This stupid bitch is perpetuating the "Dumb Blonde" stereotype, lol...

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Going out to eat ANYWHERE was probably not the smartest move after her recent comments, but going to a Mexican restaurant? I'm surprised that they didn't offer her a free take-out order with some special sauce on it, lol...

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...by-protestors-chanting-Shame?detail=emaildkre

Secretary of Homeland Security chased from Mexican restaurant by protestors chanting 'Shame!'



Walter_Einenkel.jpg

Walter Einenkel
Daily Kos Staff

Tuesday June 19, 2018 · 6:42 PM PDT

Secretary of Homeland Security, Kirstjen Nielsen famous for “following orders,” pretending she isn’t doing things that she’s doing and separating young children from their families, decided to have dinner at a Mexican restaurant. Yes. a Mexican restaurant. The Metro D.C. Democratic Socialists of America went live with their video and protestors inside of the restaurant and proceeded to peacefully protest, and chant “Shame, shame, shame ...”
The results were beautiful as Sec. Nielsen had to hurry away. Good. These people are monsters and deserve to be reminded of that fact. And here’s a PSA before you enjoy the video.
Reminder: This is what Kirstjen Nielsen looks like, in case she comes into the restaurant you're at and you want to ensure she can't eat a meal in peace while keeping kids in cages. pic.twitter.com/zjKj0hM3OR
— Julia Wick (@sherlyholmes) June 20, 2018
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Fun Fact - 2.7 Million legal citizen children in the US are separated from their parents, from ALL races....
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,608
Tokens

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Typical of the rx's two biggest stalking morons to ignore the main point of the story, which is that that stupid stupid twat-whose insistence that there WAS no policy of Dump's to separate parents from children in an unprecedented way-was left looking like a fool, not just because Rump reversed him self in humiliating fashion, but because of her stupidity in going out to eat in that place, at this time.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Typical of the rx's two biggest stalking morons to ignore the main point of the story, which is that that stupid stupid twat-whose insistence that there WAS no policy of Dump's to separate parents from children in an unprecedented way-was left looking like a fool, not just because Rump reversed him self in humiliating fashion, but because of her stupidity in going out to eat in that place, at this time.

Can you cite the law/executive order/policy that Trump implemented?

I can prove that the settlement was passed with INS and Human Rights 1997 -

The Original Flores Settlement
In 1985, two organizations filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of immigrant children who had been detained by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) challenging procedures regarding the detention, treatment, and release of children. After many years of litigation, including an appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the parties reached a settlement in 1997.

The Flores Settlement Agreement (Flores) imposed several obligations on the immigration authorities, which fall into three broad categories:

The government is required to release children from immigration detention without unnecessary delay to, in order of preference, parents, other adult relatives, or licensed programs willing to accept custody.
If a suitable placement is not immediately available, the government is obligated to place children in the “least restrictive” setting appropriate to their age and any special needs.
The government must implement standards relating to the care and treatment of children in immigration detention.

----------

Your turn... which law/policy/executive order did Trump sign saying CHILDREN MUST BE TAKEN AWAY ?

(response will be insult, insult, cohen, stormy, insult, more deflection to a random topic, insult)
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Can you cite the law/executive order/policy that Trump implemented?

I can prove that the settlement was passed with INS and Human Rights 1997 -

The Original Flores Settlement
In 1985, two organizations filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of immigrant children who had been detained by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) challenging procedures regarding the detention, treatment, and release of children. After many years of litigation, including an appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the parties reached a settlement in 1997.

The Flores Settlement Agreement (Flores) imposed several obligations on the immigration authorities, which fall into three broad categories:

The government is required to release children from immigration detention without unnecessary delay to, in order of preference, parents, other adult relatives, or licensed programs willing to accept custody.
If a suitable placement is not immediately available, the government is obligated to place children in the “least restrictive” setting appropriate to their age and any special needs.
The government must implement standards relating to the care and treatment of children in immigration detention.

----------

Your turn... which law/policy/executive order did Trump sign saying CHILDREN MUST BE TAKEN AWAY ?

(response will be insult, insult, cohen, stormy, insult, more deflection to a random topic, insult)

You can't prove ANYTHING, you heavy legged, boulder headed, lard ass, lying sack of shit. I already blew that dumb lie outta the water:


http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1113577

post # 22, moron. Plus, the questions and comparisons you make with people whose children are forcibly taken from them, taken, who knows where, are incredibly stupid-ESPECIALLY with those who are seeking asylum and aren't breaking the law, and ignoring that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days, whereas, Numbnuts HAS no plan, and many of the children may NEVER be reunited with their parent, so, Example One of your being a moron. Plus, you're still deflecting, you thick legged, boulder headed, lard ass runt. C'mon, run that poll, Smart Guy, see how many people agree with your brilliant conclusion "...except for this new one(charge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses), which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." ROTFLMAO!!!!! Yeah, two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right?

