Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this picture?
Hint: it NOT about the moon and wind or no wind, look closely at this picture and tell me why it's not a flag that's waving, it was never intended to really wave
the clue is in the flag itself
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this picture?
Hint: it NOT about the moon and wind or no wind, look closely at this picture and tell me why it's not a flag that's waving, it was never intended to really wave
the clue is in the flag itself
OMG, of all people, I wouldn't expect LM to have the answer. My she's not a conspiracy aficionado
Yes, the thread is not about another moon landing conspiracy, it's a rebuttal of one of the favorite conspiracy theories. The flag couldn't wave like that on the moon.
Well it didn't and even that part was planned by NASA. The top of the flag is perfectly straight, and that's because NASA put a crossbar in it to make it appear as if it's waving in the wind
There are rather simple answers to most questions, you just have to look for them
Yes, the thread is not about another moon landing conspiracy, it's a rebuttal of one of the favorite conspiracy theories. The flag couldn't wave like that on the moon.
Well it didn't and even that part was planned by NASA. The top of the flag is perfectly straight, and that's because NASA put a crossbar in it to make it appear as if it's waving in the wind
There are rather simple answers to most questions, you just have to look for them
She doesn't even know she's all riled up up semantics. Essentially repeats what I'm saying, and still argues about it
OK, the rod was not intended to make the flag appear has if it's waving, it was intended to make sure the flag doesn't droop down. Well alrighty then, I stand corrected
face)(*^%
and the fool thinks he's make some point, he and mob absolutely share the same genes
all bitch all day every day, weird lives they live, they're like trying to have a conversation with a brick wall
no offense to brick walls intended, they actually serve a purpose
