Is this yet another “system”?? LOL - I guess technically that yes, it is yet another system.
This system generates weekly “lines”. It automatically adjusts itself (theoretically getting better or smarter as the season progresses). Each week I then compare “My Lines” to the “real world lines” that we bet with, and look for the best value.
In the past, the plays with the highest winning % have been:
(1) “Favorites” with +3 (or more) value
(2) Dogs receiving +3 (or more) points when my system deems the game a “Pick ‘Em”
(F.Y.I., a third option would be FADING “Favorites” with -3 points (or more) in negative value, but the winning percentage of those have not been nearly as good as the first two options).
WARNING: It is never advisable to play values of +0.5, +1 or +1.5 (and the jury is still out on +2 and +2.5).
Week #3 Lines (My Lines)
DEN @ GB (GB -9)
DET @ PHI (PHI -5)
BAL @ KC (KC -10)
CIN @ BUF (BUF -10)
ATL @ IND (IND -6)
OAK @ MIN (MIN -10)
NYJ @ NE (NE -19)
MIA @ DAL (DAL -19)
NTG @ TB (TB-7)
CAR @ ARI (CAR -1)
NO @ SEA (PICK ‘EM)
HOU @ LAC (LAC -7)
PIT @ SF (SF -10)
LAR @ CLE (LAR -5)
CHI @ WA (CHI -3)
Under the criteria defined above, the system is suggesting 6 plays for week #3: KC, BUF, IND, NO, LAC and SF.
I will judge this system based on the closing number at PINNY. Teams will need to cover the final closing line at PINNY to receive a win.
WARNING: This system does NOT realize that Drew Brees is not playing for NO!! I need to point that out to you. (LOL - This game is a tough one for me. My “Road Wreck System” says to FADE the Saints and THEGAME9000’s system says to PLAY the saints!)
Week #3 Plays: KC, BUF, IND, NO, LAC & SF
This system generates weekly “lines”. It automatically adjusts itself (theoretically getting better or smarter as the season progresses). Each week I then compare “My Lines” to the “real world lines” that we bet with, and look for the best value.
In the past, the plays with the highest winning % have been:
(1) “Favorites” with +3 (or more) value
(2) Dogs receiving +3 (or more) points when my system deems the game a “Pick ‘Em”
(F.Y.I., a third option would be FADING “Favorites” with -3 points (or more) in negative value, but the winning percentage of those have not been nearly as good as the first two options).
WARNING: It is never advisable to play values of +0.5, +1 or +1.5 (and the jury is still out on +2 and +2.5).
Week #3 Lines (My Lines)
DEN @ GB (GB -9)
DET @ PHI (PHI -5)
BAL @ KC (KC -10)
CIN @ BUF (BUF -10)
ATL @ IND (IND -6)
OAK @ MIN (MIN -10)
NYJ @ NE (NE -19)
MIA @ DAL (DAL -19)
NTG @ TB (TB-7)
CAR @ ARI (CAR -1)
NO @ SEA (PICK ‘EM)
HOU @ LAC (LAC -7)
PIT @ SF (SF -10)
LAR @ CLE (LAR -5)
CHI @ WA (CHI -3)
Under the criteria defined above, the system is suggesting 6 plays for week #3: KC, BUF, IND, NO, LAC and SF.
I will judge this system based on the closing number at PINNY. Teams will need to cover the final closing line at PINNY to receive a win.
WARNING: This system does NOT realize that Drew Brees is not playing for NO!! I need to point that out to you. (LOL - This game is a tough one for me. My “Road Wreck System” says to FADE the Saints and THEGAME9000’s system says to PLAY the saints!)
Week #3 Plays: KC, BUF, IND, NO, LAC & SF