The 11 instances of Trump obstructing justice detailed in the Mueller report.

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

I realize that reading may be hard for some of you, but I hear that the Mueller report is available as an audio-book. I recommend giving it a read/listen.

However, for those of you that hang on every last lying-word of the President... here is what's ACTUALLY in the report.

https://justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Scroll to PDF page 209 to view the table of comments and tell me what starts on page 15.

II. FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION
A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President' s Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia
D . Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Comey
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
G. The President's Efforts to Prevent Disclosure of Emails About the June 9, 2016 Meeting Between Russians and Senior Campaign Officials
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort, **REDACTED**
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen
L. Overarching Factual Issues

Willie99 · Jun 18, 2019

the whole world laughs at this dude, especially his handlers

they're thinking "we can't believe assholes are still falling for this bullshit"

Willie99 · Jun 18, 2019

Donger getting his daily briefing

Good boy, now go spread the word

PS: and you know he falls for that feeding trick every day too

SheriffJoe · Jun 18, 2019

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Willie99 said:
the whole world laughs at this dude, especially his handlers

they're thinking "we can't believe assholes are still falling for this bullshit"

[/IMG]

The whole world?? Nah, maybe a handful of willfully ignorant who will slurp up and swallow whatever the president puts on their chin.

If Trump wants to keep repeating "NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION" then Mueller report should support that.

Facts matter:

"As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that." -Robert Mueller

Acebb · Jun 18, 2019

Zero pages of the report say the President obstructed justice.

Do you know what zero means, dummy?

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Acebb said:
Zero pages of the report say the President obstructed justice.

Do you know what zero means, dummy?

They didn't, because DOJ policy said they couldn't.

We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the President did commit a crime. The introduction to volume two of our report explains that decision.

It explains that under long-standing Department policy, a President cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office. That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view—that too is prohibited.

The Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice and, by regulation, it was bound by that Department policy. Charging the President with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.

The Department’s written opinion explaining the policy against charging a President makes several important points that further informed our handling of the obstruction investigation. Those points are summarized in our report. And I will describe two of them:
First, the opinion explicitly permits the investigation of a sitting President because it is important to preserve evidence while memories are fresh and documents are available. Among other things, that evidence could be used if there were co-conspirators who could now be charged.
And second, the opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing.

And beyond Department policy, we were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of an actual charge.

So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President.

Acebb · Jun 18, 2019

theDonger said:
They didn't, because DOJ policy said they couldn't.

No, that is a lie.

Report: "We didn't reach a determination"

You: "Mueller reached a determination!"

You're so fucking dumb it is scary.

SheriffJoe · Jun 18, 2019

Mueller could have easily recommended prosecution...but he didn't.

It is painful to watch how dumb this kid is!

Meanwhile...

"House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff says he thinks “time is running out” for Robert Mueller to testify before Congress: “I think we’re reaching a point where if we can’t reach an agreement, and I hope we will, then we’ll have to use a subpoena"

:hahahahah

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Acebb said:
No, that is a lie.

Report: "We didn't reach a determination"

You: "Mueller reached a determination!"

You're so fucking dumb it is scary.

You are implying that the absence of a formal indictment in the Mueller report exonerates the president of obstruction.

I am saying that the absence of a formal indictment was not allowed, per DOJ rules.

This alone is reason enough for a Congressional hearing. Congressional oversight is function of government and mechanism designed by the founding fathers.

I guess we'll see if the dems have enough balls to actually hold an impeachment inquiry. If this was Obama, or a Clinton, the GOP would already have articles of impeachment drawn up.

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Sheriff Joe said:
Mueller could have easily recommended prosecution...but he didn't.

It is painful to watch how dumb this kid is!

Meanwhile...

[FONT=&]"House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff says he thinks “time is running out” for Robert Mueller to testify before Congress: “I think we’re reaching a point where if we can’t reach an agreement, and I hope we will, then we’ll have to use a subpoena"

[/FONT]:hahahahah

Here's the shorter version inbreed

So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President.

SheriffJoe · Jun 18, 2019

theDonger said:
Here's the shorter version inbreed

So that was the Justice Department policy and those were the principles under which we operated. From them we concluded that we would not reach a determination – one way or the other – about whether the President committed a crime. That is the office’s final position and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the President.

Then what was the point of the investigation?

hno:

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Sheriff Joe said:
Then what was the point of the investigation? hno:

Trump campaign colluding with Russia and Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Willie99 · Jun 18, 2019

There was no collusion, which means there can't be obstruction

So simple, even a fucking idiot SHOULD understand it. But we're not dealing with your run of the mill fucking idiots, we're dealing with fucking idiots that the fucking idiots can call fucking idiots

SheriffJoe · Jun 18, 2019

theDonger said:
Trump campaign colluding with Russia and Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Which we all knew never happened, despite your vehement insistence to the contrary for months on end.

"Trump is Manafucked!! It's in the court documents!!"

Retard.

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Willie99 said:
There was no collusion, which means there can't be obstruction

Trump obstructed the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Willie99 · Jun 18, 2019

Here's a cute cowboy analogy

-------------------------------

[FONT=&quot]An anonymous, but wise, Wyoming rancher recently summarized special counsel [/FONT][FONT=&quot]Robert Mueller[/FONT][FONT=&quot]’s report in clear middle-America language: “We know that old boy didn’t actually steal any horses, but he’s obviously guilty of trying to avoid being hanged for it.”

---------------------

only really stupid fucking idiots have no idea what this cowboy is talking about

then again, that's what makes the fucking idiots so adorable, they're so much fun to laugh at [/FONT]

Dave007inVegas · Jun 18, 2019

Willie99 said:
There was no collusion, which means there can't be obstruction

So simple, even a fucking idiot SHOULD understand it. But we're not dealing with your run of the mill fucking idiots, we're dealing with fucking idiots that the fucking idiots can call fucking idiots

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Lighten up Frances, the poor bastard is borderline illiterate.[/FONT]

theDonger · Jun 18, 2019

Willie99 said:
Here's a cute cowboy analogy

-------------------------------

[FONT="]An anonymous, but wise, Wyoming rancher recently summarized special counsel [/FONT][/COLOR][COLOR=#2B2C30][FONT="]Robert Mueller[/FONT][FONT="]’s report in clear middle-America language: “We know that old boy didn’t actually steal any horses, but he’s obviously guilty of trying to avoid being hanged for it.”

---------------------

only really stupid fucking idiots have no idea what this cowboy is talking about

then again, that's what makes the fucking idiots so adorable, they're so much fun to laugh at [/FONT]

Your homosexual cowboy story works if you are talking about obstruction and the investigation into Trump colluding with Russia.

There was a second directive. Mueller was ordered to investigate Russian interference int eh 2016 election. Items E, F, and I would have obstructed that investigation.

E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel

skoda · Jun 18, 2019

"As set forth in NO report, after the investigation that never happened

we have confidence that some Presidents clearly do commit crimes, so we don't investigate.
"
welcome to the political arena, when they do investigate they call it suicide! Ask da Clintons!

The 11 instances of Trump obstructing justice detailed in the Mueller report.

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Rx Normal

Member

Member

Member

Member

Rx Normal

Member

Member

Rx Normal

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Rx Normal

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Member

Member

Forum statistics

Share this page