Road Wreck System Plays

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Road Wreck System

The Road Wreck System produces plays that fall into two categories. These plays are either (1) Road / Home Plays or (2) Road / Road Fades.

Road / Home Plays

The “Play” is an ATS play on any team that loses on the road by 14 or more points (but also by less that 30 points) and plays its very next game at home.

Road / Road Fades

The “Play” is an ATS fade against any team that loses on the road by 14 or more points (no limit) and plays its very next game on the road again.

Road Wreck System Record Y.T.D.: 11~1

In week #3 GB lost at WA by 14, then covered in week #4 at home (R/H win).
In week #3 NE lost at DET by 16, then covered in week #4 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 NYJ lost at JAX by 19, then covered in week #5 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 MIA lost at NE by 31, then failed to cover in week #5 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #4 BUF lost at GB by 22, then covered in week #5 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 TB lost at CHI by 38, had a bye, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #5 DEN lost at NYJ by 18, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 ATL lost at PIT by 24, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 OAK lost at LAC by 16, then failed to cover in week #6 at home (1st R/H LOSS).
In week #5 WA lost at NO by 24, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 IND lost at NE by 14, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #5 JAX lost at KC by 16, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).

”R/H Plays” are 7~1 Y.T.D
”R/R Fades” are 4~0 Y.T.D.

No plays qualified in week #7 or #8.

But 4 plays qualify for week #9.

Road Wreck System Plays for Week #9

In week #8 MIA lost at HOU by 19 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY).
In week #8 CLE lost at PIT by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY)
In week #8 BAL lost at CAR by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY).
In week #8 NYJ lost at CHI by 14 and plays on the road in week #9 (R/R FADE).
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Looks like the Fish is the play this week

With both sides of this system pointing at the Fish, it certainly appears to be a reasonably high percentage play. But it’s also important to note that technically, this has happened one other time this season, when both sides of the system pointed at ATL in week #6.

The reason I bring that game up is because ATL only won by 5 points, covering the spread by a mere 2 points (possibly less depending on your number that week). That game is also interesting because we had to wait a full week to fulfill the TB side (fade), since TB had a bye the week in between their system road loss and this second road game versus ATL.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
WORD OF CAUTION: This is just something that I have noticed and have been tracking this season. I’m not sure if I have found and created a new system, or if a similar system exists elsewhere. The old saying is, “there’s nothing new under the sun.” And I believe that. So perhaps this is already a “thing”. It certainly is simple enough in nature, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it is. But nonetheless, it is “new to me” and something I’ve been tracking and playing with this current season.

Will it go undefeated this weekend? (Probably not.) Will it go 11~1 over its next 12 games? (Certainly not!) But I do think it is a strong system and that it will continue to produce more winners than losers ATS. Like all systems, it will be susceptible to a bump or two in the road (perhaps a losing week or two), but will ultimately prove very viable over the long run.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,691
Tokens
Ended up with 14-11 ATS last years for teams losing by 14 or more and less than 30 then playing home.Home dogs were 8-6ATS
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Ended up with 14-11 ATS last years for teams losing by 14 or more and less than 30 then playing home.Home dogs were 8-6ATS

If you by chance have access to a database, could you see how it does at 16 (instead of 14?). When looking back at the 2017 & 2016 seasons, I noticed that the system gained a few more wins when I increased the number from 14 to 16. So the 2017 ATS record of 14~11 ATS may look more like 14~7 with the “14” being changed to a 16.

And in 2016 the “Road / Home” went 17~12 in using “16” as the minimum and using “no limit” as the max....but the “Road / Road” went an impressive 5~2.

