PAC 12 still not a good conference

Search

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
2,653
Tokens
Watching these games not sure why everyone isn't betting against this conference every game ... Every game I have seen the PAC 12 is not fairing well .
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
YEP!

Pac 12 has been terrible ATS in bowls for years. Last yr 2-7, this year 0-3 with Stanford pending. I have gone against them every time in that span and have Pitt right now + 6 but they are faltering and Michigan St + 1.5

They get lots of positive media while they play each other then play good teams.

One nut always tells me not to go by last years results. Well I am not gonna bet against all of the Pac 12's if they start covering but so far so good 10-2.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
2,653
Tokens
Oregon 109 yards through 3 quarters
Stanford -133 yards less than Pitt.. Costello 6 completions .. these teams are hard to watch ..
Northwestern in the blind +7 against this conference
 

Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2011
Messages
6,021
Tokens
PAC 12 has only one dog(the Beavers), but a lot of mediocre teams. UW is the only complete team, and easily could have been a one loss team. Basketball pretty much weak too vs. good competition.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
5,985
Tokens
I will say Utah has a legit defense
The pac12 teams offense tends to get stifled by better conferences though.
I have my doubts about UW vs OSU. Surprised the line hasn't swing past 7 yet
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
YEARS ago there was a stretch when the opposite was true.
The narrative was for Big 10 schools playing in the snow running every play and they would come to the Rose Bowl against teams that throw the ball all over the place in warm weather.
Big 10 favorites would lose SU, a completely different game than they were accustomed.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
Lil Pac 12 is now 0-4 this year Stanford got its ass physically beaten Pitt blew it should have been up 14-17 at half.
Michigan St + 1.5 pending winning 6-0.
I already have NW + 7, BIG.
OSU - 6.5 looks very good, the Washington "D" is a myth, will be a blowout, Washington has not seen anything like OSU's offense, its my top bowl wager.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
3,644
Tokens
And Herbert is going back to school. If he would be drafted in the first round, he is a fool to go back. Take that money if some team be foolish enough to take him high. He doesn't look anything like Mayfield and Darnold did last year.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
And Herbert is going back to school. If he would be drafted in the first round, he is a fool to go back. Take that money if some team be foolish enough to take him high. He doesn't look anything like Mayfield and Darnold did last year.

Agree he is insane take the millions he'd go first round. If he blows out a knee... or has a bad year next year.
Plenty of NFL teams need a QB I do not see him as top notch but he could be set for life before he plays a down in the NFL if he goes in the first round.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
A squeaker but Oregon failed to cover, so Pac 12 is 0-5 ATS. :pointer:


  • Utah tonight


  • Washington tomorrow

two more losers
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
8,957
Tokens
opened as fave, closed as dog
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Oct 4, 2014
Messages
5,659
Tokens
YEP!

Pac 12 has been terrible ATS in bowls for years. Last yr 2-7, this year 0-3 with Stanford pending. I have gone against them every time in that span and have Pitt right now + 6 but they are faltering and Michigan St + 1.5

They get lots of positive media while they play each other then play good teams.

One nut always tells me not to go by last years results. Well I am not gonna bet against all of the Pac 12's if they start covering but so far so good 10-2.

trends are useless.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2010
Messages
8,574
Tokens
trends are useless.

Yes some "trends" are useless. But this is not a trend, it is the marketplace. Big difference.
I have been going against the Pac 12 for years, so last year I went 7-2 and this year I am 5-0. 12-2.
And I give rationale for my wagers, some just name a team and if some actually win, then celebrate.
Have you noticed The Big 12 is kicking ass this year? The ACC? I doubt you have until now.
HA some posters just fade the board's narrative like they are wise guys going against the stupid public. Others look at line changes and call it a Vegas trap.
I go by team's track record, conference, motivation, injuries, location of game, QBs, OL's, offense, defense, coaching, weather, the whole she-bang.
GL!
 

Banned
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
760
Tokens
Taking ng Northwestern and the points ....

Are you basing this off the big 10? Purdue lost by 49 to Auburn, Michigan got smoked by a mediocre Florida team, Michigan State scoring 6 points? We could go on and on about this conference thing.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,501
Tokens
I had Oregon +1 ..thats a winner..-105 @ Dimes. Closing line..
 

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
2,653
Tokens
Utah straight up loser as 7 pt favorite ....
Thank you very much... Already took Ohio St. Earlier at -6- so another win I hope
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,708
Messages
13,453,712
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com