Odell Beckham Jr. agrees to extension to be highest-paid WR.

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
giphy.gif


Odell Beckham Jr. has agreed to a five-year extension with the New York Giantsthat makes him the highest-paid wide receiver in football, a source told ESPN's Josina Anderson.
The three-time Pro Bowl receiver can receive a maximum $95 million over the course of the deal with $65 million in guaranteed money. The deal eclipses Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown's $17 million per year average and tops Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Mike Evans' $55 million in total guarantees.
Beckham is set to make $8.4 million on the fifth-year option of his rookie contract. He has been seeking a contract extension for the better part of the past two years and was optimistic in recent weeks that a deal would work itself out. He is now under contract through 2023.
Sources told ESPN's Dan Graziano that the contract carries a $65 million injury guarantee and a $41 million guarantee at signing. Beckham will receive $13 million in new cash this year, and the first three years of the extension will average $19.5 million per year.
The deal opens the door for Beckham to make a return to the field for the Sept. 9 season opener against the Jacksonville Jaguars. Beckham has not played in the preseason after breaking his ankle in October and with the likelihood of a new deal lurking.
Beckham, 25, had at least 90 catches, 1,300 yards and 10 touchdowns in each of his first three professional seasons. He was quickest to 200 receptions and 3,000 yards in NFL history, needing just 30 games to accomplish each feat.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
Let the count down begin.....:dancefoolI`m in love....I`m all shook up :dancefool

 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
He's awesome, there is no question about it.

However, you really dont see super bowl winning teams that have high priced wide receivers on that team, do you?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
He's awesome, there is no question about it.

However, you really dont see super bowl winning teams that have high priced wide receivers on that team, do you?

Thats large variance that got turned into a cute little sports talk radio narrative.

‘07 Pats, ‘08 Cardinals, ‘09 Colts, ‘16 Falcons all had high paid elite WRs and all lost super bowls by very slim margins.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
Thats large variance that got turned into a cute little sports talk radio narrative.

‘07 Pats, ‘08 Cardinals, ‘09 Colts, ‘16 Falcons all had high paid elite WRs and all lost super bowls by very slim margins.

Not really. First off, the 09 colts lost by 2 touchdowns. Not really a slim margin.

Even the above years that you mentioned (lets take away the colts), we're still talking about 8 of the last 9 super bowls. Plus Julio was a non factor after his team was up 28-3 (i'm sure u didnt mind).

Not cute sports talk. You still cant give me an example or even a "rare exception"
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
1. The colts were driving to tie the game with like 4 minutes left.

2. All of those other games were 50/50 games late, if they go the other way your little thesis is basically done.

What you are saying is a trend is basically the epitome of a noise statistic based on a small sample size.

And 2006, the Colts won the SB with a high priced WR. But if you think paying a WR big $ is a legitimate leak as far as team building goes, then don’t bet those teams or something. Dunno what to tell you.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
And Julio not doing much in the latter 1/3rd of NE/ATL has nothing to do with anything.

If those 3 teams cited all make 1 more play then they win the super bowl with a high priced WR. Something you deem to be extremely difficult to do.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
1. The colts were driving to tie the game with like 4 minutes left.

2. All of those other games were 50/50 games late, if they go the other way your little thesis is basically done.

What you are saying is a trend is basically the epitome of a noise statistic based on a small sample size.

And 2006, the Colts won the SB with a high priced WR. But if you think paying a WR big $ is a legitimate leak as far as team building goes, then don’t bet those teams or something. Dunno what to tell you.

The colts were driving but obviously their high priced WR couldnt make a play to tie up the game??
Many super bowl games are 50/50 but as i previously stated, we still dont see a "high priced" WR winning a ring (when i say high priced, i am talking about a player who is taking up a HUGE chunk of their team's cap)
Being a pats fan, how many of your super bowl titles came down to 50/50 games?
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
All 3 of those games I cited could’ve gone either way. If you think that’s not a big deal then I dunno what to tell you.

I don’t think paying elite receivers is suboptimal team construction. We’ll have to agree to disagree.

If you’re > 50% to win a game in the final minutes, I’d say that’s a little more than “Many Super Bowls are 50/50”

It’s just the textbook definition of a noise statistic that the mainstream sports media would use.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Being a pats fan, how many of your super bowl titles came down to 50/50 games?

What did this have to do with anything? Are you saying being in a close SB game is no big deal?

Like those teams with elite WRs were fatally flawed in close games and the results indicate that or something?

I don’t even see the point your making.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
What did this have to do with anything? Are you saying being in a close SB game is no big deal?

Like those teams with elite WRs were fatally flawed in close games and the results indicate that or something?

I don’t even see the point your making.

(this is going to get confusing in writing).

You had stated that 4 different receivers lost in "50/50 type games" and "if the ball went the other way", then maybe we would have a different winner.

I am just saying that MANY pats super bowls have been like that as well (off topic from WR discussion)

However when those 50/50 games were on the line, where the HELL were those elite receivers? Obviously them and their crazy cap number didnt deliver in the clutch
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
77,240
Tokens
Antonio Brown the best,not even close.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,228
Messages
13,449,781
Members
99,402
Latest member
03sunwinvip
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com