I do not have access to a database, so I checked 2016 & 2017 by hand. Quite exhausting and certainly at risk of making an error here or there. So if you’re willing to go back and check out the results with a 16 for 2017 and with a 16 and no top limit in 2016, I think you’ll find slightly better results.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
21,691
Tokens
I actually did it by hand. And for the last 10 years. Making the minimum for a loss on the road 16 and no limit.then playing home...... home teams were 164-144 ATS. Even if I made a few mistakes I think you are looking at about 50-55% system at best
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
I actually did it by hand. And for the last 10 years. Making the minimum for a loss on the road 16 and no limit.then playing home...... home teams were 164-144 ATS. Even if I made a few mistakes I think you are looking at about 50-55% system at best

Thanks for looking into this. After going through the season week bye week, I have a firm record for the 2017 season. I’ll post it below this message.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
2017 Road / Home Results

In week 1 NYG lost by 16 and failed to cover at home in week 2 vs DET (LOSS)
In week 2 MIN lost by 17 and covered at home in week 3 vs TB (WIN)
In week 2 CHI lost by 22 and covered at home in week 3 vs PIT (WIN)
In week 2 NYJ lost by 25 and covered at home in week 3 vs MIA (WIN)
In week 3 TB lost by 17 and covered at home in week 4 vs NYG (WIN)
In week 4 CHI lost by 21 and covered at home in week 5 vs MIN (WIN)
In week 4 IND lost by 28 and covered at home in week 5 vs SF (WIN)
In week 5 ARI lost by 27 and covered at home in week 6 vs TB (WIN)
In week 6 CLE lost by 16 and covered at home in week 7 vs TEN (WIN)
In week 8 SF lost by 23 and failed to cover at home vs ARI (LOSS)
In week 9 TB lost by 20 and covered at home in week 10 vs NYJ (WIN)
In week 9 DEN lost by 27 and failed to cover at home in week 10 vs NE (LOSS)
In week 10 HOU lost by 26 and covered at home in week 11 vs ARI (WIN)
In week 10 DAL lost by 20 and failed to cover at home in week 11 vs PHI (LOSS)
In week 10 MIA lost by 24 and failed to cover at home in week 11 vs TB (LOSS)
In week 11 the RAMS lost by 17 and covered at home in week 12 vs NO (WIN)
In week 12 MIA lost by 18 and covered at home in week 13 vs DEN (WIN)
In week 12 CHI lost by 28 and failed to cover at home in week 13 vs SF (LOSS)
In week 13 DEN lost by 26 and covered at home in week 14 vs NYJ (WIN)
In week 14 WA lost by 17 and covered at home in week 15 vs ARI (WIN)
In week 15 CIN lost by 27 and covered at home in week 16 vs DET (WIN)
In week 16 MIA lost by 16 and failed to cover at home in week 17 vs BUF (LOSS)
In week 16 DEN lost by 16 and failed to cover at home in week 17 vs KC (LOSS)
In week 16 NYG lost by 23 and covered at home in week 17 vs WA (WIN)

​Home / Road Record 16~8
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
As stated before, the 2016 season did not fare nearly as well (17~12 using a minimum # of 16, and no limit for the top #) but it did really well on the “Road / Road” side of the system (5~2 using the same #’s as above).

So who knows how this will perform going forward? I just know that it has hit at an extremely high percentage so far this season and wanted to share these observations with everyone in the event it continues to produce.

@)
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,580
Tokens
H and p:AL and -14 >= p:margin >= -30 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
77-0-0 (10.07, 100.0%)-1.42-5-0 (-5.79, 28.6%)46.96-1-0 (11.43, 85.7%)season = 2018
2814-13-1 (0.95, 51.9%)1.210-18-0 (-2.88, 35.7%)42.515-13-0 (-0.25, 53.6%)season = 2017
3214-17-1 (-1.42, 45.2%)-0.516-16-0 (-2.70, 50.0%)44.614-18-0 (-0.88, 43.8%)season = 2016
2914-14-1 (0.31, 50.0%)0.110-16-3 (-1.40, 38.5%)44.215-14-0 (0.21, 51.7%)season = 2015
3318-15-0 (1.88, 54.5%)-1.419-14-0 (1.53, 57.6%)46.019-13-1 (3.27, 59.4%)season = 2014
3713-24-0 (-3.23, 35.1%)0.012-25-0 (-2.59, 32.4%)45.314-22-1 (-3.27, 38.9%)season = 2013
3119-12-0 (5.63, 61.3%)-1.210-20-1 (-1.27, 33.3%)44.421-10-0 (6.81, 67.7%)season = 2012
3515-19-1 (-0.23, 44.1%)-0.416-17-2 (1.61, 48.5%)43.116-19-0 (0.17, 45.7%)season = 2011
3012-17-1 (-4.72, 41.4%)0.815-13-2 (1.97, 53.6%)43.013-17-0 (-5.57, 43.3%)season = 2010
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries

Appears to be a short term random streak. Nothing in the past results points to this being sustainable. Just my $.02
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,580
Tokens
A and p:AL and p:margin <= -14 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
40-4-0 (-11.50, 0.0%)2.53-1-0 (8.88, 75.0%)48.60-4-0 (-14.00, 0.0%)season = 2018
2111-8-2 (1.29, 57.9%)2.08-12-1 (-3.83, 40.0%)44.210-11-0 (-0.76, 47.6%)season = 2017
126-6-0 (-1.67, 50.0%)6.35-7-0 (-2.00, 41.7%)44.53-9-0 (-8.00, 25.0%)season = 2016
147-7-0 (-4.36, 50.0%)5.48-6-0 (1.36, 57.1%)46.15-9-0 (-9.79, 35.7%)season = 2015
158-7-0 (-1.43, 53.3%)3.111-4-0 (4.27, 73.3%)46.17-8-0 (-4.53, 46.7%)season = 2014
139-4-0 (2.73, 69.2%)5.37-5-1 (-1.50, 58.3%)45.26-6-1 (-2.62, 50.0%)season = 2013
138-5-0 (0.69, 61.5%)5.12-10-1 (-5.96, 16.7%)43.95-8-0 (-4.38, 38.5%)season = 2012
189-9-0 (0.61, 50.0%)6.98-8-2 (0.14, 50.0%)43.96-12-0 (-6.33, 33.3%)season = 2011
1813-5-0 (8.42, 72.2%)6.010-8-0 (3.42, 55.6%)43.110-8-0 (2.39, 55.6%)season = 2010
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Appears to be a short term random streak. Nothing in the past results points to this being sustainable. Just my $.02

You could very well be right Biz. Could you do me a favor? Could you run those exact same numbers again, but at “16” instead of “14” as the low number? I’d really appreciate it. It would likely prove to be the final verdict in terms of “past success” for this system.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
107
Tokens
I have to wonder if this system has gotten a better percentage outcome due to rule changes in the NFL that have made this a more offensive minded league. I would think that rule changes would have to have an impact on the system that can't be quantified with numbers. Making the game safer has made for easier scoring for offenses. I think this year, with the way the QB's are being protected, we are seeing drives extended that would have normally been ended with a sack. Just throwing out my opinion on things, we could see this system stay viable for years to come with the direction the NFL is going. It's all about beating the book and cashing those tickets, so good luck to you and thanks for sharing the system.^!:

JDub984
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
I have to wonder if this system has gotten a better percentage outcome due to rule changes in the NFL that have made this a more offensive minded league. I would think that rule changes would have to have an impact on the system that can't be quantified with numbers. Making the game safer has made for easier scoring for offenses. I think this year, with the way the QB's are being protected, we are seeing drives extended that would have normally been ended with a sack. Just throwing out my opinion on things, we could see this system stay viable for years to come with the direction the NFL is going. It's all about beating the book and cashing those tickets, so good luck to you and thanks for sharing the system.^!:

JDub984

Thanks JDub! And BOL to you this weekend!

