Ken Starr, on Fox News: 'It doesn't look good for the president'

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Many of the schmucks on here are like the guy who jumped off the Empire State building, and could be heard saying "So far, so good," every time they whizzed by a floor.:hahahahahSlapping-silly90))kth)(&^popcorn-eatinggifazzkick(&^


Ken Starr, on Fox News: 'It doesn't look good for the president'




20525307_825430844299743_2769629872415657434_n.jpg

kos
Daily Kos Staff

Wednesday November 20, 2019 · 8:55 AM PST




Recommend 120




Tweet
129 Comments 129 New

GettyImages-1188925829.jpg

Ambassador Gordon Sondland






















Ken Starr, the guy who got Bill Clinton impeached, a day ago on Fox: “What we hear is 'improper.' I've never heard the suggestion 'unlawful.’ I think, again, the president's judgment is being called into question — whether this is wise or not. But, not a crime." He added, “Reasonable people could say he should not have done that. Perfectly reasonable conclusion ... but the idea that this was impeachable is, to me, quite extreme. It's extravagant. It's certainly not what the founding generation intended.”
In other words, Starr wasn’t interested in defending Donald Trump’s behavior, but he didn’t think it rose to the standard for impeachment, saying about the proceedings, “It's extravagant. It's political.”
It’s always been funny seeing Starr defend Trump, given that he pushed for Clinton’s impeachment over a consensual sexual dalliance. But the Republican defense has held steady … that is, until today, and Ambassador Gordon Sondland.

Today, during a break in the testimony, Starr quoted Adam Schiff, saying (again, on Fox News), “There is now proof that the President committed the crime of bribery. This has been one of those bombshell days,” adding that “it doesn’t look good for the president.” Finally, he said, “I think articles of impeachment are being drawn up if they haven't already been drawn up,” the only question being whether they would be bipartisan or not.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens
And Sondland testified "Trump told me, I want no Quid Pro Quo, I want exactly what Zelensky campaigned to do"...

Should watch the actual hearings and not what extreme left echo chamber false news sources tell you. Can see some of the testimony here where Sondland testified and his basis is how he "Felt" and not what he was told by Trump or anyone else https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaI0fVyFYg Skip to 3:20 where Sondlan folds, and testifies NO ONE told him the aid was tied to the investigations. Sondlands whole testimony was (in his own words) "I assumed"...

What was so devastating that Sondland testified to that dailykos is saying?

Would be nice to actually debate on facts with you, instead of the normal random insults and deflections to off topic things, doubt that will happen.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
And Sondland testified "Trump told me, I want no Quid Pro Quo, I want exactly what Zelensky campaigned to do"...

Should watch the actual hearings and not what extreme left echo chamber false news sources tell you. Can see some of the testimony here where Sondland testified and his basis is how he "Felt" and not what he was told by Trump or anyone else https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaI0fVyFYg Skip to 3:20 where Sondlan folds, and testifies NO ONE told him the aid was tied to the investigations. Sondlands whole testimony was (in his own words) "I assumed"...

What was so devastating that Sondland testified to that dailykos is saying?

Would be nice to actually debate on facts with you, instead of the normal random insults and deflections to off topic things, doubt that will happen.

"Should watch the actual hearings and not what extreme left echo chamber false news sources tell you."


Ken Starr, on Fox News: 'It doesn't look good for the president':hahahahahSlapping-silly90))kth)(&^popcorn-eatinggifazzkick(&^:bbsmile::laughingb:tongue2:
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,457
Tokens

Sent the link to what he testified to.... but, you did post a dailykos article.

So, what did Sondland say that threw them "Under the bus". I watched his testimony (and even posted the link where you can watch it as well). What did he say? The Dailykos article nor Starr said what it was.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
85,766
Tokens
And Sondland testified "Trump told me, I want no Quid Pro Quo, I want exactly what Zelensky campaigned to do"...

Should watch the actual hearings and not what extreme left echo chamber false news sources tell you. Can see some of the testimony here where Sondland testified and his basis is how he "Felt" and not what he was told by Trump or anyone else https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaI0fVyFYg Skip to 3:20 where Sondlan folds, and testifies NO ONE told him the aid was tied to the investigations. Sondlands whole testimony was (in his own words) "I assumed"...

