Tax returns?

theDonger · Mar 2, 2019

So it looks like house dems are going after the last 10 years of Trump tax returns.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/house-democrats-prepare-ask-irs-trump-tax-returns

I've always had a gut feeling that Trump is legit broke, maybe he made some money from the Russians like when they overpaid for som Trump property.

Ought to be interesting popcorn-eatinggif

Willie99 · Mar 2, 2019

Tax returns will NOT tell you if Trump is broke, believing such is rather naive

More importantly, financial disclosures required of Presidential candidates and available to the public provide significantly more data and detail then any tax return possibly could, especially since they disclose assets and income sources that may NOT be found on tax returns.

This is yet another great example of how the criminal corrupt colluding always lying democratic media spoon feeds the democratic base, and the parrots then regurgitate the talking points they simply don't understand

busterhyman · Mar 2, 2019

Willie99 said:
Tax returns will NOT tell you if Trump is broke, believing such is rather naive

More importantly, financial disclosures required of Presidential candidates and available to the public provide significantly more data and detail then any tax return possibly could, especially since they disclose assets and income sources that may NOT be found on tax returns.

This is yet another great example of how the criminal corrupt colluding always lying democratic media spoon feeds the democratic base, and the parrots then regurgitate the talking points they simply don't understand

so what you're saying is....we need a pill???

Willie99 · Mar 2, 2019

busterhyman said:
so what you're saying is....we need a pill???

He tells us he's totally unbiased, as he posts nothing butt extreme liberal talking points, and now he even believes Trump is broke. How can one reason with that? The dots just don't connect

theDonger · Mar 2, 2019

Willie99 said:
He tells us he's totally unbiased, as he posts nothing butt extreme liberal talking points, and now he even believes Trump is broke. How can one reason with that? The dots just don't connect

I never said I am unbiased, I said I am not a democrat or republican and that I have voted for candidates of both parties. I have ALWAYS hated the Clintons and hope this whole Epstein case gets re-opened/evaluated because I think some real fucking shitbags are involved.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/do...to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein

When it comes to Trump and this current administration. Damn right I'm biased. Sure seems to me, by a preponderance of evidence and courtfilings that the Trump Organization and Campaign was involved in some criminal behavior.

This video didn't age well: https://youtu.be/WrDCekqFbl8 Paying off a pornstar to right before an election to keep it quiet? That's a crime.

As I have said before. If all of this is one big charade and Trump is exonerated via due process of the law, then I'll eat my crow and accept the findings of the special counsel and House Intel Committee.

To me, there just seems like a TON of allegations stacking up against this admin and I've never been one to defend a politician by saying its raining when in fact they're pissing all over us. I may have voted for Obama, but there was plenty I didn't like about his time as president. Plenty. And I never bent over backwards to try explain his fuckups.

REDEYE · Mar 2, 2019

theDonger said:
I never said I am unbiased, I said I am not a democrat or republican and that I have voted for candidates of both parties. I have ALWAYS hated the Clintons and hope this whole Epstein case gets re-opened/evaluated because I think some real fucking shitbags are involved.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/do...to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein

When it comes to Trump and this current administration. Damn right I'm biased. Sure seems to me, by a preponderance of evidence and courtfilings that the Trump Organization and Campaign was involved in some criminal behavior.

This video didn't age well: https://youtu.be/WrDCekqFbl8 Paying off a pornstar to right before an election to keep it quiet? That's a crime.

As I have said before. If all of this is one big charade and Trump is exonerated via due process of the law, then I'll eat my crow and accept the findings of the special counsel and House Intel Committee.

To me, there just seems like a TON of allegations stacking up against this admin and I've never been one to defend a politician by saying its raining when in fact they're pissing all over us. I may have voted for Obama, but there was plenty I didn't like about his time as president. Plenty. And I never bent over backwards to try explain his fuckups.

I haven't see a crime yet ? shouldn't be investigating a person without a crime that's allegedly taken place

Serbone · Mar 2, 2019

theDonger said:
I never said I am unbiased, I said I am not a democrat or republican and that I have voted for candidates of both parties. I have ALWAYS hated the Clintons and hope this whole Epstein case gets re-opened/evaluated because I think some real fucking shitbags are involved.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/do...to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein

When it comes to Trump and this current administration. Damn right I'm biased. Sure seems to me, by a preponderance of evidence and courtfilings that the Trump Organization and Campaign was involved in some criminal behavior.

This video didn't age well: https://youtu.be/WrDCekqFbl8 Paying off a pornstar to right before an election to keep it quiet? That's a crime.

As I have said before. If all of this is one big charade and Trump is exonerated via due process of the law, then I'll eat my crow and accept the findings of the special counsel and House Intel Committee.

To me, there just seems like a TON of allegations stacking up against this admin and I've never been one to defend a politician by saying its raining when in fact they're pissing all over us. I may have voted for Obama, but there was plenty I didn't like about his time as president. Plenty. And I never bent over backwards to try explain his fuckups.

If you are unbiased, do you, then, believe the Clinton Foundation should be tax audited and investigated publicly?
Yes or no...

Willie99 · Mar 2, 2019

Paying off a porn star is NOT a crime

There's a precedent, there's case law, you need to become more informed, you need to research and think

-----------------------

"It’s not a crime," he said. "Paying $130,000 to Stormy whatever and paying $130,000 to the other one is not a crime. The Edwards case determined that... The FEC ruled on the Edwards case before they prosecuted it. The FEC ruled it’s no violation of the campaign finance law. The Justice Department went ahead and prosecuted it anyway and they were embarrassed."

SheriffJoe · Mar 2, 2019

NFLTrends · Mar 2, 2019

So what crime was there to want 10 years of tax returns? When will he be charged with the crime so they can use it to get his returns?

(Thinking there "might" be something is NOT legal grounds for anything)

carlspackler · Mar 2, 2019

theDonger said:
Paying off a pornstar to right before an election to keep it quiet? That's a crime.

Actually it is not. Are you aware that congress has a slush fund worth millions of dollars for this very thing?

Dave007inVegas · Mar 2, 2019

Willie99 said:
Paying off a porn star is NOT a crime

There's a precedent, there's case law, you need to become more informed, you need to research and think

-----------------------

"It’s not a crime," he said. "Paying $130,000 to Stormy whatever and paying $130,000 to the other one is not a crime. The Edwards case determined that... The FEC ruled on the Edwards case before they prosecuted it. The FEC ruled it’s no violation of the campaign finance law. The Justice Department went ahead and prosecuted it anyway and they were embarrassed."

carl spackler said:
Actually it is not. Are you aware that congress has a slush fund worth millions of dollars for this very thing?

Yo dingdong, do yourself a favor and quit while you're ahead.

REDEYE · Mar 2, 2019

seems to me there are more important things to worry about then Trumps taxes for congress oversight to look at

Dave007inVegas · Mar 2, 2019

RED EYE said:
seems to me there are more important things to worry about then Trumps taxes for congress oversight to look at

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Yeah you would think so. But when 1 door closes (Russian collusion) another must open (Trump taxes)

This is how Congress justifies its exsistance. [/FONT]

Willie99 · Mar 2, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
Yo dingdong, do yourself a favor and quit while you're ahead.

Categorically incorrect on two topics in this thread alone, including his OP

Dave007inVegas · Mar 2, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
Yeah you would think so. But when 1 door closes (Russian collusion) another must open (Trump taxes)

This is how Congress justifies its exsistance.

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]And if the tax probe ends up a nothing burger then...…

Congressional Democrats are planning to hold hearings about President Trump’s criticisms of establishment
news outlets, according to a new report.

Bloomberg News reports that the House Judiciary Committee, which is currently led by Jerrold Nadler (D-NY),
will seek to investigate Trump calling the media “fake news” and “enemies of the people.”

“The committee will study whether such actions either reflect or blur the Constitution’s separation of powers,” the report states.

Busy busy busy. You just can't make this shit up. [/FONT]

rolltide · Mar 2, 2019

Willie99 said:
Categorically incorrect on two topics in this thread alone, including his OP

donger is barman/lanquel correct?

i know both of them have voices in their heads that are "voluminous and complex" where the Trump Obsession Disorder rages through the brain so i just assumed they are the same guy...same writing style, etc

confused now because i would have given barman more credit than equating a old man's recent tax returns with their net worth

theDonger · Mar 2, 2019

Serbone said:
If you are unbiased, do you, then, believe the Clinton Foundation should be tax audited and investigated publicly?
Yes or no...

Yes, of course. Especially if either of them currently hold public office.

theDonger · Mar 2, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
Yo dingdong, do yourself a favor and quit while you're ahead.

If you think I'm a ghost, I encourage you to have a mod check IPs. I don't know these other users you are comparing me to. I've been here in the NFL/NCAA football forums for years

Serbone · Mar 2, 2019

theDonger said:
Yes, of course. Especially if either of them currently hold public office.

You are suggesting that a crime like this should be let go if you lose an election?

Taking a $145,000,000 "donation" from Russia simultaneous with selling 20% of our country's uranium should still be criminally investigated even though she lost the election.

All kinds of long term associates of Bill Clinton were involved in the deal as middlemen, Bill got a $500,000 fee for one hour speech to some Russians (what could he have told them worth that much... tell me. Tell me.)

Tax returns?

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

New member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Member

Nirvana Shill

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Rx Normal

New member

Rx Alchemist.

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Nirvana Shill

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Life's a bitch, then you die!

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Member

Member

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page