I’ve put together a program taking a look at each NCAA Football box score to see if a team’s, actual stats, met their pre-game (line) expectation and the final score (margin).So if a team meets or exceeds pre-game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.I also adjust the totals based on actual yards compared to actual points. For example two teams may score 35 points but their offense’s total yardage for the game only amounted to an estimated 25 points based on their yardage stats. They may have benefited from turnovers, kick returns and short fields.Below you’ll find every game from Thursday 8/30 through Monday 9/4. (FBS vs FBS, FBS vs FCS, FCS vs FCS)*Sunday and Monday games (4 total) will be updated on Tuesday when the site I get the box score information from, is updated.People may have different opinions on why this happens. I just run the numbers through my program to get a “statistical opinion” on what should have happened based on yardage stats and taking away turnovers.I’ve used something similar to this in the past to find teams that may be overlooked or overvalued based on the prior weeks games.
NCAA Box Score Analysis
The chart below is taking a look at the previous week’s box scores and showing who may have overachieved or underachieved based on stats.
The program generates an “expected” margin of victory, using actual final game stats, and compares that to the:
1. Las Vegas line (pre-game prediction)
2. Actual margin of victory
So if a team meets or exceeds pre game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.
Key:
1. ATS– Against the spread.
2. Act. Yds vs Act. Spread –How each team did using their yardage stats and turnovers.
3. Game should’ve been.. — A scoring projection based on total yards gained using yards per point.
4. Win Margin—Final game margin.
5. Yds/TO spread conv.— A spread projection using total yards gained/allowed and turnovers.
6. Game tot—Acutal game total.
7. Yppt. Total—A total projection of how many points should’ve been scored based on yards.
8. W/L Projection—An estimation of the final score using actual yards and turnover margin.
9. Margin—A number each team “should’ve” won/loss by.
10. Actual Yds—Total yards gained in the game by the offense.
11. Score should’ve been..—A projection for a score based on the game stats and turnovers.
12. TO—Actual game turnovers.
13. Adjusted TO
14. Next Week—A computer generated suggestion for how a team may do next week. (Good, Bad, Play, Fade)
Good—Played as they were projected to do in the game.
Bad—Played below expectations for the game.
Fade—Played well below expectations for the game even though they covered the spread.
Play—Played better than final score and should be looked at next week.
The chart below is taking a look at the previous week’s box scores and showing who may have overachieved or underachieved based on stats.
The program generates an “expected” margin of victory, using actual final game stats, and compares that to the:
1. Las Vegas line (pre-game prediction)
2. Actual margin of victory
So if a team meets or exceeds pre game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.
Key:
1. ATS– Against the spread.
2. Act. Yds vs Act. Spread –How each team did using their yardage stats and turnovers.
3. Game should’ve been.. — A scoring projection based on total yards gained using yards per point.
4. Win Margin—Final game margin.
5. Yds/TO spread conv.— A spread projection using total yards gained/allowed and turnovers.
6. Game tot—Acutal game total.
7. Yppt. Total—A total projection of how many points should’ve been scored based on yards.
8. W/L Projection—An estimation of the final score using actual yards and turnover margin.
9. Margin—A number each team “should’ve” won/loss by.
10. Actual Yds—Total yards gained in the game by the offense.
11. Score should’ve been..—A projection for a score based on the game stats and turnovers.
12. TO—Actual game turnovers.
13. Adjusted TO
14. Next Week—A computer generated suggestion for how a team may do next week. (Good, Bad, Play, Fade)
Good—Played as they were projected to do in the game.
Bad—Played below expectations for the game.
Fade—Played well below expectations for the game even though they covered the spread.
Play—Played better than final score and should be looked at next week.
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Florida | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -39 | -23.13 | 73 | -24.00 | 9.31 | 70 |
| Connecticut | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 39 | 23.13 | 73 | 24.00 | 5.59 | 87 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Florida | 82.64 | Should have won by | 23.13 | 652 | 52.88 | 0 | 0.00 | 31.00 | FADE |
| Connecticut | 82.64 | Should have lost by | 23.13 | 486 | 29.76 | 3 | 1.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Florida | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | 9-for-11 | 3-27 |
| Connecticut | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | 10-for-18 | 7-93 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northwestern | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -4 | 11.48 | 58 | 1.00 | 5.08 | 79 |
| Purdue | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 4 | -11.48 | 58 | -1.00 | 6.65 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northwestern | 60.24 | Should have lost by | 11.48 | 401 | 24.38 | 0 | -0.08 | 25.00 | FADE |
| Purdue | 60.24 | Should have won by | 11.48 | 472 | 35.86 | 3 | 3.00 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northwestern | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 6-for-17 | 6-56 |
| Purdue | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 8-for-15 | 9-95 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| New Mexico State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 38 | 29.88 | 58 | 22.00 | 3.47 | 78 |
| Minnesota | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -38 | -29.88 | 58 | -22.00 | 6.44 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| New Mexico State | 58.67 | Should have lost by | 29.88 | 271 | 14.39 | 1 | -0.83 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Minnesota | 58.67 | Should have won by | 29.88 | 522 | 44.27 | 1 | 1.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| New Mexico State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-17 | 5-50 |
| Minnesota | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-14 | 9-92 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Wake Forest | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | -16.51 | 40 | -7.50 | 5.83 | 94 |
| Tulane | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | 16.51 | 40 | 7.50 | 5.52 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Wake Forest | 68.44 | Should have won by | 16.51 | 548 | 42.48 | 3 | 3.00 | 32.00 | PLAY |
| Tulane | 68.44 | Should have lost by | 16.51 | 436 | 25.97 | 1 | 0.38 | 20.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Wake Forest | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-19 | 6-70 |
| Tulane | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-19 | 9-83 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Connecticut State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 36 | 37.51 | 48 | 19.50 | 4.41 | 66 |
| Ball State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -36 | -37.51 | 48 | -19.50 | 7.76 | 84 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Connecticut State | 69.64 | Should have lost by | 37.51 | 291 | 16.06 | 1 | -0.63 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Ball State | 69.64 | Should have won by | 37.51 | 652 | 53.58 | 1 | 1.00 | 30.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Connecticut State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 9-58 |
| Ball State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 11-for-16 | 6-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Kennesaw State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 4 | -5.24 | 44 | 2.50 | 5.46 | 70 |
| Georgia State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -4 | 5.24 | 44 | -2.50 | 4.88 | 65 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Kennesaw State | 48.14 | Should have won by | 5.24 | 382 | 26.69 | 2 | 1.79 | 19.00 | PLAY |
| Georgia State | 48.14 | Should have lost by | 5.24 | 317 | 21.45 | 1 | 1.00 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Kennesaw State | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-15 | 7-65 |
| Georgia State | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | 6-for-12 | 3-33 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southeastern Louisiana | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | 23.85 | 65 | 21.00 | 6.72 | 65 |
| UL Monroe | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | -23.85 | 65 | -21.00 | 5.77 | 96 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southeastern Louisiana | 71.00 | Should have lost by | 23.85 | 437 | 23.58 | 1 | -0.75 | 22.00 | FADE |
| UL Monroe | 71.00 | Should have won by | 23.85 | 554 | 47.43 | 2 | 2.00 | 31.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southeastern Louisiana | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-10 | 11-89 |
| UL Monroe | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 11-for-18 | 10-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Weber State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 31 | 60.87 | 51 | 30.50 | 1.17 | 52 |
| Utah | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -31 | -60.87 | 51 | -30.50 | 7.62 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Weber State | 54.74 | Should have lost by | 60.87 | 61 | -3.07 | 0 | -2.54 | 3.00 | BAD |
| Utah | 54.74 | Should have won by | 60.87 | 587 | 57.81 | 4 | 4.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Weber State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-15 | 5-42 |
