'You have embarrassed us in the eyes of our children': Navy SEAL who oversaw the Osama bin Laden raid rebukes Trump in stunning opinion column

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
This guy, obviously, has tremendous cred, and I love the way he tore Cadet Bone Spurs a new one....

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/e6dff5...ee54dee38/ss_'you-have-embarrassed-us-in.html

[h=1]'You have embarrassed us in the eyes of our children': Navy SEAL who oversaw the Osama bin Laden raid rebukes Trump in stunning opinion column[/h] Business Insider Wed, Aug 15 10:00 PM PDT


  • Retired US Navy admiral William McRaven, a former US Navy SEAL who oversaw the raid that took out al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 2011, delivered a stunning rebuke of President Donald Trump.
  • McRaven said he would "consider it an honor" if Trump revoked his security clearance, following his decision to revoke former CIA director John Brennan's security clearance.

The man who oversaw the raid that took out al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden delivered a stunning rebuke of President Donald Trump amid the White House's decision to revoke former CIA director John Brennan's security clearance.
In an opinion column published by The Washington Post on Thursday, retired US Navy admiral William McRaven, a former US Navy SEAL and commander of the US Joint Special Operations Command, described Brennan as "one of the finest public servants."
"He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question, except by those who don't know him."
On Wednesday, the White House announced it would revoke Brennan's security clearance, citing his "erratic conduct and behavior," and questioned his "objectivity and credibility."
"Mr. Brennan's lying and recent conduct, characterized by increasingly frenzied commentary, is wholly inconsistent with access to the Nation's most closely held secrets and facilitates the very aim of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos," the White House's statement said.
59246b6e63914721008b5d7b-750-496.jpg
Former CIA director John Brennan. Thomson Reuters Brennan, who had been critical of the Trump administration prior to the White House's decision, said that the move was "part of a broader effort by Mr. Trump to suppress freedom of speech & punish critics."
"It should gravely worry all Americans, including intelligence professionals, about the cost of speaking out," Brennan said on Twitter. "My principles are worth far more than clearances. I will not relent."
McRaven appeared to concur with Brennan in his brief, but critical, column.
"Therefore, I would consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well, so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency," McRaven wrote.
McRaven continued by describing the qualities of a good leader; characteristics he said he "hoped" that Trump would embody after becoming president.
"A good leader sets the example for others to follow," McRaven said. "A good leader always puts the welfare of others before himself or herself."
"Your leadership, however, has shown little of these qualities," McRaven said. "Through your actions, you have embarrassed us in the eyes of our children, humiliated us on the world stage and, worst of all, divided us as a nation."
McRaven retired from the Navy in 2014 after 36 years of service as a Navy SEAL. He was hired as chancellor of the University of Texas' school system in 2015. In 2017, McRaven announced he would leave the school, citing health concerns.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,743
Tokens
Awesome, hopefully a few more members of the resist resist resist movement give up that privilege
 

I'm from the government and I'm here to help
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
32,970
Tokens
Obama embarrassed us in the eyes of 7 billion people for nearly a decade so I don't mind if a few million spoiled bitch kneeling american kids don't like the POTUS
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
Retired Army Brigadier General Anthony Tata says revoking John Brennan's security clearance was the right move by President Trump.


:):)
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
When I left the military after 16 year, I had a "Classified" clearance. I cnt think of any reason WHY anyone in the military, once they leave serviice need to keep their clearance.

Can you give us any reason why someone would need to keep their clearances in the civilian world?
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,255
Tokens
Fake garbage
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
When I left the military after 16 year, I had a "Classified" clearance. I cnt think of any reason WHY anyone in the military, once they leave serviice need to keep their clearance.

Can you give us any reason why someone would need to keep their clearances in the civilian world?
Status symbol?
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
44,217
Tokens
The guy called President Trump treasonous.

Sure sounds like a guy Trump would want on his team.