What was so devastating that Sondland testified to that dailykos is saying?

Would be nice to actually debate on facts with you, instead of the normal random insults and deflections to off topic things, doubt that will happen.

NFL, I like you, I really do, butt reaching out to duuuuuuhfeces the street squatter and expecting a reasoned debate is just plain stupid

Dude, forgetaboutit, just point and laugh. When this process is over, we'll be right, they'll be proven to be categorically incorrect across the boards, and the fucking idiots will just start another line of bullshit. We've seen this act before, don't bother trying to reach them, you're trying to reason with ignorance

K08GLC.gif


The brick wall actually serves a purpose and has a higher net worth
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,715
Tokens
Ben Carson lost his brain surgeon license!

Bloodhound Bob!

Michael Avanetti will take down Trump!

The hits just keep on comin' for the street-squatting pauper.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Sent the link to what he testified to.... but, you did post a dailykos article.

So, what did Sondland say that threw them "Under the bus". I watched his testimony (and even posted the link where you can watch it as well). What did he say? The Dailykos article nor Starr said what it was.

Wtf does the fact that Daily Kos posted the story-and, included a video of Starr saying EXACTLY what they reported he said-have to do with the fact that you just made a complete and utter fool of yourself by implying that the remarks weren't true because they were from an "extreme left echo chamber?????" Try again, Blubber Runt-and, like I said, read the thread about what Sondland actually said. You and Bill Ball-less are like in Twittler cult, something happens, in broad daylight, and, you simply deny or ignore it (kinda like Mullvaney trying to say he DIDN'T say what millions of people saw him say, lol). As far as "under the bus," try reading the remarks of FOX NEWS reporter Chris Wallace, schmuck.
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,424
Tokens
Ben Carson lost his brain surgeon license!

Bloodhound Bob!

Michael Avanetti will take down Trump!

The hits just keep on comin' for the street-squatting pauper.

And Tom “Brainless” Arnold
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
NFL, I like you, I really do, butt reaching out to duuuuuuhfeces the street squatter and expecting a reasoned debate is just plain stupid

Dude, forgetaboutit, just point and laugh. When this process is over, we'll be right, they'll be proven to be categorically incorrect across the boards, and the fucking idiots will just start another line of bullshit. We've seen this act before, don't bother trying to reach them, you're trying to reason with ignorance

K08GLC.gif


The brick wall actually serves a purpose and has a higher net worth


Yo, Witless Willie, I never saw an answer to how right were YOU about the "weak case" against Paul Manafort?:hahahahahSlapping-silly90))kth)(&^popcorn-eatinggifazzkick(&^:bbsmile::laughingb
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
48,715
Tokens
"Mr. Sondland, let's be clear: no one on this planet—not Donald Trump, Rudy Guiliani, Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo—no one told you aid was tied to political investigations, is that correct."

Gordon Sondland: "That's correct."

Game over.

Adam-Schiff-Nothing-Burgers.jpg

 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Yeah, it is over, but NOT in the way YOU think it is, Sheriff Jagoff:

[h=1]‘It was no secret’: Ambassador says quid pro quo came at ‘express direction of the President’[/h] Posted 11:58 am, November 20, 2019, by CNN Wire, Updated at 11:59AM, November 20, 2019
US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, in his opening statement, made clear that some of President Donald Trump's senior-most aides were aware of a link between US aid to Ukraine and the country opening investigations that would benefit Trump politically.


US Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified Wednesday there was a quid pro quo for Ukraine to announce investigations into President Donald Trump’s political opponents that came from the President’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani at the “express direction of the President.”
What’s more, Sondland provided House impeachment investigators with emails and texts showing it wasn’t just him and Giuliani pushing for the investigations outside government channels — Trump’s inner circle knew what was going on, too. He even said he raised concerns with Vice President Mike Pence that the freezing of $400 million in security aid to Ukraine was linked to the investigations.
Sondland’s testimony is the most damning evidence to date directly implicating Trump in the quid pro quo at the heart of the impeachment inquiry. His public remarks show a link between US security aid and a White House meeting and Ukraine publicly announcing investigations that would help the President politically. From the beginning of Wednesday’s hearing, Sondland’s comments dragged some of Trump’s senior most officials — including Pence, his chief of staff and his secretary of state — into the scandal.
“Everyone was in the loop,” Sondland said. “It was no secret.”
In his remarkable opening statement before the fourth day of public impeachment hearings, Sondland told House impeachment investigators that Trump “wanted a public statement from President (Volodymyr) Zelensky committing to investigations of Burisma and the 2016 election.”
“Mr. Giuliani expressed those requests directly to the Ukrainians,” said Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union. “Mr. Giuliani also expressed those requests directly to us. We all understood that these pre-requisites for the White House call and White House meeting reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements.”
Sondland said that Trump’s senior aides, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Energy Secretary Rick Perry, were all aware that Zelensky was briefed days ahead of the July 25 call to commit to doing investigations.
LIVE UPDATES: Three key impeachment witnesses testify
“Everyone was informed via email on July 19, days before the Presidential call,” Sondland said. “As I communicated to the team, I told President Zelensky in advance that assurances to ‘run a fully transparent investigation’ and ‘turn over every stone’ were necessary in his call with President Trump.”
Sondland said that he told Pence before his September 1 meeting with Zelensky that he “had concerns that the delay in aid had become tied to the issue of investigations.” Sondland said that Pence “nodded” in response, but he did not remember if he gave any further reaction.
At the center of the Ukraine storm
Of the dozen witnesses Democrats have called to testify publicly in the impeachment inquiry, none had as much involvement in the push for Ukraine to announce an investigation as Sondland.
Sondland said that he told Pence — who has so far mostly avoided being publicly implicated in the Ukraine scandal — before his September 1 meeting with Zelensky that he “had concerns that the delay in aid had become tied to the issue of investigations.”
Sondland testified he was never able to obtain a clear answer for why the security aid was frozen, but he believed that “if Ukraine did something to demonstrate a serious intention to fight corruption, specifically addressing Burisma and 2016 server, then the hold on military aid would be lifted.”
“In the absence of any credible explanation for the suspension of aid, I later came to believe that the resumption of security aid would not occur until there was a public statement from Ukraine committing to the investigations of the 2016 elections and Burisma,” Sondland said.
Sondland’s testimony that it was a “presumption” the aid was tied to investigations gave Republicans a small opening to argue there wasn’t a quid pro quo tied to the security aid. “President Trump never told me directly that the aid was conditioned on the meetings,” Sondland said.
Sondland, however, said it was “abundantly clear” there was a link between the two, even if he wasn’t explicitly told.
“As of September 9, you understood, did you not, that President Trump — either himself or through his agents — required that President Zelensky make a public announcement of the two investigations that President Trump cared about in order to get both the White House meeting and to release the security assistance?” asked Democratic counsel Daniel Goldman.
“I believe that is correct,” Sondland said.
Republican counsel Steve Castor pressed Sondland on his conversations with Trump, confirming that Trump never “personally” told Sondland there were preconditions on releasing the aid or arranging the White House meeting. He asked Sondland how he knew that Giuliani “was expressing the desires of the President.”
“Well, when the President says talk to my personal attorney, and then Mr. Giuliani, as his personal attorney, makes certain request or demands, we assume it’s coming from the President,” Sondland responded. “I’m not testifying that I heard the President tell Mr. Giuliani to tell us.”
Castor also took aim at Sondland’s reliability as a witness, noting that he didn’t have records, didn’t take notes and didn’t recall many episodes. “I mean, this is like the trifecta of unreliability,” he said.
‘I want nothing’
Speaking to reporters as he left the White House Wednesday, Trump repeatedly said he told Sondland over the phone that he wanted “nothing” on Ukraine.
“I say to the Ambassador in response: I want nothing, I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo,” Trump said, reading from notes that appear to be written in Sharpie. “Tell Zelensky, President Zelensky, to do the right thing.”
Trump also downplayed his connection to Sondland, saying he “came in late” as a backer of his 2016 campaign. “This is not a man I know well,” Trump said. “Seems like a nice guy, though.”
Giuliani also downplayed his connection to Sondland, saying in a tweet that Sondland was “speculating” and he had “VERY little contact” with him. Giuliani later deleted the tweet.
And Pence’s office also distanced the vice president from Sondland, too. Pence chief of staff Marc Short said the vice president “never had a conversation with Gordon Sondland about investigating the Bidens, Burisma, or the conditional release of financial aid to Ukraine based upon potential investigations.”
But Democrats seized on Sondland’s comments to highlight the fact that senior Trump administration officials have stonewalled the impeachment investigation. Sondland’s testimony names a number of senior Trump administration officials who have defied House subpoenas in the impeachment inquiry, including Mulvaney and Pompeo, and the Trump administration has not provided any documents that were subpoenaed.
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sondland’s testimony shows “that the knowledge of this scheme was far and wide.”
“We now can see the veneer has been torn away, just why Secretary Pompeo and President Donald Trump do not want any of these documents provided to Congress,” Schiff told reporters Wednesday, “because apparently they show, as Ambassador Sondland has testified, that the knowledge of this scheme to condition official acts, a White House meeting and $400 million in security assistance to an ally at war with Russia, was conditioned on political favors the President wanted for his reelection.”
Sondland’s calls with Trump
Since Sondland testified last month behind closed doors, multiple administration officials have provided testimony that contradicted his account. In the case of his September 1 comments to the Ukrainians, Sondland amended his testimony when he said he recalled that he told them the aid was conditioned on announcing investigations in the wake of others’ testimony.
Sondland was asked about other discrepancies, like US diplomat Bill Taylor and National Security Council aide Tim Morrison saying Sondland told them the President said he wanted Zelensky to “go to a microphone” to announce the investigations. Taylor said that Sondland told him they would be in a “stalemate” unless Zelensky made the announcement.
“I don’t recall who told me — whether it was (former special envoy) Kurt Volker, whether it was Giuliani or whether it was President Trump — it’s got to be Zelensky. It can’t be the prosecutor. But that’s what I relayed,” Sondland said.
Sondland also confirmed that he spoke to Trump on July 25, hours before the President’s call with Zelensky. Sondland said “it’s likely” he would have received a message from Trump that Volker had referenced in a text message, but he said he didn’t recall the specifics of the call.
Sondland also acknowledged another call he left out of his initial testimony: the July 26 conversation where US diplomat David Holmes says he overheard Trump ask Sondland if Zelensky was gonna “do the investigation,” and Sondland replied Zelensky was “gonna do it.”
Sondland did not dispute those details in the call involving his conversation with Trump.
“Actually, I would have been more surprised if President Trump had not mentioned investigations, particularly given what we were hearing from Mr. Giuliani about the President’s concerns,” he said.
But Sondland said he did not recall mentioning the Bidens in his conversation with Holmes, drawing a distinction with Burisma, the natural gas company that hired Hunter Biden. “The only part of Mr. Holmes’ recounting that I take exception with is I do not recall mentioning the Bidens. That did not enter my mind. It was Burisma and 2016 elections,” Sondland said.
This story has been updated with additional developments Wednesday.

Trademark and Copyright 2019 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.


 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,424
Tokens
Game over, you lost. Pack your shit and move on to the next lie.
 

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
13,680
Tokens
House will vote for impeachment, so far no “smoking gun” to get 20 GOP in Senate to vote with Dems.

Pretty sure that was bottom line point made by Starr.

But like most libtards and MSM, they try to get a sound bite and run with it.

Both parties play that to some regard.

This, just like Russia crap and everything else Dems are doing is a waste.

Good thing we pay for this clown show ##)
 

Never bet against America.
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
8,424
Tokens
Notice how bigger the article posted by Street “Doubling Down On Stupid” Squatter thinks it makes the lies into reality as if a nugget of explosive damning evidence exists but yet takes a few simple questions and short answers in the hearings to expose this sham. It’s over, done, now the only thing left to see is how Shifty Schiff and the rest of the “Shiff for brain” Demoscum weasle their way out of this. They desperately need a national or world disaster away from this shit show to escape out the trap door.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
144
Tokens
Dafinch, please quit confusing these people with facts. Trump will take down the Republican party even he wins in 2020. The truth will always prevail. He could come out and admit guilt but many republicans call him a liar and still vote for him. Its laughable but also sad.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
44,398
Tokens
Dafinch, please quit confusing these people with facts. Trump will take down the Republican party even he wins in 2020. The truth will always prevail. He could come out and admit guilt but many republicans call him a liar and still vote for him. Its laughable but also sad.

huh?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,108,708
Messages
13,453,712
Members
99,429
Latest member
AnthonyPoi
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com