| Utah | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-14 | 4-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Missouri State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 41 | 67.16 | 75 | 46.00 | 4.38 | 63 |
| Oklahoma State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -41 | -67.16 | 75 | -46.00 | 7.96 | 92 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Missouri State | 88.39 | Should have lost by | 67.16 | 276 | 10.62 | 2 | -1.83 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Oklahoma State | 88.39 | Should have won by | 67.16 | 732 | 77.77 | 2 | 2.00 | 36.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Missouri State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-16 | 7-69 |
| Oklahoma State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 11-for-18 | 7-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Savannah State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 52 | 48.36 | 52 | 38.50 | 3.24 | 55 |
| UAB | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -52 | -48.36 | 52 | -38.50 | 6.71 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Savannah State | 61.34 | Should have lost by | 48.36 | 178 | 6.49 | 2 | -1.21 | 12.00 | BAD |
| UAB | 61.34 | Should have won by | 48.36 | 550 | 54.85 | 2 | 2.00 | 38.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Savannah State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-12 | 10-94 |
| UAB | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-12 | 4-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northwestern State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 52 | 73.60 | 66 | 46.50 | 5.23 | 48 |
| Texas A&M | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -52 | -73.60 | 66 | -46.50 | 7.90 | 96 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northwestern State | 90.06 | Should have lost by | 73.60 | 251 | 8.23 | 0 | -3.88 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Texas A&M | 90.06 | Should have won by | 73.60 | 758 | 81.83 | 1 | 1.00 | 40.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northwestern State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-12 | 11-93 |
| Texas A&M | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-11 | 8-95 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UC – Davis | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -6 | -0.01 | 82 | 2.50 | 6.47 | 91 |
| San Jose State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 6 | 0.01 | 82 | -2.50 | 5.62 | 90 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UC – Davis | 75.44 | Should have won by | 0.01 | 589 | 37.72 | 1 | 0.79 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| San Jose State | 75.44 | Should have lost by | 0.01 | 506 | 37.72 | 3 | 3.00 | 27.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UC – Davis | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | 6-for-18 | 11-79 |
| San Jose State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 8-for-21 | 12-125 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Rhode Island | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -2 | 14.33 | 40 | 18.50 | 5.69 | 58 |
| Delaware | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 2 | -14.33 | 40 | -18.50 | 5.69 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Rhode Island | 47.61 | Should have lost by | 14.33 | 330 | 16.64 | 1 | -0.54 | 13.00 | GOOD |
| Delaware | 47.61 | Should have won by | 14.33 | 347 | 30.97 | 3 | 3.00 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Rhode Island | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 5-12, 42% | 8-75 |
| Delaware | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 5-13, 38% | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Morehead State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 26 | 30.99 | 72 | 27.00 | 4.96 | 67 |
| Eastern Kentucky | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -26 | -30.99 | 72 | -27.00 | 6.64 | 85 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Morehead State | 67.10 | Should have lost by | 30.99 | 332 | 18.05 | 2 | -0.25 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Eastern Kentucky | 67.10 | Should have won by | 30.99 | 564 | 49.05 | 1 | 1.00 | 29.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Morehead State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-15, 20% | 4-45 |
| Eastern Kentucky | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-16, 56% | 7-67 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| New Hampshire | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 28 | 18.46 | 42 | -6.00 | 2.15 | 54 |
| Maine | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -28 | -18.46 | 42 | 6.00 | 6.43 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| New Hampshire | 38.15 | Should have lost by | 18.46 | 116 | 9.85 | 1 | 1.00 | 9.00 | BAD |
| Maine | 38.15 | Should have won by | 18.46 | 450 | 28.30 | 0 | -0.50 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| New Hampshire | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-15, 33% | 5-61 |
| Maine | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 5-13, 38% | 7-49 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tennessee Tech | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 24 | 12.72 | 44 | 14.50 | 4.56 | 72 |
| Chattanooga | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -24 | -12.72 | 44 | -14.50 | 7.34 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tennessee Tech | 55.43 | Should have lost by | 12.72 | 328 | 21.36 | 3 | 1.79 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Chattanooga | 55.43 | Should have won by | 12.72 | 455 | 34.07 | 1 | 1.00 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tennessee Tech | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | 6-17, 35% | 5-30 |
| Chattanooga | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 8-17, 47% | 10-69 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Illinois | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -39 | -11.54 | 59 | -16.00 | 4.65 | 96 |
| Murray State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 39 | 11.54 | 59 | 16.00 | 4.13 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Illinois | 52.28 | Should have won by | 11.54 | 446 | 31.91 | 2 | 2.00 | 27.00 | FADE |
| Murray State | 52.28 | Should have lost by | 11.54 | 285 | 20.37 | 6 | 4.67 | 17.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Illinois | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 10-21, 48% | 9-94 |
| Murray State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 2-12, 17% | 5-61 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Mississippi Valley State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 43.03 | 42 | 42.50 | 3.63 | 65 |
| North Dakota | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -43.03 | 42 | -42.50 | 6.48 | 80 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Mississippi Valley State | 63.12 | Should have lost by | 43.03 | 236 | 10.05 | 2 | -1.54 | 16.00 | FADE |
| North Dakota | 63.12 | Should have won by | 43.03 | 518 | 53.08 | 1 | 1.00 | 29.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Mississippi Valley State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-17, 41% | 10-84 |
| North Dakota | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-16, 63% | 8-76 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Illinois | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | -8.46 | 49 | -2.50 | 4.46 | 71 |
| Montana State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | 8.46 | 49 | 2.50 | 4.19 | 57 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Illinois | 38.45 | Should have won by | 8.46 | 317 | 23.45 | 2 | 2.00 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Montana State | 38.45 | Should have lost by | 8.46 | 239 | 15.00 | 1 | 0.79 | 12.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Illinois | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 3-15, 20% | 7-41 |
| Montana State | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-14, 21% | 2-7 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Utah State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 20.70 | 69 | 23.50 | 4.99 | 69 |
| Michigan State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -20.70 | 69 | -23.50 | 6.03 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Utah State | 57.62 | Should have lost by | 20.70 | 344 | 18.46 | 2 | 0.04 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Michigan State | 57.62 | Should have won by | 20.70 | 452 | 39.16 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Utah State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | 7-for-13 | 7-49 |
| Michigan State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | 11-for-17 | 9-62 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Syracuse | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -13 | 2.93 | 97 | -4.50 | 6.22 | 90 |
| Western Michigan | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 13 | -2.93 | 97 | 4.50 | 9.70 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Syracuse | 81.40 | Should have lost by | 2.93 | 560 | 39.23 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | FADE |
| Western Michigan | 81.40 | Should have won by | 2.93 | 621 | 42.16 | 2 | 1.63 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Syracuse | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-17 | 5-45 |
| Western Michigan | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-10 | 6-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Kentucky | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 31 | 32.53 | 37 | 36.50 | 4.77 | 64 |
| Wisconsin | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -31 | -32.53 | 37 | -36.50 | 7.01 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Kentucky | 62.06 | Should have lost by | 32.53 | 305 | 14.76 | 2 | -1.04 | 15.00 | GOOD |
