Google Exposed, again....

rolltide · Jun 24, 2019

if you don't have time to watch the full 25 minutes then at least check out the hidden cam with Google's head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai. She confirms that Google are creating their algorithms specifically to combat Trump's reelection in 2020 and that "only big tech can stop the next Trump situation" (aka: a president that isn't a radical liberal)

and from the anonymous guy interviewed when asked what "fairness" means at Google:
[FONT=&quot]“Fairness Is a dog whistle. What they’re really saying about fairness is that they have to manipulate their search results so it gives them the political agenda that they want. And so they have to re-bias their algorithms so that they can get their agenda across.”[/FONT]

https://www.projectveritas.com/2019...revent-trump-situation-in-2020-on-hidden-cam/

Google internal documents mandating algorithm development to tamper with the 2020 election, https://www.projectveritas.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/SS1DocDump.pdf

SheriffJoe · Jun 24, 2019

Outside of illegal aliens, this is the most important issue and nobody is talking about it.

I've already ditched Chrome and installed Dissenter as my web browser, along with the DuckDuckGo as my search engine.

Google is evil. Time to break them up, along with all the other fascist Big Tech companies.

rolltide · Jun 24, 2019

Sheriff Joe said:
Outside of illegal aliens, this is the most important issue and nobody is talking about it.

I've already ditched Chrome and installed Dissenter as my web browser, along with the DuckDuckGo as my search engine.

Google is evil. Time to break them up, along with all the other fascist Big Tech companies.

i'll have to check out dissenter

i use duckduckgo for personal browser but i need google for my work one because of the integration with my business apps. the negative with DDG is that you click "news" and it's pulling up stuff that is really dated.

Coldweather · Jun 24, 2019

We needs to put google into the dot com clink, and toss the clink key into a pile

of ca ca! azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^azzkick(&^

rolltide · Jun 24, 2019

good article that summarizes today's new info:

Monday, 24 June 2019

Google Is Gearing Up To Defeat Trump In 2020

Written by R. Cort Kirkwood

A new exposé from Project Veritas shows that Google is working to defeat Donald Trump in 2020.

Project Veritas published documents from Google that demonstrated its anti-conservative bias, as well as video of a top Google executive who admitted the globe-straddling tech behemoth will use its Artificial Intelligence technology to stop Trump’s re-election.

And yet another whistleblower told Project Veritas that what Google means by “fairness” isn’t what users mean, and the anti-Trump work at the company includes rigging the auto-complete feature of its search engine to favor the hard left.

AI Attack
Project Veritas’ key revelation comes from Jen Gennai, Google’s chief of “Responsible Innovation,” a title itself that telegraphs what her job is: deep-sixing Trump and going to war against conservatives.

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again,” Gennai said.

As well, “we’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Apparently, Americans who voted for Trump don’t understand “fairness,” and so Google was forced to step in to rectify that failing and ensure his defeat.

“The reason we launched our AI principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand,” Gennai said. “They were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable, so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.”

Unsurprisingly, Gennai thinks fairness is about pushing victim ideology:

My definition of fairness and bias specifically talks about historically marginalized communities. And that’s who I care about. Communities who are in power and have traditionally been in power are not who I’m solving fairness for.

Gennai correctly observed that the “same people who voted for the current president who do not agree with our definition of fairness.”

And whatever her love for Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren, Gennai is concerned about her plan to break up Google because Trump might be re-elected:

"Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that."

Among Gennai and Google’s kooky ideas are “algorithmic unfairness,” meaning that even if a search result is objectively true, if the truth is “unfair,” the search result might have to be manipulated.

Says one Google document Veritas published:
For example, imagine that a Google image query for “CEOs” shows predominantly men. Even if it were a factually accurate representation of the world, it would be algorithmic unfairness because it would reinforce the stereotype about the role of women in leadership positions....

In some cases, it may be appropriate to take no action if the system accurately reflects current reality, while in other cases it may be desirable to consider how we might help society reach a more fair and equitable state.

Example? Typing “men can” into a search window auto-completes as “have babies.”

Google Insider
And auto-complete, the Google whistleblower showed PV’s James O’Keefe, is how Google manipulates search results.

Typing in “Hillary Clinton’s emails” will not autocomplete, even though the emails, according to Google’s own analytics, were a highly searched subject. Yet “Donald Trump’s emails” provided a full menu of auto-complete options even though the president’s emails were not a highly searched subject.

Why the difference? Because, the whistleblower said, the social justice warriors inside Google think “Clinton’s emails [are] a conspiracy theory and it’s unfair to return results based on her emails.”

Social justice warriors are “training the AI now,” he told O’Keefe, and YouTube, a Google subsidiary, is censoring conservatives as well.

As for fairness, it’s “a dog whistle. It does not mean you think it means,” meaning what an average Google user would think. “And you have to apply doublethink in order to understand what they’re really saying.”

For the social justice warriors inside Google, “fairness is that they have to manipulate their search results so that it gives them the political agenda that they want.”

