It does not matter. They do not really care.
It is not about business, it is about an ideology.
CNN exists to spread the globalist socialist message, not to make profits. Same with most others in the media.
Again, there are 140,000,000 voters, the globalist socialist message is getting to >90% of them thru media-press, Hollywood, 4 social media giants, and academia. Cable news like this is a drop in the bucket.
A few million a night see Fox News? SO what?
It is not about business, it is about an ideology.
CNN exists to spread the globalist socialist message, not to make profits. Same with most others in the media.
Again, there are 140,000,000 voters, the globalist socialist message is getting to >90% of them thru media-press, Hollywood, 4 social media giants, and academia. Cable news like this is a drop in the bucket.
A few million a night see Fox News? SO what?
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932FollowFollow
More
2/n Here's 'holy fucking shit' #1
2:33 PM - 28 May 2019
60 replies722 retweets1,899 likes
Reply
60
Retweet
722
Like
1.9K
Direct message
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
Tweet text
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
1/n Spent some time on LexisNexis over the weekend. Depending on your political orientation, what follows will either disturb or encourage you. But regardless of political orientation, I'm sure we can all say 'holy fucking shit'
451 replies2,595 retweets4,803 likes
Reply
451
Retweet
2.6K
Like
4.8K
Direct message
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932FollowFollow @ZachG932
More
2/n Here's 'holy fucking shit' #1
2:33 PM - 28 May 2019
- 722 Retweets
- 1,899 Likes
-
60 replies722 retweets1,899 likes
Reply
60
Retweet
722
Like
1.9K
Direct message
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[FONT="]
- New conversation
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#2
10 replies348 retweets1,079 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
348
Like
1.1K
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#3
3 replies245 retweets854 likes
Reply
3
Retweet
245
Like
854
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#4
5 replies262 retweets872 likes
Reply
5
Retweet
262
Like
872
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#5
15 replies325 retweets937 likes
Reply
15
Retweet
325
Like
937
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
(#6) So many of these graphs look the same that, without the title, it looks like I'm simply reposting a single chart
12 replies300 retweets965 likes
Reply
12
Retweet
300
Like
965
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
(#7) If you're looking for a job in a booming industry....
17 replies232 retweets846 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
232
Like
846
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
(#8) Some of these terms (such as the one below) turn up so many results that I had to limit the search to a single news source
13 replies219 retweets773 likes
Reply
13
Retweet
219
Like
773
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
(#9)
8 replies186 retweets699 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
186
Like
699
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
(#10)
7 replies183 retweets661 likes
Reply
7
Retweet
183
Like
661
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#11
6 replies163 retweets602 likes
Reply
6
Retweet
163
Like
602
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#12
7 replies136 retweets564 likes
Reply
7
Retweet
136
Like
564
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#13 I was telling @rasmansa that I don't recall the term 'people of color' being used so frequently in previous years/decades. Maybe there's something to this...?
17 replies216 retweets755 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
216
Like
755
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#14: One important thing to keep in mind is that only results for articles which LexisNexis has inventorized are going to turn up. For instance, the trend below technically begins in the 1980s; but only a handful of articles that LexisNexis has for this period mentions 'racism'.
5 replies157 retweets573 likes
Reply
5
Retweet
157
Like
573
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#15: Clear Charlottesville effect
3 replies144 retweets593 likes
Reply
3
Retweet
144
Like
593
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#16 Our future is intersectional
14 replies156 retweets614 likes
Reply
14
Retweet
156
Like
614
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
Have a couple more I'm currently working on (including political correctness). Anybody have any other suggestions?
129 replies44 retweets353 likes
Reply
129
Retweet
44
Like
353
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#17 'Unconscious bias' is more frequency referred to than 'implicit bias', but had to check
10 replies92 retweets464 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
92
Like
464
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
#18 During the 90s, the number of articles (at least on LexisNexis) mentioning 'political correctness' ranged from 4 (1990) to 380 (1990). 2007 was the first year this number entered into the 1000s (1056), which is where it's stayed since 2013.
8 replies100 retweets416 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
100
Like
416
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
@C_Kavanagh You asked for RW-related terms. Here's one.
10 replies23 retweets157 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
23
Like
157
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
As some of you pointed out, any search term is likely to see an overtime increase (if only due to growth in the number of news outlets/publications). As such, I think it's better to limit the searches to single publications. So here's the trend for 'PC' in the NYT
12 replies79 retweets353 likes
Reply
12
Retweet
79
Like
353
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
And here's the number of NYT articles mentioning 'diversity'
8 replies89 retweets392 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
89
Like
392
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 28More
Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here's the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected.
16 replies106 retweets446 likes
Reply
16
Retweet
106
Like
446
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 29More
The 'privilege' NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word 'privilege' need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I'm skeptical.
23 replies62 retweets300 likes
Reply
23
Retweet
62
Like
300
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 29More
Update: Currently working on tallying the annual number of NYT articles between 1980-2018 so I can calculate percentages. The NYT doesn't make this information readily available so I have to 'cheat' by using noise words (e.g. 'the') as search terms.
8 replies23 retweets175 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
23
Like
175
Direct message
-
Zach Goldberg @ZachG932 May 29More
Update #2: Okay, I've finished one of them. Once again, using 'the' as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that 'racism' mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles.
