NFL explains controversial offensive pass interference call against Redskins Thursday night

Search

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Confusion and controversy abounded Thursday night amid the Cincinnati Bengals-Washington Redskins game following an offensive pass interference call.

In the fourth quarter, offensive PI was called on Washington receiver Kelvin Harmon when he went airborne and reached back for an underthrown Dwayne Haskins pass over Bengals defensive back Davontae Harris.

A 10-yard penalty was enforced against the Redskins, who subsequently challenged the play, but it was upheld and the call stood.

On Friday, the official NFL Officiating Twitter account explained why the call was not overturned.

"The on-field officials called OPI for a push off by WAS 13 at the 50-yard line, well before he jumped to catch the ball," the statement began. "There was no clear and obvious visual evidence from the available broadcast video that the ruling was incorrect, so the on-field ruling stands."

A follow-up tweet explained that via a coaches video, which was not available on the game broadcast, it could be seen that Harris was off-balance after contact was made by Harmon, which was the origin of the call.

"All I know is I want Kelvin Harmon to do that every time the ball is in the air," Redskins coach Jay Gruden, who challenged the play, told reporters after the game. "That's why we drafted him because he's aggressive when the ball in the air. If he can't do what he did in this game then I don't know what he can do. I'm going to continue to coach Kelvin Harmon to go up and go get the ball like he did tonight and good things will happen for him.

"We'll get the explanation hopefully tomorrow or the next day, but I applaud Kelvin for his effort for attacking the ball."

The explanation has been made. Whether it affects how receivers go up for the ball going forward remains to be seen.






http://www.nfl.com/nflnetwork/story...lains-controversial-opi-call-against-redskins
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
Gonna be interesting this season with challenges......regs can upheld whenever they want no matter what happened, unless it's obvious like the Saints/Rams championship game, yeah right, we shall see!
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,744
Tokens
I'm telling y'all, the coaches simply don't have enough challenges. This rule change will not have the impact on plays that some people are anticipating

And as pointed out already, they can always find some microscopic contact on the field to justify any call

We're going to see the same ole inconsistency, just different

Roger's NFL
 

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
5,985
Tokens
i dont like the idea of more challenges or more replays
changes the narrative to the entire game being dependent on one call and removes any kind of liability to the teams who lost
just play the fuckin game
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,959
Tokens
i dont like the idea of more challenges or more replays
changes the narrative to the entire game being dependent on one call and removes any kind of liability to the teams who lost
just play the fuckin game

I wouldn't mind if they completely got rid of instant replay......I was never a fan. It seems the more they try to get it right, the worse the controversy's.

Like couple years ago with Steelers vs Pats, when Pitt receiver caught it & reached across in endzone & they made a huge spectacle of what a catch was......complete joke of rules, luckily they got rid of that stupid rule
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,276
Messages
13,450,166
Members
99,404
Latest member
byen17188
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com