Court Justice Before Midterms


chuck-schumer-1-640x480.png


Americans want the President to appoint, and the Senate to confirm, a new Supreme Court justice before the 2018 midterm elections — by a staggering 2-to-1 margin, according to a new poll released Tuesday.


According to a new NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll:

More than six in 10 Americans, or 62 percent, said Trump’s nominee, who will be announced on Monday, should be confirmed or rejected before the elections in which control of the House and Senate are at stake. About three in 10, or 33 percent, said the Senate should wait until after the elections, the poll found.



The vast majority of Republicans surveyed, 85 percent, said the Senate’s vote on the nominee should take place before the election. Roughly six in 10 Independents, or 61 percent, agreed. However, more than half of Democrats, 55 percent, believe the voting on a new justice should wait.


Many Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), have argued that President Donald Trump should not appoint a new Supreme Court justice in an election year, and should wait for a new Congress to be seated in January.


They have cited a bogus version of the rule Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) applied in 2016, when he said the Senate should not confirm a new Supreme Court justice in a presidential election year.






Kamala Harris
@SenKamalaHarris





Given the stakes of this Supreme Court seat, which will determine the fate of fundamental constitutional rights, the American people, who will vote in less than 4 months, deserve to have their voice heard. We shouldn't vote on confirmation until they have voted at the ballot box.
8:23 PM - Jun 27, 2018







Sen Dianne Feinstein
@SenFeinstein





4 months away from an election, there should be no consideration of a Supreme Court nominee until the American people have a say. Leader McConnell set that standard when he denied Judge Garland a hearing for nearly a year, and the Senate should follow the McConnell Standard now.
9:21 PM - Jun 27, 2018










McConnell, in fact, had cited a “rule” created by then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) in 1992, the last year of President George H.W. Bush’s first term. Schumer himself sought to block President George W. Bush from appointing a new Supreme Court justice in 2007 — though Bush had more than a year left in office.

The practical effect of the rule Democrats are seeking to apply would bar Supreme Court appointments in even-numbered years.

But the new poll suggests that the public is decidedly against them, and they barely have majority support among their own voters.

Democrats may be more astute than their leaders. Given that the party has 23 (or 25, including independents) Senate seats up for re-election, ten of which are in states Trump won, versus eight seats for Republicans, it is entirely possible that the new Congress could be more Republican, meaning Trump would feel greater freedom to choose a more conservative nominee in 2019.

The poll also notes that the Supreme Court battle could be at least a modest factor in the election results: “Sixty-six percent of Democrats and 60 percent of Republicans said Trump’s nominee would be an important factor in their vote in the midterms. However, less than half of independents, 46 percent, said it would be on their mind when casting their November ballot.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
Sorry Chuck, YOU don't get to nominate the judges regardless of who wins the midterm election. We know you and John McCain enabled the Senate to provide a predetermined acceptable list when W was President, butt you once again show what a piece of shit you are when that committee process you espoused was dropped when Obama was president. Now you want a say again, well GO FUCK YOURSELF.

Elections have consequences, Trump won, and Trump won telling the country he was going to appoint conservative judges.

The small concentration of urban areas the democrats control just ain't enough, and the electoral college ain't going away, so you may just have to act smarter if you want a shot at nominating power again.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,636
Messages
13,453,136
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com