LOCK....HIM....UP!! He is a crook!!!

SmallDaddy · Nov 15, 2019

[h=1]Roger Stone guilty of lying to Congress to protect Trump and his campaign[/h]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/roger-stone-guilty-lying-congress-164937961.html

Coldweather · Nov 15, 2019

Pardon me ! cheersgifcheersgifcheersgif

Dave007inVegas · Nov 15, 2019

That makes the score card Mueller 8 Barr 0.

REDEYE · Nov 15, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
That makes the score card Mueller 8 Barr 0.

to be fair , Mueller was on the hunt a lot longer . Barr is playing catchup at this point.. BTW , if Cohen was one of those 8 convictions , I would actually put it in our column

Dave007inVegas · Nov 15, 2019

RED EYE said:
to be fair , Mueller was on the hunt a lot longer . Barr is playing catchup at this point.. BTW , if Cohen was one of those 8 convictions , I would actually put it in our column

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Don't get me wrong Mueller has a history prosecutorial misconduct that dates back to Enron.
A case can be made that he overstepped his role in the Russian probe and that he endicted
people for crimes not related to his charge.

Having said that the fact renains 8 people which includes Cohen are in jail or awaiting sentencing.

Whatever Cohen did pails in comparison to dozens of deep state characters still walking around
without a care in the world. I'm not sure why you think Cohen is win for our column but I really
don't care all that much. [/FONT]

REDEYE · Nov 15, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
Don't get me wrong Mueller has a history prosecutorial misconduct that dates back to Enron.
A case can be made that he overstepped his role in the Russian probe and that he endicted
people for crimes not related to his charge.

Having said that the fact renains 8 people which includes Cohen are in jail or awaiting sentencing.

Whatever Cohen did pails in comparison to dozens of deep state characters still walking around
without a care in the world. I'm not sure why you think Cohen is win for our column but I really
don't care all that much.

because Cohen is a piece of shit . glad he's in prison for awhile.. Nobody on our side is shedding tears for Cohen.. that's the 1 for our side

SheriffJoe · Nov 15, 2019

He'll get pardoned.

50 years for process crimes while the REAL criminals still roam free is a bloody joke.

Corrupt Obama judge needs to be impeached.

Dave007inVegas · Nov 15, 2019

RED EYE said:
because Cohen is a piece of shit . glad he's in prison for awhile.. Nobody on our side is shedding tears for Cohen.. that's the 1 for our side

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]My bad. Somehow in my mind I confused Cohen with Stone. You're right Cohen is a piece of shit
and deserved what he got.[/FONT]

Willie99 · Nov 15, 2019

Anyone know what his crime was?

Bonus question

Anyone know the definition of crook?

Willie99 · Nov 15, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
That makes the score card Mueller 8 Barr 0.

His biggest scores had nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do with the campaign, and nothing to do with 2016

Willie99 · Nov 15, 2019

Willie99 said:
His biggest scores had nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do with the campaign, and nothing to do with 2016

Liberals, their politicians and their media all hate the nuances of the truth, they misrepresent everything everyday to suck in the street squatters, crack whores, mental midgets and fools that keep their moronic political policies in play

Libtard nation they are

Dave007inVegas · Nov 15, 2019

Willie99 said:
His biggest scores had nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do with the campaign, and nothing to do with 2016

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Never said they did. All I'm saying is when you put Muellers record up against
Barr, Mueller wins hands down.

Now Barr does have an advantage I think, he's got way more suspects and way more
attonyes than Muller had.

And as you have pointed out the way to do the job right is to take as much time
as needed so there are no loose ends.

So to be fair Barr has at least 2 more years of investigation to go before he
exceeceds Mueller.

[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif]Currently t[/FONT]he line is Mueller +8. Final score to be determended.[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Calibri,Geneva,sans-serif] [/FONT]

Dafinch · Nov 15, 2019

Gee, anybody see Runty Roman? He's kinda SCARCE on this subject for some reason...:think2:

ointer:Shush()*

SheriffJoe · Nov 15, 2019

"Contrary to her opening statement, former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch later admitted under questioning that Obama-Biden officials prepared her to answer questions about Hunter Biden's role on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma during her 2016 confirmation hearing."

