NFL doesn’t come close to changing replay rule after Saints mess

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
There is no answer for the NFC Championship game catastrophe.

The NFL competition committee met for two days in Indianapolis to discuss possible changes to the instant replay rule in the wake of the infamous no-call on an obvious pass interference against the Rams in their win over the Saints.

“We’ve had these conversations,” Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones told ESPN. “And you start rehashing them, and you go, ‘Oh my gosh, we’ve had this conversation again and again and again and again and again.'”

Giants owner and committee member John Mara said he’s “not sensing a lot of support for making changes,” according to ESPN.

“Calls are just missed,” he said. “Officials are just human. They’re going to miss calls from time to time. … To think that we’re going to be a system where calls are always going to be corrected from New York or from upstairs, I just don’t think we’re there or even close to being there.”

The weeks after the call that was filled with angst by Saints fans and a notable silence by commissioner Roger Goodell. Many called for the NFL to add pass interference call to the replay system, but the league’s owners seem to have rejected that possibility.

When Goodell did finally speak, nearly two weeks later, he laid out the rejected changes that had been discussed through the years.

“It does not cover judgment calls. Our coaches and clubs have been very resistant,” Goodell said. “There has not been support to date about having a replay official or someone in New York throw a flag when there is no flag. They have not voted for that in the past; it doesn’t mean that we won’t.

“We’ll put it to the competition committee, see if there is an answer to that. But the reality is, it’s been there has been opposition philosophically for many clubs.”

The monumental blunder did little to change the minds of the competition committee, which seems to have chalked it up to just bad luck.

“Over the course of time,” Jones said, “everybody gets affected by a call, by a player making a mistake, by a coach making a bad decision. Those things happen.”






https://nypost.com/2019/02/26/nfl-d...utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Lmao@ “Calls are just missed,” he said. “Officials are just human...... To think that we’re going to be a system where calls are always going to be corrected from New York or from upstairs, I just don’t think we’re there or even close to being there.”

What a joke the NFL has become. I guess they're waiting until 2040, after artificial intelligence gets involved. On the other hand, the NFL wants to control the outcome of games, & we can't have anyone/anything questioning the most blatant calls & misses.
 

Balls Deep
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,492
Tokens
There is an answer. Money.

Ok Owners, we can have fair play and get the calls as accurate as possible. But it will cost you all millions each in lost revenues.

Or we can take the more profitable approach and manipulate the market? Hmm choices.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
1,305
Tokens
Lmao@ “Calls are just missed,” he said. “Officials are just human...... To think that we’re going to be a system where calls are always going to be corrected from New York or from upstairs, I just don’t think we’re there or even close to being there.”

What a joke the NFL has become. I guess they're waiting until 2040, after artificial intelligence gets involved. On the other hand, the NFL wants to control the outcome of games, & we can't have anyone/anything questioning the most blatant calls & misses.


Yes calls are missed but one of the officials had to see it. In hoops how many times does a ref call something down below from half court when the official standing right there doesn't? Also funny there were 3 or 4 officials from California in the game. I'm liking the rules in the AAF league.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
20,483
Tokens
Lmao@ “Calls are just missed,” he said. “Officials are just human...... To think that we’re going to be a system where calls are always going to be corrected from New York or from upstairs, I just don’t think we’re there or even close to being there.”

What a joke the NFL has become. I guess they're waiting until 2040, after artificial intelligence gets involved. On the other hand, the NFL wants to control the outcome of games, & we can't have anyone/anything questioning the most blatant calls & misses.

Ratings would have been better with a brees brady superbowl so why would nfl want the rams to win
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
1,305
Tokens
Ratings would have been better with a brees brady superbowl so why would nfl want the rams to win


The refs (4) from California wanted the Rams to win. The ref who blew that call was a ref at a Cbb game right after that no call. Got reemed a new asshole by the fans. Well deserved.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
The Rams probably only have like 30 fans, who knew 4 of them were reffing in the NFC title game?

That's some run good.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Ratings would have been better with a brees brady superbowl so why would nfl want the rams to win

Maybe because the NFL didn't want Brady & the Pats to lose 2 str SB's, & they probably didn't want Bree's losing in the SB either. Although yes, a Pats vs Saints SB would have been way better for the ratings.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,276
Messages
13,450,151
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com