SCENARIO:
Two presidents have a phone conversation with each other.
A handful of people who weren't on the call said there was "Bribery, black mail, quid pro quo" etc, and that they heard it from someone, who heard it from someone, who might have heard it from someone else... Another who listened to the call said he "felt" there was "quid pro quo".
BOTH presidents that were on the call said that there was nothing of the sort, no "quid pro quo, blackmail, bribery, felt no pressure" etc... SEVERAL TIMES.
Using logic, which of these people would be correct?
The two involved on the call speaking to each other.... or the witnesses who heard it from others, that heard it from others, and 1 witness who listened to the call who "Felt"?
Two presidents have a phone conversation with each other.
A handful of people who weren't on the call said there was "Bribery, black mail, quid pro quo" etc, and that they heard it from someone, who heard it from someone, who might have heard it from someone else... Another who listened to the call said he "felt" there was "quid pro quo".
BOTH presidents that were on the call said that there was nothing of the sort, no "quid pro quo, blackmail, bribery, felt no pressure" etc... SEVERAL TIMES.
Using logic, which of these people would be correct?
The two involved on the call speaking to each other.... or the witnesses who heard it from others, that heard it from others, and 1 witness who listened to the call who "Felt"?