Sooooooooo...she'll be Roger Stoned, right? RIGHT???

SmallDaddy · Nov 15, 2019

Willie99 said:
Liberals, their politicians and their media all hate the nuances of the truth, they misrepresent everything everyday to suck in the street squatters, crack whores, mental midgets and fools that keep their moronic political policies in play

Libtard nation they are

Banana Republican after Banana Republican going to the pokey, yet its libtards this...libtards that.

SmallDaddy · Nov 15, 2019

OOOhhh the sweet irony!!!

SheriffJoe · Nov 15, 2019

SmallDaddy said:
Banana Republican after Banana Republican going to the pokey, yet its libtards this...libtards that.

Yeah, FBI process crimes, one after the other, courtesy that other sham special council. You must be so proud.

Libtard.

SmallDaddy · Nov 15, 2019

are process crimes impeachable offenses, in your opinion?

Dafinch · Nov 15, 2019

Dave007inVegas said:
My bad. Somehow in my mind I confused Cohen with Stone. You're right Cohen is a piece of shit
and deserved what he got.

Confused Cohen with Stone? Yeah, I can see that, they're practically identical, in appearance, age, and current allegiance to Twittler.:think2:Loser!@#0face)(*^% Well, they're about to share ONE thing in common, lol.:cripwalk:

SheriffJoe · Nov 15, 2019

Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson Refused Roger Stone from Raising the Argument that Would have Set Him Free – Proof that Russia Hacked the DNC – As a Result He Faces Life in Prison

by Joe Hoft November 15, 2019

Roger Stone was indicted today on seven counts of process crimes which could put him in prison for the rest of his life.

He’s indicted because corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson did not allow Stone to argue for proof that Russians hacked the DNC server, as was reported in the Mueller report. Stone claimed that if the Russians didn’t hack the DNC, his case would be dismissed, but Judge Jackson wouldn’t let him.

We reported on May 11, 2019, that Roger Stone and his legal team requested the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks. This report was used by the FBI and the Mueller gang as support that the DNC was hacked by Russia.

Stone’s position was that if the Mueller team and the FBI did not inspect the DNC server, then how can they know that the server was hacked. This logical argument makes sense –

The Mueller team fought back against the Stone team and argued that it was not necessary to see the documents that support that Russia hacked the DNC –

We’ve been saying for months that the entire Russia collusion delusion is a sham. To date there has been no information reported that ascertains that the DNC was hacked by the Russians. No reports to date show that the DNC server was inspected by the Mueller team and the FBI. Since this is the case, there is no way the Mueller team can claim the server was hacked.

Since there is no proof that the emails were hacked, the reports that Russians were involved in the collusion delusion evaporate. This would have destroyed the entire Russian sham make-believe case. Our reporting has been confirmed by others in the Intelligence community.

Next we reported that NSA Whistle blower Bill Binney looked at the DNC data leaked by WikiLeaks and determined that it was definitively not hacked, it was copied to a disk or flash drive.

Former NSA employee and whistle blower, Bill Binney, reviewed the leaked emails provided online and they show that the data coming from the DNC was not hacked but rather copied to a disk or flash drive!

Binney said:

The problem with the Mueller report and the Rosenstein indictment is it’s all based on lies. I mean the fact they’re still lying about the, saying the DNC was hacked by the Russians and the Russians gave it to WikiLeaks.

Well, we had some of our people and our group, the VIPS, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals, look at the data that WikiLeaks posted on the DNC data. They actually posted the DNC data…
…that entire set of data was read to a thumb drive or a CD Rom then physically transported. Now this is what Kim Dotcom is saying. This is what Julian Assange basically was inferring. Others have been saying the same things.”

It’s clear the DNC was not hacked and it’s more likely a disgruntled insider like Seth Rich copied the files to a disk drive than that the Russians hacked the DNC.

We next posted more arguments against Mueller’s assertion that the DNC was hacked by Russians. Another Internet sleuth and techie by the name of Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report earlier this year with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.

Apelbaum’s first argument is this –

According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.

This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?

A second point by Apelbaum is –

… that three of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ wanted list were allegedly working concurrently on multiple non-related projects like interfering with the 2016 United States elections (both HRC and DNC) while at the same time they were also allegedly hacking anti-doping agencies (Images 2-3).

Above are pictures of the individuals the FBI says were working on both the DNC/HRC email hacking and the Olympic doping projects.

The same guys were working on both projects which is all but impossible. (Do we really know if they’re even Russians?)
Apelbaum argues –

The fact that the three had multiple concurrent high impact and high visibility project assignments is odd because this is not how typical offensive cyber intelligence teams operate. These units tend to be compartmentalized, they are assigned to a specific mission, and the taskforce stays together for the entire duration of the project.

Next Apelbaum questions the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian –

Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind:

He used a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address, but did not use TOR. Using a proxy to conduct cyber operations is a SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] in all intelligence and LEA [Law Enforcement Agency] agencies. [i.e. Russia would have masked their VPN service]
He used the AOL email service that captured and forwarded his IP address and the same AOL email to contact various media outlets on the same day of the attack. This is so overt and amateurish that its unlikely to be a mistake and seems like a deliberate attempt to leave traceable breadcrumbs.
He named his Office User account Феликс Эдмундович (Felix Dzerzhinsky), after the founder of the Soviet Secret Police. Devices and accounts used in offensive cyberspace operations use random names to prevent tractability and identification. Why would anyone in the GRU use this pseudonym (beside the obvious reason) is beyond comprehension.
He copied the original Trump opposition research document and pasted it into a new .dotmtemplate (with an editing time of about 2 minutes). This resulted in a change of the “Last Modified by” field from “Warren Flood” to “Феликс Эдмундович” and the creation of additional Russian metadata in the document. Why waste the time and effort doing this?
About 4 hours after creating the ‘Russian’ version of the document, he exported it to a PDF using LibreOffice 4.2 (in the process he lost/removed about 20 of the original pages). This was most likely done to show additional ‘Russian fingerprints’ in the form of broken hyperlink error messages in Russian (Images 4 and 5). Why bother with re-formatting and converting the source documents? Why not just get the raw data out in the original format ASAP?

Apelbaum next discusses Guccifer 2.0 –

In June 21, 2016, Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai from Vice Motherboard interviewed a person who identified himself as “Guccifer 2.0”. During their on-line chat session, the individual claimed that he was Romanian (see transcript of the interview below). His poor Romanian language skills were later used to unmask his Russian identify.

…I’m not a scientific linguist nor do I even know where to find one if my life depended on it, but I’m certain that you can’t reliably determine nationality based on someone impersonating another language or from the use of fake metadata in files. This elaborate theory also has the obvious flaw of assuming that the Russian intelligence services are dumb enough to show up to an interview posing as Romanians without actually being able to read and write flaunt Romanian.

After providing a couple more examples of why the Russian story doesn’t stick, Apelbaum closes with this –

The bottom line is that if we want to go beyond the speculative trivia, the pseudo science, and the bombastic unverified claims, we have to ask the real tough questions, mainly: is Guccifer 2.0 even the real attacker and how did he circumvent all of the logs during several weeks of repeated visits while downloading close to 2 GB of data?

Finally, we know that WikiLeaks has stated numerous times that Russia did not provide them with the emails they leaked in 2016 and Julian Assange has stated that WikiLeaks had nothing to do with Russia.

But of course the Mueller gang never interviewed WikiLeaks in an effort to determine how they received the Clinton emails. Of course the Mueller team could not risk WikiLeaks saying the emails were not received from Russia which would destroy their Russia hacked the DNC fairy tale.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson did not allow Roger Stone to destroy the ‘Russia Collusion’ sham once and for all. As a result of her sham court case a good man who befriended President Trump is now indicted on totally bogus charges. There is nothing the Deep State won’t do and nothing they won’t make up!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-the-dnc-as-a-result-he-faces-life-in-prison/

LOCK....HIM....UP!! He is a crook!!!

Member

Member

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Nirvana Shill

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Nirvana Shill

Rx Normal

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory

Life's a bitch, then you die!

Member

Rx Normal

Member

Member

Rx Normal

Member

Member

Rx Normal

Forum statistics

Share this page