The Rise and Fall of Legendz Sportsbook, Part I

Search

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
Breaking Down The Rise and Fall of Legendz Sportsbook, Part I

John Holden Posted on Jul 31, 2019


This is an installment in a periodic series for Legal Sports Report looking at famous sports betting cases, how the cases came together, and how they eventually concluded.


This article looks at the indictment of the founders of Legendz Sportsbook. The prosecution alleged that this was one of the largest illegal sports betting operations in the history of the United States, seeing an alleged handle of upwards of $1 billion.


Looking inside the indictment


On March 20, 2013, United States Attorney Sanford C. Coats, along with two Assistant United States Attorneys and a trial attorney from the Department of Justice’s Organized Crime and Gang Section, filed a 95-page indictment against 34 people and 23 corporations in the Western District of Oklahoma.

The unsealing of the indictment revealed a sports betting operation that existed for more than a decade in one form or another.

Batrice “Luke” King and others were indicted for operating a sports gambling website called MVP Sports based out of San Jose, Costa Rica. In 2003, it was alleged by the U.S. Attorney that King moved the operation to Panama City, Panama, and changed the name to Legendz Sports.

In 2003, the government alleged that Legendz began operating in the Western District of Oklahoma, as well as throughout other parts of the country. That triggered state gambling law accusations in California, Colorado, Florida, Nebraska, New York, Oklahoma, and Texas, in addition to federal charges under a variety of statutes including Wire Act violations, Travel Act violations, Illegal Gambling Business Act violations, and money laundering charges.


Who were the key players?

King was indicted as the founder and primary officer of Legendz, along with his “executive staff,” which included:

  • His wife, Serena
  • Business partner Spiros “The Greek” Athanas
  • Business partner Robert Rolly
  • A handful of other individuals who held positions such as Chief Operating Officer, Chief Information Technology Manager, and Chief Financial Office

In addition to the executives, the feds also indicted a number of agents who operated in the United States from Florida to California. Under the agents were four runners, who were also indicted, and five Oklahoma-based bookmakers.

In addition to the laundry list of defendants, a swath of companies registered in both Panama and the United States, and the “10 Grandchildren Foundation” were also indicted for their alleged roles in the bookmaking and money laundering operation.


How did they run the sports betting operation?

Legendz, under the direction of the indicted and unindicted conspirators, operated a variety of websites, which were hosted on servers within the United States. These sites were alleged to “among other things, offering, facilitating and conducting unlawful computer and telephone service-based sports betting, and other forms of gambling.”

Legendz used an 800 number to take bets from U.S. based customers. In order to facilitate payments to U.S.-based customers, Legendz established at least four different entities that would facilitate both deposits and payouts to bettors.


The conspiracy

Legendz used their physical operation in Panama City to take wagers almost exclusively from U.S.-based customers according to the indictment. Legendz offered a number of services to consumers, including setting up accounts and credit arrangements for bettors.

In its 10 years of operation, Legendz was alleged to have operated 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and brought in more than $1 billion worth of bets.

To facilitate payments, Legendz allegedly made false representations to payment services like Western Union, and processed credit and debit transactions under non-gambling related codes. That helped to avoid alerting banks and processors as to the intention of the sender.


The rise

Legendz was a licensed sportsbook operating out of Panama, and the website operated similarly to other legal gambling entities in the United States, except for the subject matter of their operation. The company offered promotional prizes on their sites; for instance, the Legendz owned www.thepig.com arranged for a motorcycle to be offered as a promotion.

By 2007, Legendz had grown so large that it opened a “state-of-the-art call center facility in Panama” to accommodate all the wagers that they were taking in.

Legendz even used fax machines to send transmissions directing payments to bettors and providing other instructions. By 2008, one intercepted conversation indicated that Legendz had 400 agents, and about 250 employees working at the call center.

By 2009, Serena King was applying to purchase a Maserati Quattroporte, listing her annual salary as $975,000. In 2010, she again listed her salary as just under $1 million per year in her application for the lease of a Cadillac Escalade.


How’d it all come together for Legendz?

The group used the bettors and agents located in the U.S. to transfer funds to a variety of offshore companies, including those in Panama and Costa Rica. The agents would use a variety of means including cash, wire transfers, personal and business checks, credit cards, and MoneyGrams to get the money to the offshore companies.