| Wisconsin | 62.06 | Should have won by | 32.53 | 491 | 47.30 | 1 | 1.00 | 24.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Kentucky | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-16 | 6-65 |
| Wisconsin | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-13 | 8-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Colorado | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -32 | -27.67 | 58 | -7.00 | 9.17 | 65 |
| Colorado State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 32 | 27.67 | 58 | 7.00 | 3.74 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Colorado | 61.87 | Should have won by | 27.67 | 596 | 44.77 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Colorado State | 61.87 | Should have lost by | 27.67 | 284 | 17.10 | 1 | 0.42 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Colorado | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-9 | 6-44 |
| Colorado State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-19 | 5-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| San Diego State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 21 | 14.95 | 41 | 14.00 | 5.06 | 52 |
| Stanford | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -21 | -14.95 | 41 | -14.00 | 6.47 | 59 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| San Diego State | 45.70 | Should have lost by | 14.95 | 263 | 15.37 | 1 | -0.17 | 11.00 | BAD |
| Stanford | 45.70 | Should have won by | 14.95 | 382 | 30.33 | 1 | 1.00 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| San Diego State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-13 | 11-125 |
| Stanford | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-15 | 3-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Army | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 20 | 6.46 | 48 | 14.00 | 5.37 | 68 |
| Duke | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -20 | -6.46 | 48 | -14.00 | 7.33 | 52 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Army | 52.04 | Should have lost by | 6.46 | 365 | 22.79 | 2 | 0.83 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Duke | 52.04 | Should have won by | 6.46 | 381 | 29.25 | 1 | 1.00 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Army | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-14 | 7-69 |
| Duke | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 2-for-9 | 4-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Monmouth | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 34 | 17.63 | 68 | 23.00 | 4.89 | 79 |
| Eastern Michigan | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -34 | -17.63 | 68 | -23.00 | 7.17 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Monmouth | 61.75 | Should have lost by | 17.63 | 386 | 22.06 | 1 | -0.92 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Eastern Michigan | 61.75 | Should have won by | 17.63 | 473 | 39.69 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Monmouth | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-16 | 10-102 |
| Eastern Michigan | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-11 | 7-65 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Portland State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 53 | 39.28 | 91 | 28.50 | 4.52 | 77 |
| Nevada | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -53 | -39.28 | 91 | -28.50 | 10.10 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Portland State | 74.65 | Should have lost by | 39.28 | 348 | 17.68 | 1 | -1.38 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Nevada | 74.65 | Should have won by | 39.28 | 636 | 56.97 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Portland State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-19 | 8-55 |
| Nevada | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-9 | 9-106 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Florida Atlantic | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 49 | 32.65 | 77 | 18.50 | 4.38 | 74 |
| Oklahoma | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -49 | -32.65 | 77 | -18.50 | 10.48 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Florida Atlantic | 71.20 | Should have lost by | 32.65 | 324 | 19.27 | 1 | -0.54 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Oklahoma | 71.20 | Should have won by | 32.65 | 650 | 51.93 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Florida Atlantic | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-15 | 6-48 |
| Oklahoma | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-10 | 6-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Houston | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -26.89 | 72 | -25.50 | 9.37 | 62 |
| Rice | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 26.89 | 72 | 25.50 | 5.34 | 83 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Houston | 74.60 | Should have won by | 26.89 | 581 | 50.74 | 2 | 2.00 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Rice | 74.60 | Should have lost by | 26.89 | 443 | 23.86 | 2 | -0.13 | 22.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Houston | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-11 | 5-38 |
| Rice | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 11-for-22 | 6-57 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Oregon State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 46 | 53.87 | 108 | 39.50 | 6.22 | 63 |
| Ohio State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -46 | -53.87 | 108 | -39.50 | 8.41 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Oregon State | 89.78 | Should have lost by | 53.87 | 392 | 17.95 | 2 | -1.29 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Ohio State | 89.78 | Should have won by | 53.87 | 723 | 71.82 | 2 | 2.00 | 35.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Oregon State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 5-49 |
| Ohio State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 12-for-15 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Appalachian State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 11.49 | 83 | 24.50 | 5.93 | 76 |
| Penn State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -11.49 | 83 | -24.50 | 5.49 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Appalachian State | 62.62 | Should have lost by | 11.49 | 451 | 25.57 | 1 | -1.04 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Penn State | 62.62 | Should have won by | 11.49 | 434 | 37.06 | 0 | 0.00 | 24.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Appalachian State | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 9-100 |
| Penn State | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-15 | 2-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Massachusetts | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 34 | 26.50 | 76 | 20.50 | 4.63 | 68 |
| Boston College | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -34 | -26.50 | 76 | -20.50 | 6.97 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Massachusetts | 67.15 | Should have lost by | 26.50 | 315 | 20.32 | 3 | 1.29 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Boston College | 67.15 | Should have won by | 26.50 | 599 | 46.82 | 0 | 0.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Massachusetts | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 2-8 |
| Boston College | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 5-for-11 | 7-38 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Kent State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 10.47 | 55 | 18.00 | 5.47 | 83 |
| Illinois | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -10.47 | 55 | -18.00 | 6.77 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Kent State | 65.18 | Should have lost by | 10.47 | 454 | 27.35 | 2 | 0.50 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Illinois | 65.18 | Should have won by | 10.47 | 474 | 37.82 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Kent State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 5-for-17 | 5-38 |
| Illinois | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 7-for-15 | 3-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 27.20 | 42 | 16.50 | 3.13 | 54 |
| Rutgers | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -27.20 | 42 | -16.50 | 5.64 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas State | 43.38 | Should have lost by | 27.20 | 169 | 8.09 | 3 | 1.63 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Rutgers | 43.38 | Should have won by | 27.20 | 423 | 35.29 | 4 | 4.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-13 | 15-119 |
| Rutgers | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-14 | 7-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Indiana | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -10 | -12.70 | 66 | -13.00 | 5.67 | 82 |
| Florida International | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 10 | 12.70 | 66 | 13.00 | 4.88 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Indiana | 55.92 | Should have won by | 12.70 | 465 | 34.31 | 1 | 1.00 | 31.00 | BAD |
| Florida International | 55.92 | Should have lost by | 12.70 | 327 | 21.61 | 3 | 1.92 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Indiana | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-15 | 8-90 |
| Florida International | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-12 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Illinois | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 26 | 12.13 | 40 | 10.00 | 3.40 | 62 |
| Iowa | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -26 | -12.13 | 40 | -10.00 | 4.82 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Illinois | 39.69 | Should have lost by | 12.13 | 211 | 13.78 | 2 | 1.17 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Iowa | 39.69 | Should have won by | 12.13 | 352 | 25.91 | 1 | 1.00 | 18.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Illinois | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-12 | 7-65 |