PS ~ I agree with your comments and would also like to add that perhaps “parity” in the NFL could also be a contributor. Either way, I can’t wait to see how this system continues to perform this season and beyond.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Today’s System Plays:

Road Wreck System Plays for Week #9

In week #8 MIA lost at HOU by 19 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY).
In week #8 CLE lost at PIT by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY)
In week #8 BAL lost at CAR by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY).
In week #8 NYJ lost at CHI by 14 and plays on the road in week #9 (R/R FADE).
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Week #9 Results:

Road Wreck System Plays for Week #9

In week #8 MIA lost at HOU by 19 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY) WIN
In week #8 CLE lost at PIT by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY) LOSS
In week #8 BAL lost at CAR by 15 and plays at home in week #9 (R/H PLAY) LOSS
In week #8 NYJ lost at CHI by 14 and plays on the road in week #9 (R/R FADE) WIN
 

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
7,659
Tokens
Road Wreck System Record Y.T.D. 13~3

In week #3 GB lost at WA by 14, then covered in week #4 at home (R/H win).
In week #3 NE lost at DET by 16, then covered in week #4 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 NYJ lost at JAX by 19, then covered in week #5 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 MIA lost at NE by 31, then failed to cover in week #5 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #4 BUF lost at GB by 22, then covered in week #5 at home (R/H win).
In week #4 TB lost at CHI by 38, had a bye, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #5 DEN lost at NYJ by 18, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 ATL lost at PIT by 24, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 OAK lost at LAC by 16, then failed to cover in week #6 at home (1st R/H LOSS).
In week #5 WA lost at NO by 24, then covered in week #6 at home (R/H win).
In week #5 IND lost at NE by 14, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #5 JAX lost at KC by 16, then failed to cover in week #6 on the road (R/R fade win).
In week #8 CLE lost at PIT by 15, then failed to cover in week #9 at home (R/H LOSS).
In week #8 MIA lost at HOU by 19, then covered at home in week #9 (R/H win).
In week #8 BAL lost at CAR by 15, then failed to cover at home in week #9 (R/H LOSS).
In week #8 NYJ lost at CHI by 14, then failed to cover in week #9 on the road (R/R win).

“R/H Plays” are 8~3
“R/R Fades” are 5~0
 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,580
Tokens
A and p:AL and p:margin <= -14 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
40-4-0 (-11.50, 0.0%)2.53-1-0 (8.88, 75.0%)48.60-4-0 (-14.00, 0.0%)season = 2018
2111-8-2 (1.29, 57.9%)2.08-12-1 (-3.83, 40.0%)44.210-11-0 (-0.76, 47.6%)season = 2017
126-6-0 (-1.67, 50.0%)6.35-7-0 (-2.00, 41.7%)44.53-9-0 (-8.00, 25.0%)season = 2016
147-7-0 (-4.36, 50.0%)5.48-6-0 (1.36, 57.1%)46.15-9-0 (-9.79, 35.7%)season = 2015
158-7-0 (-1.43, 53.3%)3.111-4-0 (4.27, 73.3%)46.17-8-0 (-4.53, 46.7%)season = 2014
139-4-0 (2.73, 69.2%)5.37-5-1 (-1.50, 58.3%)45.26-6-1 (-2.62, 50.0%)season = 2013
138-5-0 (0.69, 61.5%)5.12-10-1 (-5.96, 16.7%)43.95-8-0 (-4.38, 38.5%)season = 2012
189-9-0 (0.61, 50.0%)6.98-8-2 (0.14, 50.0%)43.96-12-0 (-6.33, 33.3%)season = 2011
1813-5-0 (8.42, 72.2%)6.010-8-0 (3.42, 55.6%)43.110-8-0 (2.39, 55.6%)season = 2010
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries


A and p:AL and p:margin <= -16 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
30-3-0 (-13.50, 0.0%)2.52-1-0 (2.50, 66.7%)48.80-3-0 (-16.00, 0.0%)season = 2018
168-6-2 (0.44, 57.1%)1.75-10-1 (-5.47, 33.3%)44.08-8-0 (-1.25, 50.0%)season = 2017
94-5-0 (-1.39, 44.4%)5.94-5-0 (-0.94, 44.4%)43.83-6-0 (-7.33, 33.3%)season = 2016
136-7-0 (-5.69, 46.2%)5.37-6-0 (0.54, 53.8%)45.84-9-0 (-11.00, 30.8%)season = 2015
148-6-0 (0.93, 57.1%)3.111-3-0 (5.14, 78.6%)46.27-7-0 (-2.21, 50.0%)season = 2014
118-3-0 (3.73, 72.7%)3.26-4-1 (-1.64, 60.0%)44.46-4-1 (0.55, 60.0%)season = 2013
127-5-0 (0.29, 58.3%)4.72-9-1 (-6.29, 18.2%)43.95-7-0 (-4.42, 41.7%)season = 2012
156-9-0 (-2.40, 40.0%)8.37-7-1 (0.63, 50.0%)43.93-12-0 (-10.67, 20.0%)season = 2011
139-4-0 (8.73, 69.2%)7.38-5-0 (4.58, 61.5%)42.97-6-0 (1.46, 53.8%)season = 2010