The agents in the U.S. would then transfer money amongst themselves to pay clients their winnings across the country. Losing bettors would be instructed to send payments to offshore companies like Olmos Overseas Limited or International Goldstore.

Winning Bettors would be paid with checks from companies like Can-Am, LLC. It is alleged that millions of dollars were laundered through shell companies to both pay and receive payments for Legendz.

The federal government requested forfeiture of assets totaling more than $1 billion in value, including:

  • Homes in gated communities
  • Bank accounts
  • Serena King’s Maserati
  • A 1969 Ford Mustang
  • IRA Accounts
  • Various internet domain names

The indictment contained salacious details about extravagant lifestyles of a business operation that appeared to look more like a Las Vegas sportsbook than theatrical depictions of an organized crime bookmaking operation.

But as we examine more of the Legendz case this week, we see the alleged size of the operation had little effect on the resulting trial outcomes.
 

Home of the Cincinnati Criminals.
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,495
Tokens
Weirdest software out there and mediocre bonuses but always paid.

Was steak part of this?
 

hacheman@therx.com
Staff member
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
139,166
Tokens
Breaking Down The Rise and Fall of Legendz Sportsbook, Part II

John Holden Posted on Aug 1, 2019


This is the second in a periodic series for Legal Sports Report looking at famous sports betting cases, how the cases came together and how they eventually concluded.


Part II on Legendz Sportsbook looks at the trial and sentencing of the founders. The prosecution alleged this was one of the largest illegal sports betting operations in the history of the United States, seeing an alleged handle upwards of $1 billion.


The decision

Nearly four years after the unsealed indictment resulted in dozens of seizures and arrests, US District Judge Stephen Friot issued his decision on the US request for forfeiture of assets that were alleged to total upwards of $1 billion. The decision was nearly 200 pages.


Friot noted that the government’s initial request for $1 billion was actually an amount totaling more than $231 million. Friot referred to the forfeiture proceedings “as contested,” noting that the four jury trials related to the case and a judge-alone trial generated more than 11,368 pages of trial transcripts.


The trials

The defendants were split into four different trial groups. The trials spanned 13 months through 2015 and 2016.


Given the array of defendants, the judge produced a table detailing the defendants (other defendants including Serena King were acquitted or settled) and their trial outcomes:


DefendantCount 1: Racketeering ConspiracyCount 2: Illegal Gambling Business ActCount 3: Money Laundering Conspiracy
KingNot GuiltyGuiltyGuilty
KoralewskiGuiltyNot GuiltyNot Guilty
TuckerGuiltyGuiltyGuilty
MoranGuiltyGuiltyGuilty
RoblesGuiltyGuiltyGuilty
ZaptGuiltyNot ChargedGuilty
BramleyGuiltyGuiltyGuilty
DiebnerGuiltyGuiltyGuilty

<tbody>
</tbody>

Despite the astounding success of obtaining guilty verdicts from the jury on all principal defendants, the Legendz Sportsbook trial resulted in none of the defendants being sentenced to jail time. One defendant received credit for time served.

A damning statement


Luke King, the founder of Legendz, received five months of house arrest and a fine of $12.6 million. King, like the other defendants, was sentenced by Friot, as opposed to a jury. Friot noted that the key to his decision regarding jail time was the amount of harm that the offenses caused to society. The judge apparently quoted from jury notes, stating:

“With all the ‘legal’ sports gambling that goes on in the U.S., coupled with the fact that no one was physically harmed and nobody was forced to place bets, I see no threat to society by allowing both … to avoid prison time.”


While not a factor in his sentencing decision, the judge cited prosecutorial abuses, which included the repeated citation to the argument that Legendz had a handle of more than $1 billion when there was no evidence to support such a finding. He referred to that position as “preposterous.”


License to seize?

The lack of jail time did not, however, deter prosecutors in their search for forfeitures. Forfeitures are generally allowed under federal law for certain crimes, including the racketeering, illegal gambling business act and money laundering charges involved in the Legendz case.