| Iowa | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-16 | 8-66 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 5 | -12.53 | 63 | -12.00 | 5.40 | 75 |
| Maryland | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -5 | 12.53 | 63 | 12.00 | 5.09 | 80 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas | 56.37 | Should have won by | 12.53 | 405 | 34.45 | 3 | 3.00 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| Maryland | 56.37 | Should have lost by | 12.53 | 407 | 21.92 | 0 | -1.00 | 20.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 3-for-15 | 10-102 |
| Maryland | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 6-for-18 | 8-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Boise State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -36 | -1.20 | 76 | -8.50 | 7.30 | 57 |
| Troy | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 36 | 1.20 | 76 | 8.50 | 4.86 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Boise State | 55.17 | Should have won by | 1.20 | 416 | 28.18 | 1 | 1.00 | 16.00 | FADE |
| Troy | 55.17 | Should have lost by | 1.20 | 379 | 26.98 | 4 | 3.29 | 21.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Boise State | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 9-for-15 | 4-27 |
| Troy | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-15 | 3-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Louisiana Tech | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -4 | -12.66 | 56 | -10.50 | 5.71 | 77 |
| South Alabama | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 4 | 12.66 | 56 | 10.50 | 4.67 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Louisiana Tech | 52.52 | Should have won by | 12.66 | 440 | 32.59 | 3 | 3.00 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| South Alabama | 52.52 | Should have lost by | 12.66 | 308 | 19.93 | 4 | 3.13 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Louisiana Tech | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 4-for-14 | 6-55 |
| South Alabama | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 7-82 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Marshall | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | 0.66 | 63 | 1.00 | 5.91 | 75 |
| Miami (Ohio) | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | -0.66 | 63 | -1.00 | 6.08 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Marshall | 61.18 | Should have lost by | 0.66 | 443 | 30.26 | 0 | -0.08 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Miami (Ohio) | 61.18 | Should have won by | 0.66 | 444 | 30.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Marshall | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 6-for-14 | 7-62 |
| Miami (Ohio) | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-15 | 8-71 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Methodist | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 23 | 18.73 | 69 | 3.50 | 5.95 | 43 |
| North Texas | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -23 | -18.73 | 69 | -3.50 | 5.63 | 94 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Methodist | 54.62 | Should have lost by | 18.73 | 256 | 17.95 | 1 | 0.71 | 9.00 | BAD |
| North Texas | 54.62 | Should have won by | 18.73 | 529 | 36.68 | 0 | 0.00 | 34.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Methodist | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-10 | 4-40 |
| North Texas | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-17 | 5-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Middle Tennessee | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 1.07 | 42 | 3.00 | 4.08 | 72 |
| Vanderbilt | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -1.07 | 42 | -3.00 | 6.43 | 54 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Middle Tennessee | 44.30 | Should have lost by | 1.07 | 294 | 21.61 | 2 | 1.75 | 21.00 | PLAY |
| Vanderbilt | 44.30 | Should have won by | 1.07 | 347 | 22.69 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Middle Tennessee | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-16 | 6-40 |
| Vanderbilt | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 7-for-13 | 7-49 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Brigham Young | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -5 | 1.29 | 51 | 11.50 | 5.52 | 71 |
| Arizona | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 5 | -1.29 | 51 | -11.50 | 4.72 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Brigham Young | 49.47 | Should have lost by | 1.29 | 392 | 24.09 | 0 | -0.96 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Arizona | 49.47 | Should have won by | 1.29 | 326 | 25.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Brigham Young | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 5-for-12 | 10-94 |
| Arizona | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 4-26 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas-San Antonio | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 42 | 22.83 | 56 | 17.50 | 2.86 | 77 |
| Arizona State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -42 | -22.83 | 56 | -17.50 | 8.38 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas-San Antonio | 52.99 | Should have lost by | 22.83 | 220 | 15.08 | 3 | 1.54 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Arizona State | 52.99 | Should have won by | 22.83 | 503 | 37.91 | 0 | 0.00 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas-San Antonio | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | 7-for-18 | 5-29 |
| Arizona State | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | 3-for-10 | 11-95 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UNLV | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 22 | 20.75 | 64 | 26.00 | 5.79 | 70 |
| Southern California | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -22 | -20.75 | 64 | -26.00 | 6.86 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UNLV | 65.79 | Should have lost by | 20.75 | 405 | 22.52 | 1 | -1.17 | 17.00 | GOOD |
| Southern California | 65.79 | Should have won by | 20.75 | 501 | 43.27 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UNLV | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-15 | 4-35 |
| Southern California | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-16 | 6-58 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Cincinnati | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -9 | 6.57 | 43 | 14.00 | 3.95 | 77 |
| UCLA | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 9 | -6.57 | 43 | -14.00 | 4.50 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Cincinnati | 42.48 | Should have lost by | 6.57 | 304 | 17.95 | 1 | -0.17 | 18.00 | GOOD |
| UCLA | 42.48 | Should have won by | 6.57 | 306 | 24.53 | 1 | 1.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Cincinnati | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 5-for-18 | 7-45 |
| UCLA | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 6-26 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Washington | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 5 | -1.65 | 37 | 1.50 | 6.12 | 65 |
| Auburn | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -5 | 1.65 | 37 | -1.50 | 5.19 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Washington | 56.44 | Should have won by | 1.65 | 398 | 29.04 | 2 | 1.88 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Auburn | 56.44 | Should have lost by | 1.65 | 420 | 27.39 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Washington | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-14 | 10-95 |
| Auburn | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-18 | 12-111 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Michigan | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 15 | 28.71 | 55 | 17.50 | 3.86 | 66 |
| Kentucky | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -15 | -28.71 | 55 | -17.50 | 6.10 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Michigan | 49.18 | Should have lost by | 28.71 | 255 | 10.23 | 0 | -1.46 | 11.00 | FADE |
| Kentucky | 49.18 | Should have won by | 28.71 | 427 | 38.95 | 4 | 4.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Michigan | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-18 | 12-106 |
| Kentucky | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-13 | 3-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Mississippi | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -20 | -7.78 | 74 | -2.50 | 9.10 | 60 |
| Texas Tech | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 20 | 7.78 | 74 | 2.50 | 5.12 | 95 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Mississippi | 71.26 | Should have won by | 7.78 | 546 | 39.52 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Texas Tech | 71.26 | Should have lost by | 7.78 | 486 | 31.74 | 0 | -0.21 | 31.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Mississippi | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-13 | 7-49 |
| Texas Tech | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-19 | 6-80 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Coastal Carolina | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 34 | 38.57 | 64 | 31.00 | 4.34 | 56 |
| South Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -34 | -38.57 | 64 | -31.00 | 7.79 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Coastal Carolina | 63.02 | Should have lost by | 38.57 | 243 | 12.22 | 1 | -1.58 | 20.00 | BAD |
| South Carolina | 63.02 | Should have won by | 38.57 | 561 | 50.79 | 0 | 0.00 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Coastal Carolina | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 2-for-9 | 4-36 |
