Democrats Tell Rep. Louie Gohmert To Take His Meds As He Goes Bonkers At Strzok Hearing

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Hypocritical scumbag, if he's so worried about affairs, why doesn't he pry his lips off of Dump's ding-a-ling and ask about all of HIS affairs? "Do you need your medication," :hahahahah:103631605Slapping-silly90))popcorn-eatinggifShush()*:pointer:w-thumbs!^

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/07/12/louie-gohmert-meds-strzok.html

THU, JUL 12TH, 2018 BY JASON EASLEY
Democrats Tell Rep. Louie Gohmert To Take His Meds As He Goes Bonkers At Strzok Hearing


Republicans hit their red line desperation point at the Strzok hearing when Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) called Peter Strzok a liar and brought up an affair that he had. Democrats responded by asking a frothing Gohmert if he needed his meds.
Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZMymfkiD8g

With their conspiracy theory falling apart, Rep. Gohmert said, “There is a disgrace and it won’t be recaptured any time soon because of the damage you’ve done to the justice system. And I’ve talked to FBI agents around the country. You’ve embarrassed them. You’ve embarrassed yourself and I can’t help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa –”
>> Democrats starting loudly objecting, “Mr. Chairman, this is outrageous, Mr. Chairman, please!, Mr. Chairman, this is intolerable harassment of the witness.”
Finally, a Democratic member of the committee asked Gohmert, “Do you need your medication?”
Gohmert’s line of questioning was a symptom of the growing Republican desperation. They have been looking for something that they take back to Trump to give him cover to fire Rosenstein and shut down Mueller all day long. Peter Strzok has owned the Republican majority all day. Democrats have been turning the tables at every opportunity, and the made for Fox News Strzok hearing has been an unmitigated disaster.


The Peter Strzok conspiracy is a Republican distraction from the evidence and issues surrounding Trump and Russia. It is a circus, and House Republicans are trying to get one little out of this fiasco that they can use as justification for shutting the Russia investigation down.
It hasn’t worked.
The hearing has made the GOP look crazy, and made the rest of the country ask that if like Louie Gohmert, the Republican Party needs their meds.

With their conspiracy theory falling apart, Rep. Gohmert said, “There is a disgrace and it won’t be recaptured any time soon because of the damage you’ve done to the justice system. And I’ve talked to FBI agents around the country. You’ve embarrassed them. You’ve embarrassed yourself and I can’t help but wonder when I see you looking there with a little smirk how many times did you look so innocent into your wife’s eye and lie to her about Lisa –”
>> Democrats starting loudly objecting, “Mr. Chairman, this is outrageous, Mr. Chairman, please!, Mr. Chairman, this is intolerable harassment of the witness.”
Finally, a Democratic member of the committee asked Gohmert, “Do you need your medication?”
Gohmert’s line of questioning was a symptom of the growing Republican desperation. They have been looking for something that they take back to Trump to give him cover to fire Rosenstein and shut down Mueller all day long. Peter Strzok has owned the Republican majority all day. Democrats have been turning the tables at every opportunity, and the made for Fox News Strzok hearing has been an unmitigated disaster.
The Peter Strzok conspiracy is a Republican distraction from the evidence and issues surrounding Trump and Russia. It is a circus, and House Republicans are trying to get one little out of this fiasco that they can use as justification for shutting the Russia investigation down.
It hasn’t worked.
The hearing has made the GOP look crazy, and made the rest of the country ask that if like Louie Gohmert, the Republican Party needs their meds.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
33,178
Tokens
​Strzok is a lying poo poo head! azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)

Why don't you ask that question of a certain boulder headed, lard asses lying scumbag-and, in this particular case, I don't mean YOU.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)

Why don't you ask that question of a certain boulder headed, lard asses lying scumbag-and, in this particular case, I don't mean YOU. OMG. Wow, DD, what a shock that you "missed" the whole point of the article, namely, the hypocrisy of the Republicans, Meanwhile, when are you gonna answer the questions below that you feebly tried to claim that you DID answer, Blubber Runt?