Hope Admiral William McRaven doesn't continue to have clearance.

What brazen jokers.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
You can argue all day about the necessity of this guy's clearance, it's still a weak move on Trump's part. Whether or not you like the guy, he's thin-skinned as a person.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
You can argue all day about the necessity of this guy's clearance, it's still a weak move on Trump's part. Whether or not you like the guy, he's thin-skinned as a person.
Another unpresidential act? That's the best you can come up with?
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
Another unpresidential act? That's the best you can come up with?

It's not "unpresidential," I like that Trump is unconventional. He won because he is unconventional.

But he's thin-skinned as hell. It's honestly pathetic how easily he gets bothered by criticism.

Before you go ahead an accuse me of being anti-Trump, I don't really care much about the personality of our president. You can be a good president and a shitty person at the same time. Bill Clinton fits that mold, in my opinion.

I was just think the rationale behind Trump's decision, in this case, is pretty weak and pathetic.
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
It's not "unpresidential," I like that Trump is unconventional. He won because he is unconventional.

But he's thin-skinned as hell. It's honestly pathetic how easily he gets bothered by criticism.

Before you go ahead an accuse me of being anti-Trump, I don't really care much about the personality of our president. You can be a good president and a shitty person at the same time. Bill Clinton fits that mold, in my opinion.

I was just think the rationale behind Trump's decision, in this case, is pretty weak and pathetic.
Trump is a street fighter he doesn't know what the Marquess of Queensberry Rules are nor
does he care. You don't become a real estate billionaire in New York by being timid.

I really think the fight is what drives him. Growing the economy and creating jobs was
child's play for him, second nature if you will, he's been doing it his hole life.

If anything I think he has shown get restraint with his naysayers much more than I would have.

Sessions is still the AG despite showing that he is incompetent at best, Mueller is still
jerking his chicken at the taxpayers expense and the Democrats and Media continue their
wet dream to try and bring him down.

You call it thin skinned where as I call it him having the time of his life and enjoying
every second of it.

Reagan did exactly the same thing and is arguable considered the greatest president.
By the time Trump is finished he'll have given him a run for his money.

The only thing I question is some of the people he brought on board but I think that goes
with his business background, give someone a shot and if it doesn't work out fire them.

Oh and the next time I have a beer with him I'll be sure to let him know you think his
decision to revoke Brennan's security clearance was pretty weak and pathetic.

That ought to give him a good laugh.
 

schmuck
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,352
Tokens
NFL TRENDS, the reason as I understand that people are allowed to keep their security
clearance in civilian life, is that it makes them immediately available to be able to
provide insight and colour to the new administration about any area that they might
have a unique insight. sometimes to do this more accurately, they might be given
an updated briefing that one would need a security clearance to have access.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
NFL TRENDS, the reason as I understand that people are allowed to keep their security
clearance in civilian life, is that it makes them immediately available to be able to
provide insight and colour to the new administration about any area that they might
have a unique insight. sometimes to do this more accurately, they might be given
an updated briefing that one would need a security clearance to have access.

Well, what if they arent working for the administration... no one should have any sort of clearance if they arent working directly for some sort of government entity, and only clearances given thats for part of the position they have.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
Trump is a street fighter he doesn't know what the Marquess of Queensberry Rules are nor
does he care. You don't become a real estate billionaire in New York by being timid.

I really think the fight is what drives him. Growing the economy and creating jobs was
child's play for him, second nature if you will, he's been doing it his hole life.

If anything I think he has shown get restraint with his naysayers much more than I would have.

Sessions is still the AG despite showing that he is incompetent at best, Mueller is still
jerking his chicken at the taxpayers expense and the Democrats and Media continue their
wet dream to try and bring him down.

You call it thin skinned where as I call it him having the time of his life and enjoying
every second of it.

Reagan did exactly the same thing and is arguable considered the greatest president.
By the time Trump is finished he'll have given him a run for his money.