| South Carolina | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-9 | 9-99 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| West Virginia | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -26 | -24.77 | 54 | -10.00 | 8.97 | 61 |
| Tennessee | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 26 | 24.77 | 54 | 10.00 | 4.78 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| West Virginia | 59.94 | Should have won by | 24.77 | 547 | 42.35 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Tennessee | 59.94 | Should have lost by | 24.77 | 301 | 17.59 | 0 | -0.83 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| West Virginia | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-9 | 4-35 |
| Tennessee | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-14 | 6-48 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| North Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | -6.20 | 41 | 7.50 | 4.12 | 73 |
| California | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | 6.20 | 41 | -7.50 | 3.44 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| North Carolina | 40.03 | Should have won by | 6.20 | 301 | 23.11 | 4 | 3.38 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| California | 40.03 | Should have lost by | 6.20 | 279 | 16.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| North Carolina | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-17 | 13-124 |
| California | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 4-for-17 | 5-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Washington State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -22 | -16.33 | 60 | -3.00 | 5.05 | 78 |
| Wyoming | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 22 | 16.33 | 60 | 3.00 | 3.49 | 59 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Washington State | 41.67 | Should have won by | 16.33 | 394 | 29.00 | 2 | 2.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Wyoming | 41.67 | Should have lost by | 16.33 | 206 | 12.67 | 1 | 0.75 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Washington State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 3-for-14 | 10-75 |
| Wyoming | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-13 | 13-109 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Bowling Green | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 34 | 27.93 | 82 | 33.50 | 4.69 | 87 |
| Oregon | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -34 | -27.93 | 82 | -33.50 | 7.41 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Bowling Green | 68.06 | Should have lost by | 27.93 | 408 | 20.07 | 3 | 0.21 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| Oregon | 68.06 | Should have won by | 27.93 | 504 | 47.99 | 3 | 3.00 | 23.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Bowling Green | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-19 | 5-50 |
| Oregon | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-13 | 3-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Old Dominion | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 42 | 15.07 | 62 | -5.00 | 4.12 | 73 |
| Liberty | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -42 | -15.07 | 62 | 5.00 | 7.88 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Old Dominion | 60.90 | Should have lost by | 15.07 | 301 | 22.92 | 2 | 2.00 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Liberty | 60.90 | Should have won by | 15.07 | 591 | 37.98 | 1 | 0.58 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Old Dominion | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 3-for-16 | 8-75 |
| Liberty | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | 5-for-13 | 6-58 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Michigan | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | -3.71 | 41 | -3.00 | 4.45 | 69 |
| Notre Dame | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | 3.71 | 41 | 3.00 | 4.38 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Michigan | 42.03 | Should have won by | 3.71 | 307 | 22.87 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | PLAY |
| Notre Dame | 42.03 | Should have lost by | 3.71 | 302 | 19.16 | 1 | 0.75 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Michigan | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-13 | 7-52 |
| Notre Dame | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-15 | 4-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Louisville | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 37 | 28.73 | 65 | 23.50 | 4.12 | 65 |
| Alabama | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -37 | -28.73 | 65 | -23.50 | 7.63 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Louisville | 58.62 | Should have lost by | 28.73 | 268 | 14.95 | 2 | 0.04 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Alabama | 58.62 | Should have won by | 28.73 | 519 | 43.67 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Louisville | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 11-93 |
| Alabama | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-15 | 10-111 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Navy | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 18 | 1.37 | 100 | -14.00 | 6.63 | 62 |
| Hawaii | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -18 | -1.37 | 100 | 14.00 | 7.74 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Navy | 64.46 | Should have lost by | 1.37 | 411 | 31.54 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Hawaii | 64.46 | Should have won by | 1.37 | 526 | 32.92 | 1 | -0.17 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Navy | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-12 | 2-18 |
| Hawaii | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | 7-for-12 | 1-5 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| James Madison | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 11 | 9.84 | 37 | 15.00 | 5.37 | 68 |
| NC State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -11 | -9.84 | 37 | -15.00 | 5.44 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| James Madison | 52.97 | Should have lost by | 9.84 | 365 | 21.56 | 1 | -0.25 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| NC State | 52.97 | Should have won by | 9.84 | 392 | 31.40 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| James Madison | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 7-for-13 | 5-25 |
| NC State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 11-for-16 | 5-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 48 | 44.99 | 62 | 49.50 | 3.56 | 52 |
| Texas Christian | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -48 | -44.99 | 62 | -49.50 | 6.74 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern | 61.76 | Should have lost by | 44.99 | 185 | 8.39 | 3 | -1.13 | 9.00 | GOOD |
| Texas Christian | 61.76 | Should have won by | 44.99 | 499 | 53.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 30.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 5-40 |
| Texas Christian | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-11 | 5-48 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Villanova | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -2 | -1.74 | 36 | 14.50 | 5.26 | 77 |
| Temple | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 2 | 1.74 | 36 | -14.50 | 4.56 | 55 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Villanova | 44.63 | Should have won by | 1.74 | 405 | 23.18 | 1 | -0.21 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Temple | 44.63 | Should have lost by | 1.74 | 251 | 21.44 | 2 | 2.00 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Villanova | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-16 | 9-82 |
| Temple | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 8-for-13 | 6-56 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Furman | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 41 | 49.24 | 55 | 50.50 | 4.05 | 61 |
| Clemson | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -41 | -49.24 | 55 | -50.50 | 7.87 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Furman | 70.09 | Should have lost by | 49.24 | 247 | 10.43 | 2 | -2.21 | 13.00 | GOOD |
| Clemson | 70.09 | Should have won by | 49.24 | 543 | 59.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Furman | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-16 | 3-22 |
| Clemson | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-12 | 0-0 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Alcorn State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 41 | 54.64 | 41 | 43.00 | 2.86 | 51 |
| Georgia Tech | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -41 | -54.64 | 41 | -43.00 | 7.54 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Alcorn State | 61.00 | Should have lost by | 54.64 | 146 | 3.18 | 2 | -1.58 | 9.00 | FADE |
| Georgia Tech | 61.00 | Should have won by | 54.64 | 543 | 57.82 | 3 | 3.00 | 28.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Alcorn State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-11 | 3-20 |
| Georgia Tech | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-12 | 3-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Stony Brook | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 38 | 25.86 | 38 | 15.50 | 1.50 | 50 |
| Air Force | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -38 | -25.86 | 38 | -15.50 | 4.26 | 85 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Stony Brook | 32.63 | Should have lost by | 25.86 | 75 | 3.38 | 2 | 0.71 | 4.00 | BAD |
| Air Force | 32.63 | Should have won by | 25.86 | 362 | 29.25 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Stony Brook | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 8-63 |
| Air Force | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-20 | 3-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Howard | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | -1.85 | 70 | 31.50 | 7.01 | 92 |
| Ohio | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | 1.85 | 70 | -31.50 | 5.90 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Howard | 73.99 | Should have won by | 1.85 | 645 | 37.92 | 4 | 1.38 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Ohio | 73.99 | Should have lost by | 1.85 | 425 | 36.07 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Howard | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 12-for-21 | 8-71 |
| Ohio | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 5-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Albany | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 26 | 20.21 | 40 | 27.00 | 5.67 | 57 |
| Pittsburgh | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -26 | -20.21 | 40 | -27.00 | 6.78 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Albany | 53.27 | Should have lost by | 20.21 | 323 | 16.53 | 2 | -0.25 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Pittsburgh | 53.27 | Should have won by | 20.21 | 407 | 36.74 | 2 | 2.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Albany | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-13 | 7-40 |
| Pittsburgh | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-9 | 6-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Austin Peay | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 45 | 52.87 | 45 | 48.50 | 3.04 | 50 |
| Georgia | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -45 | -52.87 | 45 | -48.50 | 8.47 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Austin Peay | 60.50 | Should have lost by | 52.87 | 152 | 3.81 | 1 | -3.04 | 7.00 | FADE |
| Georgia | 60.50 | Should have won by | 52.87 | 508 | 56.68 | 1 | 1.00 | 21.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Austin Peay | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-13 | 3-15 |
| Georgia | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-9 | 3-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tennessee-Martin | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 37 | 39.53 | 65 | 35.50 | 4.69 | 59 |
| Missouri | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -37 | -39.53 | 65 | -35.50 | 7.15 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tennessee-Martin | 66.31 | Should have lost by | 39.53 | 277 | 13.39 | 1 | -1.96 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Missouri | 66.31 | Should have won by | 39.53 | 558 | 52.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tennessee-Martin | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-14 | 13-108 |
| Missouri | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-15 | 4-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Illinois | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 35 | 15.68 | 75 | 35.50 | 4.41 | 81 |
| Arkansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -35 | -15.68 | 75 | -35.50 | 6.56 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Illinois | 59.32 | Should have lost by | 15.68 | 357 | 21.82 | 5 | 2.04 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Arkansas | 59.32 | Should have won by | 15.68 | 433 | 37.50 | 0 | 0.00 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Illinois | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-18 | 6-30 |
| Arkansas | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-15 | 4-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Carolina State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 31 | 21.68 | 43 | 28.00 | 2.90 | 52 |
| Georgia Southern | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -31 | -21.68 | 43 | -28.00 | 5.80 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Carolina State | 38.47 | Should have lost by | 21.68 | 151 | 8.39 | 2 | -0.33 | 10.00 | PLAY |
| Georgia Southern | 38.47 | Should have won by | 21.68 | 348 | 30.08 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Carolina State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-12 | 3-35 |
| Georgia Southern | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-12 | 2-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Fordham | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 24 | 22.67 | 44 | 16.00 | 4.56 | 63 |
| Charlotte | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -24 | -22.67 | 44 | -16.00 | 7.28 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Fordham | 55.66 | Should have lost by | 22.67 | 287 | 16.49 | 1 | -0.33 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Charlotte | 55.66 | Should have won by | 22.67 | 488 | 39.16 | 1 | 1.00 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Fordham | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-15 | 6-30 |
| Charlotte | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-15 | 4-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Delaware State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 38 | 20.13 | 58 | 44.50 | 3.82 | 72 |
| Buffalo | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -38 | -20.13 | 58 | -44.50 | 5.36 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Delaware State | 49.74 | Should have lost by | 20.13 | 275 | 14.80 | 4 | 0.29 | 18.00 | GOOD |
| Buffalo | 49.74 | Should have won by | 20.13 | 354 | 34.93 | 0 | 0.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Delaware State | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | 7-for-18 | 6-75 |
| Buffalo | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | 2-for-13 | 5-42 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Richmond | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 29 | 24.01 | 55 | 14.50 | 4.69 | 48 |
| Virginia | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -29 | -24.01 | 55 | -14.50 | 6.65 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Richmond | 51.81 | Should have lost by | 24.01 | 225 | 13.90 | 2 | 0.79 | 9.00 | BAD |
| Virginia | 51.81 | Should have won by | 24.01 | 492 | 37.91 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Richmond | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-10 | 5-69 |
| Virginia | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-15 | 4-24 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Elon | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 20 | 31.16 | 48 | 28.00 | 3.84 | 61 |
| South Florida | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -20 | -31.16 | 48 | -28.00 | 6.13 | 84 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Elon | 57.54 | Should have lost by | 31.16 | 234 | 13.19 | 2 | -0.33 | 16.00 | FADE |
| South Florida | 57.54 | Should have won by | 31.16 | 515 | 44.35 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Elon | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-13 | 6-40 |
| South Florida | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 11-for-19 | 7-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Virginia Military | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 63 | 53.10 | 69 | 48.50 | 2.88 | 77 |
| Toledo | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -63 | -53.10 | 69 | -48.50 | 7.83 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Virginia Military | 73.96 | Should have lost by | 53.10 | 222 | 10.43 | 3 | -1.04 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Toledo | 73.96 | Should have won by | 53.10 | 603 | 63.53 | 0 | 0.00 | 30.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Virginia Military | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-22 | 3-11 |
| Toledo | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-11 | 5-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Nicholls State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -0.89 | 49 | 9.50 | 4.45 | 74 |
| Kansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 0.89 | 49 | -9.50 | 3.64 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Nicholls State | 40.11 | Should have won by | 0.89 | 329 | 20.50 | 1 | 0.21 | 17.00 | GOOD |
| Kansas | 40.11 | Should have lost by | 0.89 | 255 | 19.61 | 1 | 1.00 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Nicholls State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 10-for-20 | 6-35 |
| Kansas | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-17 | 7-54 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Arkansas | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 11 | 24.29 | 65 | 13.00 | 4.33 | 57 |
| Tulsa | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -11 | -24.29 | 65 | -13.00 | 5.49 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Arkansas | 51.39 | Should have lost by | 24.29 | 247 | 13.55 | 2 | 0.92 | 16.00 | FADE |
| Tulsa | 51.39 | Should have won by | 24.29 | 472 | 37.84 | 3 | 3.00 | 25.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Arkansas | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 0-for-10 | 5-35 |
| Tulsa | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 12-for-20 | 9-92 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Jackson State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 48 | 33.12 | 62 | 33.00 | 3.37 | 59 |
| Southern Mississippi | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -48 | -33.12 | 62 | -33.00 | 5.86 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Jackson State | 51.98 | Should have lost by | 33.12 | 199 | 9.43 | 4 | 1.25 | 10.00 | BAD |
| Southern Mississippi | 51.98 | Should have won by | 33.12 | 457 | 42.55 | 3 | 3.00 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Jackson State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 5-35 |
| Southern Mississippi | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-16 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Grambling State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 32 | 27.23 | 66 | 13.50 | 4.78 | 64 |
| UL Lafayette | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -32 | -27.23 | 66 | -13.50 | 7.62 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Grambling State | 61.59 | Should have lost by | 27.23 | 306 | 17.18 | 0 | -1.13 | 15.00 | BAD |
