Watergate Prosecutor Predicts The Moment This Week That Donald Trump Will Be ‘Toast’

Former federal prosecutor Cynthia Alksne said that Sondland SHOULD take the Fifth, but predicts that he'll be too arrogant and stupid to do so. Sounds about right...ointer:Shush()*popcorn-eatinggif

Watergate Prosecutor Predicts The Moment This Week That Donald Trump Will Be ‘Toast’

Lee Moran,HuffPost 10 hours ago






Former Watergate prosecutor Nick Akerman on Monday predicted Donald Trump will be doomed by EU ambassador Gordon Sondland’s upcoming public House testimony in the impeachment inquiry into the president.
“Donald Trump is toast,” Akerman told CNN.
“Sondland is going to come out and tell the whole story,” he predicted. “He’s going to detail it, he’s going to have documents to detail it, you’ve got lots of witnesses corroborating it.”



“I mean there’s no question that they were trying to get the Ukrainian government to announce an investigation into (former Vice President) Joe Biden,” Akerman added. “And using money as appropriated by the U.S. Congress to do that. Pure bribery.”
Sondland will testify on Wednesday morning. He has already walked back his initial closed-door claim that he didn’t recall any discussions about Ukraine announcing an investigation into the Bidens allegedly in exchange for withheld military aid.
Akerman said Sondland has “got no choice here” but to “come clean” about his role and Trump.
“Otherwise he’s gonna wind up like Roger Stone in federal prison, with Roger Stone as his roommate. I mean, he does not want that to happen,” Akerman explained, referencing the GOP strategist and longtime Trump associate who was on Friday found guilty on seven charges relating to lying to investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Stone will be sentenced next year.
“If I were his lawyer, I would be sitting on him pretty hard and making sure that he told everything he knew, every truthful bit of evidence just to make sure he doesn’t go down for Donald Trump,” Akerman, referring to Sondland, added.
Check out the clip here:

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/watergate-prosecutor-donald-trump-toast-092839771.html

Never give up, don't ever give up

You might get lucky and actually foul off a pitch someday


When the street squatter talks, nobody listens, everybody laughs, and the opposite always happens

Willie99 said:

Never give up, don't ever give up

You might get lucky and actually foul off a pitch someday


When the street squatter talks, nobody listens, everybody laughs, and the opposite always happens

Click to expand...

Stick it up yer ass, Witless Willie; how'd that "weak case" against Manafort work out for ya?ointer:Slapping-silly90)):think2:kth)(&^Shush()*azzkick(&^:madasshol:carto1710:fckmad::bigfingercockingasnook()

Remember when you used the same "Watgergate" pitch dozens of times during the whole "Russian Collusion" hoax? Here are some of them... since you abandoned those threads and wont revisit or "BUMP, BITCHES" them...

Dafinch said:

Lol, both Nick Ackerman and Jill Wine-Banks, both of whom are attorneys who were involved with the Watergate investigation, say the present situation is VERY reminiscent of that one, who knows more about this situation, 2 Watergate veterans, or Dumbo? Hmmmm, that's a TOUGH one, lol. And, you STIL didn't answer the question, bitch:

Click to expand...

Dafinch said:

Hmmmm, who is more knowledgable about this issue, former special prosecutor Ken star,or A Sap Sucker? Gee, that's a TOUGH one, :nohead::think2::missingteLoser!@#0Slapping-silly90))

Click to expand...

Just a few of the DOZENS... where, apparently, the posters here were correct, and those Watergate people were wrong

I can post more and bump the threads if you like, I have a ton to choose from

Wow. Can’t believe this dumbshit posted this

go find a job

StevieRay said:

Wow. Can’t believe this dumbshit posted this

go find a job

Click to expand...

getting your power shut off and suing the electric company for discrimination is a full time job

No quid. No pro. And no quo.

Swing. Miss. Abandon. Repeat.

.000

NFLTrends said:

Remember when you used the same "Watgergate" pitch dozens of times during the whole "Russian Collusion" hoax? Here are some of them... since you abandoned those threads and wont revisit or "BUMP, BITCHES" them...



Just a few of the DOZENS... where, apparently, the posters here were correct, and those Watergate people were wrong

I can post more and bump the threads if you like, I have a ton to choose from

Click to expand...