1. Can you show me what his sentence was for the Witness Tampering, so this way I can tell you that you were right and I was wrong<<FIRST of all, you've just tacitly admitted that you lied, like the scum you are, in you are, by claiming that you answered these questions, but, as for this first question, ROTFLMAO!!!!!! There hasn't even been a TRIAL yet, moron, therefore, no sentence-but he DID have his bail REVOKED for there being probable cause for witness tampering, which is why his fat ass is sitting in jail-plus, that brought forth the UNBELIEVABLY stupid comment from you that "..."...except for this new one(charge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses), which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." And, why is THAT, exactly? Because of a gut feeling you have in your blubbery belly? Because Manafort is aligned with Republican scum? Because a friend of a friend of a friend has seen the statements by the TWO witnesses who said he tried to get them to lie? Why are you ignoring the statement of those two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right? You're a hypocrite and a moron>>


2. Nope, you are the one passing on an IQ test. <<A 40 something old cab driver runt still hanging on to hihs supposedly high IQ. That's about as pathetic as it gets>>

3. Its actually joyful making fun of the mentally inept on therx <<More like the obsession of a psychotic stalking scumbag, and more evidence, as if more were required, that, your word is worth about as much, as, say, a degree from Dump University>>

4. Has Cohen flipped? Can you point to the post where I said Trump didnt care if Cohen flipped? Or are you just deflecting to other topics?<<Once again, your reading skills are abysmal: I never SAID that you said Dump didn't care if Cohen flipped, schmuck. Dump himself claimed, more than once, that Cohen wasn't going to flip-what I SAID was, why would he care whether or not Cohen flipped, if, he, Dump, was innocent?>>

5. No idea, the facts of the case havent been put out yet, so Im not going to assume anything at this point. We have seen how your threads go when you "Assume" things<<Gee, THAT'S strange, because you "assumed" all 19 of Dump's accusers were Democrats, that the obviously bogus "Facebook" post about Congresswoman Wilson was legit, and about a half dozen lies you posted about me were true-so, once again, you're a fat lying sack of shit.>>

6. No idea why someone "Feels" the way they do, Im not a psychic or spiritual median or any of that nonsense where I can tell how someone is feeling if I dont even know them.<<Sorry, Porky, you "felt" the things mentioned in # 5, and you obviously "feel" that the charges vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses) "... is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." without a SHRED of evidence to support that, so, keep on talking outta both sides of yer mouth, Oh Boulder Headed Runt.>>
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
What’s the excuse u give?

Wtf are you babbling about, Jagoff? Aren't you still on post review?:nohead:Loser!@#0Slapping-silly90)):pointer:azzkick(&^popcorn-eatinggif:bigfinger:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...lattened-by-a-runaway-Strzok?detail=emaildkre

[FONT=&quot]The GOP got flattened by a runaway Strzok.

