Brainless Boobs strokin' their little Jimmys in excitement over "impeachment" of Rosenstein, lol

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Hilarious to see the headlines of know-nothings babbling excitedly about impeaching RR. The following article can be condensed in part to a portion of just one sentence:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/us/politics/republicans-congress-impeach-rosenstein.html
"...support of a majority of the House and two-thirds of the Senate..." Yeah, good luck on THAT...:hahahahah:neenee::pointer:popcorn-eatinggif:ohno::think2:[h=1]House Republicans Mount a Long-Shot Bid to Impeach Rod Rosenstein[/h]By Katie Benner
  • July 25, 2018


WASHINGTON — A group of House Republicans escalated their feud with the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, on Wednesday, introducing articles of impeachment in a long-shot bid to oust the official overseeing the special counsel inquiry into Russian election interference.
The move was seen as much as a political maneuver as an act of congressional oversight. The group of 11, led by Representatives Mark Meadows of North Carolina and Jim Jordan of Ohio, would need the support of a majority of the House and two-thirds of the Senate to impeach. The resolution they filed does not require the entire House to vote before Congress adjourns for its summer recess on Friday.
But it could provide President Trump with more ammunition to attack Mr. Rosenstein, who has been in Mr. Trump’s cross hairs since he appointed the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, to investigate Russia’s plot to manipulate the 2016 presidential election and whether any Trump associates were complicit.
Republican lawmakers have been sparring with Mr. Rosenstein for months. They accuse the Justice Department of being less than forthcoming with documents related to several of its most sensitive investigations, including the Russia inquiry.


“It’s time to find a new deputy attorney general who is serious about accountability and transparency,” Mr. Meadows said in a statement on Wednesday.
While the department has largely produced the documents requested in subpoenas from the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, Republicans have complained for months that Mr. Rosenstein and the department have slow-walked production of the papers and hidden information from Congress.

“At almost every opportunity, Mr. Rosenstein has resisted and defied Congress’s constitutional oversight,” Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona said in a statement. “His time to obstruct our investigations has expired.”


“His conduct in authorizing the FISA surveillance at issue in the joint congressional investigation makes him a fact witness central to the ongoing investigation of potential FISA abuse,” the resolution said. The lawmakers said that Mr. Rosenstein’s “failure to recuse himself in light of this inherent conflict” constituted a “dereliction of duty.”
A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the resolution.
Congressional Democrats called the resolution “a panicked and dangerous attempt to undermine an ongoing criminal investigation in an effort to protect President Trump.”
“The president should not mistake this move by his congressional enablers as a pretext to take any action against Mr. Rosenstein or Mr. Mueller and his investigation,” Representatives Jerrold Nadler of New York, Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland and Adam B. Schiff of California said in a statement. “Any attempt to do so will be viewed by Congress and the American people as further proof of an effort to obstruct justice with severe consequences for Trump and his presidency.”
Over the last year, the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees have sent three subpoenas to the Justice Department requesting hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, emails and text messages related to investigations into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, the F.B.I.’s use of confidential informants and the Russia investigation.
Justice Department officials said on Wednesday that they had fully complied with two of those subpoenas — one related to the department’s application to wiretap Mr. Page, and the other pertaining to the confidential informants.
They said they had complied with seven of nine items in a broad subpoena from the Intelligence Committee, which asked for materials pertaining to Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Page, as well as other matters.
The Justice Department expects to deliver all of the Clinton-related materials to the committee in the next week. Officials said they would continue to work with Congress to fulfill its request for documents related to the final item, the inspector general’s investigation of the department’s conduct during the 2016 election and the investigation into Mrs. Clinton. They have already produced 880,000 related to the inspector general’s review.
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,669
Tokens
Says the guy who was dumb enough to bet Trump won’t finish his term . Say byebye)(&^ soon .
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Says the guy who was dumb enough to bet Trump won’t finish his term . Say byebye)(&^ soon .

Your opinion has been proven wrong MANY times, Dumbo, and, if you think the GOP, with a 50-49 current edge, is ever gonna get to 67(and, I wouldn't bet my house on them even getting a majority in the House), you stupidity has reached new highs-or lows, lol...
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,762
Tokens
Interesting choice of a thread title for a dude who's "stroked his little Jimmy" a few thousand times around here over the most inaccurate and juvenile material, all shoved up his bleeding ass


When do you know you're a loser? when you're hand won't have sex with you. Even little Jimmy is laughing at him
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Interesting choice of a thread title for a dude who's "stroked his little Jimmy" a few thousand times around here over the most inaccurate and juvenile material, all shoved up his bleeding ass


When do you know you're a loser? when you're hand won't have sex with you. Even little Jimmy is laughing at him

Here's a moron who thought he knows more than Mueller about the strength of the case against Manafort, and apparently thinks that about 17 Democrats are gonna vote to impeach Mueller's boss, babbling about "losers," ROTFLMAO!!!!

