Forum: Political Forum - Spirited Political comedy. All serious political and World Event posting is also to be posted in this forum.

Thread: Sean Hannity Just Let Trump's Lawyers Host His Radio Show

  1. #1 Sean Hannity Just Let Trump's Lawyers Host His Radio Show 
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Whatta friggin' disgrace, Dump's 2 meathead lawyers-for now-go on the show of that scum Hannity to circle jerk each other in proposing Dump's absolutely ridiculous "offers" to Mueller. When are these idiots gonna realize that the subject of an investigation doesn't get to set the terms of that investigation????


    Sean Hannity Just Let Trump's Lawyers Host His Radio Show

    Sara Boboltz,HuffPost Fri, Aug 10 8:22 AM PDT

    Jay Sekulow and Rudy Giuliani, lawyers for President Donald Trump, hosted Sean Hannity’s radio show Friday afternoon in an unvarnished display of partisan loyalty on one of the nation’s most influential talk shows.
    Hannity announced the schedule change Friday morning on Twitter as he shared an interview with Sekulow he conducted earlier in the week. The lawyer criticized special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, a theme that resurfaced in Friday’s episode when Sekulow and former New York Mayor Giuliani took the reins.
    Hannity’s cozy relationship with the president is well known, but this is the first time he’s stepped aside to lend his powerful microphone to Trump’s team directly.
    The president’s lawyers spent the show’s three hours rehashing Trump administration talking points and making their case for their shared client in between listeners’ calls.
    As he did earlier in the week, Sekulow argued that Article II of the U.S. Constitution protects the president from Justice Department questioning ― a claim debated in legal circles. He also acknowledged that, contrary to legal advice, Trump wants to speak with Mueller because he believes he can clear his name. (The attorneys are currently negotiating terms of a possible interview.)
    Giuliani claimed the Mueller investigation was “born in corruption” and called for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey to be investigated for legal violations he deemed “clear.” If he were attorney general, Giuliani said, he would appoint an independent counsel to “appropriately prosecute” individuals including Comey and Peter Strzok, the FBI agent who sent personal texts critical of Trump to a colleague.
    The attorneys lingered on the kerfuffle over the American pastor detained in Turkey, a situation which earlier Friday prompted Trump to announce economic sanctions on the country. They also briefly discussed Chicago’s rash of gun violence and once again blamed Mayor Rahm Emanuel for not taking sufficient action.
    Their appearance on Hannity’s show comes at a time when a tight link between the host and Trump is becoming increasingly clear.
    New York magazine’s Olivia Nuzzi in May detailed the pair’s habit of calling one another after 10 p.m. many nights. The radio and Fox News host appears to be one of few people the president trusts, and the two reportedly spend a good part of their time together discussing the Russia investigation, Mueller, media coverage and the so-called deep state conspiracy theory.
    Trump and Hannity previously shared a personal attorney, Michael Cohen, currently besieged by a Mueller offshoot investigation into possible tax fraud.
    The president has also admitted in front of at least one crowd that Hannity may influence his policy decisions, including a threatened government shutdown to force Congress to take action on border security. And after Trump’s controversial Helsinki summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the president gave Hannity the first interview.
    Although the commentator has waffled on whether he considers himself a journalist, he has promoted baseless conspiracy theories on his various platforms, including the “deep state” theory positing that a secret cabal of government employees is scheming to undermine Trump.
    Hannity hosted Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey this week to discuss the tech executive’s refusal to boot notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones from the platform.
    In recent months he has garnered criticism from Fox News anchor Shepard Smith, among others, for veering too far from fact-based opinion and into unbridled pro-Trump cheerleading. This week, the Sekulow and Giuliani takeover of Hannity’s radio show underlines that point.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    RX Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    rockchester
    Posts
    1,509
    must be donald was busy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Dafinch posts articles condemning news sources for using "Partisan Loyalty" guests to give their views.

    Forgets that he has posted dozens and dozens of Dailykos/HuffingtonPost articles that do the same thing
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    RX Deplorable
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    21,097
    I think duhhhhhhhhFAIL should let his lawyers post in this here forum.