[h=3]Memo[/h][FONT=&quot]To: Rod Rosenstein[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Subject: House congressional testimony[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Dear Rod[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]At your earliest convenience, but by the close of business tomorrow, please carefully review the testimony of FBI agent Peter Strzok in front of the combined House committee yesterday. This should serve as a tutorial for your future dealings with spineless, bullying little GOP toadies in your future congressional testimony. If you require further assistance, please also review former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's testimony in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi. In the future, we fully expect that there will be no more gratuitous concessions to the incessant demands of worms like Devin Nunes for additional documents or information in the ongoing Mueller investigation. Your complete cooperation is sincerely appreciated.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Hugs and kisses[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The American people[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Boy, oh boy! You rarely get to see the kind of unrestrained ass whuppin' that Peter strzok laid on Bob Goodlatte, Trey Gowdy, and the rest of the petty tyrants of what passes for House oversight. If it had been a 12 round title fight, it would have been stopped in the last minute of the third round.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You know, I really think that we need to start collecting DNA samples from the GOP House leadership. You normally don't see this kind of blinding stupidity outside of failed lab experiments. I predicted to my wife on Wednesday night that it would go like this, for two simple reasons. First, like Clinton before him, Strzok wold be exquisitely prepared for the antics of the GOP Trump whisperers. Second, Strzok would have an Everest sized chip on his shoulder to get some payback for a year of being slandered, misquoted, and misrepresented. And man, did he get his pound of flesh![/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]While I'm sure that soulless propaganda spinmeisters like Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity were thrilled to play endless loops of Gowdy and Goober Gohmert, hammering Strzok without bothering to play any of his replies, for anybody getting their news from an unfiltered outlet, this was a total debacle for the GOP.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]For one thing, Strzok's quiet dignity, and calm under fire only exposed the GOP attempts to slander him for what they were, a craven attempt to distract from the Mueller investigation, and cover Glorious Bleater's pasty ass. For another, as I noted in the memo, it provided an A-B-C primer for Rod Rosenstein for his future entanglements with the House committees. And as an extra bonus, it showed that the Democrats are capable of not only setting the table for a witness by lobbing cupcake follow up questions to allow a GOP interrupted witness to complete his original answer, it also showed that they have learned how to disrupt the GOP flow with skillful use of parliamentary procedures and strategic interruptions.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]But most importantly, Strzok's testimony was kryptonite for the GOP, and by extension Trump, to all viewers who picked up even only the highlights from non FOX media. This is because by dragging Strzok in front of the cameras, they gave him a chance to do the one thing they couldn't survive. They allowed him to put practical perspective on what appeared to be the most inflammatory texts. For instance, by explaining when he spoke of a "disruptive Trump Presidency," he said that he was referring to Trump's incendiary remarks about walking away from NATO allies the night before. And his now infamous "He won't. We'll stop him" text, so beloved of the GOP to show his dark intentions to damage Trump? Well, turns out that when he said "we," he was talking about the American people having too much common sense and self respect to elect a man who disgraced the nation by belittling the Khan family at the convention.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]But the real neutron bomb was Strzok dismantling the entire GOP three legged coffee table by reminding the entire country, along with the GOP committee members, that if he had wanted to sink Trump's little blue boat, all he had to do would have been to leak even a confirmation that the Trump campaign was under serious FBI counter intelligence investigation for possibly colluding with, or accepting assistance from, a hostile foreign government to alter the outcome of the election. Instead, the FBI went to the extreme lengths of even misleading newspapers like the New York Times of the very existence of said investigation.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]You can't say that the GOP didn't have fair warning, once before they thought they had a wounded bear, ready for the kill, only to be mauled in the process of taking aim. But I think that Forrest Gump's beloved mother summed it up best when she opined the quaint but telling phrase, "Stupid is as stupid does." Here endeth the lesson.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The wait is over! Volume two of the trilogy, President Evil II: A Clodwork Orange is now available. Amazon is whining about me crashing their site, but the hell with them, I ain't in this for their health. You can also find volume one, President Evil as well. And fear not, work on volume three is just beginning.[/FONT]
[/FONT]



[FONT=&quot]
Murf.jpg

[FONT=&quot][FONT=&quot]Murfster35 [/FONT] [/FONT]
Community

Friday July 13, 2018 · 5:30 AM PDT


[/FONT]
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)

See post # 5, you blubbery, boulder headed, lard asses, psychotic runt.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
See post # 5, you blubbery, boulder headed, lard asses, psychotic runt.

You never answered, you just insulted and deflected off topic as always.

So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
You never answered, you just insulted and deflected off topic as always.

So, if he cant even be honest and truthful to his wife... Why would he be truthful to the people of the United States and to those interviewing him in the hearings?

(This is a question that has to do with the topic of the thread and the article)

YOU never answered the questions in # 5, DD, and lied about doing so, which I conveniently pointed out. Stuff it, Lard Ass.:bigfinger:madasshol:trx-smly0:tongue2::Countdown:fckmad:
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2007
Messages
99,709
Tokens
If we are going to police the Poly forum, there will be more than one person banned from this forum
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
If we are going to police the Poly forum, there will be more than one person banned from this forum

As long as the random untrue insults and people stay on the topics of the threads, there shouldnt be any bans imo. Or a simple POST REVIEW might nip it in the bud rather quickly and we can have civilized discussions and debates, where we stay on topic and dont make baseless false insults.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,774
Members
99,402
Latest member
03sunwinvip
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com