Opinion: Trump cannot keep his corruption hidden forever. Here's what's coming.


Opinion: Trump cannot keep his corruption hidden forever. Here's what's coming.

Greg Sargent, The Washington Post Published 8:13 am PDT, Thursday, July 26, 2018


Two of the biggest stories in Washington right now - President Donald Trump's battle with lawyer Michael Cohen, and a federal judge's decision to let a lawsuit alleging ongoing violations of the Emoluments Clause proceed - are both converging towards one end point. Both demonstrate the degree to which Trump places his personal interests before those of the American people, and both may shed light on that wretched reality in much more detail in coming days than Trump ever bargained for.

Thursday morning, multiple news reports tell us that Trump's allies view future disclosures from Cohen - who released audio showing Trump was aware of a hush-money scheme to quiet an alleged mistress before the election - as a serious threat to his presidency. Meanwhile, the judge's ruling this week means the court battle over whether Trump is violating the Constitution with his business profits shifts into a new phase that could bring more revelations.

In that ruling, a federal judge denied Trump's motion to dismiss the lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Maryland and Washington, D.C., which alleges that Trump, whose businesses are regularly patronized by foreign officials, is violating the Constitution's ban on officials accepting emoluments from foreign governments (and state governments). The court rejected Trump's effort to define "emoluments" very narrowly, and instead accepted the plaintiffs' argument that they constitute "profit," "gain," or "advantage," i.e., the sort of profits that go to Trump's businesses. This means the case now moves forward to determine whether Trump reaped such profit, gain, or advantage from foreign governments.
In an interview with me, Noah Bookbinder, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which is involved in the lawsuit, laid out the next steps: D.C. and Maryland will now seek discovery access to the financial records of Trump's businesses - in particular, the hotel he owns in D.C. "We're going to seek records to show what benefits and payments the president got, and that's going to include extensive business and financial records," Bookbinder said.

It's possible Trump could block the discovery process, through an unusual appeal or other means. But if he fails, Bookbinder says, the discovery process could "prove that the president has been receiving payments," demonstrating this in a new level of detail documenting "foreign officials staying at the Trump hotel," which could in turn show that "the president is violating the Constitution."

The goal is to get the court to flatly declare that in accepting these payments, Trump is violating the Constitution, and even better, for the court to order Trump to stop. For instance, Trump might have to divest from his businesses (which he has refused to do), or his hotel might have to stop accepting forms of business that constitute the violation, among other possibilities. The case would probably go to the Supreme Court, and it's possible the plaintiffs could lose or only gain a partial victory, in which the courts declare that Trump is violating the Constitution without ordering an end to it. Another possibility, of course, is that Trump defies a court order to stop, which would precipitate a crisis.

But whatever happens, along the way, we may well learn much more about the scope and nature of the payments themselves. This will boost pressure on congressional Republicans to exercise real oversight (which may only happen if Democrats take back the House). Barring that, the public will learn a good deal more about Trump's questionable profiteering - and about the congressional GOP's abdication in the face of it.
Related Stories


This case goes directly to the core of Trump's blending of private and public interest at the expense of the country. It is of course completely possible for Trump to continue to profit this way without letting it influence his decision-making. But importantly, this week's ruling explicitly confirmed that the goal of the Constitution's ban on emoluments is to remove any possibility that this might happen. The framers "made it simple," the ruling states. "Ban the offerings altogether."

Trump's interests always come first

The crucial point here is that Trump should not be receiving these payments - and should have divested in his businesses at the outset - to remove any doubt for the American people that in his official decision-making capacity, he is acting in their interests at all times, and not in his own. But Trump does not see any institutional obligation of any kind to reassure the people - all the people - in this regard. Instead he has placed his personal interests first - a form of corruption in its own right. This lawsuit may end up shedding new light on just how much this has lavished on his personal bottom line.
READ ANOTHER OPINION


This is the through line to Trump's battle with Cohen. At a minimum, this week's released audio demonstrated that Trump knew during the election that his lawyer was making a hush-money payoff to an alleged mistress that functioned as a campaign-related expenditure, while not publicly disclosing it as such. Whether or not that is a crime, the Trump campaign falsely claimed "no knowledge of any of this" at the time, misleading the press and the public, thus putting Trump's seamy personal interests first. And this is only the beginning of what Cohen-related revelations may reveal, when it comes to Trump's prioritizing of his own interests over those of the rest of the country.

