Mueller Time: Substantial evidence Trump attempted to obstruct

theDonger said:

Read it and weep incels.

Charging Trump with a crime was never an option due to established precedent of DOJ guidelines. Mueller also confirmed that Russia interfered with the 2016 election in a coordinated manner by creating FAKE NEWS articles, having russian agents posing as Americans, and inflicting damage on a political candidate.

Our democracy is under attack from foreign adversaries, and the President won't even address the issue let alone take steps from preventing happening again. Perhaps he enjoyed benefiting from the Russian interference a bit too much -- why prevent it from happening again in 2020?


The guys is a fucking LIAR TRAITOR. Get ready for an impeachment!!!

Click to expand...

PatsFanatic said:

Another lie.......

He DID NOT say what your headline says....you fucking stupid or something??

Click to expand...

PatsFanatic said:

Does this guy not understand that Impeachment votes goes through BOTH houses?

Good luck with that

Click to expand...

theDonger said:

I understand how impeachment works. If the Senate wants to remain complicit in the behavior of a criminal president, then let their vote be on the public record.

The house will impeach him and then its up to the Senate on whether or not to take the charge seriously or to hold a kangaroo court.

Click to expand...

Sheriff Joe said:

Mueller's statement doesn't even move the needle. It was just a last ditch effort to keep the coup on life support. Barr is closing in on the traitors and they know they're screwed. Ding-donger and his libtards actually believe this means something. All we can do is just laugh at their desperation.

Click to expand...

Sheriff Joe said:

Mueller's statement doesn't even move the needle. It was just a last ditch effort to keep the deep state coup on life support. Barr is closing in on the traitors and they know they're screwed. Ding-donger and his libtards actually believe this means something. All we can do is just laugh at their desperation.

Click to expand...

PatsFanatic said:

correct.....all the guy did was read what he wrote months ago.

But its a big "AAHA" moment for the little minds.

Click to expand...

theDonger said:

Are you retarded?

“Under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office... Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.”

"If we had confidence that the president did not commit a crime, we would have said so."

Click to expand...

Sheriff Joe said:

Yes, yes I am.

Click to expand...

theDonger said:

Wrong. It gives Congress the green light to begin an impeachment inquiry.

Click to expand...

PatsFanatic said:

"Substantial evidence Trump attempted to obstruct" Never said it or wrote it

Click to expand...

And in a second volume, the report describes the results and analysis of our obstruction of justice investigation involving the president.

The order appointing the Special Counsel authorized us to investigate actions that could obstruct the investigation. And we conducted that investigation and we kept the Office of the Acting Attorney General apprised of the progress of our work.

And as set forth in the report after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime. The introduction to the volume two of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited. The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice and by regulation it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider.

The Department’s written opinion explaining the policy makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report, and I will describe two of them for you. First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting President because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could be charged now. And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrong doing. And beyond Department policy we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially — it would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

Click to expand...

Sheriff Joe said:

Well, Pelosi may proceed to slice her own throat (politically speaking), but the rest of the country will just laugh...like everyone here at the moment laughing at you.

Trump attempted to obstruct a hoax!!!!

:laughingb

Click to expand...

PatsFanatic said:

It's the silliest thing ever. I'm starting to root for the guy to obstruct more if he did indeed do so the first time around.

I would like to obstruct more than half of Washington in doing their job, we'd be better off no doubt.

Click to expand...