Your stupidity really knows no bounds, does it?

What happened to ignoring my posts?

Why does Dump care if Cohen flips if he's innocent? You've been running away from THAT question like the gutless twat that you are for weeks, I wonder why?

And, why was Dump paying Cohen's legal fees, when Cohen 1) isn't a part of Dump's administration 2) wasn't a part of his campaign 3) did only a tiny fraction of work(according to Dump) for him? Oh, and, why does Cohen feel that Dump should pay his legal fees, scumbag?
slapping.gif
youre-a-loser-smiley-emoticon.gif
knee-to-head-knockout.gif
ass-kicking.gif
trx-smly01.gif
trx-smly05.gif
trx-smly113.gif
tongue2.gif
Countdown.gif
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
You can't prove ANYTHING, you heavy legged, boulder headed, lard ass, lying sack of shit. I already blew that dumb lie outta the water:


http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1113577

post # 22, moron. Plus, the questions and comparisons you make with people whose children are forcibly taken from them, taken, who knows where, are incredibly stupid-ESPECIALLY with those who are seeking asylum and aren't breaking the law, and ignoring that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days, whereas, Numbnuts HAS no plan, and many of the children may NEVER be reunited with their parent, so, Example One of your being a moron. Plus, you're still deflecting, you thick legged, boulder headed, lard ass runt. C'mon, run that poll, Smart Guy, see how many people agree with your brilliant conclusion "...except for this new one(charge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses), which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." ROTFLMAO!!!!! Yeah, two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right?

Your stupidity really knows no bounds, does it?

What happened to ignoring my posts?

Why does Dump care if Cohen flips if he's innocent? You've been running away from THAT question like the gutless twat that you are for weeks, I wonder why?

And, why was Dump paying Cohen's legal fees, when Cohen 1) isn't a part of Dump's administration 2) wasn't a part of his campaign 3) did only a tiny fraction of work(according to Dump) for him? Oh, and, why does Cohen feel that Dump should pay his legal fees, scumbag?
slapping.gif
youre-a-loser-smiley-emoticon.gif
knee-to-head-knockout.gif
ass-kicking.gif
trx-smly01.gif
trx-smly05.gif
trx-smly113.gif
tongue2.gif
Countdown.gif

What ACT did Obama pass??? lmao...... Prove that "Act"
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Flores Consent Decree - 1997

II SCOPE OF SETTLEMENT, EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PUBLICATION

9. This Agreement sets out nationwide policy for the detention, release, and treatment of minors in the
custody of the INS and shall supersede all previous INS policies that are inconsistent with the terms of
this Agreement.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
What ACT did Obama pass??? lmao...... Prove that "Act"

You should laugh your ass off(that will TAKE awhile, like, to mid century) at your own stupidity: where did I, or the article, claim that Obama passed the Act? Learn how to read, scumbag, the fact that you are too stupid to understand the Fact Check article is not my problem.-and, why do you continue to ignore the people who claimed asylum? Plus, the questions and comparisons you make with people whose children are forcibly taken from them, taken, who knows where, are incredibly stupid-ESPECIALLY with those who are seeking asylum and aren't breaking the law, and ignoring that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days, whereas, Numbnuts HAS no plan, and many of the children may NEVER be reunited with their parent, so, Example One of your being a moron. Plus, you're still deflecting, you thick legged, boulder headed, lard ass runt. C'mon, run that poll, Smart Guy, see how many people agree with your brilliant conclusion "...except for this new one(charge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses), which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." ROTFLMAO!!!!! Yeah, two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right?

Your stupidity really knows no bounds, does it?

What happened to ignoring my posts?

Why does Dump care if Cohen flips if he's innocent? You've been running away from THAT question like the gutless twat that you are for weeks, I wonder why?

And, why was Dump paying Cohen's legal fees, when Cohen 1) isn't a part of Dump's administration 2) wasn't a part of his campaign 3) did only a tiny fraction of work(according to Dump) for him? Oh, and, why does Cohen feel that Dump should pay his legal fees, scumbag? Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^:madasshol:trx-smly0:fckmad::tongue2::Countdown
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
You should laugh your ass off(that will TAKE awhile, like, to mid century) at your own stupidity: where did I, or the article, claim that Obama passed the Act?

Plus, the questions and comparisons you make with people whose children are forcibly taken from them, taken, who knows where, are incredibly stupid-ESPECIALLY with those who are seeking asylum and aren't breaking the law, and ignoring that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days,

LMAO,,, which obama acts?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You should laugh your ass off(that will TAKE awhile, like, to mid century) at your own stupidity: where did I, or the article, claim that Obama passed the Act?


LMAO,,, which obama acts?

