Super Bowl Discussions*

G-Man! · Jan 20, 2019

Patriots are 2 point favorites.

Could be anyones' game.

Both teams beat the Chiefs this year.

Maybe the Rams have the best defense?

Is Goff good enough to win this?

Can Brady be stopped?

And is the Rams coach as creative as Belichik?

Loves2kickass · Jan 20, 2019

F Brady

TheGiems2k · Jan 20, 2019

Its different story here...... Rams get this one

seer · Jan 20, 2019

mcming · Jan 20, 2019

Poetic Justice...the dynasty started with Brady as the underdog nobody's heard of beating the "greatest show on turf". Now the Rams will feel like the underdog and will walk away the victors. This is it for the Patriots. The last SB Brady is in and maybe Belichick too.

SaintsFan1977 · Jan 21, 2019

Rams. LA needs this one for that new stadium

wizard1183 · Jan 21, 2019

Ramapajamas crowned SB winners with Gurley riding the pine lol

ShadyMcCoy304 · Jan 21, 2019

mcming said:
Poetic Justice...the dynasty started with Brady as the underdog nobody's heard of beating the "greatest show on turf". Now the Rams will feel like the underdog and will walk away the victors. This is it for the Patriots. The last SB Brady is in and maybe Belichick too.

Lol man 9 super bowls, shame this is the last one.

2DIMES · Jan 21, 2019

Almost every year its the same conversation. Tom brady

StevieRay · Jan 21, 2019

Tried to get a room in Atlanta last night for Super Bowl and nodda. Nothing available

G-Man! · Jan 21, 2019

StevieRay said:
Tried to get a room in Atlanta last night for Super Bowl and nodda. Nothing available

Simple solution. Rent a camper/motor home, from a local in Atlanta...You only need to be there one day in advance. Pick it up Sat and return it Monday. Less cost than a room...if you share it with a small group.

wizard1183 · Jan 21, 2019

Airbnb

gtgtTHESPOTPLAYERltlt · Jan 21, 2019

Do any of you find it interesting how the odds makers opened up LAR -1.....absolutely they knew that line would swing the other way immediately. Why not just open NE -1 then? With all the experience NE has and how young the Rams are on this stage why would they open Rams -1??

wizard1183 · Jan 21, 2019

>>THE SPOT PLAYER<< said:
Do any of you find it interesting how the odds makers opened up LAR -1.....absolutely they knew that line would swing the other way immediately. Why not just open NE -1 then? With all the experience NE has and how young the Rams are on this stage why would they open Rams -1??

Most books you couldn’t touch NE as a dog cause it was swayed before it was ever put out there

gtgtTHESPOTPLAYERltlt · Jan 21, 2019

wizard1183 said:
Most books you couldn’t touch NE as a dog cause it was swayed before it was ever put out there

I get that....but why in the first place would Rams be -1? Makes no sense.....I got a lot to look at on this game, but that right there makes you want to take the Rams. Odds makers are very sneaky they knew damn well that line would move the other way in a heart beat. Nothing is free in Vegas. Opening NE -1 would make much more sense if NE was going to win this game. Rams D line has the potential to FINALLY get to Brady and make him look his age

wizard1183 · Jan 21, 2019

Because the Rams are the stronger team. In EVERY category. In SOS they’re ranked 7th. Paths 29th. However to make Pats a dog? The books new they’d get super slammed with money on one side. It was stupid to think that with way Pats have always been in the SB ect and beat Rams in 2001. I think it was an experiment maybe? Idk? But dumb move to consider them a dog. You have to make more experienced team the fav. Had Saints won? Saints would’ve been a fav and they’d have won as nfc fav.

gtgtTHESPOTPLAYERltlt · Jan 21, 2019

wizard1183 said:
Because the Rams are the stronger team. In EVERY category. In SOS they’re ranked 7th. Paths 29th. However to make Pats a dog? The books new they’d get super slammed with money on one side. It was stupid to think that with way Pats have always been in the SB ect and beat Rams in 2001. I think it was an experiment maybe? Idk? But dumb move to consider them a dog. You have to make more experienced team the fav. Had Saints won? Saints would’ve been a fav and they’d have won as nfc fav.

Yea this is a confusing one.....damn odds makers mind fucking us again lol

Serbone · Jan 21, 2019

wizard1183 said:
Because the Rams are the stronger team. In EVERY category. In SOS they’re ranked 7th. Paths 29th. However to make Pats a dog? The books new they’d get super slammed with money on one side. It was stupid to think that with way Pats have always been in the SB ect and beat Rams in 2001. I think it was an experiment maybe? Idk? But dumb move to consider them a dog. You have to make more experienced team the fav. Had Saints won? Saints would’ve been a fav and they’d have won as nfc fav.

Rams SOS is 18, NE 28 as of today, per Sagarin.

OL's are equal, Football Outsiders ranks NE # 3 run blocking, # a1pass blocking, Rams #1 & #6.
Gurley seems to be a big question mark, without him, I give NE a big advantage in the running game, Michel, White is amazing, and Burhardt is a solid role player.
I like the NE WRs slightly better than the Rams, great hands, but more speed on the Rams.
I like GOAT Brady over Goff though Goff is damn good.

On defense it is clear the Rams defensive line is superior.
Linebackers, even.
DB's even, though NE might be more consistent.

G-Man! · Jan 22, 2019

Has anyone looked at the results for teams that got to the Super Bowl when getting in on a fault? I.e. turnover or bad non-calls or bad calls in general?

That would be interesting to know the point spread and the end result.
Im sure in the 50-some SB's there was teams that didn't deserve ti get there?

wizard1183 · Jan 22, 2019

Just look at the Patriots every time they got to the SB. 5-2? LOL

****************Super Bowl Discussions*****************

Member

Member

Member

seer

Member

Member

Member

New member

New member

Active member

Member

Member

New member

Member

New member

Member

New member

Member

Member

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page

Super Bowl Discussions*