So how much money is vegas losing tonight?

wtd03 · Feb 3, 2019

With pats winning in an obvious pats victory game. THis was literally the easiest money won for me all season.

had saints got here i wouldve guessed twice

tnvolfan · Feb 3, 2019

all the props, totals, teasers, parlays Vegas came out just fine

bigwang · Feb 3, 2019

Not a penny. Volume alone guarantees a win.

wtd03 · Feb 3, 2019

big wang said:
Not a penny. Volume alone guarantees a win.

When 80% of public money was on the winning team on the ML alone?

sounds like a hit to me.

halekulani · Feb 3, 2019

lots of free money from the props and the under
vegas prob wasn't as profitable as it could have been

JIMMYTHEGENTSPORTS · Feb 3, 2019

plain and simple, pats covered, public won,books lost. period. regaurdless of the big late "wiseguy" $ on the rams. according to las vegas
vegas journal review, most books needed the rams.

mrwho · Feb 3, 2019

Everyone likes to always assume the favorite and over is always the heavy money side but memo to you so called sharp guys, your money is part of public money

reddog49 · Feb 3, 2019

Vegas wanted a low scoring, boring game. They needed Rams, but don't kid yourself. They won big. They feared another high scoring shootout like last year. Trust me.

JIMMYTHEGENTSPORTS · Feb 3, 2019

mrwho said:
Everyone likes to always assume the favorite and over is always the heavy money side but memo to you so called sharp guys, your money is part of public money

thats true , depending on when you wager

JIMMYTHEGENTSPORTS · Feb 4, 2019

reddog49 said:
Vegas wanted a low scoring, boring game. They needed Rams, but don't kid yourself. They won big. They feared another high scoring shootout like last year. Trust me.

according to my info, that is false info about the total, there were five $250,000 bets with pats/rams UNDER 58, 1.5 million was on the under
at mgm in early action. Laughlin NV , early heavy action was on the under 58, by a 3-1 ratio. 1.2 million was wagered early on the UNDER
57.5 at ARIA this past friday, and to top that off, a Billings Montana bettor won 1.2 million on a $2500 5 teamer.
the total dropped from the beginning, the sharps and majority hit big on the under, ME i LOST on the total, shame on me, but did cash
on pats ml and side.

Spaded707 · Feb 4, 2019

If you think Vegas lost tonight just because the pats covered you know nothing about the industry.

OCguy · Feb 4, 2019

JIMMYTHEGENT SPORTS said:
plain and simple, pats covered, public won,books lost. period. regaurdless of the big late "wiseguy" $ on the rams. according to las vegas
vegas journal review, most books needed the rams.

Wrong! I was in Vegas all week with my friends. We visited many many sports book. Spoke to Primm Williams Hills Sup (Maggie) and also sportsbook clerks. All of them said heavy money poured in on Rams Sunday all day.

wtd03 · Feb 4, 2019

Spaded707 said:
If you think Vegas lost tonight just because the pats covered you know nothing about the industry.

Care to explain?

80% was on Pats
75%+ was on the under

How can they possibly make money when they are paying so much money out? How does such a thing work?

MantisToboggan · Feb 4, 2019

wtd03 said:
Care to explain?

80% was on Pats
75%+ was on the under

How can they possibly make money when they are paying so much money out? How does such a thing work?

First, where did you even get those numbers? I saw 59% cash on the Pats and 61% on the over. Not even close to 75+ or 80.

Second, books clean up on props. They especially bend the public over on props where they can hide the Vig ( First player to score, Super Bowl MVP, etc.).

mrwho · Feb 4, 2019

wtd03 said:
Care to explain?

80% was on Pats
75%+ was on the under

How can they possibly make money when they are paying so much money out? How does such a thing work?

while some place will show you somewhat accurate %, a majority of bets are placed underground, not with offshores or in vegas. anyone that sits and tells you what % of money is on a side is bullshitting for whatever reasons or looking for attention. anyone that takes enough action doesnt have time to "show" general people they dont know where their money is going.

skins85 · Feb 4, 2019

vegas is fine, probably made money. a lot of the props that didnt hit were heavy juice like brady over 294.5 was -140. local books got beat up if they didnt offer all the extras.

azbob · Feb 4, 2019

I live here. The paper said most books made a small profit...heavier money was on the Pats and the over. Did great on the props as most bet on the overs. All of the books will be taking bets again today so no need to worry.

JIMMYTHEGENTSPORTS · Feb 4, 2019

mrwho said:
while some place will show you somewhat accurate %, a majority of bets are placed underground, not with offshores or in vegas. anyone that sits and tells you what % of money is on a side is bullshitting for whatever reasons or looking for attention. anyone that takes enough action doesnt have time to "show" general people they dont know where their money is going.

This is truth, the actual opening line the public sees, is NOT the real line. It actually gets hammered one side or the
other by heavy hitter sharps/wiseguys.

JIMMYTHEGENTSPORTS · Feb 4, 2019

azbob said:
I live here. The paper said most books made a small profit...heavier money was on the Pats and the over. Did great on the props as most bet on the overs. All of the books will be taking bets again today so no need to worry.

good point , just another day for the books lol, casinos wern't built by winning gamblers.

halekulani · Feb 4, 2019

https://twitter.com/MicahRoberts7/status/1092567328670179328

books keeping 7% of the hold

y'all funny thinking vegas be losing on this game.

jimmythegent got some weird schizophrenic posts tryin to play both sides lol