You fat, ugly, no neck toad, why did you lie about Vindman? How can you POSSIBLY have nothing to say about long time Roger Stone going "7 for 7" in obstruction charges, Boulder Head? Why don't you dazzle us with an explanation of why Sondland, Twittler's Million Dollar Baby, has turned on him (and several other WH toadies) like a rabid dog? Even Republican witnesses yesterday did as much harm to Dump as they helped . C'mon, Blubber Runt, speak up, lol...ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups::carto1710

Dafinch said:

You fat, ugly, no neck toad, why did you lie about Vindman? How can you POSSIBLY have nothing to say about long time Roger Stone going "7 for 7" in obstruction charges, Boulder Head? Why don't you dazzle us with an explanation of why Sondland, Twittler's Million Dollar Baby, has turned on him (and several other WH toadies) like a rabid dog? Even Republican witnesses yesterday did as much harm to Dump as they helped . C'mon, Blubber Runt, speak up, lol...ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups::carto1710

Click to expand...

Again with the deflection and same things over and over again...

Already explained Vindman in that thread you are talking about... and I havent stated any opinion anywhere on Stones charges or conviction. (Why do you feel the need to deflect constantly?)

My rebuttal has to do with the topic of who to believe in this thread. And it appears the only people you decide to believe are the people that fit your narrative at the time.

Had it been FLIPPED, and the Ukraine President said he felt pressured, and 2 "anonymous sources" close to Trump said "No, he didnt feel pressured"... you would say the President of Ukraine was the believable one.

Why is it hard for you to debate? Why do you always deflect to completely different topics, and then throw random baseless insults at anyone who questions what you post?

NFLTrends said:

Again with the deflection and same things over and over again...

Already explained Vindman in that thread you are talking about... and I havent stated any opinion anywhere on Stones charges or conviction. (Why do you feel the need to deflect constantly?)

My rebuttal has to do with the topic of who to believe in this thread. And it appears the only people you decide to believe are the people that fit your narrative at the time.

Had it been FLIPPED, and the Ukraine President said he felt pressured, and 2 "anonymous sources" close to Trump said "No, he didnt feel pressured"... you would say the President of Ukraine was the believable one.

Why is it hard for you to debate? Why do you always deflect to completely different topics, and then throw random baseless insults at anyone who questions what you post?

Click to expand...

Refresh my memory, Obsessive Douche, what did you say about Vindman, other then trying to lie and say that he wasn't on the call, when he was. Plus, you once again demonstrate that your reading "skills" are sadly deficient: I never SAID that you stated anywhere an opinion on the Stone result, schmuck, your HAVING no opinion is as gutless as it is revealing. And, you got a lotta balls talking about believing sources that fit one's narrative : I wish I had a dollar for every time that you claim that some poll with results that you don't like "over represented" Democrats.

Your third paragraph shows just how stupid you ARE, no neck: of COURSE, I'd say that the President of Ikraine was the believable one, you brainless moron, because Twittler has been lying for over 40 years, with thousands of them being documented by the NY Times and others during his term. But, even if I didn't know the identities of ANY of the participants in the situation, I would say that those who said that pressure had been exerted were by far the more believable side, for the simple reason that anybody in Ukraine's position, with the lives of thousands of citizens at stake, and with that Fat Bastard still alive and regrettably, not in jail is not going to speak freely. I don't know whether you're just too STUPID to understand that, or too DISHONEST, but, doesn't matter.

You keep babbling about deflection (ironic, since that is YOUR stock in trade), "over and over again," that being the case, why don't you get a clue and stay out of threads that I start and/or stop addressing me, Blubber Runt?ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups::carto1710

Dafinch said:

Refresh my memory, Obsessive Douche, what did you say about Vindman, other then trying to lie and say that he wasn't on the call, when he was. Plus, you once again demonstrate that your reading "skills" are sadly deficient: I never SAID that you stated anywhere an opinion on the Stone result, schmuck, your HAVING no opinion is as gutless as it is revealing. And, you got a lotta balls talking about believing sources that fit one's narrative : I wish I had a dollar for every time that you claim that some poll with results that you don't like "over represented" Democrats.

Your third paragraph shows just how stupid you ARE, no neck: of COURSE, I'd say that the President of Ikraine was the believable one, you brainless moron, because Twittler has been lying for over 40 years, with thousands of them being documented by the NY Times and others during his term. But, even if I didn't know the identities of ANY of the participants in the situation, I would say that those who said that pressure had been exerted were by far the more believable side, for the simple reason that anybody in Ukraine's position, with the lives of thousands of citizens at stake, and with that Fat Bastard still alive and regrettably, not in jail is not going to speak freely. I don't know whether you're just too STUPID to understand that, or too DISHONEST, but, doesn't matter.