Google, he said, is a “highly-biased political machine that is bent upon never letting some like Donald Trump come to power again.”

rolltide · Jun 24, 2019

PragerU‏

BREAKING: A court date has been set for the PragerU vs. Google/YouTube hearing - August 27, 2019. PragerU will present oral arguments to the Ninth Circuit Court in its case against the big tech company for restricting access to over 100 of PragerU's educational videos.

TomGshotput · Jun 24, 2019

This is Fake News. And old news. Trump already addressed this issue as part of his Make America Great Again promise to the country. He did this in 2017. This sort of bullshit has been dead for over two years now. These so-called journalists in the liberal media are proving once again why they are the enemy of the people. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presiden...ntial-advisory-commission-election-integrity/

Serbone · Jun 24, 2019

Sheriff Joe said:
Outside of illegal aliens, this is the most important issue and nobody is talking about it.

I've already ditched Chrome and installed Dissenter as my web browser, along with the DuckDuckGo as my search engine.

Google is evil. Time to break them up, along with all the other fascist Big Tech companies.

100% agree!

Willie99 · Jun 24, 2019

I just googled "Men can"

men can get pregnant now
men cancer
men canvas shoes
men can have babies now
men candles
men can have periods
men can think about nothing
men can cook
men can't multitask

WOW

Michelangelo · Jun 24, 2019

Today President Trump signed a very significant executive order calling for transparency in hospital pricing. It is a huge deal if you have a large deductible or no insurance at all. Prices will start coming down for many hospital services as they embarrassed by how much less others in the same geographic neighborhood are charging for the same procedures.

I just Googled "Trump news today". There is absolutely no mention of this executive order on the first page that came up.

I find similar results all the time when I am looking for current news favorable to conservatives or made by conservatives when it would be looked at as positive by any thinking person.

I hate the idea of legislating companies but these social media companies are the biggest monopolies ever seen in this country. Where are legislators invoking the Sherman Antitrust Act which has been the backbone of antitrust laws since 1890?

Something has to give so that conservative viewpoints are properly heard on these massive platforms like Google and Facebook.

SheriffJoe · Jun 24, 2019

James O'Keefe‏ @JamesOKeefeIIIFollowFollow

@JamesOKeefeIII

BREAKING: YOUTUBE/GOOGLE HAS REMOVED OUR GOOGLE INVESTIGATION as it was approaching 50K likes and a million views. IMPORTANT: Please download it on @bitchute and repost it.

6:30 PM - 24 Jun 2019

:neenee:

rolltide · Jun 25, 2019

Sheriff Joe said:
James O'Keefe‏ @JamesOKeefeIIIFollowFollow
@JamesOKeefeIII

BREAKING: YOUTUBE/GOOGLE HAS REMOVED OUR GOOGLE INVESTIGATION as it was approaching 50K likes and a million views. IMPORTANT: Please download it on @bitchute and repost it.

6:30 PM - 24 Jun 2019

:neenee:

YouTube pulled vid and deleted all shared versions. Same thing they did 2 weeks ago with Veritas' Pinterest Censorship vid
Reddit canceled Project Veritas' owners account
Twitter pulled "Project Veritas" down from their Trending section

big tech giving you a strong "Sieg Hiel"

rolltide · Jun 25, 2019

response from this jen gennai cvnt playing the victim:

These are a series of debunked conspiracy theories about our search results, and our other products. Google has repeatedly been clear that it works to be a trustworthy source of information, without regard to political viewpoint. In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings. And everything I have seen backs this up. Our CEO has said ”We do not bias our products to favor any political agenda.” He’s somewhat more powerful and authoritative than me.

But despite what the video may have you believe, I’m not involved in any of these products, just like I’m not involved in any of the other topics Project Veritas baited me into discussing (whether it’s antitrust, Congress, or the dozens of other topics that didn’t appear in the video, on which I presumably didn’t say anything that could be twisted to their advantage). I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.

Willie99 · Jun 25, 2019

Is it possible that liberals and people who believe in conspiracy theories and people like Ron Paul supporters are younger and / or are not employed full time and tend to spend much more time on the internet doing searches? Does this impact their algorithms and search results?

Taking liberalism out of the equation

1) when 9/11 searches were popular, the vast majority of the first two pages of hits were about conspiracy theories. For example, you'd find 20 stories about no eyewitnesses at the Pentagon before you'd find the 1 story where the reported quotes 50 eyewitnesses describing the specifics of what they saw

2) when Ron Paul was a Republican candidate, all the polls and all the stories about the Republican primaries had him winning by yuuuuuuge numbers, when in reality he barely registered in the vote tally

I'm guessing this might be part of the problem. Although I also believe there's more to it then that, I believe all the reports about the bias found in the management of those companies.