17 replies63 retweets261 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
63
Like
261
Direct message
-
[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[LIST]
[*][INDENT][URL="https://twitter.com/ZachG932"]Zach Goldberg @ZachG932[/URL] May 28More
1/n Spent some time on LexisNexis over the weekend. Depending on your political orientation, what follows will either disturb or encourage you. But regardless of political orientation, I'm sure we can all say 'holy fucking shit'
451 replies2,595 retweets4,803 likes
Reply
451
Retweet
2.6K
Like
4.8K
Direct message
[/INDENT]
[/LIST]
[/FONT]
[FONT="][URL="https://twitter.com/ZachG932"]Zach Goldberg @ZachG932[/URL]FollowFollow@ZachG932
More
2/n Here's 'holy fucking shit' #1
2:33 PM - 28 May 2019
- 722 Retweets
- 1,899 Likes
60 replies722 retweets1,899 likes
Reply
60
Retweet
722
Like
1.9K
Direct message
[/FONT]
[FONT="][INDENT=2][IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/395756624/puss_normal.jpg[/IMG]Tweet text
[COLOR=#657786]
[/COLOR]
[/INDENT]
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#14171A][FONT="]
- New conversation
#2
10 replies348 retweets1,079 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
348
Like
1.1K
Direct message
#3
3 replies245 retweets854 likes
Reply
3
Retweet
245
Like
854
Direct message
#4
5 replies262 retweets872 likes
Reply
5
Retweet
262
Like
872
Direct message
#5
15 replies325 retweets937 likes
Reply
15
Retweet
325
Like
937
Direct message
(#6) So many of these graphs look the same that, without the title, it looks like I'm simply reposting a single chart
12 replies300 retweets965 likes
Reply
12
Retweet
300
Like
965
Direct message
(#7) If you're looking for a job in a booming industry....
17 replies232 retweets846 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
232
Like
846
Direct message
(#8) Some of these terms (such as the one below) turn up so many results that I had to limit the search to a single news source
13 replies219 retweets773 likes
Reply
13
Retweet
219
Like
773
Direct message
(#9)
8 replies186 retweets699 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
186
Like
699
Direct message
(#10)
7 replies183 retweets661 likes
Reply
7
Retweet
183
Like
661
Direct message
#11
6 replies163 retweets602 likes
Reply
6
Retweet
163
Like
602
Direct message
#12
7 replies136 retweets564 likes
Reply
7
Retweet
136
Like
564
Direct message
#13 I was telling @rasmansa that I don't recall the term 'people of color' being used so frequently in previous years/decades. Maybe there's something to this...?
17 replies216 retweets755 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
216
Like
755
Direct message
#14: One important thing to keep in mind is that only results for articles which LexisNexis has inventorized are going to turn up. For instance, the trend below technically begins in the 1980s; but only a handful of articles that LexisNexis has for this period mentions 'racism'.
5 replies157 retweets573 likes
Reply
5
Retweet
157
Like
573
Direct message
#15: Clear Charlottesville effect
3 replies144 retweets593 likes
Reply
3
Retweet
144
Like
593
Direct message
#16 Our future is intersectional
14 replies156 retweets614 likes
Reply
14
Retweet
156
Like
614
Direct message
Have a couple more I'm currently working on (including political correctness). Anybody have any other suggestions?
129 replies44 retweets353 likes
Reply
129
Retweet
44
Like
353
Direct message
#17 'Unconscious bias' is more frequency referred to than 'implicit bias', but had to check
10 replies92 retweets464 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
92
Like
464
Direct message
#18 During the 90s, the number of articles (at least on LexisNexis) mentioning 'political correctness' ranged from 4 (1990) to 380 (1990). 2007 was the first year this number entered into the 1000s (1056), which is where it's stayed since 2013.
8 replies100 retweets416 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
100
Like
416
Direct message
@C_Kavanagh You asked for RW-related terms. Here's one.
10 replies23 retweets157 likes
Reply
10
Retweet
23
Like
157
Direct message
As some of you pointed out, any search term is likely to see an overtime increase (if only due to growth in the number of news outlets/publications). As such, I think it's better to limit the searches to single publications. So here's the trend for 'PC' in the NYT
12 replies79 retweets353 likes
Reply
12
Retweet
79
Like
353
Direct message
And here's the number of NYT articles mentioning 'diversity'
8 replies89 retweets392 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
89
Like
392
Direct message
Original NYT Racism graph was actually an undercount. The search was generated with racism in quotations (and quotations should only be used when connecting two words). Here's the corrected figure. Let me see if other graphs are similarly affected.
16 replies106 retweets446 likes
Reply
16
Retweet
106
Like
446
Direct message
The 'privilege' NYT graph was also an undercount. Obviously, the word 'privilege' need not refer to social/racial privilege. I nevertheless find it interesting that its use has grown tremendously over the past few years. It could be just a coincidence, but I'm skeptical.
23 replies62 retweets300 likes
Reply
23
Retweet
62
Like
300
Direct message
Update: Currently working on tallying the annual number of NYT articles between 1980-2018 so I can calculate percentages. The NYT doesn't make this information readily available so I have to 'cheat' by using noise words (e.g. 'the') as search terms.
8 replies23 retweets175 likes
Reply
8
Retweet
23
Like
175
Direct message
Update #2: Okay, I've finished one of them. Once again, using 'the' as a search term, I tabulated the number of results for NYT each year between 1980-2018. In the end, it seems that 'racism' mentions grew both in absolute terms *and* as a percent of all listed articles.
17 replies63 retweets261 likes
Reply
17
Retweet
63
Like
261
Direct message
[/FONT]
Quality post :neenee:
