[FONT="]The Pats offence looked "off" on MNF, but how much did the weather & NYG jinx have to do with that? The last Super Bowl showed they don't need the great offences of the past to "go all the way" since, after all, "defence wins championships". But they could sure use Antonio Brown, eh? And Stephen Carroll Gostkowski.[/FONT]
It seems as if Brady needs a chip on his shoulder to play his best. He totally sucked last night until the strip sack fumble TD. After that, he was awesome
If he's not pissed, then he looks his age
[FONT="]NE -10 +111 (Pinnacle, sharp book)[/FONT]
[FONT="]Jets +10 -110 (Bovada, etc, square books)[/FONT]
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/
[FONT="]Not a good sign for NE (4-2 ATS YTD) covering this week.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Jets +10 -110 (Bovada, etc, square books)[/FONT]
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/
[FONT="]Not a good sign for NE (4-2 ATS YTD) covering this week.[/FONT]
The Jets covered +21 at Foxborough w/o their "new shining" QB. Backdoor type. 30-14 final.
Most shops down to 9.5 now. Which would make it a bit easier than 10 for NE to cover.
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/?date=20191021
Most shops down to 9.5 now. Which would make it a bit easier than 10 for NE to cover.
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/?date=20191021
I use this site a ton bc of its sortable options (NBA especially)
https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/trends/ats_trends/?sc=all_games
<tbody style="box-sizing: inherit;">
</tbody>
https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/trends/ats_trends/?sc=all_games
| San Francisco | 4-1-0 | 80.0% | 16.6 | +15.4 |
| Buffalo | 4-1-0 | 80.0% | 4.0 | +5.3 |
| Detroit | 4-1-0 | 80.0% | 0.2 | +2.9 |
| Indianapolis | 3-1-1 | 75.0% | -0.4 | +2.2 |
| Carolina | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 5.5 | +5.2 |
| Arizona | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | -6.2 | -2.1 |
| LA Rams | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | -0.2 | -3.2 |
| New Orleans | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 1.0 | +1.4 |
| Pittsburgh | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | -1.3 | +0.9 |
| New England | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 23.7 | +9.8 |
| Minnesota | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 9.5 | +6.3 |
| Green Bay | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 4.5 | +2.8 |
| Houston | 4-2-0 | 66.7% | 4.7 | +4.0 |
| Oakland | 3-2-0 | 60.0% | -4.0 | +2.1 |
| Jacksonville | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | -2.3 | +0.2 |
| Seattle | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | 3.2 | +0.4 |
| Denver | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | 0.0 | +1.2 |
| Kansas City | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | 4.7 | -1.4 |
| Dallas | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | 6.5 | -1.5 |
| Cincinnati | 3-3-0 | 50.0% | -10.3 | -6.2 |
| NY Jets | 2-3-0 | 40.0% | -12.0 | -2.9 |
| Chicago | 2-3-0 | 40.0% | 3.6 | +0.2 |
| Philadelphia | 2-4-0 | 33.3% | 2.0 | -1.8 |
| Tennessee | 2-4-0 | 33.3% | 1.0 | +1.3 |
| NY Giants | 2-4-0 | 33.3% | -8.2 | -2.8 |
| Tampa Bay | 2-4-0 | 33.3% | -2.0 | +0.4 |
| Cleveland | 2-4-0 | 33.3% | -5.7 | -5.1 |
| LA Chargers | 1-4-1 | 20.0% | 0.3 | -5.5 |
| Miami | 1-4-0 | 20.0% | -27.6 | -14.0 |
| Washington | 1-5-0 | 16.7% | -12.8 | -7.2 |
| Baltimore | 1-5-0 | 16.7% | 7.3 | +1.2 |
| Atlanta | 1-5-0 | 16.7% | -8.5 | -8.0 |
<tbody style="box-sizing: inherit;">
</tbody>
Week 8, Sunday, Oct.27:
Pats 27, Browns 14
NE improves to 6-2 ATS & 8-0 SU on the season.
I saw the line as high as NE -13 or 13.5 & here it says it closed at -9.5:
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/?date=20191027
Next up for the Patriots: NFL week 9, NE at Baltimore on SNF, November 3, 2019. ATM the line is NE -3.5.
Is it time to fade, keep following, or just watch?
Pats 27, Browns 14
NE improves to 6-2 ATS & 8-0 SU on the season.
I saw the line as high as NE -13 or 13.5 & here it says it closed at -9.5:
https://www.sportsbookreview.com/betting-odds/nfl-football/?date=20191027
Next up for the Patriots: NFL week 9, NE at Baltimore on SNF, November 3, 2019. ATM the line is NE -3.5.
Is it time to fade, keep following, or just watch?