* TRUMP TEAM WORRIES ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN: After Cohen released the audio of the phone call with Trump, The Post reports that Trump's allies are worried about more to come:

"Within Trump's political orbit, the uncertainty about what other damaging information Cohen may possess - and if he plans to weaponize it against the president, as now seems possible if not likely - has allies worried. 'The general feeling inside and outside the building is that if there was anything, this would be the guy who would know it and now give it up,' said the operative close to the White House."

Intriguingly, The Post reports, both Trump and Cohen privately are angry at each other for what they see as betrayal. No honor among thieves . . .

* COHEN HAS LOTS OF TAPES. PROSECUTORS HAVE THEM: Another key nugget from The Post story:

"The government has seized more than 100 recordings that Cohen made of his conversations with people discussing matters that could relate to Trump and his businesses and with Trump himself talking, according to two people familiar with the recordings. Cohen appeared to make some recordings with an iPhone - without telling anyone he was taping them."

There may be only one tape that features Trump speaking at any length, The Post reports, but there's no telling what Cohen said about Trump in the other ones.

* ANGRY COHEN SEEN AS 'GREATEST THREAT' TO TRUMP: The Associated Press reports on their rapidly deteriorating relationship:

"Cohen . . . is viewed by many in Trump's orbit as the greatest threat to the former businessman's presidency. . . . Cohen . . . now feels increasingly isolated and burned by the attacks against him by Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani and by the president's efforts to play down his former fixer's role."

Nothing gets a self-respecting fixer more worked up than downplaying his fixer prowess. Sad!

* A TRUCE IN TRADE WAR, OR JUST A LULL? Trump and the European Union have backed away from a destructive trade war and have pledged to negotiate to lower tariffs, but the New York Times points out:

"It was hard to say, given Mr. Trump's bluster and unpredictable negotiating style, if the agreement was a genuine truce or merely a lull in a conflict that could flare up again. Twice, Mr. Trump's aides have negotiated potential deals with China, only to have him reject them and impose further tariffs."

The problem: It's never clear what Trump will need to declare victory, because he often rails at mistreatment of America that isn't real. If he starts feeling like a loser again, all bets are off.

* DRIVE TO IMPEACH ROSENSTEIN PUTS GOP IN TOUGH SPOT: House conservatives allied with Trump have introduced impeachment articles against deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. But The Post reports:

"House Republican aides said that if a member tried to force a vote on the measure, leaders probably would move to send it to the House Judiciary Committee for further review, effectively bottling it up indefinitely. But that could still be an uncomfortable vote for many Republicans who are under pressure from conservative groups - and the voters who follow them - to unseat the man who oversees the investigation Trump routinely denigrates as a 'witch hunt.'"

So GOP leaders don't want a full vote on this to happen. Let's see if they strongly defend the integrity of the investigation and forcefully denounce this bad faith nonsense for what it is.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Hey Raiderhater . Oops !


Slapping-silly90))


Oops, WHAT, cocksucker? I started a thread about the impeachment of Rosenstein, about which, I was completely right. YOU jumped in, with a claim that I bet that Twittler wouldn't finish, which I didn't acknowledge, because it didn't happen. The very argument I used in this very thread-that the Repubs would need a shitload of defections to impeach Rosenstein, which wasn't gonna happen-applied even MORE for Twittler, since it was the Republicans who held a razor thin edge, not Dems-so, while that the Repubs would do the right thing re: Twittler was my HOPE, I would never make such a stupid bet, and I didn't. YOU are a lying, brain dead, butt fucked cocksucker. And, oh, yeah, with Turtle Boy kicking Daughter Diddler's fat, orange ass to the curb (and reports are anywhere from 15 to 30 Senators may follow his lead, or, at least "call in sick," thus avoiding going on the record against Loser Boy), I wouldn't bet the ranch on him not getting convicted, even in 8 days, cocksucker. You probably don't have a ranch to bet, but might bet it anyway, since, you're clearly a welching douchebag EXACTLY like your Fuhrer. Ahhh, in about 7.5 days, seeing his ass, even in abstensia, getting booted out is gonna be a thing of beauty. Enjoy that cock in your ass for at least 4 years, bitch.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,622
Messages
13,452,973
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com