Need a site that shows who played

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
I had McKissic under and it was graded as a push claiming he didn't play. I'm fairly confident I saw him on the field. Where can I confirm this?
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,743
Tokens
Looks like he played 1 down on offense, a few more on special teams
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
Curious to see how the book will grade this?

They probably just saw players stats and figured he didnt play b/c he didnt have any receptions or targets
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
When SF was @ GB on MNF I had Alf Morris under 50.5 and he just didn't play. They went Mostert instead.

He got 1 carry but it was called back via penalty and the book (a local) graded it no contest. Most books say that you need to play 1 official snap for action.

If he played a snap then it should be a winner.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
Curious to see how the book will grade this?

They probably just saw players stats and figured he didnt play b/c he didnt have any receptions or targets

<dt style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; line-height: 1.42857; font-weight: 700; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">PLAYER PROPS:</dt><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">All players must take the field and play for action. Results are based on the official stats from the game.</dd><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">A kicker who does not participate, due to shutout, but is suited up and available is considered to have played.</dd>
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
He played an offensive snap but even if he didn't, his special teams action should warrant "taking the field." My complaint got sent to the prop department so I'm just awaiting the change.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
I don't think playing ST constitutes playing a snap for prop purposes but every book is different. In my experience, it needs to be an offensive snap.

And obviously given it is sports betting, you can't really fight city hall too much.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
I don't think playing ST constitutes playing a snap for prop purposes but every book is different. In my experience, it needs to be an offensive snap.

And obviously given it is sports betting, you can't really fight city hall too much.

That makes sense. In all my years I think I've only ran into this a couple times.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2012
Messages
11,409
Tokens
He played an offensive snap but even if he didn't, his special teams action should warrant "taking the field." My complaint got sent to the prop department so I'm just awaiting the change.

I would interpret "take the field" as offensive snaps only and not special teams. However, he did have 1 play so it should classify as a win.

Gambling sites will look at a website or 2 for the official grade.

If you didnt have big $$$ on the game, I can see the sportsbook grading you a winner.

Good luck and let us know how it turned out
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
Well this is ridiculous. They only look at ESPN and since he doesn't show up there, they won't change it from a no bet. The most frustrating part is the guy continues to say "he didn't play." I offered to walk them through it on nfl.com and they just refuse. It's a PPH site so this is fairly normal (grading bets wrong) but this is the first time for me where they refuse to look further into it.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Well this is ridiculous. They only look at ESPN and since he doesn't show up there, they won't change it from a no bet. The most frustrating part is the guy continues to say "he didn't play." I offered to walk them through it on nfl.com and they just refuse. It's a PPH site so this is fairly normal (grading bets wrong) but this is the first time for me where they refuse to look further into it.

Yeah, not too surprising.

Sorry to hear but that's generally how PPH's roll with props. Whatever suits them.
 

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
3,064
Tokens
<dt style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; line-height: 1.42857; font-weight: 700; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">PLAYER PROPS:</dt><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">All players must take the field and play for action. Results are based on the official stats from the game.</dd><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">A kicker who does not participate, due to shutout, but is suited up and available is considered to have played.</dd>
The official stats are from NFL.com not ESPN.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
The official stats are from NFL.com not ESPN.

Trust me I tried explaining this every possible way. The guy was as stubborn as a mule. Kept repeating over and over, "he didn't play." It was infuriating to say the least.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
4,446
Tokens
Reminded me of the Seinfeld where the dry cleaner refuses to admit he shrunk Jerry's shirt. I just wanted them to admit they refuse to do any research on the matter.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,262
Messages
13,450,012
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com