You keep babbling about deflection (ironic, since that is YOUR stock in trade), "over and over again," that being the case, why don't you get a clue and stay out of threads that I start and/or stop addressing me, Blubber Runt?ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups::carto1710

Click to expand...

I copied and pasted the names of those testifying and lumped them together..... So why do you bring up roger stone, when you have no idea if I ever said anything about it?

And thanks for clarifying that anyone who is against Trump is credible (even if you have no clue who they are, and they have no name or identity).

And as usual. You resort to random insults and more deflections to other things.

NFLTrends said:

I copied and pasted the names of those testifying and lumped them together..... So why do you bring up roger stone, when you have no idea if I ever said anything about it?

And thanks for clarifying that anyone who is against Trump is credible (even if you have no clue who they are, and they have no name or identity).

And as usual. You resort to random insults and more deflections to other things.

Click to expand...

The only thing I saw you say about Vindman is to lie and say Vindman wasn't on the call, when he was, then try to say I "twisted" your words when I pointed that out, and I'm not gonna sift through your brainless posts to prove it, that's YOUR specialty, so, post something that says otherwise, or STFU. The reason I brought up Roger Stone, Oh Dimwitted One, is that I started a post asking if there was no obstruction, why was somebody who was friends with Twittler for decades was arrested for obstruction related charges, and, as luck would have it, he was CONVICTED a short time ago, but, even YOU are so stupid that you couldn't figure that out for yourself, you just pretend it didn't happen and/or has no significance, lol.

I noticed you carefully avoided addressing the fact that I said that it didn't matter what the identities of the parties were under the circumstances, because nobody with any common sense would maintain that the Ukrainian Prez was going to be forthcoming under said circumstances, Blubber Runt. How come you never posted your new picture as you said you would, Fat Boy?ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups:

Dafinch said:

The only thing I saw you say about Vindman is to lie and say Vindman wasn't on the call, when he was, then try to say I "twisted" your words when I pointed that out, and I'm not gonna sift through your brainless posts to prove it, that's YOUR specialty, so, post something that says otherwise, or STFU. The reason I brought up Roger Stone, Oh Dimwitted One, is that I started a post asking if there was no obstruction, why was somebody who was friends with Twittler for decades was arrested for obstruction related charges, and, as luck would have it, he was CONVICTED a short time ago, but, even YOU are so stupid that you couldn't figure that out for yourself, you just pretend it didn't happen and/or has no significance, lol.

I noticed you carefully avoided addressing the fact that I said that it didn't matter what the identities of the parties were under the circumstances, because nobody with any common sense would maintain that the Ukrainian Prez was going to be forthcoming under said circumstances, Blubber Runt. How come you never posted your new picture as you said you would, Fat Boy?ushups:<<ushups::laughingbushups::kissingbbushups:

Click to expand...

And, who has testified that there was "Quid Pro Quo, Bribery, Extortion, and/or pressure" ??

Since that is what these hearings are about?

Tell ya what... LETS BOTH have a picture posted! Fair is Fair!!

WE both take a picture and send it to a mod.... I tell you what to write on a piece of paper and hold it up in the pic, and you do the same for me.

Let me know, and Ill inform a mod to give us the email address to send it to, and they can post it in a thread one of us can start

NFLTrends said:

And, who has testified that there was "Quid Pro Quo, Bribery, Extortion, and/or pressure" ??

Since that is what these hearings are about?

Tell ya what... LETS BOTH have a picture posted! Fair is Fair!!

WE both take a picture and send it to a mod.... I tell you what to write on a piece of paper and hold it up in the pic, and you do the same for me.

Let me know, and Ill inform a mod to give us the email address to send it to, and they can post it in a thread one of us can start

Click to expand...

I'm getting the distinct impression that you didn't see any of today's hearings; how can you ask your initial question? Do yourself a favor and read the post about Sondland's DIRECT QUOTE, before you embarrass yourself any further.

I'm not posting SHIT, YOU are the genius who said he was going to post a picture, not me, and, clearly, you have had second thoughts about doing that. I think it finally permeated that big, boulder sized head of yours that showing yourself was NOT a good idea, which likely was the same reason you abruptly yanked the picture of you with a boot licking, unctuous grin on your face while standing next to Plunkett, who looked like he would rather be ANYWHERE else on the planet than with an Obsessive Douche, lol.

Pauper, is that you?