While the government initially sought the stated $1 billion, which was later reduced to an amount north of $200 million, Friot noted that the Eighth Amendment protections against excessive fines limits these types of forfeitures stating:

“Measured by the joint and several $231,432,686.73 forfeiture money judgment it seeks, the government’s objective, if realized, would sentence the forfeiture defendants life terms of impoverishment or living off the books, or both. The text, the historical antecedents, and the judicial treatment of the Excessive Fines Clause, … tell us that the statutory forfeiture tools wielded by the government in this case, powerful though they are, do not trump the limitations imposed by the Eighth Amendment.”


Regarding King, the government sought forfeitures from 18 different bank and brokerage accounts, three cars, 58 pieces of jewelry, 88 pairs of shoes, 75 purses, a jukebox, sports memorabilia and a variety of properties.


A bench slap for the ages

Undermining the government’s arguments, Friot wrote in his decision:

“The factual linchpin of the government’s proposed forfeiture of King’s hard assets and financial assets is its oft-repeated and palpably untrue statement that King’s only source of income during the conspiracy period was the illegal sports betting operation.


In support of forfeiture of specific properties, the government puts it as follows in its Forfeiture Brief: “[K]ing’s only source of income derived from his illegal gambling operation with Legendz Sports.” This disregards the uncontroverted testimony of the government’s witnesses — testimony the government never questioned or attempted to challenge — establishing King’s history of lawful entrepreneurial activities during the conspiracy period.”


Co-mingling of assets?


King’s legitimate businesses included a legal brick-and-mortar sportsbook in Panama City, a liquor license for the sportsbook, a travel agency that was seeing 20% year-over-year growth and a vacation company that eventually failed but was at one point doing $10,000 in daily revenues. Friot further observed that with a lone exception, these businesses were not funded with dirty Legendz money.


The ultimate forfeiture judgment against King was for more than $12.6 million and an IRA account. He was able to keep his 20 pairs of Jimmy Choo shoes and 75 handbags. But while the judge found the United States was entitled to the relatively small forfeiture award, the defendants moved for forfeiture-related sanctions against the government related to their “objectively incorrect assertions in the Government’s forfeiture briefs.”


A lesson for the prosecution?


Friot stated:
“[Defendant] Diebner is correct — the government has made significant objectively incorrect factual assertions in these forfeiture proceedings. That complaint is, of course significant in itself, but it also has some impact on the “abuse and overreach” of which Diebner complains.


“The material misstatements of fact that the government has made in writing are in some respects compounded by, and in some respects separate from, a good many vexing (and avoidable) factual problems inherent in the government’s presentation at the forfeiture trial.”


Further issuing this damning indictment of the government’s conduct:
“The court has not set out to embarrass the government in this order. To the extent, if any, that the government is embarrassed by any of the matters that are set out at length in this order, the government has embarrassed itself.”


When rhetoric does not match reality

Though the judgment of forfeiture of more than $12.5 million stood, the Legendz sportsbook case was a disastrous defeat for prosecutors. It is difficult to say whether Friot would have sentenced the defendants differently if prosecutors had handled the case with fewer hyperbolic assertions.


The statement that sports betting is a low-harm crime appears to be continuing to gain credence as more and more states seek to recapture some of the illegal market.
 

Home of the Cincinnati Criminals.
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,495
Tokens
Imagine Steak was part of this mess. Hope he is well.
 

Home of the Cincinnati Criminals.
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,495
Tokens
No jail time is awesome! Money grab us all it is. Steak if you’re reading this hope all is well brother!
 

Home of the Cincinnati Criminals.
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
19,495
Tokens
The legalization of sports betting in many states helped.

All the other dumb ass post get 100’a of replies, put something gambling related and no one relates. Legendz was one of the good ones back in the day. They had a sister book to, can’t remember. Did they buy beverlyhillbookie?
 

Their undisputed masterpiece is "Hip to be Square.
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
6,178
Tokens
Where are they all at now?
Should be set for life...
Why go to court in Oklahoma?
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
I've heard of Legends, but never played there. Good to see they got off easy for a crime that's been legalized by many states.
 

Nirvana Shill
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
28,487
Tokens
The legalization of sports betting in many states helped.

All the other dumb ass post get 100’a of replies, put something gambling related and no one relates. Legendz was one of the good ones back in the day. They had a sister book to, can’t remember. Did they buy beverlyhillbookie?

Don't you post a lot of these threads that get the dumb ass posts ?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,226
Messages
13,449,754
Members
99,402
Latest member
jb52197
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com