Social Security’s short path to implosion

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Trustees for Social Security and Medicare offered some good news Tuesday in their annual report on the programs’ financial health. But don’t get too excited: Their bad news more than made up for it.

On the up side, the retirement program didn’t have to dip into its reserves last year as expected, thanks to the soaring economy. The trustees now say Social Security costs won’t outpace revenue until 2020.

But then the program starts drawing on its $3 trillion in reserves — which means mandatory outlays in the regular federal budget. And after 2034, it will be unable to make full payments to retirees. Similarly, Medicare’s hospital-insurance nest egg will disappear as soon as 2026.

Worse, yet another year has gone by without DC plugging the structural holes that will sock these vital programs soon enough. Absent any changes, Social Security’s projected doomsday is now just 15 years off; Medicare’s, just seven.

When they go bust, payouts for retirees and health-care providers will shrink. And diverting general-fund tax dollars to cover the gaps will choke the federal budget, fuel deficits — or both.

As in the past, the trustees urge lawmakers to act sooner rather than later to limit the pain, preserve options, provide sufficient phase-in time and prepare the public.

What’s driving the problem’s no mystery: Americans now live longer than when the programs were started. Lower birth rates also mean there are fewer taxpaying workers for each retiree. Moreover, health-care costs have soared, in good measure thanks to new tests and treatments.

The trustees are right: Lawmakers shouldn’t kick the can until the last minute. There’s no excuse not to negotiate a curb at least on the growth of benefits. New hikes in the retirement age also now seem inevitable. And means-testing is something Democrats and Republicans can agree on.

What not to do is even clearer. Expanding benefits, for instance — as many Democrats, including several 2020 presidential wannabes, demand — would only tighten the squeeze.

Another non-starter: hiking taxes. That’ll just slow the economy (and maybe even lower Social Security and Medicare tax revenue). Plus, it’s unfair to ask young workers to bail out a system they don’t think will even exist when they retire.

Yet “doing no harm” won’t be good enough. Lawmakers need to put aside their partisanship and do what’s needed now — to avoid greater pain later.




https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/04/27/social-securitys-short-path-to-implosion/amp/
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Yeah, what a disaster waiting to happen......will be interesting to see how both parties deal with it.....especially these socialist dems after Trump leaves office in 2024.

This can't be good, but hey, let's get this trillion dollar Green Deal off the ground & screw medicare & SSI
 

New member
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
6,600
Tokens
new rx rule...fat ass marge must approve all posts...you will now go on post review
 

Banned
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
2,045
Tokens
I do not approve of this post
There’s a Poly forum for a reason. So you nuts can all be corralled
SAD!!!
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
2034 is an interesting year to pull up !

That's about when I expect to die, born in 1963, would make me around 71-72, seems about right, I was planning on about 75, about 77-79 max !

But yeah clearly a problem, I'm almost happy to know I've got perhaps 20 years left, maybe 25 at most, could drop dead today ?

Anyhow I'm highly unlikely to hit 80 given my family history and current health.

I'd put my over/ under at 74, and take the over, I could see 76, don't want any more than that honestly, still that's only about 20 years away, I'm cool with that ! I don't want to be be 98 ever
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
2034 is an interesting year to pull up !

That's about when I expect to die, born in 1963, would make me around 71-72, seems about right, I was planning on about 75, about 77-79 max !

But yeah clearly a problem, I'm almost happy to know I've got perhaps 20 years left, maybe 25 at most, could drop dead today ?

Anyhow I'm highly unlikely to hit 80 given my family history and current health.

I'd put my over/ under at 74, and take the over, I could see 76, don't want any more than that honestly, still that's only about 20 years away, I'm cool with that ! I don't want to be be 98 ever

Was watching Food Network, & a pizzeria owner was 99 & making pizza & throw in the doe up in the air........I guess if you have great health like that, you wouldn't mind living that long, but reality is, most people aren't as healthy as this guy was at 99.......heck, he was moving around better than some 75 year olds.
 
Joined
May 4, 2005
Messages
2,958
Tokens
One thing I've noticed when looking at people over the years there's often a huge difference in someone's health at 65 compared to what it is at 75. That seems to be a huge gap where things really start to go downhill.
 
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Messages
1,770
Tokens
another problem that is an easy fix but political correctness is more important .

like insurance. Hey you work, then you can get a chunk taken Out of every paycheck for a premium but then still have huge copays
Hey look this homeboy doesn’t work and needs treatment for his crack addiction. No charge. Go to dr whenever you want. No charge. No charge for rx. But this diabetic that has a job and contributes to society is broke because all of her money goes to pay for insulin
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,262
Messages
13,449,977
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com