CC GAMES (part 2)

how about a crazy totals trend..

when making a run from the wc round, teams have made it to the cc round 22 times since 1990...
in the cc round of these games the total has been opposite of the divisional round 18 times...
if div game went under, cc game went over, if div game went over, cc game went under...18 of 22 times...but wait...it gets crazier...
if a team wins the cc game the total of the superbowl goes opposite of the cc game 9 of the 11 times it happened.....but wait...it gets crazier...
when the cc game winner (via the wc route) gets to the sb, they have covered the spread in the sb 9 of 11 times going 9-1-1 ats, including the last 8 straight.

the breakdown...

teams who lost in cc round from wc position....
year...….team.........….wc……………....…...div...………...……...ccg…..
93...…...KC...……....hm fv-over.......rd dg-over...…..rd dg- over
95...…...IND....……..rd dg-over...…..rd dg-under.....rd dg-under
95........GB............hm fv-over......rd dg-under......rd dg over
96........JAX...........rd dg-over.......rd dg-over........rd dg-under
07........SD............hm fv-under.....rd dg-over........rd dg-under
08........BAL...........rd fv-under......rd dg-under......rd dg-over
09........NYJ...........rd dg-over.......rd dg-under.......rd dg-over
13........SF............rd fv-under.......rd fv-under.......rd dg-under
14........IND..........hm fv-under.....rd dg-under......rd dg-over
16.......PITT...........hm fv-under.....rd dg-under......rd dg-over
17.......JAX...........hm fv-under......rd dg-over.......rd dg-under

teams who won in cc round from wc position...
year......team...........wc...................div......................cc......................sb..........................ats...........o/u
92........BUF..........hm fv-over.......rd dg-under.........rd fv-under........lost sb(+6.5) 17-52..........L.............O
97........DEN.........hm fv-over.......rd pk-under.........hm fv-over........won sb(+11.5) 31-24........W............O
99.......TENN........hm fv-under.....rd dg-under.........rd dg-over.........lost sb(+7) 16-23.............P.............U
00.......BALT.........hm fv-under.....rd dg-over...........rd dg-under........won sb(-3) 34-7..............W............O
03.......CAR..........hm fv-over.......rd dg-over...........rd dg-under.......lost sb(+7) 29-32............W.............O
05.......PITT..........rd fv-over........rd dg-under..........rd dg-over.........won sb(-4) 21-10............W.............U
06.......IND..........hm fv-under......rd dg-under.........hm fv-over........won sb(-6.5) 29-17..........W.............U
07.......NYG.........rd dg-under.......rd dg-under........rd dg-over..........won sb(+12.5) 17-14.......W............U
10.......GB...........rd dg-under.......rd dg-over..........rd fv-under.........won sb(-3) 31-25............W............O
11.......NYG.........hm fv-under......rd dg-over...........rd dg-under.......won sb(+3) 21-17............W............U
12.......BALT........hm fv-under......rd dg-over...........rd dg-under........won sb(+4.5) 34-31.........W............O


this is how the oddsmakers keeping ya to jumping from one foot to the other....

be back with part 3 later..

GAME.

A bit confused on the total trend---KC went over, but Tenn went under, so what happens in the cc for this one?

cruisin said:

A bit confused on the total trend---KC went over, but Tenn went under, so what happens in the cc for this one?

Click to expand...

it applies to any cc "game" involving a team who started their run from the wildcard round....doesn't matter its kc too...

ah ok got it.

so bet over since Tenn(wildcard) went under?

I assume since talking about Wc teams and div rd we look at the titans pat game which went under. The trend is saying the conf championship will likely to over.

razorbackpicks said:

I assume since talking about Wc teams and div rd we look at the titans pat game which went under. The trend is saying the conf championship will likely to over.

Click to expand...

that's it.

mickj said:

so bet over since Tenn(wildcard) went under?

Click to expand...

I can't say it will hit the over without fail but 18 of 22 times is a pretty good percentage play...in fact 17 of 18 times since 96 clicks at about a 95% success rate, that's not bad.

GAME.

thanks

razorbackpicks said:

I assume since talking about Wc teams and div rd we look at the titans pat game which went under. The trend is saying the conf championship will likely to over.

Click to expand...

Actually the Titans-Ravens went under so the play is Titans-Chiefs over this week. Correct?

From the top:

when making a run from the wc round, teams have made it to the cc round 22 times since 1990...
in the cc round of these games the total has been opposite of the divisional round 18 times...
if div game went under, cc game went over, if div game went over, cc game went under...18 of 22 times...

Good shit my man

Keep this guy going guys..this time of year, the man