| UL Lafayette | 61.59 | Should have won by | 27.23 | 556 | 44.41 | 1 | 1.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Grambling State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 9-86 |
| UL Lafayette | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-10 | 6-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Dakota | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | 25.96 | 51 | 24.00 | 4.34 | 77 |
| Kansas State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | -25.96 | 51 | -24.00 | 5.44 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Dakota | 53.48 | Should have lost by | 25.96 | 334 | 13.76 | 0 | -2.00 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Kansas State | 53.48 | Should have won by | 25.96 | 408 | 39.72 | 4 | 4.00 | 19.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Dakota | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 4-for-16 | 5-35 |
| Kansas State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 9-for-20 | 13-129 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Mercer | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 52 | 59.25 | 80 | 31.00 | 3.41 | 51 |
| Memphis | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -52 | -59.25 | 80 | -31.00 | 8.74 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Mercer | 75.85 | Should have lost by | 59.25 | 174 | 8.30 | 2 | -0.58 | 9.00 | BAD |
| Memphis | 75.85 | Should have won by | 59.25 | 752 | 67.55 | 1 | 1.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Mercer | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-14 | 7-60 |
| Memphis | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-15 | 7-57 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| SE Missouri State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 27 | 55.85 | 69 | 32.00 | 4.83 | 59 |
| Arkansas State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -27 | -55.85 | 69 | -32.00 | 8.67 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| SE Missouri State | 76.72 | Should have lost by | 55.85 | 285 | 10.44 | 0 | -2.67 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Arkansas State | 76.72 | Should have won by | 55.85 | 685 | 66.29 | 3 | 3.00 | 30.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| SE Missouri State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-14 | 6-55 |
| Arkansas State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-12 | 12-119 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Charleston Southern | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 47 | 34.73 | 59 | 43.00 | 3.81 | 59 |
| Florida | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -47 | -34.73 | 59 | -43.00 | 6.73 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Charleston Southern | 55.50 | Should have lost by | 34.73 | 225 | 10.38 | 2 | -1.58 | 9.00 | PLAY |
| Florida | 55.50 | Should have won by | 34.73 | 444 | 45.11 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Charleston Southern | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-14 | 6-50 |
| Florida | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 2-for-9 | 3-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Arizona | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -20 | -5.29 | 40 | -7.00 | 5.25 | 61 |
| Texas El Paso | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 20 | 5.29 | 40 | 7.00 | 3.42 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Arizona | 38.25 | Should have won by | 5.29 | 320 | 21.77 | 1 | 1.00 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Texas El Paso | 38.25 | Should have lost by | 5.29 | 229 | 16.48 | 3 | 2.42 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Arizona | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 7-70 |
| Texas El Paso | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-18 | 10-76 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Stephen F. Austin | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 57 | 56.11 | 69 | 47.50 | 3.26 | 78 |
| Mississippi State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -57 | -56.11 | 69 | -47.50 | 8.70 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Stephen F. Austin | 76.58 | Should have lost by | 56.11 | 254 | 10.24 | 1 | -2.96 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Mississippi State | 76.58 | Should have won by | 56.11 | 618 | 66.34 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Stephen F. Austin | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-18 | 9-56 |
| Mississippi State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-13 | 7-80 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Abilene Christian | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 40.05 | 82 | 41.00 | 6.96 | 67 |
| Baylor | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -40.05 | 82 | -41.00 | 9.47 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Abilene Christian | 83.32 | Should have lost by | 40.05 | 466 | 21.64 | 1 | -2.42 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Baylor | 83.32 | Should have won by | 40.05 | 606 | 61.69 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Abilene Christian | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 5-37 |
| Baylor | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 2-for-9 | 5-53 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Incarnate Word | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 32 | 37.11 | 92 | 36.00 | 7.75 | 73 |
| New Mexico | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -32 | -37.11 | 92 | -36.00 | 7.47 | 91 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Incarnate Word | 93.66 | Should have lost by | 37.11 | 566 | 28.27 | 2 | -1.00 | 19.00 | FADE |
| New Mexico | 93.66 | Should have won by | 37.11 | 680 | 65.39 | 2 | 2.00 | 32.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Incarnate Word | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-15 | 8-69 |
| New Mexico | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-11 | 7-48 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Idaho | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 66 | 13.08 | 92 | 25.50 | 4.72 | 65 |
| Fresno State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -66 | -13.08 | 92 | -25.50 | 6.87 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Idaho | 58.84 | Should have lost by | 13.08 | 307 | 22.88 | 7 | 4.88 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Fresno State | 58.84 | Should have won by | 13.08 | 488 | 35.96 | 0 | 0.00 | 24.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Idaho | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 4-20 |
| Fresno State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-13 | 3-27 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Saint Francis U | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 2 | 6.23 | 40 | 6.00 | 5.08 | 59 |
| Lehigh | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -2 | -6.23 | 40 | -6.00 | 5.10 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Saint Francis U | 42.96 | Should have lost by | 6.23 | 300 | 18.37 | 1 | 0.50 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Lehigh | 42.96 | Should have won by | 6.23 | 321 | 24.59 | 2 | 2.00 | 17.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Saint Francis U | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-15, 33% | 4-40 |
| Lehigh | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-14, 36% | 5-41 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Georgetown | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -25 | -13.47 | 53 | 1.00 | 5.84 | 75 |
| Marist | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 25 | 13.47 | 53 | -1.00 | 2.78 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Georgetown | 42.36 | Should have won by | 13.47 | 438 | 27.92 | 2 | 1.92 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Marist | 42.36 | Should have lost by | 13.47 | 178 | 14.44 | 4 | 4.00 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Georgetown | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-16, 50% | 10-85 |
| Marist | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 4-14, 29% | 6-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Robert Morris | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 21 | 9.06 | 77 | 13.00 | 5.47 | 76 |
| Dayton | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -21 | -9.06 | 77 | -13.00 | 8.02 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Robert Morris | 61.56 | Should have lost by | 9.06 | 416 | 26.25 | 1 | -0.08 | 26.00 | PLAY |
| Dayton | 61.56 | Should have won by | 9.06 | 465 | 35.31 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Robert Morris | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 13-18, 72% | 5-43 |
| Dayton | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-7, 71% | 6-61 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Holy Cross | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 3.02 | 41 | 15.50 | 4.21 | 67 |
| Colgate | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -3.02 | 41 | -15.50 | 4.60 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Holy Cross | 39.58 | Should have lost by | 3.02 | 282 | 18.28 | 3 | 1.71 | 17.00 | GOOD |
| Colgate | 39.58 | Should have won by | 3.02 | 285 | 21.30 | 1 | 1.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Holy Cross | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 3-14, 21% | 5-35 |
| Colgate | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 6-15, 40% | 6-39 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Butler | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -2 | 32.97 | 44 | 37.00 | 4.91 | 69 |
| Youngstown State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 2 | -32.97 | 44 | -37.00 | 7.11 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Butler | 62.05 | Should have lost by | 32.97 | 339 | 14.54 | 0 | -3.08 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Youngstown State | 62.05 | Should have won by | 32.97 | 469 | 47.51 | 1 | 1.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Butler | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 8-16, 50% | 1-0 |
| Youngstown State | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-12, 42% | 9-97 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Cal Poly | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 46 | 42.54 | 52 | 37.50 | 3.29 | 63 |
| North Dakota State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -46 | -42.54 | 52 | -37.50 | 8.83 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Cal Poly | 58.97 | Should have lost by | 42.54 | 207 | 8.22 | 1 | -2.13 | 10.00 | BAD |
| North Dakota State | 58.97 | Should have won by | 42.54 | 512 | 50.75 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Cal Poly | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-17, 29% | 5-40 |
| North Dakota State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-9, 56% | 2-21 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| McNeese | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | -3.07 | 31 | -3.50 | 4.88 | 66 |
| Northern Colorado | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | 3.07 | 31 | 3.50 | 4.85 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| McNeese | 43.03 | Should have won by | 3.07 | 322 | 23.05 | 2 | 2.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Northern Colorado | 43.03 | Should have lost by | 3.07 | 301 | 19.98 | 2 | 1.71 | 14.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| McNeese | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-15, 33% | 7-40 |
| Northern Colorado | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-15, 20% | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Lafayette | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 29 | 13.77 | 41 | 6.50 | 4.36 | 58 |
| Sacred Heart | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -29 | -13.77 | 41 | -6.50 | 5.65 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Lafayette | 46.09 | Should have lost by | 13.77 | 253 | 16.16 | 2 | 1.46 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Sacred Heart | 46.09 | Should have won by | 13.77 | 407 | 29.93 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Lafayette | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-10, 20% | 6-42 |
| Sacred Heart | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-16, 44% | 7-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| William & Mary | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -12.50 | 21 | -13.50 | 4.77 | 73 |
| Bucknell | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 12.50 | 21 | 13.50 | 4.43 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| William & Mary | 42.68 | Should have won by | 12.50 | 348 | 27.59 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Bucknell | 42.68 | Should have lost by | 12.50 | 257 | 15.09 | 2 | 0.88 | 11.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| William & Mary | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-15, 33% | 8-80 |
| Bucknell | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-14, 29% | 4-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Citadel | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 22.75 | 49 | 9.50 | 3.64 | 66 |
| Wofford | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -22.75 | 49 | -9.50 | 7.70 | 54 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Citadel | 46.24 | Should have lost by | 22.75 | 240 | 11.74 | 0 | -0.79 | 13.00 | FADE |
| Wofford | 46.24 | Should have won by | 22.75 | 416 | 34.49 | 3 | 3.00 | 16.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Citadel | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 2-16, 13% | 2-20 |
| Wofford | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-10, 50% | 3-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Towson | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -26 | -27.01 | 46 | -23.50 | 5.99 | 67 |
| Morgan State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 26 | 27.01 | 46 | 23.50 | 2.74 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Towson | 42.92 | Should have won by | 27.01 | 401 | 34.96 | 2 | 2.00 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Morgan State | 42.92 | Should have lost by | 27.01 | 167 | 7.95 | 2 | 0.04 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Towson | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 3-14, 21% | 8-100 |
| Morgan State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-13, 23% | 12-107 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Bethune-Cookman | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 31 | 16.45 | 37 | 2.00 | 4.36 | 56 |
| Tennessee State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -31 | -16.45 | 37 | -2.00 | 6.82 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Bethune-Cookman | 53.31 | Should have lost by | 16.45 | 244 | 18.43 | 2 | 1.83 | 9.00 | BAD |
| Tennessee State | 53.31 | Should have won by | 16.45 | 525 | 34.88 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Bethune-Cookman | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 2-13, 15% | 3-25 |
| Tennessee State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-17, 47% | 11-89 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| North Alabama | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -4 | 9.25 | 64 | 18.50 | 6.76 | 82 |
| Southern Utah | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 4 | -9.25 | 64 | -18.50 | 6.41 | 83 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| North Alabama | 75.94 | Should have lost by | 9.25 | 554 | 33.34 | 1 | -0.54 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Southern Utah | 75.94 | Should have won by | 9.25 | 532 | 42.60 | 0 | 0.00 | 30.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| North Alabama | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 10-18, 56% | 7-57 |
| Southern Utah | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 7-15, 47% | 8-53 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UNI | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 3.06 | 49 | -1.00 | 3.27 | 82 |
| Montana | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -3.06 | 49 | 1.00 | 4.97 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UNI | 42.45 | Should have lost by | 3.06 | 268 | 19.69 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Montana | 42.45 | Should have won by | 3.06 | 348 | 22.75 | 0 | -0.08 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UNI | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 6-18, 33% | 8-69 |
| Montana | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 7-17, 41% | 9-87 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Miami | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 16 | -8.58 | 50 | -3.00 | 4.96 | 69 |
| Louisiana State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -16 | 8.58 | 50 | 3.00 | 4.85 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Miami | 44.08 | Should have won by | 8.58 | 342 | 26.33 | 2 | 2.00 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Louisiana State | 44.08 | Should have lost by | 8.58 | 296 | 17.75 | 0 | -0.25 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Miami | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-16 | 11-85 |
| Louisiana State | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-16 | 6-62 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| North Carolina A&T | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -5 | 20.08 | 51 | 13.00 | 4.48 | 60 |
| East Carolina | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 5 | -20.08 | 51 | -13.00 | 4.02 | 95 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| North Carolina A&T | 45.96 | Should have lost by | 20.08 | 269 | 12.94 | 0 | -1.08 | 15.00 | FADE |
| East Carolina | 45.96 | Should have won by | 20.08 | 382 | 33.02 | 3 | 3.00 | 28.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| North Carolina A&T | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-13 | 14-113 |
| East Carolina | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-21 | 5-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Virginia Tech | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -21 | 14.11 | 27 | 7.50 | 5.06 | 63 |
| Florida State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 21 | -14.11 | 27 | -7.50 | 5.19 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Virginia Tech | 44.70 | Should have lost by | 14.11 | 319 | 15.29 | 0 | -0.63 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Florida State | 44.70 | Should have won by | 14.11 | 327 | 29.41 | 5 | 5.00 | 12.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Virginia Tech | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | YES | 3-for-14 | 5-55 |
| Florida State | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-16 | 7-36 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Prairie View A&M | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -16 | -8.87 | 64 | 10.00 | 7.73 | 81 |
| North Carolina Central | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 16 | 8.87 | 64 | -10.00 | 4.98 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Prairie View A&M | 70.24 | Should have won by | 8.87 | 626 | 39.55 | 1 | 0.17 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| North Carolina Central | 70.24 | Should have lost by | 8.87 | 403 | 30.69 | 1 | 1.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Prairie View A&M | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | 3-14, 21% | 9-101 |
| North Carolina Central | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-18, 17% | 10-103 |