    Progressivism is the bastard child of Marxism
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheriff Joe View Post
    I think duhhhhhhhhFAIL should let his lawyers post in this here forum.

    Only problem with that, is he represents himself in court... he doesnt even have a BAR card lmao. But he does file as many lawsuits as possible to hope and settle or win to get cash.
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Cloudy
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    91,234
    How old is he?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    Dafinch posts articles condemning news sources for using "Partisan Loyalty" guests to give their views.

    Forgets that he has posted dozens and dozens of Dailykos/HuffingtonPost articles that do the same thing
    What, are you, trying to corner the market on incredibly stupid comparisons? You trying to compare that scumbag Ross' position to mine was stupid enough, especially when you got caught lying and therefore backed down from a self banning bet like the boulder headed, blubbery bellied bitch that you are, and now, you're comparing a news outlet, whose views you just happen to disagree with, to the two scumbag TV lawyers(funny how we never ANYTHING from the lawyer who actually has some expertise in this type of case) who just HAPPEN to be Twittler's attorneys and just HAPPEN to be hosting the show of ANOTHER scumbag who pretends to be a "political commentator" but is in constant contact with Twittler and, at one time, shared the same "lawyer" with him. Obsessive Douche, you are TRULY a piece of work.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Dafinch View Post
    What, are you, trying to corner the market on incredibly stupid comparisons? You trying to compare that scumbag Ross' position to mine was stupid enough, especially when you got caught lying and therefore backed down from a self banning bet like the boulder headed, blubbery bellied bitch that you are, and now, you're comparing a news outlet, whose views you just happen to disagree with, to the two scumbag TV lawyers(funny how we never ANYTHING from the lawyer who actually has some expertise in this type of case) who just HAPPEN to be Twittler's attorneys and just HAPPEN to be hosting the show of ANOTHER scumbag who pretends to be a "political commentator" but is in constant contact with Twittler and, at one time, shared the same "lawyer" with him. Obsessive Douche, you are TRULY a piece of work.
    So, which of the articles and writers from your NEWS SOURCE "Dailykos" that are pro-Republican ?
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    So, which of the articles and writers from your NEWS SOURCE "Dailykos" that are pro-Republican ?
    Nice avoidance of addressing your two incredibly stupid comparisons, Obsessive Douche. How many pro-Democrats are on Faux News? And why did you welch out of the self banning bet about why you lied, Fat Boy?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Dafinch View Post
    Nice avoidance of addressing your two incredibly stupid comparisons, Obsessive Douche. How many pro-Democrats are on Faux News? And why did you welch out of the self banning bet about why you lied, Fat Boy?
    Can you post the thread that I started in which I use FOX NEWS?

    Please, Ill wait, so this way I know your question has merit.

    But, just so you know, I dont use Fox news as a source of news, and Im 99% sure ive never started a thread based on something from Fox.

    So... The question is... WHY are you against a right leaning media outlet, being pro right, and supporting a right President? YET you constantly post articles and opinions from 100% left sources like Dailykos... Where only liberal viewpoints are posted, if anyone posts a viewpoint or comment that goes against Liberals, it doesnt get published, and that person is banned.

    Ill wait for you to post the link to a thread I started where I used Fox News as a source.
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    Can you post the thread that I started in which I use FOX NEWS?

    Please, Ill wait, so this way I know your question has merit.

    But, just so you know, I dont use Fox news as a source of news, and Im 99% sure ive never started a thread based on something from Fox.

    So... The question is... WHY are you against a right leaning media outlet, being pro right, and supporting a right President? YET you constantly post articles and opinions from 100% left sources like Dailykos... Where only liberal viewpoints are posted, if anyone posts a viewpoint or comment that goes against Liberals, it doesnt get published, and that person is banned.

    Ill wait for you to post the link to a thread I started where I used Fox News as a source.
    What IS your "news sources," Obsessive Douche? I notice you aren't too free with the crackerjack source that led to "have a hunch" that all of Twittler's accusers were Democrats, or that posted that OBVIOUSLY factual dressing down of Congresswoman Wilson by the Gold Star Widow. And, Faux News is not just a right diving, not leaning, outlet-in fact, they're not a goddamn "news outlet," they're a propaganda wing of a facist government, especially given Hannity's carefully conceding his constant contacts with the WH, not to mention his not revealing that he and Twittler had the same lawyer(which, even Twittler Twat Dershowitz told Hannitty, point blank, that he should have revealed). If you can't see the inappropriate nature of Twittler's two lawyer's "hosting" the show of a duplicitous toad like Hannity, to spout Twittler's bullshit, then, you're hopelessly stupid. But, then, I knew that already, DIDN'T I, Obsessive Douche. And, And why did you welch out of the self banning bet about why you lied, Fat Boy?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    How would you label Dailykos in your opinion, I would like to know after what you just labeled Fox.... should be an interesting discussion.

    And for the record:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dafinch View Post
    Faux News is not just a right diving, not leaning, outlet-in fact, they're not a goddamn "news outlet," they're a propaganda wing of a facist government
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13  
    RX Local
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Coast
    Posts
    15,223
    OMG DaFinch is insane
    OMG DuhhhhhFFFFIIIIINNNNNCCCCCHHHHHHH!!!!!!
    YOU ARE A TOTAL LOSER ! ! ! ! LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ LOLZ
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14  
    Life's a bitch, then you die! Dave007inVegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Henderson NV
    Posts
    23,859
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheriff Joe View Post
    I think duhhhhhhhhFAIL should let his lawyers post in this here forum.

    Clever.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    How would you label Dailykos in your opinion, I would like to know after what you just labeled Fox.... should be an interesting discussion.

    And for the record:
    You didn't answer the questions, Porky.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Dafinch View Post
    You didn't answer the questions, Porky.
    I believe I have answered way more questions then you have mine... I dont think you have ever answered 1 question.

    But mostly its the BBC where I get most of my news http://www.bbc.com/
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    I believe I have answered way more questions then you have mine... I dont think you have ever answered 1 question.

    But mostly its the BBC where I get most of my news http://www.bbc.com/
    I don't give a shit WHAT you believe, Obsessive Douche. YOU follow ME around, like psychotic stalkerazzi bitch, not the other way around, that's why you were named Obsessive Douche by an ally, not by me. Pound sand, DD...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Dafinch View Post
    I don't give a shit WHAT you believe, Obsessive Douche. YOU follow ME around, like psychotic stalkerazzi bitch, not the other way around, that's why you were named Obsessive Douche by an ally, not by me. Pound sand, DD...
    So, I answered where I get my news from.

    So, what would you label Dailykos?
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19  
    RX Local Coldweather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    25,259
    You needs a MAGA hat man !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20  
    Cloudy
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    91,234
    Me and Mrs.Jones.

    Released date....September,1972

    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #21  
    Cloudy
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    91,234
    Memories.....Sing it DaFlunky

    It's a classic
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #22  
    RX Wizard NFLTrends's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    9,447
    Hello?

    Whats your opinion on how Dailykos should be labeled?
    2014 NFL 51-33-1 62.35%
    2013 NFL 61-34 64.21% Finished 6th place in the LVH Supercontest
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #23  
    Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory Willie99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Home of Foxwoods, Mohegan Sun & Looney Libs
    Posts
    60,878
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    Hello?

    Whats your opinion on how Dailykos should be labeled?
    Fuck talking about the Dailykos, every reasonable mind knows they're no better than Alex Jones talking about 9/11 being an inside job or Newtown never happened. They're that fucked up, if somebody cites them it only proves one's ignorant.

    What about CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, NYT, WP, Time, Newsweek, Hollywood......, that all are over the top incredibly biased sharing buzzwords and coordinating narratives. They are guilty of crimes against the United States.

    Has Hannity ever given a Republican debate questions? You know that bullshit has been going on for generations. They ask questions and present them in a manner that favors democrats because that's the party they all belong to.

    Republicans have a lot of obstacles to overcome, not just the follow the flock 95% crowd, not just the 47 percent crowd that doesn't pay taxes, not just an incredibly biased media and Hollywood, they have to overcome an epidemic of ignorance inflicting this country, like the OP and his sources

    Social media has given a voice to the dumbest of the dumb
    "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter". "A rising tide raises all boats". "MAGA"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #24  
    Cloudy
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    91,234
    He got very quiet
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #25  
    RX Wizard
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    bronx, ny
    Posts
    9,523
    Quote Originally Posted by NFLTrends View Post
    Hello?

    Whats your opinion on how Dailykos should be labeled?
    You never answered what lefties are on Faux News; you never answered why you backed down from a self banning bet like the gutless tub of goo that you are after I busted you lying, again, and, you never responded to any of the following, after taking in the shorts on every question:

    Obsessive Douche, YOU'RE the one who runs away like the fat little toad that you are from answering questions: Let us not forget, YOU'RE the genius who had the "impression" that all 19 of Dump's accuser were Democrats, now, where, pray tell did you GET that "impression?" And, you couldn't move your fat, stubby little fingers fast enough to post a fake Facebook posting where the Gold Star widow "ripped" Congresswoman Wilson, when anybody with an ounce of common sense-which, of course, would exclude you-could've instantly deduced that the posting was completely phony. Furthermore, I'm still waiting for you answer the following questions, Porky: If Dump merely "misspoke," why did he wait 27 hours to correct it?

    1. Can you show me what his sentence was for the Witness Tampering, so this way I can tell you that you were right and I was wrong<<FIRST of all, you've just tacitly admitted that you lied, like the scum you are, in you are, by claiming that you answered these questions, but, as for this first question, ROTFLMAO!!!!!! There hasn't even been a TRIAL yet, moron, therefore, no sentence-but he DID have his bail REVOKED for there being probable cause for witness tampering, which is why his fat ass is sitting in jail-plus, that brought forth the UNBELIEVABLY stupid comment from you that "..."...except for this new one(charge vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses), which is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." And, why is THAT, exactly? Because of a gut feeling you have in your blubbery belly? Because Manafort is aligned with Republican scum? Because a friend of a friend of a friend has seen the statements by the TWO witnesses who said he tried to get them to lie? Why are you ignoring the statement of those two different people-neither of whom happened to be facing about 100 years in jail-just both happened to have reported that Mr. double-jail-anklet-converted-to-handcuffs tried to suborn perjury, but, don't tell me, let me guess, THEY are both lying, and the freshly minted jailbird facing 40 counts is the Shining Beacon of Truth, right? You're a hypocrite and a moron>>


    2. Nope, you are the one passing on an IQ test. <<A 40 something old cab driver runt still hanging on to hihs supposedly high IQ. That's about as pathetic as it gets>>

    3. Its actually joyful making fun of the mentally inept on therx <<More like the obsession of a psychotic stalking scumbag, and more evidence, as if more were required, that, your word is worth about as much, as, say, a degree from Dump University>>

    4. Has Cohen flipped? Can you point to the post where I said Trump didnt care if Cohen flipped? Or are you just deflecting to other topics?<<Once again, your reading skills are abysmal: I never SAID that you said Dump didn't care if Cohen flipped, schmuck. Dump himself claimed, more than once, that Cohen wasn't going to flip-what I SAID was, why would he care whether or not Cohen flipped, if, he, Dump, was innocent?>>

    5. No idea, the facts of the case havent been put out yet, so Im not going to assume anything at this point. We have seen how your threads go when you "Assume" things<<Gee, THAT'S strange, because you "assumed" all 19 of Dump's accusers were Democrats, that the obviously bogus "Facebook" post about Congresswoman Wilson was legit, and about a half dozen lies you posted about me were true-so, once again, you're a fat lying sack of shit.>>

    6. No idea why someone "Feels" the way they do, Im not a psychic or spiritual median or any of that nonsense where I can tell how someone is feeling if I dont even know them.<<Sorry, Porky, you "felt" the things mentioned in # 5, and you obviously "feel" that the charges vs Manafort for tampering with witnesses) "... is more than likely to be dropped or unproven." without a SHRED of evidence to support that, so, keep on talking outta both sides of yer mouth, Oh Boulder Headed Runt.>>


    7. Why did you keep babbling about collusion, and ONLY collusion when neither Mueller nor Rosenstein mentioned it at all?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •