"...there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice"

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
“In the 700 page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice,” he told FOX Business’ Neil Cavuto Opens a New Window. . “Just not enough evidence.”

"Mueller did what a lot of prosecutors do-- they take it upstairs—let the boss decide this," he said. "The evidence is equivocal. So there is evidence of obstruction. There is evidence of no obstruction—they are equivocal, we are going to let the boss decide them. The boss Bill Barr decided we are not prosecuting him."

How convenient that "the boss" was hired because of his June 2018 memo stating a special counsel shouldn't have been appointed and that Trumps obstruction wasn't illegal.

Yep, I'll wait to see what Congress has to say after they obtain the full un-redacted report via subpoena.

edit: source- https://www.foxbusiness.com/politic...roves-conspiracy-obstruction-judge-napolitano
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
^^^^

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]The wheels on the short bus continue to go round and round.... [/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
^^^^

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]The wheels on the short bus continue to go round and round.... [/FONT]

That's definitely one way to characterize FOX news -- Even the state-run media is beginning to see the writing on the wall.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
The funniest part is the link doesn't even work and he doesn't even know this.

:):)
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
25,906
Tokens
What's funnier is the supposed obstruction is based on what crime being committed?

The most disgraceful, partisan hack prosecutorial team ever assembled, 2+ years, all the money and subpoenas, and Dumber is claiming victory to obstruction of a crime that was never committed.

You're a special kind of stupid.
Can you believe these bozo Democrats? WOW
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
What's funnier is the supposed obstruction is based on what crime being committed?

The most disgraceful, partisan hack prosecutorial team ever assembled, 2+ years, all the money and subpoenas, and Dumber is claiming victory to obstruction of a crime that was never committed.

You're a special kind of stupid.
Can you believe these bozo Democrats? WOW

Go back to your spank-cave pedophile
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
Because the website, foxbusiness.com, took it down. FAIR AND BALANCED -- NOTHING TO SEE HERE.


Fortunately, the internet never forgets.

https://web.archive.org/web/2019032...roves-conspiracy-obstruction-judge-napolitano


Quote: "If there were no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction the attorney general would have told us so—he didn’t.”"


AG Barr in fact said there is no evidence of conspiracy.

[FONT=Gordita_Regular]"the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."[/FONT]

How fucking dumb are you?
 

Life's a bitch, then you die!
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
28,910
Tokens
That's definitely one way to characterize FOX news -- Even the state-run media is beginning to see the writing on the wall.
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]You thought I was referring to Fox news? That's adorable. [/FONT]
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
Quote: "[FONT=&]If there were no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction the attorney general would have told us so—he didn’t.”"


AG Barr in fact said there is no evidence of conspiracy.

[/FONT][FONT=Gordita_Regular]"the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign."[/FONT][FONT=&]

How fucking dumb are you?[/FONT]

How fucking dumb are you that the guy giving you all the 'facts' about the Mueller report penned a memo that prejudged the special counsel's investigation of obstruction against the President??

Really, what did you expect Barr to say about it?

Fortunately the House democrats aren't as dimwitted as the President's mindless, knob-polishing, supporters.

Hey you've got a little bit of orange around your mouth
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,454
Tokens
How fucking dumb are you that the guy giving you all the 'facts' about the Mueller report penned a memo that prejudged the special counsel's investigation of obstruction against the President??

Really, what did you expect Barr to say about it?

This isn't responsive simpleton.

You provided a link to someone who did not read the report (after posting 50 times that only Barr has seen the report) who blatantly lied about what the report said.

When this is pointed out to you, you cannot respond.

You should stop talking about these issues because you're embarrassing.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
This isn't responsive simpleton.

You provided a link to someone who did not read the report (after posting 50 times that only Barr has seen the report) who blatantly lied about what the report said.

When this is pointed out to you, you cannot respond.

You should stop talking about these issues because you're embarrassing.

All the more reason to release the full report, Trumptard
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,690
Tokens
What's funnier is the supposed obstruction is based on what crime being committed?

The most disgraceful, partisan hack prosecutorial team ever assembled, 2+ years, all the money and subpoenas, and Dumber is claiming victory to obstruction of a crime that was never committed.

You're a special kind of stupid.
Can you believe these bozo Democrats? WOW

You can't have obstruction without an underlying crime.

Libtards shouldn't be allowed to vote.

:neenee:
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
You can't have obstruction without an underlying crime.

Libtards shouldn't be allowed to vote.

:neenee:

33 Indictments + 7 Guilty Pleas = No Crime

:hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah :hahahahah

Only in Trumptardistan!!!
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,690
Tokens
Screen-Shot-2019-03-27-at-17.24.37.png


cnn-feeding-fake-news-to-liberals.jpg
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,690
Tokens
Mentally Ill Libs Think Barr Is Lying About What’s in the Mueller Report

Mar 28, 2019

RUSH: So we start off with the Democrats and the media and the leadership of the intelligence apparatus and the FBI claiming that the duly elected president of the United States is a traitor, that he stole the election away from the person who shoulda won it, Hillary Rodham Clinton, by colluding with our enemy, the Russians. That’s the starting point, and then for 2-1/2 years that’s all we get. Hundreds of thousands of articles, 500,000 articles, hundreds of thousands of minutes and seconds for two years.

Then we get a report (summaraized): “Trump is not a traitor, Trump did not collude. There isn’t any evidence of it whatsoever. There isn’t any evidence of obstruction of justice.” Then we find out the report is 300 pages, and the people accusing Trump of being a traitor say, “See? He’s still a traitor! It’s in there. It’s in there. Barr is just not telling us. We demand to see the whole thing. We want to see the whole thing now.” Mueller is not correcting these people.

He’s not saying, “You’re right! You’re right. Barr is suppressing it. I found evidence! I found evidence that Trump is treasonous.” Mueller’s not doing that. What are the odds that the 300-plus pages prove and prove and prove and prove and prove and prove and prove and prove over again ad infinitum that Trump is not a traitor? How in the world does a rational person think that the attorney general is purposefully suppressing this evidence and lying to the American people about it because somewhere in those 300 pages is evidence Trump is a traitor?

My God.

This is just incomprehensible.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here’s Jim in San Francisco. Great to have you, sir. Welcome.

CALLER: Hey, Rush. Hey, I wanted to let you know about a little psyops I’m doing out here in San Francisco against the liberals. There is a liberal radio talk show that I’ve called in for years, and one of more fair-minded moderators, you know, would let me go on and make my points. But that individual ended up retiring, and all that’s left now are the far-left radio show hosts. When I call in now, I got quickly cut off. In fact, the more articulate you are, the faster the liberal talk show hosts will cut you off.

So what I’ve been doing recently, is I’ve been calling in pretending to be a dispirited liberal. After the Mueller report was released, I called in. I called in every day, and I just go on and on. I go, “You know, I just can’t believe this. This is so terrible! What can I do. It turns out all my conservative friends were right. What do I say to ’em? Trump was right,” and the talk show hosts, in their effort to comfort me and not let me leave the fold and go over to the other side, they start revealing what their really true intentions are.

When I talked to this one yesterday on the radio, she was saying, “No, no, no. Do not worry. Don’t. It’s okay, ’cause what we’re gonna do is we’re gonna dissemble that 300-page report, and we’re gonna take every little thing they say and turn it around on them — and to prove that, we were so successful. Just one little thing that Robert Mueller or William Barr said, we were able to dissemble. So imagine what we’re gonna have with 300 pages.” So they’re still planning, Rush, impeachment. That’s the plan. (unintelligible)

RUSH: Oh, I know. I know. In the first hour of the program today, the New York Times is making a big deal under about the fact that report is 300 pages, and Barr’s summary is only four pages. And it’s simply not possible to summarize all of what’s in 300 pages in four pages. You can summarize a book in one page if you’re a good editor. If you want to summarize a book, you can do it in one page. Book reports? Everybody’s had to do ’em. But they’re focusing on this. It’s ridiculous. They’re assuming that Barr is suppressing evidence of collusion that’s actually in there.

“Look at Barr’s summary! It’s is four pages, but that report’s 300 pages. There has to be something in there that Barr didn’t want anybody to see.” So they’re now demanding it. I have no doubt that they’re gonna try to find something that they can then blow up and call collusion and the media will be right in on it. I have no doubt they’re gonna try this. I hope they do. I don’t think these people yet realize the damage they’ve done to themselves. I think they are completely unaware. But they have done irreparable damage.

They have let so many down on their own side. They have lied for two years to their own side!, and before that, they lied all throughout the 2016 campaign on how Hillary was a slam-dunk, landslide winner, and they backed it up with all of their phony polls. There’s gonna reach a point — don’t know when — when all of these leftist activists who invest totally in the Drive-By Media are going to begin to have doubts. It’s gonna take a while.

I mean, the Democrat Party’s been lying to its constituency groups like the African-Americans for 50 years, and they’re still getting away with it. But I have no doubt that they’re gonna try this. That’s why they’re all demanding to see the full report. What’s crazy about this, let’s say… I mean, they’re literally accusing the attorney general of suppressing evidence of collusion because he’s “Trump’s hand-picked guy,” and he’s gonna do everything he can to protect Trump.

Well, the guy that wrote the report is out there, and he had 16 to 17 Trump-hating lawyers and investigators on his team. So if there’s evidence of collusion somewhere in the 300 pages, don’t you think one of these people would be speaking up, after Barr releases his summary and says there was no collusion and there was no obstruction? If these guys put it in the report you think one of them would be standing up and saying:

“Hey, wait a minute! This guy, Barr, is lying. There’s all kinds of evidence of collusion in this report.” But that’s not happening.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens

You shouldn't post personal pictures of yourself on the internet, privacy and such.


Also, I'm 100% prepared to accept the findings of the MUELLER report. The Barr memo only contains 86 words from the Mueller report, I'd like to see the full report.

Don't worry, I'm sure someone will help you understand the ramifications of the full report by drawing pretty pictures accompanied by small, easy to digest words.

Trumptards, like dearest leader, are not big readers.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,690
Tokens
"It's in the c̶o̶u̶r̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶c̶u̶m̶e̶n̶t̶s̶ MUELLER report!!!"

-- resident retard

:):):):):):):):):):):):):):)
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
"It's the c̶o̶u̶r̶t̶ ̶d̶o̶c̶u̶m̶e̶n̶t̶s̶ Mueller report!!!"

-- resident retard

:):):):):):):):):):):):):):)

I know reading is hard for you, but court documents DO EXIST for those 33 indictments as well as the 7 guilty please.

Dearest leader sure likes to surround himself with criminals and LIARS.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,591
Messages
13,452,744
Members
99,426
Latest member
bodyhealthtechofficia
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com