 

Biz

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
14,580
Tokens
H and p:AL and -14 >= p:margin >= -30 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
77-0-0 (10.07, 100.0%)-1.42-5-0 (-5.79, 28.6%)46.96-1-0 (11.43, 85.7%)season = 2018
2814-13-1 (0.95, 51.9%)1.210-18-0 (-2.88, 35.7%)42.515-13-0 (-0.25, 53.6%)season = 2017
3214-17-1 (-1.42, 45.2%)-0.516-16-0 (-2.70, 50.0%)44.614-18-0 (-0.88, 43.8%)season = 2016
2914-14-1 (0.31, 50.0%)0.110-16-3 (-1.40, 38.5%)44.215-14-0 (0.21, 51.7%)season = 2015
3318-15-0 (1.88, 54.5%)-1.419-14-0 (1.53, 57.6%)46.019-13-1 (3.27, 59.4%)season = 2014
3713-24-0 (-3.23, 35.1%)0.012-25-0 (-2.59, 32.4%)45.314-22-1 (-3.27, 38.9%)season = 2013
3119-12-0 (5.63, 61.3%)-1.210-20-1 (-1.27, 33.3%)44.421-10-0 (6.81, 67.7%)season = 2012
3515-19-1 (-0.23, 44.1%)-0.416-17-2 (1.61, 48.5%)43.116-19-0 (0.17, 45.7%)season = 2011
3012-17-1 (-4.72, 41.4%)0.815-13-2 (1.97, 53.6%)43.013-17-0 (-5.57, 43.3%)season = 2010
Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries

Appears to be a short term random streak. Nothing in the past results points to this being sustainable. Just my $.02


H and p:AL and -16 >= p:margin >= -30 and season >= 2010 and ...
gamesATS
W - L- P (marg, %win)
Avg LineOU
W - L- P (marg, %over)
Avg TotalSU
W - L- P (marg, %win)
SDQL
77-0-0 (8.93, 100.0%)-0.42-5-0 (-5.86, 28.6%)46.66-1-0 (9.29, 85.7%)season = 2018
2414-9-1 (2.75, 60.9%)1.29-15-0 (-2.02, 37.5%)42.614-10-0 (1.50, 58.3%)season = 2017
2312-10-1 (-0.02, 54.5%)-0.412-11-0 (-2.72, 52.2%)43.612-11-0 (0.39, 52.2%)season = 2016
2111-9-1 (0.67, 55.0%)0.87-11-3 (-1.52, 38.9%)44.611-10-0 (-0.10, 52.4%)season = 2015
2915-14-0 (0.57, 51.7%)-1.516-13-0 (0.34, 55.2%)45.816-12-1 (2.03, 57.1%)season = 2014
3210-22-0 (-4.22, 31.2%)0.210-22-0 (-2.75, 31.2%)45.112-20-0 (-4.38, 37.5%)season = 2013
2416-8-0 (6.92, 66.7%)-1.28-15-1 (-1.08, 34.8%)44.918-6-0 (8.08, 75.0%)season = 2012
2912-16-1 (-0.97, 42.9%)0.714-15-0 (1.40, 48.3%)43.110-19-0 (-1.66, 34.5%)season = 2011
2310-12-1 (-4.00, 45.5%)0.910-11-2 (-0.17, 47.6%)43.310-13-0 (-4.91, 43.5%)season = 2010


 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,106,779
Messages
13,438,948
Members
99,339
Latest member
billcunninghamhomeloans
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com