"acts," small "a," as in, "actions," not "Act" as in the Privacy Act, an implemented law. How stupid are you? Why are you ignoring that scum was treating asylum seekers the same a those who crossed the border illegally, not to mention, if Rump was so "right," why did he back down like a bitch? And, why have you gone against your claim that you were going to ignore my posts, you lying sack of shit?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
"acts," small "a," as in, "actions," not "Act" as in the Privacy Act, an implemented law. How stupid are you? Why are you ignoring that scum was treating asylum seekers the same a those who crossed the border illegally, not to mention, if Rump was so "right," why did he back down like a bitch? And, why have you gone against your claim that you were going to ignore my posts, you lying sack of shit?

So, where were these actions written or stated.....

Since the 1997 decree already stated kids have 20 days...
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So, where were these actions written or stated.....

Since the 1997 decree already stated kids have 20 days...

Learn how to read, scumbag, the fact that you are too stupid to understand the Fact Check article is not my problem-and, why do you continue to ignore the people who claimed asylum? And, that Rump humiliated himself by reversing himself when he said he would not do so? And, why have you gone against your claim that you were going to ignore my posts, you lying sack of shit?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Learn how to read, scumbag, the fact that you are too stupid to understand the Fact Check article is not my problem-and, why do you continue to ignore the people who claimed asylum? And, that Rump humiliated himself by reversing himself when he said he would not do so? And, why have you gone against your claim that you were going to ignore my posts, you lying sack of shit?

You stated this as fact ".... that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days," ... and I am asking you where did Obama say or where were his actions written that would prove it.

Since the Flores Consent Decree which was enacted in 1997 already covered that. So I am asking what exactly did Obama do?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You stated this as fact ".... that Obama's acts had a plan in place to reunite the children with their families after 20 days," ... and I am asking you where did Obama say or where were his actions written that would prove it.

Since the Flores Consent Decree which was enacted in 1997 already covered that. So I am asking what exactly did Obama do?

You've already shown that you don't the difference between an act or an Act, and, like I said, the fact that you are too stupid to understand the Fact Check article is not my problem-and, why do you continue to ignore the people who claimed asylum? And, that Rump humiliated himself by reversing himself when he said he would not do so? And, why have you gone against your claim that you were going to ignore my posts, you lying sack of shit?
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
Still waiting to know which of Obama's "actions" had a plan in place....
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
...and you can wait till you grow a foot long dong, or read # 15 and actually understand it. So dumb, how come?

Well, there we have it. You got caught... there were no "actions" that had a "plan" in place.

Cause you cant name the ACTION nor the PLAN.

Just admit you made up shit, be a man, you were wrong and got caught.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
act
akt/Submit
verb
1.
take action; do something.
"they urged Washington to act"
synonyms: take action, take steps, take measures, move, react
"the government must act to remedy the situation"
2.
behave in the way specified.
"they followed the man who was seen acting suspiciously"
synonyms: behave, conduct oneself, react; formalcomport oneself
"Alison began to act oddly"

Which ACT is it... and if he TOOK "Action" what was the ACTION he took? And what was the plan?

You keep just insulting without answering a simple question on the topic YOU stated.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Well, there we have it. You got caught... there were no "actions" that had a "plan" in place.

Cause you cant name the ACTION nor the PLAN.

Just admit you made up shit, be a man, you were wrong and got caught.

ROTLFMAO!!!!! You're EXACTLY like Twittler, you think that if you say something enough times, that makes it true, i.e., "No collusion!" "Witch hunt!" "Mexico will pay for the wall!" "The Dems caused the separation crisis!"" (Notice, the last 3 have been proven false, 3 down, one to go, or its equivalent, as you cling desperately to one charge out of a dozen, easy) The only one who has been "caught" at anything is YOU, you've shown that:

you're too stupid to understand to understand the Fact Check article;

that you have no answer as to why the people who claimed asylum are treated like illegal aliens?

that that you have no answer as to why Dump backed down like a gutless bitch if his policy was so right?

that you have no answer as to why Rump has no policy in place to reunite the children with their parents, UNLIKE Obama.

that you have no answer as to how you could be so incredibly stupid to claim, in public, that thecharge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses, "...which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." ROTFLMAO!!!!! Yeah, two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right?

That you have no answer as to what happened to your pledge to ignore my posts?

That you DEFINITELY have no answer to the question, Why does Dump care if Cohen flips if he's innocent?

And, why was Dump paying Cohen's legal fees, when Cohen 1) isn't a part of Dump's administration 2) wasn't a part of his campaign 3) did only a tiny fraction of work(according to Dump) for him? Oh, and, why does Cohen feel that Dump should pay his legal fees, scumbag? Slapping-silly90))Loser!@#0kth)(&^azzkick(&^:madasshol:trx-smly0:fckmad::tongue2::Countdown
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,536
Messages
13,452,410
Members
99,422
Latest member
lbplayer
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com