How does Yahoo pick there headlines? because they're always about the bullshit the Dongers and Duuuuuuuuufeces cite too

SheriffJoe · Jun 25, 2019

Gohmert Responds to Undercover Video of Google Released by Project Veritas

Washington, June 24, 2019

Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding the undercover video of Google released by Project Veritas:

“This video shows Google’s biases are now a threat to a free and fair election, all while they hide behind the immunity given by Congress years ago when they were supposed to be a simple ‘town square’ where everyone’s voice could be heard without biased results. In fact, Google references a significant role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections. This discovery should set off alarm bells throughout the country. It is no secret that Google has a political agenda. Multiple brave tech insiders have stepped forward and exposed Google’s censorship of content and specialized algorithms. This media giant’s ‘social justice narrative’ should distress all Americans who value a free and open society. Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped and to be properly pursued by class action lawsuits by those they have knowingly harmed.”

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”

Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”

Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”

Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”

LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”

Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News

Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230

SheriffJoe · Jun 25, 2019

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.35.03-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2019-06-21-at-3.13.29-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.37.28-PM.png

SheriffJoe · Jun 25, 2019

"algorithmic unfairness"

uke1:

rolltide · Jun 25, 2019

this was written 2 years ago but certainly hits the nail with these Google SJW's

[h=2]The Politically Correct Thought Police[/h]In defining themselves as saviour of the minority, the puerile priests of political correctness have claimed their self perceived moral and intellectual high ground. From these lofty heights they feel entirely justified in their thought fascism. Unable to see that the increasing array of generalisations and stereotypes they so freely hand out to the majority has in effect turned them into what they purport to hate. Equally anyone from the larger collective whom dare step out from behind the sofa and voice an opposing view is beaten back into submission with an ever increasing array of vacuous labels. Once size fits all labels that attempt to relegate discussion, thought and the debate of dogmatic principles to the annals of history.

[h=2]A.I Groupthink[/h]Firstly in terms of artificial intelligence the elephant in the room is that it's being designed by the usual suspects. Indeed the usual suspects that are gradually manipulating us towards the collectivisation of opinion and indeed thought. From the trends perspective it’s interesting to think about how this may fit into an A.I monitored world. In many ways we have been and are being primed towards group think and the evolution of this concept would seem to be heading towards some form of A.I hive mind.

Indeed critical thinking appears to be waning and equally there is vast swathe of the population that are more than happy to have a never ending stream of “experts” define the boundaries of their world perception and reality. Once we have an artificial intelligence I feel this process will exponentially increase. The vast majority of people will simply hand over their minds and their capacity to question or disagree and A.I will become judge and jury.

It's said artificial intelligence can be controlled but does that mean they could also direct it? manipulate it to shape the world that they seek to create. There is certainly a big difference between articial intelligence and A.I consciousness but the lines seem to be increasingly blurred. It's my belief that the elites of this world are intent on creating a technological and intellectual feudal system. One where we hand our minds away to groupthink whilst at the same time they retain their intellectual ability. It may be a slow process but over time I can really see how this system could come into being.

rolltide · Jun 25, 2019

[h=1]BREAKING: New Google Document Leaked Describing Shapiro, Prager, as ‘nazis using the dogwhistles’[/h]

by Staff Report
June 25, 2019
in News Posts / Top Stories / Veritas Leaks / Tech / Google

(New York) – Project Veritas has obtained a newly leaked document from Google that appears to show a Google employee and member of Google “transparency-and-ethics” group calling conservative and libertarian commentators, including Dennis Prager and Ben Shapiro, “nazis.” Project Veritas received this document after the release of its investigation into Google through the “Be Brave” campaign at VeritasTips@protonmail.com.

Other big tech insiders can contact Project Veritas HERE.

The email apparently was sent as part of the Google “transparency-and-ethics” group internal communications and suggests that content from PragerU, Jordan Peterson, and Ben Shapiro should be disabled from the “suggestion feature.”
[h=5]“…if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles…”[/h]

Click to see larger image.

[h=5]“I don’t think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith’s suggestion of disabling the suggestion feature?”[/h]After the release of our Google investigation, Google Senior Executive Jen Gennai posted on Medium saying:

“Google has repeatedly been clear that it works to be a trustworthy source of information, without regard to political viewpoint. In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings.” – Jen Gennai, Head of Responsible Innovation at Google

The leaked document appears to contradict Jen Gennai’s claim that Google has “no notions of political ideology in its search rankings.”

The video was pulled down by YouTube yesterday citing “privacy violations.” Viewers can still watch the video in the following places:

Additional insiders can share their stories with Project Veritas securely at VeritasTips@protonmail.com. Project Veritas plans to continue recruiting insiders in technology, government, media, and education.

SheriffJoe · Jun 25, 2019

Gohmert is absolutely right, strip them of their protections and sue their asses off!

Google Exposed, again....

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Rx Normal

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Member

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Rx. Senior

Member

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Member

Rx Normal

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Rx Normal

Rx Normal

Rx Normal

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

I'm from the government and I'm here to help

Rx Normal

Forum statistics

Share this page