The only thing I question is some of the people he brought on board but I think that goes
with his business background, give someone a shot and if it doesn't work out fire them.

Oh and the next time I have a beer with him I'll be sure to let him know you think his
decision to revoke Brennan's security clearance was pretty weak and pathetic.

That ought to give him a good laugh.

A street fighter? Now that's a good one. You're right, you don't become a billionaire that way. Being born into exuberant wealth and receiving the equivalent of a $14 million loan is a good start though. Street fighter? Dude has never been on the street.

I do think he cares and is ambitious. I'll give you that. I do think he governs with a chip on his shoulder. He is definitely trying to prove something.

Trump will have given Reagan a run for his money as greatest president ever? What makes you say that? He cuts some taxes and cuts some regulations, and now he's up there as an all-time great? Trump received an improving economy and is doing pretty much what reasonable people expected him to do. It's been predictable: be hands off on the economy, create some GDP growth and jobs, and be pretty bad in most other departments. He's not this evil fascist that stupid liberals paint him out to be. I can't stand that shit, but I don't see how he's stacking up as all-time great either. That's absurd.

I don't think he'll be impeached or removed, and I hate the left-wing media trying so hard to go after him for that. If you're against Trump, your best wish should be to wait until 2020 and vote him out of there. If he gets removed from office before that, he'll find an excuse and claim "he would've won" or some bullshit like that. The best way to remove Trump is to vote him out, so that he doesn't have an excuse for losing.

With that said, here's my personal gut feeling: I think he's a one-term president. I think he gets voted out in 2020 as long as the Democrats don't throw a shitty candidate like Hillary out there. They're probably going to take back the House in Mid-Terms and come up a little short in the Senate, but there will be enough momentum to carry them to get the White House back in 2020.

Also FWIW: I can't stand either fucking party, and the one thing I like most about Trump is that he truly is an anti-establishment outsider. He is not a Republican or a Democrat. I hope this starts a trend of electing presidents who are more from the "outside."
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
Also, a good laugh? More like he would vent on Twitter about it for 30 minutes straight.

Seriously man, I don't hold it against anyone if they are big Trump supporters like yourself. But let's not act like he's this big, tough guy. He has a fragile ego and is bothered by criticism pretty easily. It's not a huge deal, it's just a personal flaw of his. We all have flaws.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,653
Tokens
The guy called President Trump treasonous.

Sure sounds like a guy Trump would want on his team.

Hope Admiral William McRaven doesn't continue to have clearance.

What brazen jokers.

It's going to take a while to clean up all of the Kenyan's crap.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,653
Tokens
You can argue all day about the necessity of this guy's clearance, it's still a weak move on Trump's part. Whether or not you like the guy, he's thin-skinned as a person.

That's not why he did it.

These guys have been leaking and sabotaging his presidency from the behind the scenes since day one. So it makes sense to cut off their contacts and ability to undermine a duly elected president with their "shadow government" tactics.

I'm just surprised he didn't do it sooner.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
That's not why he did it.

These guys have been leaking and sabotaging his presidency from the behind the scenes since day one. So it makes sense to cut off their contacts and ability to undermine a duly elected president with their "shadow government" tactics.

I'm just surprised he didn't do it sooner.

That’s all speculation, just as what I said is. I see it as a weak move that probably wasn’t necessary. He would’ve done it sooner if what you said is true, IMO.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
15,519
Tokens
That's not why he did it.

These guys have been leaking and sabotaging his presidency from the behind the scenes since day one. So it makes sense to cut off their contacts and ability to undermine a duly elected president with their "shadow government" tactics.

I'm just surprised he didn't do it sooner.

Trump’s explanation for his revocation doesn’t really cite anything specific, and just alludes to him not being “nice” to the administration. How is that grounds to revoke his clearance? You don’t have to be supportive to the organization to have clearance, it’s never been that way. It’s just soft man
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,232
Messages
13,449,874
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com